What according to you makes white people superior?

>>511399986 (OP)
The Chinese are the superior race in the 21st century

>>511399986 (OP)
Japanese people are the real superior race. if you overlook silly superficial traits like blue eyes

Individualism

>>511400044
Truth

>>511399986 (OP)
mossad

>>511399986 (OP)
isnt it funny how many kikes look indistinguishable from arabs.
if he said he was from Iraq - would you doubt it?

>>511399986 (OP)
Every other race besides Kikes can make art. This Seinfeld faggot is either so stupid that he didn't realize his show was astroturfed to hell, or he's in on it.

>>511399986 (OP)
I don't, I think non-Whites are inferior.

>>511399986 (OP)
we don't look like balding rodents

Only Whites have nations so nice everyone else wants to enter.

There is no mass White exodus to the Congo or Venezuela because it's so nice.

But the real metric for living in a good nation is "Can you drink the water"
>>511400101
Seinfeld is literally from Syria.

>>511399986 (OP)
Superiority is not a measurable concept.

we may inference actionable results that correlate with ethnic groups, and may measure various amounts of melanin and historical culture of generations within that group of people originating from points of the earth that determine said melanin.

all of this is an aside to what we can action for the future, and the current status quo wants conflict of argument regarding culture and melanin count, as it divides from the issue of those in power which want to keep the power.

to reach for progressive society, we need to have open-minded discussions that include uncomfortable language, and actually challenge the intellectual status quo, that is, the establishment of what a few groups of people have decided the best think.

we need to form a better "best think" and need to have conversations of how to think better, regardless of culture or melanin count, while including the history of culture itself.

thinking you are superior is the root problem

>>511399986 (OP)
Everyone wanting to be around them and their stuff, it's unanimous.

>>511400280
>Superiority is not a measurable concept.
We can.
Who do all the races prefer to be around?

>>511399986 (OP)
Whites are superior because of our honorable nature. We, more than anyone else, follow a code of goodness and fairplay that other races don't exhibit.

>>511400101
All meds look alike. That kike could be from Greece or Lebanon or Algeria.

>thinking you are superior is the root problem

>>511400247
hes half syrian jew but looks 100% ay-rab
>>511400413
yeah no one would argue if he said he was from any of those countries.
his longer face and slight prognathism make him look more arab than most meds imho.

>>511400383
me. i'm white, but that only matters in the sense that my blood most likely comes from a long string of explorer types that wish to excavate the philosophy of what makes a better society.

we can argue that this is whiteness vs nonwhiteness, but really what happened was generations of children taught to expose oneself to the world.

our DNA as humans is 99.999% similar to other humans, and i have witness retarded whites, blacks, and other browns fall into the same traps that much of the internet would consider "niggers" or "kikes"

the answer is the educate, expose, explore, encourage, and empower people to more open-mindedness

>>511400247
>Only Whites have nations so nice everyone else wants to enter.
And not just their stuff, they're the nicest people to be around, white Christians.

Individualism if you compare to Asians.

Farmers if you compare to Africans.

Rocket Scientists when compared to Semites.

Carpenters when compared to Native Americans.

>>511400598
>asians are unified, perhaps the strongest unit of modern society

>africa was raped constantly by explorers. what farmland that was not reaped or destroyed by folks who've intruded upon a land of 'opportunity'

>rocket science is an emergent goal that is subjective to modern success

>carpentry matters for those who prefer very strong and neat structures at the cost of raping of culture.

rape is nature. to grow is to go beyond savagery.

>>511399986 (OP)
Why does every other country want to live in predominantly white countries?

>>511400247
>>511400309
>>511400402
>>511400550
>>511400924
explorer types that want to extend philosophy beyond the village.

this should be a trait we should teach our fellow monkeys, even if its to better a greater race.

this theoretical race would be far more efficient than battling the idea of shitflinging monkeys

>>511399986 (OP)
Up to a point we are incredibly good at civilization building. Then our suicidal altruism leads us to give it away to thirdies that hate us and it all goes to shit. I don't personally get into the superiority thing. I think it's a mental trap. I just want to be left alone and live in a country of my own people without having to pay extra taxes to import people who tell me I'm the root of all evil and I need to let them turn my country into the shithole they fled and get replaced.

>>511399986 (OP)

white men don't give a fuck about the concept of superiority between the races, it all boils down to your quality as an individual.

angry non-whites are being marshalled by the subversive controllers, we are watching to see how many based non-whites there are in our communities.

>>511401104
i want you to realize in this (what i assume to be ironic) post, that you present philosophy that self-defeats intellectual growth.

>>511399986 (OP)

it's to do with the environment we evolved in. in places like south amerca, africa and india there is no real winter, food grows on the ground and there is an abundance of animals, water is readily available from running rivers and rain - this meant that there was no stimulus for evolution beyond what was required on those environments and the human population boomed, consumed all the resources and became the perpetual shitholes that we see now

in europe, every year, winter comes. all vegetation dies, all animals goes into hibernation, the drinkable water freezes and if you do not have burnable wood, warm homes and clothes then you lierally just die. Also if you are sickly or elderly you are just going to die. This means that not only did winter consistently purge all of the weaklings but it also meant that the only white europeans who survived were the ones who were intelligent enough to plan for the year by storing food, burnable wood, building homes, making clothes. not only that, but be emotionally intelligent enough to not be greedy and agree upon rules in which the limited resources are rationed and shared - and have the willingness to enforce those agreements with punishments. This all laid the foundation for a white european who is forward planning, compassionate towards other people in his tribe, observant and respectful of his tribes expectations, strong enough to survive harsh environments, has a keen interest in construction and not to mention a clever warrior when his limited resources are contested by other tribes like his.

>>511400280
>>511400307
these people are either retarded of state sponsored manipulators of public opinion

>>511400831
actually, rape is a direct afront to evolution - in all cultures were rape is common or forced marriage is common the men are usuall short, weak, unintelligent and emotionally immature
if she is allowed to choose, she chooses the top 10% and the gene pool prospers

>>511401367
you propose powerful axioms here that even i would generally accept as natural truth.

i've used 'retarded' myself, and so i accept the reciprocation.

i will give you some resistance in the notion that not only have you not refuted my claims of abstract goal, yet you've only closed the stream with saying "this is history"

where and how do you say we move forward, mr UK man?

>>511399986 (OP)
The fact that you won't leave us alone despite the fact that we've kicked you out of our countries so many times really speaks for itself, doesn't it?

>>511401616
if we maintain our current path then the west will destroy itself, economically, culturally, intellectually, technologically and genetically (yes i see genetics as being just as relevant as those other categories). the decline we are seeing is broad and so sustained from above that the argument it is part of a plan to destroy the west from within holds legitimacy.
culturally, our concept of liberalism and the reciprocal relationship between the government and the governed has been perveted such that we now view the pursuit of individual freedoms and rights as morally corrupt as this pursuit has been associated with immoral degeneracy, with our governments being perceived as a of manager of this corruption - this is not liberalism, liberalism is the concept when a government invests into it's average citizen and enables them to pursue their goals then the fruit of the average citizen's labour is a benefit to everyone, government included. it's s risk for those who are in control - to give the average person not only wealth and knowledge, but even the ability to replace you, their ruler, one day.

economics is decreasingly tied to material resource and we are increasingly trading in immaterial products that don't actually serve any purpose other than entertainment and frivolities. our population increases while our wealth stagnates, this means that the same wealth is spread across a larger number of people and we are all poorer as a result.

intellectually we are limiting and even removing the consequences of failure from study and education, when students fail they should be allowed to fail so that they can grow. the pursuit of intellect is no longer rewarded with value.

technologically, and this is the most dangerous one - technology is compounding. when we develop new technologies, developing newer technologies becomes easier. once you are ahead - you remain ahead. we are no longer ahead, we are equal.

genetics feeds into intellect.
>>511401367

>>511402843
>first statement
compare your idea of 'destroy' to a theory of new birth. does this hold any merit?

>second statement
this seems to be an issue of current powers at be manipulating the population in whatever way they can to keep the status quo.

>third statement
entertainment and frivolities, i would agree, and carry the argument that they are the greatest weapons against being evolutionary progressive. (that being the idea to expand culture into greater efficiency that opens the floor to new horizons not yet precedent-ed.)

>fourth statement
i whole heartedly agree that intellectual competition is necessary for success, and modern status quo is leveling the field, producing dangerous inefficiencies.

>fifth statement
technology needs to be more centralized to local communities so people of a region may feel empowered, and the outsourcing is a major issue for any community. it's dilution of progress, leading to minimized momentum.

>quoting yourself
an incestuous argument that reduces progress to putting eyes on the back of the head, when we really need eyes forward.

>>511399986 (OP)

>>511399986 (OP)
That’s a Jew, not a white.

>>511399986 (OP)
Unlike jews. We have souls