Thread 512105280

>Tucker Carlson starts rallying the masses against Israel
>controlled opposition assets immediately begin attacking him
Oh yeah, I'm definitely nooticing a pattern here.

>>512105280 (OP)
Pure coincidence, goyim.

>>512105280 (OP)
>entire career working for establishment media
>dad is a glowie
He is controlled opposition.

who?

>>512105280 (OP)
>>controlled opposition assets immediately begin attacking him

ok
meanwhile, in reality:

>>512105280 (OP)
>Nick has attacked Israel for 5+ years
Come again?

>>512105280 (OP)
>>Tucker Carlson starts rallying the masses against Israel

>>512105581
Nick is a spic and a faggot. Also just saying you hate Israel whilst endorsing left wing candidates like jeetskin Kamala who is literally married to a jew, does not make you any more anti-zog. Judge a person based on the actions they do, not what they say. Furthermore, it seems more than a coincidence that Nick was the only major figure who was at the captiol, and shouting "disregard the police..." yet received no conviction or even indictment for it. So on the balance of probabilities, I would say he is a fed.

>>512105280 (OP)
>/pol/ is full of shitpost
>kike fags emergency reunite to talk about that beaner as a menacxe
>/pol/ is full of shill fags shitting on said beaner, controlled opposition all shit on him script verbatim
yeah I'm a noooticer too anon, fuck off

>>512106043
>whilst endorsing left wing candidates like jeetskin Kamala who is literally married to a jew

meanwhile, in reality:
>Anyone that watches my show knows this, anyone that follows me on twitter knows this, I have insisted throughout the year that although I have my criticisms of Trump and I may not vote, I will never vote for Kamala. I have said that repeatedly.

https://x.com/DelGroyp/status/1837722726892818812

>open powl
>most normie nigger tier takes imaginable
>talkin bout the same shit nigga 9n the xfiles is
>verbatim

this is boat full of hoes.

>>512105280 (OP)
>both were talking about kikes and epstein
>then they started to talk about each other instead
really makes you think

>>512106146
Fair point you have made here I will give you that. My comment was far to general on the matter. However to reiterate this clearly, he has repeatedly changed his message to whatever suits the agenda that his bosses are pushing. Whether they need people who are taking practical measures to combat the (((deep-state))) to be labelled as "far-right extremists" or as not actually rightwing enough, depends largely on context and the intended audience. The fundamental goal seems from my interpretations of his actions to be, to divide the right against itself, (which he has to a limited extent succeeded in as evidenced by this thread) and to divide the moderates against the right through the usual frivolous use of the pejorative terms we have become well acquainted with.

Also I notice that you make no rebuttal for the claims I postulated regarding his protection from the Biden era DOJ from his incitement (entrapment) actions on January 6th.

If you have any more thoughts on these critiques of mine, or believe that I am misrepresenting Fuentes, I am open to considering your thoughts on the matter. I do enjoy these lively discussion threads.

>>512106279
I think there is a deliberate effort to divide the right against itself, and to muddy the waters. Ultimately time will tell, but the longer this continues then the longer the Jews can get away with it all.

>>512106658
>his bosses are pushing
name his bosses
go.
show proof he's getting money from anyone.

>>512106760
both stop talking about kikes and epstein and start talking about each other
it's as if someone is controlled opposition

>>512105280 (OP)
Aren't contrarian opinions his bread and butter for his entire career?

>>512106658
>his protection from the Biden era DOJ from his incitement (entrapment) actions on January 6th.
You mean the DOJ that:
>froze his bank account
>put him on a no fly list
>subpoena'd him and forced him to testify in front of congress for the J6 commitee
the one that Nick sued and spent $200k+ in legal fees fighting?
Funny how no one mentions that.

>>512106815
Nick will continue to seethe about Tucker and Tucker will move on and probably never mention him again.

It's pretty obvious who has the agenda.

>>512106965
lol
nick's viewership has tripled in the past 2 years
meanwhile tucker's has basically stayed the same
I wouldn't put money on that :)

>>512106767
I am not saying he is necessarily getting money from anyone but there are other 'rewards' that can be offered. Notably immunity from prosecution. Also as a sidenote, I would not be too surprised if they also had any videos or photographs of his homosexual escapades which would severely damage his reputation, to use as blackmail to keep him as controlled opposition.

>>512107083
>Notably immunity from prosecution.
I'm sure he would've appreciated that before Biden's DOJ prosecuted him. >>512106919

>>512107042
>nick's viewership has tripled in the past 2 years
From 10 000 viewers to 30 000 viewers.

>>512107112
live* viewers

>>512105280 (OP)
once they let nick back on twitter its over for you hoes

>>512105280 (OP)
>>controlled opposition assets
That would be both of them

>>512106146
He put all of his eggs in one basket, then tried to "hello fellow Trump supporters" us. When they let their masks slip, dont trust them anymore. He thought Trump would lose so he gambled and lost.

>>512107108
Subpoena does not equate to prosecution. All the measures taken seem to be just to make it appear that he was not getting off scot-free. In any regard, if you compare what happened to the 2000 people who were arrested to what Nick got, I think it is pretty clear who got the rough end of the stick.

By the way, explain why you like Fuentes. This is a genuine question. I just want to know if I am talking to a person or a glowie.

>>512107249
Exactly right. Thank you anon for your simply stated insight. This is the best way it could be said.

>>512107249
he was pointing out that trumps movement was coopted by jews and neocons, and those two groups would get all the benefits of his presidency, and the base would get nothing.
and turns out he seems to be pretty accurate

Has Fuentes addressed the accusations (true) that he's a fed?

>>512107375
Interesting how I asked one of the few individuals in this thread defending Spic Fuentes to prove he was not himself a fed and then he went radio silent. I am doing some nooticing of my own here.

Guess, I get to claim the win here anons. Goodnight!

>>512105280 (OP)
Anything that stands against Israel's/satans agenda is attacked. Period.

Anyone you see being criticized or character assassinated these days, has obviously pissed off the synagogue of satan.

It's simple really. Only the good goys get favorable press and literally let off with murder...

Loomer! Fuentes! Kirk! Hannity etc...All good goys.

Tucker! BAD! Candace! BAD! WHY? They know the fucking truth and are sick of not being able to say it freely in the so called land of the free.

All in all it has become too fucking obvious to see who is who these days rabbi. You's all seriously need to stop. It's over...The noticing has become supernova like. As a result, you and your people are all in great danger.

Tic fucking toc.