← Home ← Back to /pol/

Thread 512241425

51 posts 24 images 32 unique posters /pol/
Anonymous (ID: /xQOMDc+) Canada No.512241425 >>512241811 >>512241833 >>512241989 >>512243319 >>512245631 >>512246965 >>512248091 >>512248306 >>512248625 >>512249832 >>512250085 >>512251096 >>512252151 >>512252818 >>512252879
richard nixon
unironically the most honest president in recent history

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8B9G-oicSoA
Anonymous (ID: QAG+v2Ok) United States No.512241493 >>512246388 >>512253589
he was right about indians and indian women
Anonymous (ID: mIljvNMN) Mexico No.512241606 >>512242036 >>512243192
so honest that he resigned in shame after getting caught doing dishonest things
Anonymous (ID: drVTLj+L) United States No.512241811 >>512243192
>>512241425 (OP)
HE KNEW GEOPOLITICS COLD

THE GOMMIES HATED HIM
Anonymous (ID: XHQdoKwK) United States No.512241833 >>512243192
>>512241425 (OP)
Hunter S Thompson was right about him
Anonymous (ID: koADbAlr) Canada No.512241989 >>512242655
>>512241425 (OP)
the Nixon Shock and him ending Bretton Woods destroyed the USA and gave all the power to the jews
Anonymous (ID: LleXwKmS) United States No.512242036 >>512242134 >>512242356 >>512243192 >>512246388
>>512241606
he did nothing and was framed by the kike media and kike bureaucrats, it was literally a jew coup
Anonymous (ID: mIljvNMN) Mexico No.512242134 >>512242655 >>512242674
>>512242036
Why did he try to cover it up at first then?
Anonymous (ID: gmkjrdvy) No.512242356 >>512242655 >>512242674
>>512242036
Then why does he attend it 'from time to time' if it's so 'faggy'?
>did nothing
C omitting a felony and getting a pardon for it from Ford is not 'nothing' although Watergate is by far the most wimpy political scandal of all time.

The real scandal from Nixon was him and Kissinger going behind the government's back to ruin the peace talks in Vietnam, prolonging the war for 5 years and resulting in 20,000 US troops dead only to decide to pull out in the end. Another disgusting ghoul from the Nixon era is Roger Stone, who is unfortunately still alive.
Anonymous (ID: /xQOMDc+) Canada No.512242655 >>512246388 >>512248149
>>512241989
>>512242134
>>512242356

>Washington โ€œis full of Jews,โ€ the president asserted. โ€œMost Jews are disloyal.โ€ He made exceptions for some of his top aides, such as national security adviser Henry Kissinger, his White House counsel, Leonard Garment, and one of his speechwriters, William Safire, and then added:โ€œBut, Bob, generally speaking, you canโ€™t trust the bastards. They turn on you. Am I wrong or right?โ€Haldeman agreed wholeheartedly. โ€œTheir whole orientation is against you. In this administration, anyway. And they are smart. They have the ability to do what they want to doโ€“which is to hurt us.โ€

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nixon_Jew_count
Anonymous (ID: LleXwKmS) United States No.512242674 >>512243681
>>512242134
>>512242356
he did nothing wrong libtard foreigners
Anonymous (ID: /xQOMDc+) Canada No.512243192
>>512241606
>>512241811
>>512241833
>>512242036

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ozYCAWK2hY

Nixon was framed you retard.
Anonymous (ID: CdYQ6vZt) United States No.512243319
>>512241425 (OP)
>recent
Thatโ€™s a sad commentary by itself, since his tenure was eons ago
Anonymous (ID: CdYQ6vZt) United States No.512243681
>>512242674
>snidely
I had no idea Nixon was so based. I learned something today. Thanks bros
Anonymous (ID: ohpTDmvH) United States No.512243827
he was pretty based, he even had the balls to fake a moon landing for stupid boomers, also most of /pol/tards also believe in fake moon shit
Anonymous (ID: dpVRgZR5) United States No.512245631 >>512245812
>>512241425 (OP)
Nixon was ok but he basically grifted on George Wallace. All in all a decent president which is saying something tbqh. He probably would have been cucked out of 68 if Humphrey had been 2% less of a dope.
Anonymous (ID: dpVRgZR5) United States No.512245812
>>512245631
Also if Nixon had won in 60 (which he lost by the skin if his nuts), there is about a 75% chance we would have literally annihilated USSR with a nuclear strike in 63ish and all of modern history would have been different.
Anonymous (ID: Eb/m7HCW) United States No.512245979 >>512246464 >>512246663 >>512246682
he was one of the worst ever but not for what libshits whine about
he is the guy that took the US off gold and opened up trade with China
this allowed jewish banks to print fake money and pump it into China to set up manufacturing there which destroyed the middle class of the country
Anonymous (ID: H7g0v0Te) United States No.512246388 >>512253589
>>512241493
so unfortunately right. how can they be so ugly?

>>512242036
>>512242655
he should have just leaned into everything that he said because most people would still probably agree with everything that he said
Anonymous (ID: dpVRgZR5) United States No.512246464
>>512245979
He deserves criticism for the gold thing of course but something had to be done honestly you cant have your currency getting sucked out of circulation and sitting in banks across the world. There just isnt enough.

But yes something different could have been done.
Anonymous (ID: H7g0v0Te) United States No.512246663
>>512245979
we were always going to build up in china no matter what, taking us off the gold standard allowed us to pay the chinese in dollars and not gold. we can always print more dollars, whats worse is we can convince them to take out debt in dollars to give to us just so we can hand it right back to them and call it payment, plus all the debt somehow makes our currency worth more.
Anonymous (ID: dpVRgZR5) United States No.512246682 >>512248527
>>512245979
JFK must go down as the worst.

He literally had an opportunity to make the US unilateral overlords of the globe during the one brief window we could have easily won a nuclear exchange with russia and cockblocked anyone from building a nuclear arsenal to make MAD a possibility. No civilization has ever had such unilateral power at their fingertips as the US in 63ish. And we blew it thanks to JFK. SAC was begging him. The glowies were begging him.
Anonymous (ID: Sz9PaLDC) United States No.512246965 >>512247215
>>512241425 (OP)
Nixon was the realest nigga we've had in the White House since probably Andrew Jackson. JFK was a faggot who stole 1960, and the deep state framed Nixon and took him out because one thing he actually agreed with JFK on was that the deep state needed to be brought to heel, and they couldn't have that.
Anonymous (ID: dpVRgZR5) United States No.512247215 >>512247457
>>512246965
JFK wasnt wrong about the glowies and military per se but in an insane twist they were right in this one major instance.

We should have nuked the USSR in the early sixties. They never let it go.
Anonymous (ID: xru+bBHV) Australia No.512247347
I don't understand the praise for JFK. He was Obama 1.0.

Nixon, despite the end of Bretton-Woods, was an exemplar of WASP governance. Too bad he didn't have /pol/ to wake him up faster to Jewry.
Anonymous (ID: 3nR5M1QT) Germany No.512247457 >>512247667 >>512249393
>>512247215
why would you want a nuclear war with the soviets?
Anonymous (ID: dpVRgZR5) United States No.512247667 >>512247971 >>512248583
>>512247457
Around 62-64 the US would have easily come out rather well in a full scale exchange and the US would then have unilateral nuclear supremacy aka hegemony the likes of which humanity has never seen.

Research it yourself the soviets capacity at this time was just not great enough to make an exchange costly enough to deter the US. SAC called it the "Missle Gap" and the peak was like 1964. They estimated 1-2 million US casualties and 100+ million soviet.
Anonymous (ID: rJXdBk2n) No.512247759
Nixon was a Quaker, so you know they aren't all bad.
Anonymous (ID: H7g0v0Te) United States No.512247971 >>512248274
>>512247667
if that were the plan why not just bomb them before 55 when they didn't have any bombs at all?
Anonymous (ID: AoYC9I5G) Greece No.512248091
>>512241425 (OP)
Anonymous (ID: O/oiUnui) Japan No.512248149
>>512242655
>He made exceptions for some of his top aides, such as national security adviser Henry Kissinger
Ah, Mr. Swindlestein, the wise man who is a strong friend and good advisor to king goyim, who always helps expose the evil schemes of the usury rabbi Mosheberg...
Anonymous (ID: 5fzBxaZg) United States No.512248164
>...
Anonymous (ID: dpVRgZR5) United States No.512248274
>>512247971
For the exact reason you said- there was bo real threat.

The US felt no pressure from the soviets in the early 50s. It wasnt until the late 50s that they started to warry about parity and isolated the early 60s as the last chance to stop it based on their intelligence.
Anonymous (ID: VoEx3mvZ) United States No.512248306 >>512248504
>>512241425 (OP)
He hated kikes but still gave "Israel" $2 billion dollars
Anonymous (ID: xbO+cJnw) Chile No.512248504 >>512248807
>>512248306
>Only $2B
Most antisemitic US president in history
Anonymous (ID: O/oiUnui) Japan No.512248527
>>512246682
The Soviet Union has already collapsed, so why was it necessary to "win" a nuclear war?
Anonymous (ID: 3nR5M1QT) Germany No.512248583 >>512249219 >>512251511
>>512247667
>just 1-2 million US casualties
youre mentally insane
Anonymous (ID: p6h8vPkX) United States No.512248625
>>512241425 (OP)
>if Agnew, then Nixon knew.
Anonymous (ID: VoEx3mvZ) United States No.512248807
>>512248504
>Value of $2 from 1973 to 2025
>$2 in 1973 is equivalent in purchasing power to about $14.48 today, an increase of $12.48 over 52 years. The dollar had an average inflation rate of 3.88% per year between 1973 and today, producing a cumulative price increase of 624.02%.
He gave them $14.48 billion in today dollars (subtle kek)
Anonymous (ID: dpVRgZR5) United States No.512249219
>>512248583
That's not my estimate thats the US Govt and SAC's estimate. Youre vastly overestimating their capacity in the early 60s it wasn't that impressive.

Assuming an effective first strike yeah I think it's a rational estimate.
Anonymous (ID: oISJw4Ye) No.512249393 >>512249613
>>512247457
to kill as many white people as possible, of course
Anonymous (ID: dpVRgZR5) United States No.512249613
>>512249393
It's not a question of that memeflag. It's a simple question of having hegemony over the world the likes of which no civilization could ever imagine. Having it realistically at your fingertips.

You put Caesar, Napoleon, Chungus... anyone in that chain and they slap the button without much thought.
Anonymous (ID: iIyHVIR9) United States No.512249832
>>512241425 (OP)
>A ladies man
Soviet's idea of charm is threatening to send your family to Siberia
Anonymous (ID: j6Op+csF) United States No.512250085 >>512251028
>>512241425 (OP)
He started the war on drugs, fuck Nixon.
Anonymous (ID: euJvD/+5) United States No.512251028
>>512250085
My earlies memory of the war on drugs was Nancy Reagan getting kids to swear off drugs, as well tobacco and alcohol. That had to have pissed off some people who were giving ronnie money
Anonymous (ID: m7gFmKdj) United States No.512251096
>>512241425 (OP)
im proud to say i love Dick so much
Anonymous (ID: dpVRgZR5) United States No.512251511
>>512248583
Just to flesh this out a bit. Imagine the scenario:
>US has nuclear hegemony in the 1950s. >As we approach the 1960s soviets begin developing an arsenal.
>Thermonuclear warheads begin to proliferate vastly multiplying destructive potential
>ICBMs start becoming a reality vastly multiplying delivery potential.
>US is ahead significantly in number of ICBMs thermonuclear warheads and strategic bomber fleets.
>Intel determines that the gap will be the largest in 1963ish and after then the soviets begin to establish near parity.
>It would be survivable perhaps even easily survivable with a proper first strike and appropriate civilian warning systems etc.
What would you do? I'll tell you what you'd do- you'd go to the president and explain this situation to him and try to get the point across that the button will need to be pressed. And if he says no you will try to find a way to walk him into it... now imagine
>your intel gets reports that the soviets have moved missile installations to Cuba right off of the US east coast.
>This is it, you think
>you breif thr president, you advice an immediate and strong attack on the installations resulting in escalation and enough pressure to get him to slap the big red button.
>President quibbles. He agrees something must be done. The entire going chiefs is advising him to strike.
>he is on the bubble. He authorizes the attack but backs out and pursues diplomacy.
This all happened just like Ive laid out- every bit of it. It hindsight we learned khrushchev authorized the use of naval tactical nuclear weapons if a strike on Cuba occured... you do the math.

Now a little alternate history... Nixon lost in 60 by the skin of his teeth. Let's imagine he is sitting in the room with the JCoS and SAC. They are advising him to strike Cuba... what do you think he does?
Anonymous (ID: mpAB7zdQ) United States No.512252151
>>512241425 (OP)
Yes. He was extremely based.

>these fucking jews are out to get me

I would've broken into the Watergate hotel for him. Hell I would've personally waterboarded woodward and Bernstein
Anonymous (ID: /UsvWQji) No.512252818
>>512241425 (OP)
Anonymous (ID: jPNhLoCh) Brazil No.512252879
>>512241425 (OP)
I hear he was noisier but considerably less evil then Ronald Raegan
Anonymous (ID: Y4ZRZRLZ) United States No.512253589
>>512241493
>>512246388