Thread 512337767

We don't do European type stuff specifically because of non American people's trying to come to the US. If they came here for in part medical care we'd have systems with similar issues to the countries they come from where there's consistently about 1 third as much medical equipment and 1 half as many doctors. Whenever people say why don't we into some European shit it's because latin people are poorer and not as educated or intelligent to some extent either. Our privatized system allows people who can afford the extra expenses the freedom to make those PURCHASES of medical SERVICES and PRODUCTS. So yeah.

Also though because we have emergency services that respond to homelessness issues it literally costs us money not to have housing first programs. About 17k dollars per person per year.

Medical services can be made more efficient through the utilization of AI because personnel need less training, work fewer hours, and patients use it to self diagnose and avoid wasting practitioner time.

Finally though it is against the real spirit of rights and freedoms for people to hold patent laws over the heads of society. In the modern world with millions of phd holders and researchers, the idea that multiple people wouldn't independently develop something of the course of their own studies proves a logical fallibility in applying the old time frames of the 19th century to patents. It'd only make sense to limit how much money by some system of probably a maximum of the % of revenue the per unit cost and the total amount of money a person or legal entity can charge based on owning IP, and even then the time limits and proof that someone couldn't replicate the IP are what's more dubious. What we've created makes monopolism more than encouraging research.

Less related to this, we have billions of dollars of grocery waste every day in America. If we got a little extra supply chain slack and gave an extra day for products, then reverse stock them and use like dairy to likely make some cheese products and meats to make some canned fortified lard, we could ship all of it to developing economies that lack good nutrition sources and spur them meritocratically. You just make like one processing facility for every 10 big chain groceries and pay a mark down for the otherwise most likely wasted foods. Maybe means the stores have a few extra stocker and picker jobs. Plus you can sell unsold dry goods in bulk at mark downs too. It's worth enough to pay the shipping cross continent or just to sell the products in bargain and surplus stores in places with expensive food. Then telling farmers they can still break even off overproducing means we don't feed the world, more importantly we give them nutrition so they have the ability to help themselves. But of course this isn't charity. It's a business. For working adults.

In the final debate between capitalism and communism there won't be any preparatory tasks incompleted. What remains some is intellect but I doubt anyone can surmise some justification to only have people who are more intelligent. There's a large reverse Flynn effect in the debates generated just by all the pondering and questions of society so the idea that groups will go back to healthy birth rates before a lot of debating is uh. Stupid. After that in terms of things it would be more about privileges and responsibility to offer people nice things. Trying to get ahead of maybe comments about being all over the political spectrum.

All I know is that overproducing now means we can amplify productivity and progress in other areas of the world so that people accelerate to having their sustainable and egalitarian or comfy etc not so unequal everything. If you plot it all out at least 50 years even it's worth the investment any metric you use unless you do plan on just stoking genocides. Which still the Palestinians should move just because Israelis can do more with that area for the mena area including keeping them in check militarily. Either the US or China would do another Gulf war. They fucking would. Don't fucking doubt that they fucking would. Don't fucking make them fucking do that.

I guess you could argue that housing the homeless might lead to them having kids. Idk you could be mean and say it's only for some older homeless people. Or disabled ones?

On the idea of birth rates, I mean women don't still really run the world because they're not disagreeable and think of things as you know like conflicts, fights, engagements. So toxic masculinity it's more like what honestly are the techniques that represent truth? Well. They're pretty involved and mid high level kinds of things conceptually and in practice and execution. So it's kind of all neck beard ninja shit. In truth. It's like that. And people debate about it but you can't get around the fact that you have to grapple with really negative things to get to those stages. So I feel like that's as other people have said they don't trust me the right the open minded the out spoken the shit poster troll etc. you shouldn't. But I'm still not going to hurt anyone. More than emotionally.

I don't know how to break the attitude that it's all bad without laying out the expectation that things certainly won't get better without managed conflict. Controlled practice sometimes even of chaos.

If I were to point culturally after the debate earlier in the day on this topic... We should have a culture of understanding meaning primarily you admit plainly what you do not know, and on top of that a culture of shame less as in defeatism of the self but more like just jolly embarrassment. Like a person that's amused to find they can't handle something. And laughs about it. In a still reasonably worried about it way.

That set of expectations is fair and balanced enough that if anyone has a problem with it it would make sense to nut check them over it. I don't think anyone would think ill of you for it really.

Still surprised no one with a PhD ever feels like trying to heckle. As if admitting for all their practice they can't even do simple karate still. Maybe they're all spineless. You don't need to dox yourself.

They call them exhibitions at least. Or are you afraid of collateral?

Still caught up trying to monetize something?

You can hide from people maybe I guess. Anything that would get rid of them will end your chances at forever. Which are only potentially genetic. Idk what's confusing about this? You can speak while you're alive or forever be silent. Why's it that no one serious is engaging? Is it really over your level? To do any of it sans a name?

Just ending tired and simple debates.

Your problem is that you're choosing to only do actual pvp to begin with. It's immature. You live by the sword...

This is pv e veryone

Which you only do to figure out e verything. Cooperatition. It's all anyone actually has the time or sanity for right now. Both of which are slipping away. Quickly.

Idk. I suppose people would eventually think of this change in perspective as raising an army. Because if you solve these problems people would respond to something etc about the person that struck that into form. So maybe it's that people are skeptical I really mean it as just exhibition.

Might be that I'm known to lie all the time.

So that is the question though. Can you rule the world and be a part of it? Being a part is too limiting. Or too stressful. So no. In a very real and fundamental sense you cannot deign to be a part of the world and also functionally rule it. What does it take to rule something? Understand and influence it. Why would you command the world? I can only think of immature things. You can trust if these statements are lies then I'm just a fool. They're facts.

Anyone that ever tried in the past they simply weren't loud enough to reach the whole thing anyway. Someone said I came I saw I conquered and still 9 in 10 never heard that statement.

Anyone that believes in empire either does so in appreciation of order and necessities or they're a gaffe.

But you'd miss that even the uniform is silly. Says I'm domineering. Says pvp

Even if the uniform is money.

Sounds odd but the uniform that works is actually just volume.

Ridiculously loud. So ridiculously loud that other people keep up side conversations only to palliate the children.

Loud just means memorable. Obnoxious is something everyone wants to forget.

But how many people aren't obnoxious? Hmmm.

So you have to I mean you couldn't do anything effectual to stop people consistently from being obnoxious. But you also do have to make them aware of it at boundaries.

I can't think of anything better than minced biscuit.

We could feed a town with that much ego.

Admittedly it's like original coke recipe.

And there's pizza girl.

Then performative tranche.

Hmmm. So what's my point? Yes things are about lifting weights. You pick them up being people who are down, and put them down being people that think anything but you just picking them up is the point.

Except with obnoxious people. You have to... What? Exactly.

But who do you how do you decide who?

And how to do that too? That's an infinite topic.

>>512345853
>>512342088
Yeah it's centrally this. Preventatively.

Then outliers have to do with people who miss apprehend power. So that's other of these. More points to that stuff.

How do you explain this to a kid who just thinks the obvious... That this is weird.

They would probably think the same if you explained sex or taxes to them. The government prints the money, why would they ask for it back from you? I'm kidding. What's specific to the weirdness of this?