But, I think its a self destruction in order to clear the way for the next think, given the anticipation of mid terms and knowledge there is no MAGA after 2028.
People walking the tight rope around this fact is because they dont want to lose the base. The concept is to "reinvest" what MAGA into the next iteration. Every iteration has to feel new, improved, upgrade.
>>512128109
Lol so when everyone on the list is a leftist you'll agree with it, right? Your personal god Biden and every other democrat had 4 years to do something with the Epstein stuff but not one of them did a fucking thing. But orange man bad so this is your new Alinsky project. you should kill yourself out of shame Lefty losers continue to be losers, news at 11.
>>512129346
<-- Hey! *snap* *snap* look over here!
I dont care you can call me leftist (im not).
I voted trump, becuase trump > biden or kamala.
Nothing to do with who any of them fucks.
Trump could be George Washington or Jimmy Carter, MAGA ends when Trump ends. Which is inevitable in 2028. So who takes over? How do you continue "MAGA"? You must "excite" the base. You must try to retain the "value" Trump built. But it must be "new" in some form. So wht do?
>>512130828
I guess we'll see where we are in 3.5 years. If things are going great like they were before conveniently timed Covid and George Floyd, and this time we don't have leftist snakes in the gov't to derail things like in 2020, MAGA may be stronger than ever by then.
>>512131828 > MAGA may be stronger than ever by then.
What the hell are you talking about? Trump cant run again dude.
Someone has to take his place.
MAGA is trump.
No one is going to win on MAGAv2.
They can continue the same policies and extend MAGA, even virtually and for all intensive purposes be MAGAv2, but they will still need to display and promote their "own" thing as if its new and different. Just think iPhone upgrades.
C'mon folks, just ain't right askin' bout them there Epstein files. A man ought to care for his cattle 'n his crop, not 'bout a man's private dealings. Now I reckon, if you're askin' bout that sort of thing, you must be a transvestite or sumthin'... t'aint no patriot at all. It just ain't right.
>>512132907
You don't define things for everyone. That's simply your definition. The most logical choice would be Vance as a continuation of MAGA and Trump. Or perhaps someone else. MAGA is an ideal, not a person.