Thread 512228571

Why is preventing kids from accessing adult content online more important than protecting children from literal pedophiles and sex traffickers?

Because the government wants to pretend it solved the problem while it continues to rape children.

it is what it is

>>512228571 (OP)
this isnt about protecting anyone, this is about control

>>512228639
This.
I cant believe you are all so degenerate retards that they gaslit you into accepting child protection to be the governments job and not the parents.

>>512228571 (OP)
Call me radical, but I think parents should parent their children, not the government.

>>512228571 (OP)

WILL SOMEBODY PLEASE THINK OF THE POOR CHILDREEEEN GOD FORBID THEY SEE A PENIS ONLINE IT WOULD TRAUMATIZE THEM FOREVER YOU MONSTER

>>512228571 (OP)
Because the pedophile is trump.

>>512228571 (OP)
WON'T SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!

>>512228571 (OP)
they seem to want all the dissidents who are going to kill them one day to NOT be online and easily tracked. makes no sense until you realize the "elite" have an average IQ around 98

>>512228571 (OP)

my first question is who is this treasonous vile cunt being paid off by

it should be still be legal to exile a enemy of the country

>>512228963
Rightoids want more censorship, they're shitty parents anyway.

>>512228571 (OP)
Same reason normies and karens hyperventilate about loli/shota but won't do anything to help actual kids: It's a very easy thing to virtue signal about and requires no actual effort or risk on their part.

Age verification is just a way to make coomers’ porn viewing history public information. It will appear on background checks and may prevent them from getting a job

>>512228571 (OP)
It’s not about the kids, it’s about ending anonymity on the internet so they can arrest us for disagreeing with multiculturalism

It's well intentioned but they are going to use this to force everyone to use digital ID and censor the internet. They want anything you post to be properly cataloged in your palantir database and be able to jail you for social media posts.

>>512228571 (OP)
The "protecting kids shit" is a ruse, while I do disagree with Porn as it's degenerate and literally one of most Jewish industries out there, this is a ruse to get you to sell your soul away to the government so they can abuse your privacy in ways never before possible without you realizing it.

Politicians will never touch smelly Kike industries in any real way that will damage them, they just want to you give in and give you life away to them. (If they really wanted to protect kids, they'd ban Kikes and Islam from their countries.)

>>512229669
That's not well intentioned at all.
That's conniving and manipulative.

Also, they'll come for VPNs next.

>>512228571 (OP)
It is up to each individual parent to control what their child accesses, not a (((company))) or (((government))). Evil people passing evil (((laws))).

>>512229320
Way too generous of you friend, the (((elite))) have an average iq of 30, they are as smart as the rocks, they literally, and I do mean literally, have ZERO brain function. They are more akin to sludge, or sewage, than man.

>>512229932
Trump tried to ban encryption in his last term. Hopefully he tries again.

>>512230686
>tried to ban encryption
Jesus christ boomers are the biggest fucking dipshits on the planet.

Yeah but the UK government is forcing x to not show music and videos of dissent. I've also seen some memes being blocked. The children not seeing porn stuff is just what they're presenting to the public. When I was 14/15 we all found ways to get porn and that was just before Internet was in every home. Kids are much smarter than mtg as using the Internet so will find a way even though the younger generations have purposely been dumbed down towards using technology. On an unrelated note I was to fuck mtgs brains out and I can't explain why.

>>512228571 (OP)
children should have no internet connection then
retarded pretext this is not about children

>>512228571 (OP)
Why aren't parents parenting anymore is the real question and why is the state against parents parenting? People should be asking these questions and looking inward.

>>512232204
It's a misdirection on their part. The whole thing is. If it wasn't children, they'd find some excuse about "terrorism" to do the same thing.

The real question people should be asking is "why does the government want my ID to be tied to all of my online activity?"

>>512228571 (OP)
because protecting kids online means you can stop antisemitism and van political undesirables

I always love how they are posting stuff like this. They will implement it, there is no choice. People truly believe that we can stop this (by voting) lmao

>>512228660
>it is what it is
I'm sorry, but that account has a negative balance.

This isn't going to work too well with the whole Epstein shit going on.
It's just fake, it's too obviously fake.

>>512228571 (OP)
Don't be unreasonable, you know full well that asking a politician to not infringe on civil liberties is like asking them not to frequent child prostitutes.

>>512228571 (OP)
Circumcision is horrific and damaging child buse, but they are fine with that. Deranged people.

>>512228571 (OP)
Cool it with the anti-semitic rhetoric

>>512228571 (OP)
I mean we used to share porn at lan parties since the age of like 14 or something.