Thread 512214909

I don't find what the elites are doing to us morally wrong.

Darwinistically speaking, they have all the right to. The average person is stupid, unambitious and all the "virtue" they have is just for show, they'd abandon all of it for a moment of opportunity or if their life is thereatened, they don't really believe in a higher cause. So why shouldn't the elite keep doing what they are doing?

>>512214909 (OP)
>they have the right
Then so do we. Survival of the fittest. Time for rope. Do them before they do us.

>>512214909 (OP)
Any effective society has an elite and a working class. Elites have an enormously important role in steering society. It's both natural and fair that there is a large wealth and power inequality between the classes. From time to time the elites have to be replaced though, because after a few generations they lose their brilliance and moral character, and they become spoiled, entitled, lazy, hedonistic, and immoral. What you need is an upper class that is highly idealistic and loyal. The current upper classes in the West are traitorous globohomo sell outs. One might say that we as commoners can't complain because the quality of the working class is in the gutter too. But I strongly believe this is a direct result of low quality elites. They're responsible for the lack of inspiration from the commoners. They have failed to provide us with a productive and ambitious vision, and now nobody gives a shit anymore. You can't put a great amount of blame and responsibility on the masses, because many of them literally don't even have an internal monologue and are therefore much more like animals.

>>512214909 (OP)
>Darwinistically