Thread 512321850

What will the implications be on politics and culture overall with this in mind?
By tech, I also mean gene editing as will as hardware augmentations. And other possible elements that I may not be considering

>>512321850 (OP)
Technology makes the average mouthbreather obsolete and in the not so distant future the earth is populated by a couple million jews supported by AI while all the useless eaters get genocided by goyslop, wars, vaccines and psyop brainwashing to make them stop reproducing and make them an hero faster.

>>512321850 (OP)
>how far will humans take technology in the future?

Sky's the limit.

>What will the implications be on politics and culture overall with this in mind?

Politics and culture:
This depends entirely on how advanced humanity becomes. This will sound silly to you, but, in order to increase the odds that humans get there, we must first start with a top down "optimum condition". What do you consider "victory for all mankind"?

>>512322228
Honestly, I’m not sure. I guess it’s highly dependent on who the leading culture is?

Be not afraid, Universe seed. Look, we both have eyes for seeing, brains for thinking, and limbs for locomotion, I am you and you are me.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TvNEUhBNVpU

>>512321850 (OP)
humans and technology will be indistinguishable.
from the breaking of the turing test. and everyone getting fooled or paranoid over bots.
to this gene editing, brain implants and such.
humans are technology.
and we will say "god works through all of us"
but that will be a lie.

>>512321850 (OP)

Huh? Run a viability test first. Will extrapolate from the data. Think conceptually we got some good stuff to start with ... :)

>>512322414
Alright. Let's try the bland template of The Kardashev Scale. Type Six. Outside of space and time, you have a civilization of what you can only assume are eternals, they sit around a holodeck and watch this very conversation occur between me and you, they aid us in the quest for ascension, precisely like God. Now, past a certain point, is there a difference? Your body is made of 300 trillion cells. All of them working in tandem to formulate what you call your life. Yet they act as one. This society must have a hivemind. So there. Victory condition. You become God.

>>512321850 (OP)
You must refute technology as it makes you weak and stupid.

>>512323000
Checked

>>512322414
And from there you work your way down. Backwards. A literal "Jacob's Ladder". A lifeline. Like a rope. Reverse engineered paradise.
https://youtu.be/ARrUGH2u_Uo

>>512323000
youre just talking about the primacy of collctive consvious over the nuace of its atomized parts.
the ends justify the means.
but the means have to be tailored to each unique path everyone takes to get there

>>512323000

First things first. :p

>"Nobody really knows who built these rings ..."

Höhöhöhö ... ^^

They won't ever stop because technology = control

>>512323254
Precisely, however the primacy of collective consciousness must be able to observe the vision to reach it. Like a light that shines from every angle. Would you reach your hand towards the sun if it were not there? Everyone sees it differently, and yet everyone sees it. That. is the genius of it all. Simplicity.
https://youtu.be/U7RYSQvrUrc

>>512323468

Category error ...

>>512323651
the collective conscious is dumb and blind. it sees nothing, it knows nothing. easily manipulated by emotional messages. very easy to breakdown.
the collective conscious feels.
it feels nothing until it is burned by the sun.
it must be led to it. at which point its not a collective conscious but a one eyed king leading the blind

>>512321850 (OP)
Stagnation is already close.
The massive reduction in white people among academia already led to an impressive corruption of it, with the *majority* of paper being utter bullshit using statistical trickery to shit results from nothing and keep the grant train rolling.
At some point actual progress will be completely drowned.

And that's without considering that we might be close to the end of science.
Yes, I know that was what Newton's contemporaries claimed and they were fucking wrong, doesn't change the fact that the universe won't have an infinite Matryoshka of "actually, if you look harder it's completely different".
Us being only one or two steps away from the terminus of Science might also explain the Fermi paradox, maybe we don't see cool galactic FtL space civilizations simply because the universe is lame and doesn't allow it, no matter if you have 500 IQ and spent a few billions years trying to get the most basic colony ship to work for anything but very, very nearby stars.

>>512324297
Even the blind can feel the warmth of sunlight. Even the dumb can understand it's fury.
https://youtu.be/plgg9sSLRvQ

>>512324455

Just a badly contained plasma.

>>512321850 (OP)
What future? Trump deployed nuclear subs over a tweet. IF you don't see that we are beyond cooked you haven't been paying attention.

>>512324455
alreaady you have lost your self to metaphor. living in apataphoric life. plans within plans.
how do you think the collective conscious can stay focused for that long without everyone falling into their own personal narritive filled with subjectic semiotics?
Yes the blind and dumb can feel. its what I established.
what im saying is that that there is nothing greater than the influence of one person over a group.

in the end. people are tools, not masters of them.

>>512321850 (OP)
I pray I live to see the angels of death descend upon this hedonistic dystopia