Thread 512009477

How is it two of the most powerful countries in world history were or are communist?

>>512009477 (OP)
IDK LOL

>>512009477 (OP)
dumb takoposter

>>512009477 (OP)
because authoritarianism is the only true way for effective governance
most people are goyim and deserve to be treated as goyim

>>512009477 (OP)
Were they powerful because they were communist or because they were basically ethnostates?

>>512009477 (OP)
Slavery works you fucking retard, except for all the slaves...

>>512009477 (OP)
Because collectivism when applied properly achieves good results. The western abhorrence of it is mostly a psyop by rich people to prevent organization against them

>>512009554
Reminder Fauna is getting married

Your oshi will not compromise on her happiness for (You)

>>512009477 (OP)
communism kinda works if theres no kikes around
just like capitalism works until the kikes buy the government

>>512009477 (OP)
>How come most of the most powerful countries in history were monarchies?

>>512009477 (OP)
The Soviet Union was weak until it got help from the democratic world.
Pre-ww2 Soviets lost a war to Poland and struggled to win a minor border conflict with Finland.
But when Barbarossa happened it became within the West's best interest to supply the Soviets with machine tools and technology and resources, and they used those things to build a colossal military industrial base, which they used to take the wealthy industrial heartlands of Germany and Czechoslovakia and pilfer German scientists to run their r&d for them.

The USSR was a generational power fueled by its war dividends from WW2, and collapsed as soon as those dividends were exhausted. Asking about the success of a country that failed to meet it's first centennial is silly.

>>512010750
>Pre-ww2 Soviets lost a war to Poland
During Russian civil war when proper institutions had not yet been established and the country was in ruin...

>>512009554
>all the asians look naturally cute
>all the white chicks have the thousand cock stare

>>512010750
I don't think the Soviet Union was by any means doomed to fail from the beginning. We thought we were losing the Cold War until like the late 70's / early 80's. The inefficiencies of relying purely on central planning started to bite them in the ass eventually, but the Chinese figured out how to inject elements of a market economy while still remaining a fundamentally communist state, which as of yet appears to be working fine

>>512011517
lol

>>512009992
Despite watching JP since 2020 at least, I still don't get why anyone cares about this. Or rather, I don't get how they can be an adequate substitute for a gf in someone's mind.

Also I'm pretty sure she's pregnant, not just getting married.

>>512009477 (OP)
Do you seriously have to ask? It's always the jews.

The bolshevik revolution and the chinese communist revolution happened at the same time.

>>512011953
>>512009554
god, imagine a bbc stretching them out before 5 indians take turns cumming into their wombs until they are forcibly fertilized

>>512010750
>struggled to win a minor border conflict with Finland
Their real goal was to creat a fake popular uprising and replace the government with communists who would "apply" to join the USSR as a Finnish Soviet Socialist Republic. The border dispute was just to create a fake reason to invade. This is clear because they cultivated a Finnish communist part in the USSR from commie exiles who lost the Finnish civil war but got rid of them after the minor victory where they re-adjusted the fake border claims to their face-saving backup goal.

>>512009955
>”im poor”

>>512009477 (OP)
How is it they are the most ethnically pure?
>China, Korea, Russia.

>>512009477 (OP)
Communists get their power from capitalism being corrupt. It's always been that way.

>>512012565
"t. seething poor" is the basis of the psyop, yes. The problem with this is that it loses power every time you state it explicitly, because it's aversion to broaching the issue at all for fear of being denounced as such that makes it work; once enough people are discussing the issue openly and collectively realize it's just lazy ad hominem, elitism loses the argument, because it doesn't stand up to scrutiny. This is in general the problem with social orders and mores held up by feminine shaming methods not backed up by actual legitimacy - they're paper tigers

>>512009992
>>512011989
Please tell me her baby isn't white