Thread 512234729

Are "influencer houses/streaming houses" going to be the next big thing?

Waging leads to literally nothing but miserable slavery, I can see zooms and Gen Alpha pooling their money and just trying to basically create their own bullshit reality shows and gather an audience than working "normal" jobs going forward.

Even if they make peanuts their lives will be 10x better than waging. Clocking in is completely dead, it doesnt matter how much boomers and kikes screech, they completely killed it.

we need to got back to when the jesters of society were the bottom peasants.

>>512234935
Well they are the ones with all the money and nice houses now, people are only going to respond to incentives

No, because AI will dominate all media by 2030. Gen A will just receive UBI and jerk off in diapers to AI porn until they die without reproducing, and having barely interacted with a human at all.

>>512235075
right. we reward idiocracy, and in turn, get more idiocracy. which goes back to my point.

>>512235266
Kikes have arrived

>>512235266
>Gen A
Man... you almost have to feel sorry for them.
Zoomers think they got shafted, HOLLY FUCK gen A are literally going to own nothing and be totally unemployable

I hope it results in them killing all the jews and burning down the data centers.

>>512234729 (OP)
If I ever find out there's one of those in my neighbourhood I'll fucking firebomb the place.

>>512235320
You know I'm right, faggot. No one is going to watch Timmy Sanchez stream himself droolng while having orgasms in VR for 9 hours.
>>512235429
They're absolutely fucked, and have zero chance already.

>>512237753
>no one is going to watch someone else play video games
>no one is going to watch some dysgenic nigger talk into a camera for hours
>no one is going to pay for bathwater

lmao, just kill yourself you miserable little rat

>>512234729 (OP)
Theyve been a thing for years havent they, mould mansion for instance

>>512234729 (OP)
Influencers exist to influence consumer behavior. You can't influence consumer behavior if there are no consumers. If consumers don't exist, then influencers don't exist. Idiot.

>>512234729 (OP)
>frat house webcams but worse

sure whatever

I think old people are fine with death because the world just gets faker and gayer around you

Just the natural evolution of reality TV

>>512234729 (OP)
White people are no longer masters of their societies and civilization, but clowns to perform ever increasing feats of humiliation for the brown hordes taking over

>>512235075
acting has always been one of the roughest careers out there. aligning the top 0.01% of streamers with the general "talent" is disingenuous. plenty of people have had one or two extras gigs in well-known movies, but they didnt star. they got paid $200 for ten hours of standing around in position while the main guys had speaking lines

>>512238245
You deserve what you tolerate

>>512238295
We arent talking about Hollyjew

>>512238245
Streaming is huge in south korea

>>512238365
yeah, we kinda are. the influencers who have name recognition go throuh the same motions. there are thousands of people with zero viewers on twitch

They have been for a while. I'm not deep into watching streamers but always see stuff about content houses and airbnbs. At the minute it's mansions but once the money starts to come down it will be like China where theyre in booths or streets near areas that gift more money.

>>512237849
Not when AI can duplicate all that bullshit.

>But people will still buy used bath water
Sure, vtubers will be selling their bottled piss to perverts, but the vtubers won't exist and jeets will be pissing in the bottles. You got me there.

I'm sorry if your gay little YouTube channel goes under or whatever, but I don't care and no one else will either.

>>512234729 (OP)

You think I can get paid livestreaming my descent into madness?

i quit my job because of stress and have been on gibs and moved back to my parents place rent free. they even encouraged it. gonna ride this gravy train long as i can.
>explain this gap in your resume
was working on a project. signed an NDA. next question :^)

>>512234729 (OP)
This streamer shit isn't working out. It's just kids doing a cargo cult of jewish hollywood, copying bits that were never funny.

>>512234729 (OP)
Literal children in adult bodies. Humanity is doomed.

Nah the young lads & I did some dumb stuff too, but Zoomers seem extra dumb because of little to no life experiences as children (too much time spent laying around looking at a phone vs I was outside having adventures at that age).

i’d 100% be on the streamer or youtuber or chinktok grind if my personality wasn’t the equivalent to a brick wall. they all pretend sitting in front of a camera is hard work. please. the hardest part of their job is coming up with something people will watch every week. they used to get the low paid writer interns to do that shit for TV shows. they hire 16 year olds and pay them like 1/8th of their ad revenue to edit the shit for them. teams of pakis and indians use AI voices and shit to make videos for them and they larp as a singular “white” guy to run a channel or two. swear it happens; look it up. i hope my post inspires some anon to give that whole grift a shot because hey if done right it’s literally free money to upload dumb shit. you might just get lucky and catch the algorithm. it is also a lot of luck. and picking some random indian kid on Fiverr who happens to be somewhat decent at editing 2hrs of raw footage into something adhd brained meme addicts will click on. i feel like i learn more about how the fucking industry works from how often mid level youtubers themself bitch about how it works.

>>512234729 (OP)
Anon, the problem with selling your soul is you no longer have a soul.

I would rather wage than live like this. They are not having fun, they are trying to entertain.

>>512234935
Jester was actually a high ranking political advisory role.

>>512239344
now youre getting into advertising. sales/advertising has always been a lucrative career for 1% of the population. its formulaic, repetitive, and a day job for everyone else.

its always irked me that sales people in consulting get paid more than the people doing the projects, but then, the sales people bring in the projects. different strokes i guess

>>512238437
We’re talking about what used to be called brand ambassadors, and people who work for themselves to push Amazon storefront links who receive portions of the profit from purchases from people using their link in bios. That is all these people are doing, in one way or another. Also engagement farming to gain their followers to push their links.

>>512239070
it must collapse at some stage right? sponsors are gonna move on. streamers and streaming isnt going to be “the thing” forever. being somewhat big in X genre of Youtube isn’t gonna pay more than minimum wage in a couple years maybe. we’re already at the stage where stuff like instagram influencer (glorified Advert reader) is a side gig, not something you make thousands from anymore. it’s getting oversaturated. many of the mid tier and bigger influencers/youtubers/streamers NEED to branch out and try get revenue from multiple sources. how fucking often have you heard a youtuber say AND THIS FOOTAGE IS LOCKED BEHIND OUR PATREON! or some shit?

>>512234729 (OP)
No, they've been a thing for over a decade and they all fizzle out after varying degrees of success or failure. Fishtank seems to be the most successful version of this

>>512239692
theyre actors, why are you making this complicated? it's the same formula for television and radio. they entertain for the advertising revenue. most tv channels suck ass, most streamers suck ass. ryan seacrest is a successful announcer, the guys introducing cover bands at their shitty bars are not successful

>>512234729 (OP)
>Are "influencer houses/streaming houses" going to be the next big thing?

No, because owning a house requires financial responsibility and longevity. Streamers don't have that. They're so undisciplined they can't even keep to a schedule for their soft video game jobs. Like any creative types, they're flighty and unreliable. They're not gonna be able to make 30 years of mortgage payments. Streamers don't last that long, a select few get big and then they fall off. Couple all that instability with the instability of constant turnover with people joining and leaving the house. Which is responsible for what? Who covers which bills? Who cooks? Who cleans? What about lawn care?

>>512234729 (OP)
you know i think this is an incredibly insightful thought.. the idea that poverty and hopes of fame and fortune will result in streaming homes of working and middle class people is i think a very possible outcome.

in fact im going to capture this post because the inevitably of it and the reasoning as to why it will happen seem so correct to me.
i've never even considered this.. very insightful

>>512234729 (OP)
most of these people would be suicidal if they didn't drown out their inner monologues 24/7. They're dancing monkeys and have no friends that aren't completely fake opportunists, nobody actually takes them seriously, and they are in a constant struggle to remain relevant where even a single day off or social media post could nuke their entire career.

Small but loyal community gaming streamers who keep their lives heavily compartmentalised and private are the only ones who actually beat the rat race and they are extremely rare.

>>512234729 (OP)
what will happen to those service economy jobs when pajeets do them better and for half the cost?

>>512240075
go to bed gramps

>>512234729 (OP)
Oh shit zoom zooms are gonna cut out middle man boomer child molester Sam Hyde.

>>512239559
what you’re talking about in sales and projects i am assume you’re speaking from experience? engineering firm or something? basically, you mean real work. this entire internet-work thing is genuinely a bubble. it’s a monified cult of personality. it’s not sustainable. youtube had an entire advertiser income crisis because some swedish gamer dork said nigger in a videogame, the footage not even hosted on their platform. people do shit “to go viral” and that’s it. they expect then to just do ad reads, maybe a podcast or brand deal or two and live the ez life and branch out into acting or music. or maybe they expect to stream / pump out a half assed “lets play” a few times a week and live a somewhat comfy wage off a meager low end subscriber count? it’s not gonna work like that even for the bigger names out there very soon i think anons. what i mean to say is, soon the bar to even get into earning money from “internet work” like sponsorships is gonna get harder, and the money earned from this income is going to be awful unless you’re BIG big with an established viewerbase or guaranteed income from a business. what’ll happen to the hundreds of thousands of “mid tier” youtubers/streamers/tiktokkers/instagrammers who have this as their main income?

>>512234729 (OP)
Back in the 90's there was a website called "Voyeur Dorm"; where, for something like $40/month you had access to a dozen cameras inside a house where female employee residents were guaranteed to be nude at least a few hours per day.

Your 'influencer house' thing will eventually try to go that way, because that's the only way that can earn a profit for a long period of time. But it will still fail, because they eventually have to move to an employee-based system, because real life people are never attractive enough without clothes on to keep the subs coming in

>>512234729 (OP)
>"influencer houses/streaming houses"
The iPhone was a mistake.

>>512240186
a lot of places will in no way let you in to rent even short term unless you have proof of consistent income. and good luck convincing some rich chink or jew with keys to his dad’s property to let you and 3-4 of your grubby college friends to hole up and stream 24/7 in their property unless it’s already a hovel.

>>512240810
not even that. reporting on fucking internet drama is an entire industry in of itself. EVERY fucking streamer has some skeleton in their closet no one would ever know about if they were just Mr Guy in suit and tie in an office. how many “The [Some Streamer] situation is crazy!” videos have you seen pop up even if you dont follow that shit? how many off topic posts have you seen here because some dickhead wanted to gossip about his favourite e-celeb?

>>512241518
that fucking drama slop is all youtube pushes anymore. they spam those videos

>>512241518
>>512242543
I would argue though that it always collapses down to a matter of just a few pieces of original content.

For example, the 'reaction video' genre. There are hundreds of 'influencers' out there doing reaction videos; but they all fall into the trap (via competition among themselves) of reviewing the same things.

So if one reaction channel gets 12k views reacting to a certain movie; you're pretty much guaranteed that most of the other reaction channels will be rushing out their own reaction videos on the same film pretty soon. This results in a reduction in the amount of things being reacted to overall.

There are very few real original content creators. You might have someone like "the fat electrician"; who produces very good content. Half of the reaction channels out there would have nothing to do if they didn't have the ability to react to the fat electrician videos. Which, again, causes an overall drop in original content.

Side note since this is /pol/; the same theories apply to the push toward increased sexual degeneracy as a way for people in competition with others to stand out from everyone else doing the same year-old degenerate fad.

>>512243141
forgot to mention:

There is now also a derivative market; new reaction channels whose genre is running a compilation of a dozen other reaction channels, all reacting to the same key scenes from famous movies

>>512243141
> push toward increased sexual degeneracy
i wanna follow this with what you were saying about movie reviewers. same thing with e-drama shit, it’s like its own internet ecosystem. like other anon said it seems to be pushed, he isnt the first to say that. i think even logged out and with cookies cleared it shows up in the feed a lot. and what does a lot of e-drama involve? e-girls. so then like 10-20 200k-400k subscriber guys have some bullshit going on behind the scenes in their personal life, to which hundreds of 50k-150k subscriber channels make basically 20 minute news reports on the drama, while fuckin minecraft or the FOTM videogame footage plays in the background. there are SO many low effort channels like this, and thats just one “genre” of youtuber. so many copy cats and trickle down feeders.

>>512234729 (OP)
This is is like a comedy sketch.

>>512244715
It doesn't surprise me.

In the reaction channel world, there has been another strange thing happening more and more...
> A makes a video reacting to a video by B
> B sees it, and makes a video reacting to A's reaction to his
sometimes:
> A makes another reaction of B's reaction to their reaction

If we wanted to get really 'macro' about it, the same thing happens in a lot of cities; where there are a thousand places to spend money buying things, but almost nowhere you can go to 'do things'