literal ghouls

don't see how you can have this reaction to signing a bill which will remove healthcare and food assistance benefits from millions of Americans

>>511415839 (OP)
its called democracy chud

Fuck timmy gon do?

>>511415839 (OP)
What would George Washington think of them?

>>511416187
We're not talking about people trying to get the government and insurance to cover the cost of hormone supplements and inhibitors, but people in poverty trying to outright live. All for what? To give rich people tax breaks? It's pathetic. How do people support this shit? They don't, these Republicans just don't care, nor do they care about citizens suffering and dying.

>>511416279
That they are unsophisticated, immoral, sacrilegious rats.

>>511415839 (OP)
It's on purpose, even if a policy is good like lowering welfare, it's drop in the ocean that won't change anything, and they do it with a smug attitude to provoke people

>>511415839 (OP)
we shouldn't be paying people to be lazy

>>511415839 (OP)
Feed yourself you lazy nigger

>>511415839 (OP)
mike watches porn with his adopted nigger son

Didn't they take away free school lunches too?

>>511416518
What do you mean?

>even if a policy is good like lowering welfare
?

>>511416565
It's not free money, it's healthcare and food assistance.

>>511416585
In the developed world, governments have the ability to take care of their citizens. Why not help when you can? Government should be an instrument of good whenever possible.

>>511415839 (OP)
If whites didn’t have dei social programs, they’d vanish in a month. Momma needs that chemo and little wyboi needs its insulin

>>511416662
Yes. It's sad. These people would have millions starve and suffer if it meant they'd save millionaires a couple hundred dollars a year on taxes.

>>511416682
our government needs to stop 99% of all gibs foreign and domestic

>>511416955
Why? Why shouldn't the government help people when it can? When there is an abundance of wealth in the country which can be taxed and redistributed to do some real good? Since this is /pol/, I assume the issue has to do with giving assistance to minorities and immigrants, but this is detrimental to poor whites as well.

>>511417079
because we're currently helping other countries more than we are our own people, many in our government are corrupt from national to local levels and there are loads of people abusing those welfare systems. A huge overhaul is needed and it would be better to stop and restart from scratch than altering what we have now

>>511416649
Hey now don't be kinkshaming

>>511415839 (OP)
I will gladly give up all government assistance since it has been proven time and again white people survive just fine without. Survival of the fittest. You wanna live here? Prove it without the help of the white man.

>>511417611
The problem I have with statements like,
>because we're currently helping other countries more than we are our own people,
is those who generally say it aren't in favor of government assistance programs to help those at home anyway, like you've already stated in your original post. You want to send less money to, say, Pakistan in order to help house the homeless? Okay, I respect that. But then those same people say 'fuck the homeless,' so it's a disingenuous argument.

> many in our government are corrupt from national to local levels
Which has what to do with helping people survive, pay rent, and eat?

> there are loads of people abusing those welfare systems.
Such an overblown talking point used to trick people into voting against their own interests and fellow man. If we take 'abuse' to mean those receiving benefits when they're actually ineligible, it's something miniscule like 1%. And again, why should those who genuinely need the assistance and quality suffer just because of a few people putatively taking advantage of the system? The solution isn't to burn the whole thing down. That's like closing down a food bank because one out of the hundred recipients ends up reselling the food for profit. Okay, that's not great, but now the other 99 have to suffer because that 1 guy upsets you so much? It's a red herring.

>>511417992
>corruption has nothing to do with welfare
lmao you're retarded

>>511417079
I get where you are coming from, but keep in mind where you are asking these questions. People here are miserable, alone, and suffering. Misery loves company. It's pretty rare to find empathy on the internet because of the depersonalization, but multiply that by 1000 in places like this. Think about it. They are miserable and surround themselves with death, rape, gore, genocide, porn, racism, sexism, etc. The worst of the worst inundating their nervous system all day every day on top of being alone/suffering. Many here likely enjoy it when others suffer. Take a look at the tea leak for instance.

Truth doesn't matter. People who are in pain twist things and make their own truth. Pain blinds.

>>511418068
really? i just shitpost for fun here

>>511417940
I fundamentally and vehemently disagree, but your opinion is at least coherent and consistent so I respect it, that everyone should be responsible for their own well-being, even if it means many will suffer and die and lead to an increase in crime.

>>511418052
How about taking issue with actual corruption like corporate welfare and loopholes and deregulation? Look, I get what you're saying, you're saying X politician supports Y government assistance program because it redistributes wealth from a few to the masses and in turn wins them votes and gets them re-elected, right? Okay, sure, that could be one of their motives, but if it's still helping people, if it's still the right policy decision, what does it matter?

Like I said, don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. A couple unseemly cases doesn't mean no one should receive help from the government of a developed, wealthy nation.

>>511418068
Yeah, you're right :/ I've had many of these discussions here before and most of the time it does indeed boil down to wanting to see other people suffer because of societal resentment.

>>511418224
And why is it "fun", anon? People who are whole internally do not find fun in shitposting. Shitposting is just a word for minimizing the extreme content that your nervous system is used to. None of this is even meant to be an insult, just fyi.

>>511418346
We could have welfare if we weren't innundated with shitskins who are vehemently anti-White and scream about dem reparashuns because Schmuley Shekelblatt used dey great great great great grandpappy as agricultural equipment 160 years ago. I cannot be a leftist because I am not a self loathing White.

>>511419537
Okay, now we're getting somewhere. So you'd be in support of robust government assistance programs if the only recipients were white people? I can understand that, it's natural to feel greater sympathy for those one feels a kinship with. What about all of the white people right now who massively benefit from if not rely on government assistance? You think them suffering is worth it so long as minorities suffer too? I guess what I'd say is I think it's preferable helping those whom you want to help if it means those you don't care about benefit as well than vice versa. The opposite is too cold, ruthless, and sadistic for me, if not outright immoral.

>>511416484
the thing about America is, it has always been a fascist nation since it was formed. if you look at George Washington's memorial, and around D.C. and at Congress on the wall behind the main seats.. the symbol that used to be on the back of the dime coin. its the fasces.. its a bundle of rods signifying how many bound together are stronger than they are alone. and the axe represents the authority of the state. my point being the socialism and fascism are not exactly anti-american. yes there is an emphasize on personal liberities which turn out to be a double edged sword. your freedom and health become your own responsibility. but if that were true we wouldn't have police, fireman, or any other public services.. no welfare programs, no public schools. the thing is we've always needed a bit of socialism to hold the wholet hing together and maintain stability. the people with the least could use a little help, the idea is to make them strong enough that they can contribute back to the collective. and if people can't afford basic health care they cant really contribute in other areas of society. can't work their job well enough.. it negatively impacts their livelihood and income. so they make less money, they can afford less things they need.. and then what? just die? is that the point we are at? just let people suffer, go without what hey need, struggle.. no real chance of getting out of that life.

meanwhile we got psychopaths with way more than what they need who are not only indifferent to our suffering, in a lot of cases they are partly the cause of it.

what we need to focus on is what RFK Jr is there to reinforce. preventative health care. they'll save on a lot of costs by just preventing them from having so many health problems. lets preserve "free" healthcare for accidents and unpreventable things that are beyond someones choices. hence why they are going to make stricter requirements to qualify for health care.

>>511421569
You mean classically liberal/libertarian. But yeah, I get what you're saying, though I do want to say: a welfare state, eg free healthcare or housing or food, isn't socialist. It's just a progressive capitalism.

>hence why they are going to make stricter requirements to qualify for health care.
With work requirements? I suppose it comes down to a fundamental philosophical and moral question: should the state help support those who are a net-negative to the economic health of the nation? If someone is fine with those who can't fulfill those work requirements going without food and healthcare and ultimately suffering and dying because that's just how life is meant to be, then, well, as much as I disagree, it's a consistent stance. But with the amount of wealth which exists in the US, when there is so much abundance, why not show some generosity and lend assistance to people solely because they're human and our fellow citizens? Not to mention, as you said, you never know if someone will make an economic contribution down the line once the government assistance helps them get their affairs in order. For example, in my own life, free healthcare allowed me to get on the medication I needed to make my life livable and comfortable, and with it I can go on to engage with my pursuit of happiness. Without it, I'd be really beat down. Maybe I would've made it through anyway, maybe not.

>>511416279
He would probably sign a temporary cease-fire with them for Christmas lmfao

lets say i have a few health problems but no personal wealth, a few luiquid assets, not much personal property and no personal income due to different circumstance.

lets say i have a few dead teeth that are broken and rotting and poisoning my body. it'd cost $15k to get oral surgery and implants. the idea is to just get a job with bad teeth, hoping it won't be an issue, saving up $15k or.. hopefully qualify for loans or maintain a good credit score.. while also paying various bills to have a home to live in and food to eat for myself and my family.

oh and driving one night there was an invisible pothole so now i gotta get $500 to have that repaired in order to get to and from the new job im trying to get making $18 an hour.

oh and now my wife needs a root canal too. oh and my son also needs new clothes and on and on.

life is totally different when you have less money. it forces you to find ways to do more with less. and that can be bad.. as we've seen with many other nations. standards slip and degeneracy and poor physical and societal health ensues. but as long as you have just enough, you are humbled by the few things you are able to afford. but once you can't do the most simple things.. life becomes a dread and people get desperate and anxious. meanwhile on the other end we got ultra wealthy people with far more than they need and their values inevitably get warped.

if only they were willing to help out those with less. and i dont just mean with direct donations but ways of helping other people to acquire more wealth. elevate the general standard of living for everyone without forcing it via taxation.

>>511417079
Go to therapy chud

>>511422345
>if only they were willing to help out those with less. and i dont just mean with direct donations but ways of helping other people to acquire more wealth. elevate the general standard of living for everyone without forcing it via taxation.
Well, that's a pipe-dream, hence why we have taxes. Otherwise, I sympathize with everything else you said, anon. I'm glad I live in a liberal state with robust government assistance programs. Are there negatives too, like a massive homeless problem fueled by drug addicts who are living off of those same government benefits and lax-to-no enforcement and a general tolerance by the state? Yes. But it's worth it, and even still, are those really negative when it's what comes with being humane.

the dark truth is something probably like when Obama introduced the healthcare systems, and whoever else was part of all that, it wasn't for the benefit of the American people in some sort of pure and wholesome and benevoloent way. it was only to ensure the jew overlords who run the insurance companies can get their money. they need patients. they need people in the system to make it all work.

just like when television was first invented. there came a point in the UK it was made to be mandatory, and talking about Obama, he did something similar with widescreens or something. they made everyone think it was just for our convenicence or entertainment or something. same with cable internet and 5g.. its all for their system of power and control. they don't give you free things for no reason. none of this is for fun. the social media and technology is to get you all part of the system. so they can better manage everyone.

and once again theres something dark behind it all i bet. next level eugenics...

>>511422547
civilization is a pipe dream.

you want a truly black red pill? they've probably killed more people through the healthcare system than they've saved. or, that will be true by the end of it.

>>511423092
That's because it was a compromise with the Republican controlled congress. Democrats are the ones who support universal healthcare. We should just get rid of health insurance entirely and put everyone on Medicaid/Medicare. But the ghouls in the OP pic won't allow that because they prefer people suffer for whatever reason. Makes them feel good to have something others in this country lack, that's what it boils down to. "I've earned my healthcare, I've got mine, now get yours or get fucked." Despicable.

>>511418068
It is so rare and nice to see an actual human being on here. The many raving lunatic subhumans here have lost their humanity and I don't think they will ever get it back. Might have to kill these people, eventually.

>>511415839 (OP)
You think they care? They've never been poor. They've never used a food stamp or an EBT card. Never had to pull out a Medicaid card to see the doctor. It doesn't register with them at all. So why would they give a fuck about taking away the medical assistance of some poor old black lady or some disabled white man like me? They don't give a shit, never have never will. But when Israel says "jump", they reply "how high?"

>>511423092
>>511423402
correction: it wasn't a GOP controlled congress but because the Democrats didn't have a supermajority, they weren't able to pass the bill without support from key Republicans who prefer a free market approach to healthcare for whatever reason, and thus it was modified for compromise.

>>511423592
Yep :/ Sorry, anon.

Genuinely curious if the people who so often throw around the "ghouls" argument could accurately define what a ghoul is, without looking it up first.

>>511417079
>When there is an abundance of wealth in the country
There isn't.
We're broke.
Tens of trillions of dollars in debt, remember?
Totally in the red. In the hole.
I WISH we had no money.
Time to tighten your belt, retard; the hard times are officially here.

>>511423699
Your mother. And that sea hag aunt you have. That's what a fucking ghoul is.

>>511423699
This is the faggiest attempt at a "gotcha" I've ever seen.

>>511423866
>>511423957
I accept your concession, dipshits.

>>511424029
Accept deez nuts, faggot

>>511423838
national debt is a meme. Deficit spending in the US's situation is perfectly fine.

>>511416484
Actually this is all about HRT and transing kids. Long March poisoned many institutions, they can not be reformed so they must be defunded and destroyed.

As a White person it’s certain the Shaniquah and Judiths running these organizations would never dole anything out to me so what’s the loss? Some nigger won’t be made into a tranny? Some illegal alien anchor baby with “autism” doesn’t get a full time sensory gym daycare?

>>511423838
Debt to whomst've?

Bonds are just are shitty version of taxes to enrich the wealthy. Instead of just taxing the rich, they borrow money from them with interest. Fuck 'em. Take that fucking money. If they threaten to leave seize their assets and put them on a no fly list.

>>511427646
>As a White person it’s certain the Shaniquah and Judiths running these organizations would never dole anything out to me so what’s the loss?
Huh? If you meet the income requirements, you'd be eligible for government assistance too... it's not an either/or thing, if it was that'd be fucked up and I'd rail against it. It was more about helping everyone, even those you might dislike and disagree with. Now, with the GOP's and Trump's new bill, everyone loses, including regular upstanding white people.

>smiling at your own death warrant to lose mid terms and probably 2028

The GOP only got this chance with Trump in 2016 and now BECAUSE people thought they were finally gonna put an end to the typical Republican MO of rugpulling to kiss Wall Street ass.

And what do they do? Literally go back to Reagan and Bush Sr style policy and do the typical rugpulling/rich ass kissing and middle east war hawking that people have been fatigued and had enough about.

>>511416484
That sounds pretty important and serious, so let me ask the
fuck timmy gon do?

>>511416187
Timmy will be fine. Jamal and Muriel (formerly Timmy) will have to get
jobs now.

>>511415839 (OP)
If browns are most affected, thats a good thing. I am sorry about poor whites though.

>>511418346
>it does indeed boil down to wanting to see other people suffer because of societal resentment.
Goddamn right it does. I worked to pay back all my loans, i work every day so i have food and shelter. Unless someone was born a cripple or became one under reasonable circumstances, they can get the fuck off their asses and work too. Hell have some kind of govt guaranteed employment picking trash off the side of the highway or moving shit in a warehouse, or making license plates

No able-bodied lazy fuck should get free shit

>>511429190
Yeah, minus the fact that white people pay into the system. Where as the spics and nigs don't to begin with. Welfare SHOULD only be available to whites, no cap.

>>511429216
Yup, completely agree. I really thought Trump was gonna operate more of a like a third-party type President, siding with Democrats on some issues and the GOP on others, which would eventually change the parties' stances on issues for the better. Instead, we got, well, what you said. To be fair, Democrats shoulder a bit of the blame too because I genuinely believe if they were more open to working with Trump on issues, he would be amenable to moving and working with them. For example, one can easily imagine President Trump supporting single-payer healthcare if presented with the bill and given credit on "making a deal." Instead we got total polarization so Trump became a completely standard-issue GOP President. Yuck.

>>511415839 (OP)
if I was in charge, I'd want my citizens where I grew up and live to be happy and healthy and have more money. I wouldn't want to keep seeing more decay and slums when I drive

This thread is all bots holy shit.
Ameriniggers will never run off the plantation and will never do shit.
They fuck your kids and take your money

>>511418068
You're actually right.
I came here a decade ago for 'the movement' because I quite like England and Europe and all that. But almost everybody here is spiteful and evil hearted.

>>511429610
Okay, but between it being available for everyone or it being shut down, you'd prefer the latter? C'mon, man.

>>511429567
I get that. I suppose where we disagree is whether essential amenities like healthcare and food and housing are really 'free shit.' We're not handing out bags of unmarked bills and free cars and TVs. If you really feel working is a requirement to qualify as a moral agent, of someone worthy of society caring about them, then again, I respect that, even if I disagree.

>>511429671
The Bulwark Republicans and Blue Dog democrats seem to be the only ones willing to talk and work with one another across party lines but theyre outcasts in their own parties so there's no chance in hell they ever change this national schizophrenia

>>511429799
Yes. Seeing society around me succeed makes me happy, and it should for other citizens too. The problem is too many here and in the GOP enjoy seeing others suffer instead.
>>511429893
Where's the bots?

>>511429937
Of course. If its not going to the people who paid into it, then its theft.

>>511430126
It's contributing to society. And if you ever find yourself in those destitute situations, then those assistance programs would in fact be available to you, and vice versa, when those utilizing it now become successful later in life, they will make up for it and more. Contributing taxes to create a better society benefits everyone, even those who can afford to take care of themselves without government assistance. To use an extreme example, you'd rather see public education shut down because you yourself no longer need it yourself? C'mon.

>>511430317
Cmon what? Fuck you. There's no goddamn reason why I or anyone should pay a foreign invader, maria, to feed her 7 shitlets on whites dimes. No segregation, then yeah, get rid of it.

>>511430415
The same white people you'd be in favor of helping yesterday if they were by themselves now have to suffer today because some immigrants would also make use of the programs? Sounds petty and petulant.

And again, you're ignoring all of the benefits of society you reap on a daily basis, in addition to the safety net which will always be available to you and your loved ones should you ever need it.

Hope you someday let go of some of that pettiness, anon. Have a good one.

>>511429937
If they are physically capable of working, they should not be eligible for welfare. I have infinitely more respect for some illegal breaking his back outside in the summer heat for scraps than some shithead with a useless degree living in mommas basement who thinks they're too good to work at mcdonalds

Im not intrinsically against assistance for underpaid employed people (cola laws should also exist such that no full time employed person should be in 'poverty') but i have zero fucking regard for anyone who can work but chooses not to, and then proceeds to stick their hand out and ask others to subsidize their existance.

>>511430659
Has nothing to do with pettiness, goofy. Has everything to do with numbers. Think before you take advantage of white peoples system next time juan.

>>511416565
Trump loves "but legal" immigration to put Americans out of work.

>>511430752
>but chooses not to
How many thousand job applications is enough for you to determine that someone is lazy? When the US has zero non-citizens here, then you can call citizens lazy. Until then, you're a useful idiot for globohomo's plan to eliminate all countries in their quest for a one world government.

>>511431342
Your local mcdonalds, post office, dpw, etc.... is hiring; there are plenty of practically guaranteed employment opportunities out there for anyone who isnt a cripple or wanted criminal; but sure go ahead and sit around waiting for that perfect desk job. Sorry you're not an ai or h1b, or diversity hire, its not gonna happen. Yeah it fucking sucks, but roll with the punches, or i guess just sit around until your parents die at 90 after spending their life savings on hospitals and nursing homes and figure it out at that point when you're penniless and completely unemployable; i have a cousin doing this, hes 50, hasn't worked since his 20s, very interested to see what happens in the next ten or so years when his 80y/o mother dies, im not givin him a damn thing; it's largely her fault for letting him do this, cruel really, but he isn't without blame for going along with it, i honestly wonder if he has a plan, will he just kill himself as soon as she croaks or wait to starve or die to the elements.

They don’t care. They love pulling up the ladder before it’s their time to move on to the afterlife.

>>511415839 (OP)
caption this:

>>511415839 (OP)
>ghouls
notice how everyone is jewish? without a real history, without any culture, all made up and grounded on dishonesty and lies, pretending they're american citizens with the false pretense that washington was their forefather lmfao. These are soulless people, they stand for nothing. I bet they'll get real nervous when you stare them in the eye for more than 3 seconds.

>>511415918
It's called judaism, you feminized anti-intellect.