I hate both these factions
Trad LARPers on the right:
>muh PORN!
Shitlibs on the left:
>muh NAAAZIS
Fuck off you authoritarian cunts.
Libs of Israel trotting out the same argument used for the UK’s online censorship bill, that was basically immediately used to nuke Wikipedia and Spotify.
Want to stop kids watching porn? Then do your fucking jobs as parents.

>>511985415 (OP)
We want porn to be made illegal, not for government to ID us to see it. How many faggots will fall for this?

>>511985744
And how will you enforce "illegal porn" without monitoring you mongoloid retard?

Both sides are faggot censors who haven't taken the liberty pill yet

>>511985866
By punishing the producers and the corporations marketing that shit

>>511985415 (OP)
>we must protect children!
>by running defence for pedophiles
>for personal gain
epic style and redpilled

>>511985866
Simply making it illegal will do a ton of damage you fucking moron. The details of individual enforcementvdon't need to be established yet, let alone enacted anachronisticly.

>libs of tiktok

>>511985744
You are an absolute commie mongoloid, these are the same things

>>511985744
You could just stop your kids from watching it like a normal parent would do. Retard.

>>511985899
True

So amusing how the self-styled champions of gree speech now self-censor words like 'porn' in fear of the algorithm, while cheering the establishment of a surveillance state.

>>511986228
>>511986287
>making production and distribution a felony is the same as internet ID
Kys kikes

>>511986088
>enacted anachronisticly
80-IQ pseud detected--stop trying to use big words, it's embarrassing

>>511985415 (OP)
Government forcing youtube to demand age verification is not the same as government forcing pornhub to demand it you doubleniggers.

>>511986493
Aka not in the appropriate chronological succession. I don't give a fuck what you think about the way I used the word, kike

>>511985958
And how will you punish them without monitoring them? You think when porn is illegal they're going to stamp their brand on the films?

ANYONE will be a producer, so you have to monitor EVERYONE.

>>511986715
Kys kike.

>>511985415 (OP)
First they came for the porn and I didn't say anything because I'm not a degenerate gooner.

>>511986088
> a ton of damage
> it's super effective!
> believe these imaginary effects I'm telling you

>>511986841
Cutting off OnlyFans and PornHub from a multi-billion dollar revenue stream is "a ton of damage", you filthy kike.

PORN: Photo ID easily accessible to blacks and Hispanics so it’s ok.
VOTING: Photo ID impossibly inaccessible to blacks and Hispanics so it’s racist.

I love the woke stains.
They are so funny.

>>511986813
I'm the kike, yet you're calling for it to be made illegal without specifying how it will be enforced.

>>511985415 (OP)
>Trad LARPers on the right:
>>muh PORN!
Yes. Eliminate the porn.
>Shitlibs on the left:
>>muh NAAAZIS
Silence them.
>Fuck off you authoritarian cunts.
No. You have no liberty, only enslavement disguised as choice.
You will be freed of this foul bondage, and your consent is not necessary.

>>511988018
Cuban cigars are illegal and enforcement happens at the source, not by monitoring you in your home. You fucking idiot.

>>511985866
You are already monitored.
Making it open is positive imho - make sure you are fully accepting of the obvious reality of your surveilled condition.

You are not free, peasant, you are ruled.
Face that reality. Get angry about it.
Perhaps I can use your blind lustful writhing and spirited rhetorical defense of prosperous depravity, to protect illusory anonymity, to my advantage.

Authority is the core of civilization.
The only question is what sort of authority rules, and how.

>>511987054
HAs anyone actually said this, or you just made it up? I don't hear any 'woke' people demanding age verification for gooners, that seems to be exclusively a conservative thing

>>511985415 (OP)
libsoftiktok is niggercattle

>>511988584
Amusingly, YouTube announced they are gonna start AI-monitoring their users habits to try to ID "underage users" who will then have to provide an ID; and I'm pretty sure they're going to start restricting access to "adult" videos to accounts with verified age.

The days of just shitposting are over, the goblins have fully taken the wheel and they want to find out who the worst goyim are now, while they can.

protect the (((children)))

>>511985415 (OP)
I'm not tying my real identity to my tastes in porn. Ever.

Wow... that is not skibidigyatt.....

>>511990385
Man, that fool is ugly

>>511985415 (OP)
How glad I am to live in the EU. Shit like this would never happen in a liberal democracy like ours

Oh look, another thread of retards willing to defend an industry that sells degenerate and hedonistic slop that's been completely monopolized by kikes. Must be a slow day at Mossad HQ.

>>511985866
by executing pornographers, denying copyright protection to movies like dirty harry because that titty scene makes it obscenity and therefore ineligible for copyright, prosecuting porno stars for exhibitionism and making them register as sex offenders,

>We must protect children!

They really want their offerings to Moloch (tortured and burned) and Lilith (raped) to be pure and unspoiled, huh?

>>511988173
Excellent example. Anyone with 90+ IQ is able to get cuban cigars, illegally. These laws would be impossible for you to circumvent, of course, given that you're bound to be a mongoild sub 80 IQ retard for the rest of your existence.

>>511991153
> executing pornographers
What world are you living in dumb nigger? People nowadays don't even want to execute mass murderers.

>>511986715
no need. you dont need to monitor everyone to stop every instance of sodomy either, just make it illegal and shove the fags back in the closet. shove the whores back in the red light district. shove the porno back to the black market

>>511985415 (OP)
the moral crisis is divorce, not porno. every other moral crisis is a consequence of divorce

>>511985415 (OP)
>censoring the word porn
It's not Voldemort, Jesus.

>>511991571
fine, throw them in jail for blatant prostitution. whether or not prostitution should be illegal, it is in fact illegal except for a loophole where its a Christ-killer with a camera paying for it

>>511985866
Simple, make the production and distribution of Pornography illegal. Compile a list of the 1000 biggest sites for watching porn and block US IPs from accessing them. Pay Google like 40 million to use AI to delist whatever is left like they already do with far right content.
>But you can work around this
The vast majority of the population is so technologically illiterate that these sets of hurdles would destroy the industry and fat tech bros on reddit can make a bit of money on their patreons showing other fat nerds how to get around it. There, no ID required and it deals with the majority of the issue

>>511991574
You're arguing enforcement isn't necessary just shove the degeneracy back into the shadows.

However, overtime that degeneracy builds up in people and communities. Eventually these laws will be repealed making it legal again.

>>511985415 (OP)
>ima degenerate
Kill yourself,
kike loving faggot.
Fuck you and the porn you watch.
Don't care if the System takes away your porn,
don't give a fuck you think "freeze peach" is even real on the internet.
Hope the System destroys the porn industry next.

>>511985744
no rightoid can even make a reasonable argument why porn should be banned. All the shit they say is bad about is bullshit. I went without porn for long gaps and noticed literally no difference. I wonder if the right is just sensitive little fags that let any little thing make them spiral.

MIGApedos will take the mark of the beast because daddy Trump told them to

>>511991843

>>511985415 (OP)
libsoftiktock is a roastie cunt

thats why. nobody else cares

>>511986715
>ANYONE could be a narcotics trafficker, so what are you going to do, monitor everyone?
do you have a dent in your head?

>>511985415 (OP)
>muh freedumbs
Move to America, they don’t need your stupidity over there.

>Shitlibs on the left:
>>muh NAAAZIS
Anon, I'm a leftist. The vast majority of us are as pissed off about Internet censorship as you are. It is abundantly clear what world governments are trying to do, and this doesn't benefit any of us.

>>511991861
>You should never do anything positive because it might change in the future
Why are people like this

>>511985415 (OP)
Has kikeoftwitter said anything about Epstein yet?

>>511985744
>We want porn to be made illegal

If you're not doing anything about the woman problem first, fuck you

>>511993775
Tradcucks would rather be slowly tortured to death by cartels than go 5 minutes without putting women on a pedestal.

>>511992269
> Comparing narcotics, a tangible substance, with digital files
No anon, you have a dent on your head.

>>511985415 (OP)
If they want to protect children so much how come they haven't released the Epstein list?

>>511993342
> let's just put all this trash in the closet so we don't see it in the house.
> house starts to smell bad
> becomes infested with roaches and rodents
Why are people like this

>>511985866
This is just them pretending "they will start monitoring". They have been since the patriot act. PATRIOT ACT YOU FUCKING RETARDED NIGGER

>>511993775
>>511994245
This. If we want to undo the sexual revolution then we need to go the whole way and put women back in the kitchen. I'm not opposed to this but banning porn because muh kids doesn't move the needle on it, in fact it seems like a move towards broader internet censorship.

>>511994456
they need to rape them a few more times

>>511994541
More like
>Throw the trash out of the house so it's decent to live in
>The trash is hauled off to some remote landfill (Niche porn forum with 200 users)
>My house no longer stinks and the disgusting bugs that love trash can have fun in their little containment booth far the fuck away from me

>>511995218
You must be living in that house alone then because the woman haven't changed despite you whipping the men. And that's all this ever is. Punishing men while letting women do whatever they want. They'll still be whores, they were even during biblical times. You always just punish men and their sexuality alone.

>>511986088
Yeah, because 80yrs of the war on drugs have shown incredible results, you memeflag retard

>>511995330
>Disabling vectors and reward systems for women to sell themselves into prostitution is bad actually
The less you incentivize whorish behavior, the less whores there are. Your average 7IQ woman that goes on to become an only fans model will not figure out how to be able to mass monetize it and we can atleast go back to the state things were in back before the 2010s. Why is it all or nothing? Progress not perfection leads to real results.

>>511985415 (OP)
Ban Facebook. Ban the iPhone. Ban normies from the internet.

>>511985415 (OP)
fighting antisemitism is a bipartisan issue

>>511988931
Corporations aren't woke, they're just profit-maximizing machines and will either bend with or anticipate the way the wind is blowing to maximize revenue and minimize oversight/litigation
I think it's a big psychological mistake to personalize/ anthropomorphize these entities. Sure it can provide a useful rule of thumb in some cases but in general corporations have the same depth of intellect as an insect colony regardless of what their PR department says. If the law is changed to require statues of Moloch in every town and a minimum of 100 live babies fed to each statue per year, tech firms will start making Moloch locator apps.

>>511985415 (OP)
Kill all authoritarian scum.
Freedom to the people, sieg heil.

>>511985415 (OP)
thats a jewish account wanting to censor antisemitism