Thread 512299849

>2024: No Nick Fuentes is cringe and gay

>2025: Nick Fuentes is the greatest political figure of our time

Why are so many political E-celebs always glowies?

>>512299849 (OP)
The better question is why so many so-called nationalists are brown?

>>512299925
>The better question is why so many so-called nationalists are brown?
"White nationalist" at that kek

>>512299925
He's unironically the highest quality thinker we have over here so he gets a pass.

>>512299849 (OP)
>>2024: No Nick Fuentes is cringe and gay
>>2025: Nick Fuentes is the greatest political figure of our time

that isnt what he said.

he then goes on to explain why he had the change in opinion at great length.

>>512300065
It's totally believable that she Badenoch, isn't insulted by having to confirm her British identity over Nigerian. It's totally Lilley she's not slow betting until she gets to power and reigns with vengence.

>>512300431
Stfu. This is the same man who complains about all the woke politics yet engaged with woke political shit like "Tucker vs Fuentes" cringe.

>>512300111
>He's unironically the highest quality thinker we have over here so he gets a pass.
Have you paid your subscription and bought your course yet?

>>512299849 (OP)
Normal people change their opinions when presented with evidence. Glowniggers (or glowies as you glowniggers like to type so that you don't have to say "nigger" in front of your nigger CO). Keep repeating the same bullshit even after that bullshit has been refuted one thousand times. Gradually, you'll notice, and begin to hate them.

>>512300817
>Normal people change their opinions when presented with evidence
So Tucker Carlson isn't a glowie?

Manufactured celebrities and pundits serve to obfuscate truth by controlling narratives. They break things down into false dichotomies in the hopes that people will accept them as truth and argue for or against them while effectively keeping the truth in the dark. Trump/Epstein is a perfect example of this; either Trump fucked children or the democrats are lying about Trump fucking children and there is NO third possibility.

>>512300737
make sure you never improve your self, and remember everyone owes you their labor as well

you dumb commie potato nigger

>>512300817
>Normal people change their opinions when presented with evidence.
Except AA bans critical comments because "trolling".

>>512299849 (OP)
>changing your mind is evil

i liked his videos on how woke was dying a year or two back, totally called it.

but i hate nig fuentes so i cant agree with that

>get out
bit rude tbqhwy

>>512300065
Nobody wants to believe it, but blacks are the biggest losers in migration waves. Think about the geographic placement pressures on urban centers.

>>512299849 (OP)
AA is based

>>512301159
He banned you for being j*wish. The worst part is that this process has not yet been automated.

>>512301427
>Anyone who disagrees with AA must be a Jew!
Imagine defending a non-white person with such a non-argument.

>>512299849 (OP)
>Listening to Pakidemic Agent to begin with.

>>512299849 (OP)
Dr Neema Parvini doesn't understand how online bots work despite his book "the populist delusion". Third party actors can and will jump on trends or push
campaigns without the target necessary knowing about it. Laura Loomer might not know that Israelis bot her account despite it being highly likely.

There is a technique where you use pop culture phenomenons to prime your bots by slop posting to get some organic engagement before you then retool it for the campaign. The krassensteins ran justin bieber fan sites for that. So botters might have tried to farm the bots up with organic likes or followers by pretending to be groypers, as groypers are hyper engaged and networked.

t.retired social media botter

>>512301592
>white people aren't white when j*ws say they aren't
What?

Honestly, if he wasn't white and still banned j*ws, that would be equally as based. It's just good sense, really.

>>512301699
Look at the post above:
>Dr Neema Parvini
Is that a white name?

>>512301247
>changing your mind is evil
There's no solid reason as to why he went from ignoring Nick Fuentes to worshipping him. If AA was genuine he would have always been on neutral terms with Nick Fuentes. Instead, he went to extreme opposites. Anyone with half a brain can see people like Tucker Carlson and nigger Owens are just mainstream. So why is the academic agent now exaggerating and saying that one of Nick Fuentes' streams was "the best political stream" ever when in reality it was just an analysis of a famous public figure?

>>512301683
It's hard to believe so many people have fallen for it even after having it explained to them.

>>512301926
AA has been retweeting Fuentes since before the election. If you watched him, you would notice the change of opinion, but since you don't, only the end result is obvious to you.

Fuentes' Tucker stream was quite an impressive takedown I would expect from some longform video essay one year in the making, not some off-the-cuff rant with less than 24 hours preparation

>>512299849 (OP)
It's glownigger, you dumbass shills can't even say nigger lmao

>>512302384
>If you watched him, you would notice the change of opinion
He's full of shit. Once I realised how wrong he was about Israel he lost all credibility. He claimed Israel was in big trouble with all the proxies surrounding them. One year later Israel was bunker bombing Iran in a humiliation ritual.