Thread 512127244

>Be The United States of America
>Perfect setup for a nation to prevent an authoritarian government
>Except men decide to be retarded
>They fold and give women rights
>Queue complete subversion on the principals of the nation
>Government switches to catering to women, essentially replacing God by providing them with free shit, abusing their consuming nature
>Government becomes authoritarian (with extra steps!)
>Society begins to collapse as men become disposable assets or simply check out
Nothing will get fixed until we get rid of women's rights. There is a reason why, throughout history, they were treated as property. I hope you understand that and see why. Anybody who doesn't support the total removal of women's rights are yiddish beyond comprehension.

I don't even hate women (except the ones that are political). Everybody was much happier when they didn't have rights and followed men rather than the government. Sadly, they are gaslit to ignore this fact.

>>512127244 (OP)

shut the fuck up cum guzzler

>>512127244 (OP)
>Nothing will get fixed until we get rid of jews*

>>512127292
Fuck off redditard, go cry in the Trump general like usual

>>512127350
Consider this:
"Removal of jews" -> women will vote to remove white people (they are subverted to believe white people = jews) -> whites get fucked even more

or

Get rid of women's rights -> yiddish voting power removed -> jews lose their power.

I'll admit we also have to deal with cuckersatives that simp for Israel too. Currently there is no way to stand up against any of it in any case.

I'll suggest this too, requirements of and IQ of 115 and above would mean men would have more voting power than women. Getting something like this to pass would guarantee more voting power for men than women. From here, we can work our way back to removal of women's rights.

The trick is the play it as a race issue instead of a women's right's issue, which will be the obvious hot topic point because muh southern raysis exams of the past. Play this as a red herring so women don't realize the trick. More people are agreeing that democracy of retards isn't working. While this is a kikish play, but you must outkike the kike to win.

>>512127663
>hey are subverted to believe white people = jew
by whom?

>>512128608

Even a cut off at 105 would be sufficient. We just need a slight advantage, not to totally overpower them.

>>512127663
why is that gif so fucking funny?

>>512128608
in line with this, thought it will never happen,
i always thought it would be great and useful if we were all IQ tested every 2 years in school and its kept private beyond who the kids want to share them with.
everyone would no so much better where they stand in life.. people who are 90iq could still do quite well but knowing they have to work a bit harder to keep up with the 110s.. and 85iqs would know the trades might be a better option for them instead of driving up uni prices.
also people would know if they are under/over performing and as a society we would be far more understanding as to how much hard work actually carries you and make better diagnoses and corrections on national level or even international if it was largely adopted.

>>512128608
IQ requirements are foolish because it's arbitrary. Who assigns the IQ score? How easy is it to simply get a fake IQ identifier (hint: very). Just return to how the Founding Fathers intended and remove voting rights from women, kikes, and minorities; the latter two groups are not legitimate citizens at all in the first place as per the intentions of the founding fathers. Problem solved.

>>512131681
Agree'd that IQ is arbitrary, so I wouldn't recommend control on voting be directly related to IQ itself, but the concept still aligns. I'm glad somebody mentioned this tho. Honestly, having a required examination to vote with a high barrier of entry and ability to not be cheesed would be sufficient enough. The people who care enough to pass would fit the criteria.