Thread 512287212

What are pols thoughts on false rape accusations?

SLANDER IS AGAINST THE LAW

>>512287212 (OP)
Yes, and throw the key away. Undesirables not welcomed in society.

>>512287212 (OP)
>What are pols thoughts on false rape accusations?
It's pretty fucked up, you can go to jail for just looking at a woman these days.

>>512287212 (OP)
I think women should be allowed to do as they please in any situation in any place
For example: women hate men, cool. Building catches fire and needs rescuing "USE YOUR INDEPENDENCE TO FLY DOWN OUT OF THE 12TH STORY MA'AM! AT YOUR OWN CONVENIENCE AND OF COURSE THIS IS A SUGGESTION AND I AM OPEN TO HEAR WHAT YOU THINK I SHOULD DO!"

>>512287212 (OP)
That's already the law. The problem is that you need to proof that she lied, which is nigh impossible to obtain unless she admits to it out of sheer stupidity.

>>512287575
Imagine the post nut clarity after something is extreme/illegal

>>512287212 (OP)
Yes, in a society where rape is a serious crime that could hold you behind bars for decades no leeway should be given for false accusations

>>512287212 (OP)
Women who are raped should be considered adulteresses who are stoned to death along with their rapists.
This solves the problem.

>>512287212 (OP)
>What are pols thoughts on false rape accusations?
There should be some kind of punishment, yes.
Prison? Eh.
Women are status driven.
Something that hurts their status would be more effective than locking them up in a box and feeding them 3X a day.
Pillory and public mockery with free rotten fruit and vegetables to throw at them.
Flogging.
Possibly branding them someplace prominent they can't easily hide for attempting to get an innocent man condemned to prison and destroying his life.
Hurt their status. For life.

>>512288961
Unless you're a refugee

>>512287212 (OP)
No, because punishing women for this (which is extremely rare, like one in 2 million) discourages real victims from speaking out.

>>512289469
No. False.

We can construct a law that puts women who are proven, to a criminal standard, to have purooselfully lied with the intention of harming a man or his reputation. It doesnt just mean a woman goes to jail if the man is not convicted.

>>512287212 (OP)
they should be raped, to make honest women out of them
>>512289469
a fucking leaf

>>512287212 (OP)
I would say men shouldn't get convicted without evidence. And an accusation is not evidence.
Also: bait.

>>512287212 (OP)
You should be able to actually rape them since they already said you did

>>512287212 (OP)
No, they should be raped in the courtroom in front of everyone. Let the stenographer figure that shit out.

>>512294239
Motherfucking court artists can make that shit a watercolor with the whores' tears.

>>512287212 (OP)
jail? no.
>sterilised
>zipper tits

>>512287212 (OP)
If we assume that all crimes are punished according to the severity of the crime, then lying about a crime has the potential to cause as much harm as the crime itself and should therefore be punishable accordingly.

>>512294364
I like the way you think.

>>512287362
>SLANDER IS AGAINST THE LAW
In the USA it is considered a Civil matter, so the best you can do is get monetary compensation for slander or libel.
Technically, you can try to have someone prosecuted for false criminal accusations, since that is a crime, as is perjury if they testify falsely in court, but that would mean you would be essentially also accusing the prosecutor of admitting false evidence in court, so it is hard to get cases like this in front of a jury unless you can afford to pay a well respected lawyer to press the issue.
The US State i live in used to have “Criminal Libel” as a prosecutable offense, but while it is still listed in the State legal Code, there is a note that due to a US Supreme Court Case, the charge is no longer considered Constitutionally legal.

>>512287212 (OP)
You're murdering my reputation with that false rape accusation so you should do time equal to murder

>>512296076
Didn't they fleece alex jones for the things he said a while ago?

>>512296451
It was a civil matter. In the US there is criminal court, where you get a jury a, and civil court that is only handled by a judge

>>512287212 (OP)
False rape allegations should be punished by the maximum potential sentence the victim might have received.

>>512287212 (OP)
It opens the door for “you better win your case or you go to jail”. I don’t think women should go to jail for “false accusations” unless it can be proved without a reasonable doubt.

>muh white knight
Giving an honest opinion of what keeps civility in a white ethnostate desu (i typed desu)

>>512287212 (OP)
you need lower resolution
it's too sharp

>>512287212 (OP)
women should be executed for enslaving men with child support payments after kidnapping their children

>>512296727
as it says in the Bible

>>512287212 (OP)
They should be forced to pay 100% of the defendant's legal expenses, regardless of how big those expenses are. This will encourage innocent men who are falsely accused to hire the best lawyer available, since they ultimately won't have to pay a penny.

>>512291954
>We can construct a law that puts women who are proven, to a criminal standard, to have purooselfully lied with the intention of harming a man or his reputation.
for example, if they can be shown to have materially gained by lying about having been raped, for example with getting child custody, child support, the material benefits of a restraining order against your husband like a free house to live in and free phone service, then it will be easy to prove that they committed fraud. in fact, this law already exists, it just isnt used because this God forsaken fuckhole is beyond disgusting and must burn

>>512287212 (OP)
No. But double-jeopardy should apply, even without a conviction.
All fields for this low-quality thread.