>>511395448 (OP)They could do it if they want but it would mean a reduction in asset prices for people around 60, those peoples votes are just more valuable at the moment. We are pretty close maybe the next election cycle or the one after that there could be more gen-x + millennial + zoomer votes that they will be the next target, its going to really suck to be a boomer, they are going to get dropped like a sack of potatoes by the politicians. Boomers who didn't save during the times plenty are going to have a real brutal austere time, a bit like what the previous generation had to deal with.
I don't know if its possible to reverse, there are accounts of history that once a population goes into a death spiral its like the people just vanish within 100 years. It can just be as simple as most people just having 1 child.
>>511395682I think males have been so demoralized since the 80's that it might be impossible to convince them, they might have to wait for gen alpha but from I hear the school situation is still nuts with male hating such as that adolescence show.
This video seem interesting, its saying that the older men take women from younger generations and it gets to a point that there are just not enough women for the young men.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpYJzd7JOb8
>>511395742While some poor 5'8 guy in South America has it on demand. Aww poor female 6 can't get a 9.5.