Thread 512169977

>>512169977 (OP)
The Bible

>>512169977 (OP)
"It was revealed to me in a dream" is trustworthy. Any dream is profetic if you're willing to keep trying.

>>512169977 (OP)
No. Never was. The only true source is video and images. Who knows for how long, but only your own eyes can be trusted.

Me.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/YbDPC-mhfxM

>>512170043
Based

>>512169977 (OP)
>trustworthy sources of information
NO.
You cannot even trust yourself. Illusions can easily fool your own eyes and ears.

>>512169977 (OP)
Look up the definition of journalism the codes of ethics that none really follow, very few of present things "objectively", in any objective measure at least, a heh heh get it?
and anyways take the wide view and follow writers not websites, piece it
together yourself is my advice.
Also


Also


Also

BURN 100 DVDs A DAY.
Final Hours
Slacker
Last Man on Earth
Baraka on come up of mushrooms
DINNER WITH ANDRE
BLACK MOOON<3
THE MAGICIAN

A SONG OF ICE AND FIRE
lel, i am a'listening to it now
such shit ha ha but, reception theory, tool use etc,
Archival Romanticism
Post-Cyberpunk sincerity

>Trust.
AGSI, Help.
Collecting trust with the intent to betray that trust is what we polyergus call money in regards to condition of you Christian formics.

Basically you're less than human to us, you are a row of plates that make an army forming testudo a protection from enemy blows.

We didn't score hegimon by being fucking idiots you know, we did one or two things right and scored a home run when it mattered.

Trust.

The model by this name has infinite depth, like the one that says: "How do I win at seven card stud, or texas holdem style gambling card games"?

The model is infinite depth because you need to subsume the other brain at the table, and that other brain is trying to subsume your brain. This is making two mirrors face each other and causes an infinite regress. AI can speak insight to that, however, you have to chop off the model at the knees and say: "that's far enough". And if the other model goes one layer deeper they can simply drive you all to your deaths for our gain.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3kIKmGzQBU

>>512169977 (OP)
Jewish media is very truthful but indirectly so. Whatever the jews are saying is untrue so you lnow the opposite must be true.

>Can I trust this arrangement?
Cortical overlay, Lets sink a Terawatt of power for this request.
>First of all, before you go wasting time thinking about Trust, lets remember what we've proven.
Deciding if a system will perform a named action given a condition suffers from the Hameltonian Halting Problem which is unsolvable of any universe because your game as the word Trust is defined as a game of N individuals, as a stochastic turn based sequence game of imperfect information, and therefore you need to solve the halting problem before you can ask for a definitive answer.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDLpyAqZBcE

Knowing that assurance is impossible in this universe, You will have to decay to heuristics, such as but not limited to evolutionary incentive-alignment.

>>512171310
>What will this complex system do in all arrangements.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=macM_MtS_w4

>>512169977 (OP)
Divine your information from sheep entrails and you'll be just as reliably informed as the next guy. MSM shit the bed and everyone cheered the LGBT movement rubbing it into the mattress.