Thread 512281247

Why is it capitalism to dump employees on welfare
But communism for the employees to be on welfare?

>>512281247 (OP)
The can only do it because leftist fought tooth and nail for mass immigration.
They get what they deserve.

>>512281247 (OP)
replace wal-martians with ai tesla bots.
the customers too.

>>512281247 (OP)
Businesses should have to pay a tax penalty to cover the costs of employees on food stamps.

>>512281247 (OP)
Communism is what happens when oligarchs who already seized the means of production also control the government. Just ask any Russian.

>>512281247 (OP)
The fact that we as a nation don't have the self confidence to just cap individual wealth at something reasonable like 500 million speaks volumes to the American psychology.
The poorest Americans still see themselves as temporarily embarrassed multi billionaire captains of industry.
Someone needs to come up with a name for this mental disorder.

>>512282737
The amount of stock someone else owns has zero effect on you.

>>512281247 (OP)
It must be exhausting to scroll Twitter all day waiting for the next bot or e-celeb to tell you what to think.
Have you ever attempted to form your own opinion?

>>512284173
K but it actually does tho

>>512284351
>someone else's theorectical wealth makes me feel bad about myself
Someone needs to come up with a name for this mental disorder.

>>512284446
>money doesn't buy influence
K but it does though so there's that...

>>512281247 (OP)
They don't "dump employees on welfare" though. They "dump employees". The "on welfare" part is all on their communist former employees.

>>512284623
They don't have to buy influence, retarded leftist have given them everything they could ever dream of.

>>512282737
Absolute cap doesn't work as well as a relative cap
For instance the Mondragon corporation in Spain works as a coop where you buy your way in and become effectively a shareholder of the company you work for. Salaries are capped at 1:6 meaning the highest paid worker can only earn up to 6x the lowest paid

>>512284819
>not denying it
I accept your concession of total defeat

>>512281634
They can only do it because right wingers banned closed union shops for being an "unfair" practice in the Taft-Hartley act. If you and your union boys don't want the boss to hire mexicans and pajeets to undermine you, you could have just vetoed it by not letting them join the union in a closed union shop.

>>512285029
They don't need money to buy influence, you shill for them for free.

>>512285031
?? are you a retard? Leftist are the only ones frothing at the mouth supporting mass immigration.

>>512281247 (OP)
the highest paid person shouldn't make more than 500% of the lowest paid person

>>512285094
>still not denying it
How am I shilling for the rich?

>>512284976
Fair. But you take my meaning.

>>512285209
lol the capitalist class loves mass immigration because they want the reserve army of labor to be as large as possible. They occasional pander to their stupid base by having their propagandists blame the immigrants for their problems, but then do nothing to solve it and certainly never punish or try to prevent other capitalists for hiring immigrant labor. The only solution is to take control away from them as a class. If workers had control over the hiring at their own workplaces instead of private owners then, none of them would ever hire a bunch of scabs to undermine themselves, it's really that obvious.

Even shitlibs think immigrants should have full labor protections, that makes them less attractive as a reserve labor force for capital, not more.

>>512285624
Meanwhile in reality you do exactly as the capitalist say and riot in the streets for open borders for thirdies and you seethe uncontrollably when the rich are taxed on their goods made in foreign factories.

open borders
free trade

That is all leftism is and its why the rich keep getting richer and you keep getting poorer.

>>512285209
Yeah famous leftists Elon Musk, Donald Trump, Rand Paul, and farmers all love foreign labor.

>>512285864
lmao you are too fucking stupid if you can't comprehend why regressive taxation like tariffs and VAT is good for the rich and bad for the poor.

If Trumpkike and the right are so pro-worker why haven't they repealed the Taft-Hartley act yet? They control all three branches, they could do it at any time. Had you even hears about the Taft-Hartley act before I mentioned it? Have you considered why that is?

>>512286023
Are you honestly trying to claim leftists oppose infinite immigration?

>>512286130
>nooooo yo ucan't tax corpos, corporate tax is heck regrerssive!!!
AHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA
You know capitalists are not going to ahve sex with you right?

>>512286139
Why don't Trumpkike and the Republikikes punish business owners for hiring immigrant labor if they think it's bad?

>>512286210
Tariffs are not a corporate tax, you are fucking stupid.

Guess what buddy, I don't think the corporate structure and private ownership should exist at all.


Why hasn't Trumpkike repealed Taft-Hartley yet?

>>512286348
>>Tariffs are not a corporate tax, you are fucking stupid.
HAAHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAA
YOu are fuicking stupoid, you;'re right, corpos that employ domestiic employess are EXCEMPT making ity a progressive tax, wheras corporate tax increasing the cost of domestically produced gods making corporate tax a regressive tax

You are so caught up sucking off capitalists you can't even think straight

>>512286348
What do you do for work and what do you suppose your role will be after we abolish private property?
How much did OP's twitter screencap influence your feelings about this topic? Do you believe OP is going to come back and discuss this with you?

>>512286512
Oh look, it's the "what do you do for work" guy who is on at all hours of the day in every work-related thread to defend capitalism from the evil socialist trannies. What do YOU do for work faggot? whatever it is it gives you lots of time to post.

>>512286485
You don't know what regressive/progressive taxation is and why a flat tax on consumption will always be regressive. Do you support a flat income tax rate (or its abolishment)? Trumpkike wants to replace the income tax with tariffs.

Why hasn't Trumpike repealed Taft-Hartley?

>>512281247 (OP)
Who cares just deport the foreigners and the welfare system could possibly survive.

>>512282619
Sounds similar to capitalism. The reality is both are are set up to fuck the peasant and serve the masters.

>>512287038
tarriff s are not a flat tax dummy, corporate tax is

>>512287038
>I'm being gangstalked!
Who do you think is behind this? What makes you so dangerous to "them"?
>What do YOU do for work
My brother and I own a small business, through re-investing and automation it doesn't require that much time these days though and within the next 10 years my income from other investments should be adequate that I'll just live off of that.
>whatever it is it gives you lots of time to post.
It's not so much about what I do for work right now, it's the result of making good life choices, saving, investing, and living within my means that gives me leisure time today.
Anyway, I'll take it you do not have a job, so tell, how much did what you see on social media influence your decision to give up on life? What will your role be once we abolish private property?

I think social media is just bots and marketers talking to each other
and of course taxpayer funded glowies

>>512288379
My family that trusted Jews and had 15 million stolen from great grandfather's trust... My family has learned nothing from this and burns money at an alarming speed because they have never had to work a job since delivering newspapers as a child for silver currency. I just have to watch this happen, very depressed.