And it's regarding the most prominent Lie that killed your country.

The Lie is that the Constitution enshrines both Birthright Citizenship and tolerates Dual Citizenship. Both are unconstitutional and I'll prove it emphatically in the following post!

Naturalization + EXCLUSIVE Jurisdiction = Citizenship

According to the Framers of the 14th Amendment (and the original Constitutional Framers), in order to be naturalized, one must be EXCLUSIVELY under the jurisdiction of the United States. I'll provide it in the following post.

References:
Constitution, Article I, Section 8
>"The Congress shall have Power To...establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization..."
14th Amendment, Section I
>"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States..."
Congressional Civil Rights Act of 1866
>“All persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power... are hereby declared to be citizens.”
8 U.S. Code § 1448(a) — Oath of Renunciation and Allegiance
>You must renounce ALL foreign allegiances prior to naturalization.

>appeals to legalism
only works in white countries, we're in hard power territory now

"Subject to the Jurisdiction Thereof"
The most misrepresented 5 words in American history that guarantees the death of a Nation.

What satisfies this clause? Exclusive jurisdiction. Meaning if someone is a citizen of a foreign sovereign, they CANNOT become a citizen. This applies to illegal aliens and ALL dual-citizens.

Legal Evidence:

Senator Jacob Howard, Primary Architect of the 14th Amendment.
>“The phrase ‘subject to their jurisdiction’ excludes children of ministers, consuls, and citizens or subjects of foreign states born within the United States.”
(Cong. Globe, 39th Cong., 1st Sess., p. 2767)

Senator Lyman Trumbull, Chair of Senate Judiciary Committee regarding the 14th.
>“The provision is that ‘all persons born in the United States and not subject to any foreign power... shall be citizens.’ That means ‘subject to the complete jurisdiction.’”
>“Subject to the jurisdiction” means not owing allegiance to anybody else. "What do we mean by 'subject to the jurisdiction of the United States'? Not owing allegiance to anybody else. That is what it means."
>"It cannot be said of any Indian who owes allegiance... to his tribe that he is 'subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.' They are not subject to our jurisdiction in the sense of owing allegiance solely to the United States."
— Congressional Globe, 39th Cong., 1st Sess. 2893 (1866)

Congress additionally reserves the right to determine what consitutes denaturalization, or the revocation of citizenship. Actaully, the Executive Branch enjoys this power because it is already on the books.

It's quite simple really because...

Everyone universally recognizes Congress' authority in the revocation of citizenhip from Confederate leaders. Congress has this power.

But some fat fuck justices in Afroyim v. Rusk (1967), a 5-4 decision, unilaterally waved a magic wand and declared that Congress must first ask pretty please to revoke citizenship from anyone.
I am not joking. That's literally the decision.
>Afroyim v Rusk tl;dr - Congress attempted to revoke Afroyim's citizenship because he voted in an ISRAELI election. That would hurt his feelings so ergo, Congress can never revoke citizenship again.

Just 9 years earlier, in Perez v. Brownell (1958), the Court upheld that Congress could revoke citizenship for acts like voting in foreign elections — because those acts evidenced a breach of national allegiance.

The Court in Afroyim reversed this based not on constitutional text, but on a broad reinterpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment. Perez lost his citizenship because he voted in a Mexican election, but our entire constitution got "rewritten" by 5 justices because they wouldn't revoke the citizenship of an ISRAELI.

You literally lost your country over 1 Jew. And don't get me started on United States v. Wong Kim Ark, the Supreme Court Case that guaranteed birthright citizenship to literally every single anchor baby today.

>>512149103 (OP)
>most prominent Lie that killed

United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898)

Case tl;dr - Wong was born in the U.S. to legal resident Chinese parents. They went back home to China and brought him with them. He reimmigrates to U.S. and gets blocked. Supreme Court ruled that due to ENGLISH COMMON LAW, because anyone born in ENGLAND is an English citizen, then therefore anyone born in the U.S. is a U.S. citizen, regardless of Constitution and regardless of the Framers' intent.

How can I be certain?

From the Floor Debates of the 14th Amendment, 1866.
Sen. Cowan asks:
> “Is the child of the Chinese immigrant (Wong Kim Ark) in California a citizen?”
Sen. Howard replies:
> “If they are foreigners and aliens... they are not subject to the jurisdiction.”
Congressional Globe, 39th Cong., 1st Sess., 2890 (1866)

Meaning that the children of foreigners who owe allegiance to a foreign sovereign are not U.S. citizens.

You lost a country because of this.

>>512149103 (OP)
electricity bills

>>512149450
Country is already dead by then because of United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898). No one realized it by then, but it was already kill.

>>512149103 (OP)
no office debris explained

>>512149639
did you say what?

>>512149303
>>“The phrase ‘subject to their jurisdiction’ excludes children of ministers, consuls, and citizens or subjects of foreign states born within the United States.”
This is what people don't understand.
Children are subject to the jurisdiction of their parents' home country. "Jurisdiction" doesn't mean ordinary jurisdiction, as in, the courts have authority over the person. It means sovereign jurisdiction, as in, allegiance to one's country of citizenship
Does anyone in their righ mind believe that if the Soviet ambassador's wife gave birth while visiting him at the UN in New York, at the height of the Cold War, the child would be an american citizen?

>>512149730
While this isn't a 9/11 truth thread, I appreciate the bump thought it would be most constructive to address the contents of my thread and reflect on how you were taught this subject in your primary/secondary education.

>>512149639
Be selective on significance bro

>>512149925
>Does anyone in their righ mind believe that if the Soviet ambassador's wife gave birth while visiting him at the UN in New York, at the height of the Cold War, the child would be an american citizen?
And this is the sleight of hand used to derail the citizenship debate. It doesn't simply limit the children of ambassadors. The Framers of the 14th were clear when they said...
>and citizens or subjects of foreign states born within the United States.
The children of regular foreign subjects are awarded American citizenship not to mention the children of foreign diplomats. Regardless, the mental gymnastics used in U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark doesn't even appeal to the Constitution, but rather English Common Law. It's madness.

>>512149962
>While this isn't a 9/11 truth thread,
correct, this is:
>Must Read Post for Americans

>>512150049
9/11 lie isn't even close to Foreigner Birthright Citizenship.

>>512150229
You're just being silly now.

>>512149962
So what is more important for Americans?

Energy hoax, that still relevant today or some juridical paper 200 years ago?

climate change CO2 tax crud oil does not exist it is all bull shit ...

What ever happen in the past generations , you have no means to prove it, it wasn't like that at all it just wishful fantasy made up out of your ass , right? nigga wake up

>>512151015
You're stupid as hell and barely literate.
>Some juridical paper 200 years ago
It's bad law which creates both Anchor Babies and allows Israeli citizens to run Congress, not to mention the other dual allegiant politicians that are everywhere in state and local governments.

We wouldn't even consider the energy lie if Americans governed Americans.

>>512149103 (OP)
I know right, too bad Trump, scotus, and congress won't do shit.

>>512151422
And it is the easiest layup for an originalist court. It's as if these people don't even know about it.

>>512151650
>And it is the easiest layup for an originalist court. It's as if these people don't even know about it.
oh it's going to be a wild time for sure if they overturn the anchor baby ruling!

>>512150288
How your blah blah relevant to anything today?

It just a spam distraction, isn't?

Free energy, cunt, that what is important to freedom and everything.

OK nigger you are dumb as fuck ....

It doesn't matter :
>It's bad law which creates both Anchor Babies and allows Israeli citizens to run Congress,

Jew rats created tax enclosure USA got it?

America is not nation with own doweling territory, but greedy bastards from allover the world ...

You blame kikes for incorrect paper work, that aloud kikes to hijack public office ...

Nigger you are fucking dumb and it is not:
> Must Read Post for Americans
We know that race mixed mutts and niggers stupid, thank you for illustrating, just that.

FREE ENERGY! cunt your life quality depends on .
Ability to move and have your own life depends on ENEREGY stupid nigger

>>512151961
>Reddit spacing
Lol you have to go back

>>512149103 (OP)
That's a man ain't it?