So many funny things happening in the UK
- literally the same country that gave us 1984
- the UK being one of "the western powers" (even remaining fairly based during covid)
- literal china level censorship (much of chinese sm started requiring ids in like the late 2010s)
- based little X being lumped in with porn sites
- this whole thing being thanks to an abundance of either terfs and muzzies in the UK, which couldn't be further apart from each other aside from a common hatred of pronounettes
My prediction is this happens next in Canada, Australia, NZ, and then the US if (read: when) we get a blue president, especially a "socialist" like the mayoral candidates in NY and Minneapolis.
https://youtu.be/p3m9IZmc25Y
>>511399583 (OP)Time to take advantage of silly genders and masks and accessories. Remember: if they don’t believe you, they’re bigots and will be crushed in the court of public opinion as well as civil litigation.
Sincerely,
Slippers McRicebowl, a human slipper that identities as a bowl of white rice, age 29.
>>511399583 (OP)They're already censoring footage of arrests at protests too.
even wikipedia is blocked lol
nanny state authoritarians
and you know it will expand too, soon you`ll need an internet id. there is no line. they will keep pushing the knife in until they are stabbed in return
>>511399583 (OP)It's bad, but imagine if they had to speak German.
Its as if a crypto-jew from Poland predicted this.
>>511400092imagine the datacentres out there condensing discord message histories into structured bios via LLMs
>>511399583 (OP)is this once or for every visit lmao?
>>511400393now why ai is such an over-invested forced meme makes sense
Restricting access to porn is a good thing. Only sexual deviants regularly watch porn. It makes men weak and creates a demand for whores.
>>511399583 (OP)aren't there simple workarounds already? I can imagine you can just copy a plain cookie from another person to get around it for half of the websites.
>>511400461Yea, the bongs definitely haven't discovered cookies yet...
>>511400569wouldn't it be funny if someone hijacked peoples cookies and watched a bunch of illegal shit with em
>>511399887The "always X time behind China" pattern is familiar from Covid to be honest desu
>>511400548porn is natural.
the problem is jewish algos pushing tranny and BNWO porn onto underage kids, including girls.
men have sexual needs starting at puberty, but there is a difference between seeking out naked women with their tits out at age 13, and getting tranny BNWO porn shoved in your face by a mentally insane homosexual jew admin.
>>511400647it's required that the value is unidentifiable and thus can't be used for tracking by websites. theoretically it could work to share the cookie with other people
If this happens in Canada, maybe the sad pathetic incels will finally waddle out of their room.
And roasties will stop seething and threatening to hit me with their car for not fucking them.
Here in Denmark they are voting on a law that will give the government the right to process all citizens data in real time with a Palantir AI.
All phone calls, phone messages, GPS position, phone antenna position, internet browsing, social media activity, medical records, educational records, financial records, financial activity, municipality activity, buying cookie data information on individuals etc etc
The vote is after the summer vacation
>>511400762so it's like a generic cookie that says "you're an adult"?
>>511400813https://youtu.be/WvAEp0e0Qy8
>>511400806Theyll just provide their ID like good goys. Why are you guys acting like this is a ban?? The Internet is just gonna be even gayer than it already was
>>511400092That's the black database. I want a look at that. I think there are a lot of trannies about. Also underground orgy stuff.
>>511400818that's how I think it's done for most websites. it could be as simple as blocking cookie consent banners with ublock, other websites might use a more secure approach which I won't explain here.
>>511399583 (OP)I have multiple accounts there and it hasn't asked for ID.
>>511399887>even wikipedia is blocked lolNo it isn't Bhoopinder.
>>511399583 (OP)Fantastic. Fuck the internet. Fuck porn. Fuck "content". None of it is real life. None of it will ever make you happy. I wish all of this garbage had never been invented. My mood has already improved since I can no longer browse degenerate porn sites. Thank you.
>>511400718A very limited amount of porn is do-able. This free, instant access to all extremes at any given second is really fucking people up. /pol/ will moralize about modern women being whores, then turn right around and create the demand for them by consuming porn in extreme excess.
>>511399583 (OP)the absolute state of britbongs holy shit. I don't want to see you criticizing america EVER again.
>>511400718Couldn't have said better.
And when all that frustration will have nowhere to vent off, the elites are gonna get ripped apart. Never understimate testostetone and the smell of pussy.
No politician has clearly promised that this will only be limited to regulating porn, and politicians' promises are meaningless anyway.
There have been already incidents of websites that are largely unrelated to porn blocking access by bongs due to fears of legal issues.
This is exactly what is intended and it induces self-censorship by websites in line with the bong government's political agenda to avoid trouble.
It does not completely ban the website, but it makes it inconvenient for both users and website manager.
As a result, only good goy websites will remain easily accessible to normie bongs.
>>511401188yes, it is
you're now more dystopian shithole than China and Russia combined
>>511401998>makes it inconvenientthat's the whole point. this will make normies demand digital IDs because that's more convenient than having to verify your age for every second website you visit. niggercattle demanding their own enslavement.
I2p and tor about to be relevant again
>>511399583 (OP)Any groups against this censorship
>>511402292This piece of shit seems to have multiple purposes, and almost none of which have anything to do with protecting children lol.
It is a very insidious and despicable tactic to hide the purpose of promoting censorship and surveillance of the people on the Internet behind the moral reasons. They have no intention of controlling the borders, but they want to control what the people see and say. How far has the West fallen?
>>511400497a general-purpose, easy-to-deploy automation system for thinking tasks is hardly a gimmick
It would lead to massive savings in businesses. Salaries are the biggest cost a business incurs.
It would also massively simplify organisations and governments. The Taliban could become master administrators. The US could precision surveil every individual, something that would otherwise require a multimillion strong intelligence department.
Ofc whether LLMs can lead to such a system is debatable.
>>511399762My government assigned Internet Safety Ambassador has permitted me to tell you that everything is fine.
>>511399583 (OP)We already have this type of censorship and it was exclusively pushed by Republican governors.
