>>512118255 (OP)
>>512118379
>>512118425
She did nothing wrong. The point of sex is reproduction. If one of the pair has a horrible disease like cancer, it prevents procreation or worse spreads it on to the offspring. A genetic dead end that will only waste your limited period to mate.
Most women don't leave their cancer patient simp. They stand by him waiting for the croak to collect inheritance. It's more noble and rare for a woman to realize cancer ridden people are unfit for mating and end the relationship as soon as possible. Same for uncucked men.
If the two already have procreated, support it is different and standing by them is the moral path in that case.
Most cancer patients are better off not being treated too. They and the people around them would be happier without medical torture which at best buy a few years of life, at tremendous cost to other organs, and society. 4 trillion a year are spent on "healthcare" while people starve and can't even afford a house. Not a priority.
I'm so fucking sick of cancer patients being glazed. The church has always taught on the nobility of dying well. Big cancer rejects it, look no further than breast cancer women commercials and that ribbon campaign, such pride and arrogance.