Thread 512364693

Pray, is there a precise rationale as to why gentlemen oft express revulsion toward a lady’s numerous past romantic engagements?

Greetings, my dear subjects. The inquiry lies plainly before us. I recently found myself engaged in spirited discourse with a colleague regarding the matter of promiscuity in women and the manner in which it is oft regarded as unappealing by men. Though I am aware the notion may appear crude to some, I confess I was unable to offer her a defence beyond the sentiment that it simply felt distasteful.

It is, I believe, a common reaction among men, this quiet aversion to a partner's excessive prior entanglements. Yet I wonder whether there exists any scholarly or biological reasoning that might illuminate this instinct. My modest attempts at research yielded only opinionated writings and breathless appeals urging me to reconsider what they present as progressive behaviour.

Thus, I remain genuinely curious whether this repulsion is rooted in anything more substantial than tradition or emotion.

>>512364693 (OP)
Because women lose the ability to perceive love and affection for their partners the more partners women have.

>>512364898
>Because women lose the ability to perceive love and affection for their partners the more partners women have.
It's worse than that.
They can only love their first.

Brown hands made this AI slop

>>512364693 (OP)
The uterus contains samples of the DNA of every single man who has ejaculated into it. Article was published recently, might still be up if feminazis haven't censored it.

>>512364693 (OP)
marriage success rates fall like gravity pulls down a rock, as the amount of previous partners a woman has increases. It's a fact as real as frogs are amphibious and birds fly, the more dongs she takes, the worse wife she makes.
Modern society? All about encouraging and freeing women to be whores. Marriage rates and success rates? Plummeting. Simple tf as.

Meanwhile the latest Jews with a humanities degree, all waving their greenlit dissertations approved by other Jews the same, all try to pilpul and say it's purely economics or space beams while Jupiter is in retrograde.
Can't wait to get back to what ancient people already knew without knowing the finer details. Women aren't meant to be allowed to be whores. It doesn't work.

>>512364693 (OP)
>be man
>want safe and cozy life with many kids
>it's biological urge
>meet women
>she signals that she doesn't like safety, coziness or kids.
>gross...

Simple as.

>YOU SHOULDN'T WANT SAFTEY AS A MALE!!!
Lol, someone didn't have a father and lost 20 IQ points as a result.

>>512364693 (OP)
You write like a pompous ass. As for your question, the more partners a woman has the less likely she remains capable of pair bonding.

>>512364693 (OP)
>1pbtid

>>512364693 (OP)
THE FOUNDATION OF MY NEXT GENERATION WILL NOT STAND ON THE CORNERSTONE OF A FUCKING WHORE

>>512365619
>meet women
>she signals that she doesn't like safety, coziness or kids.
these women literally only exist over the internet
95% of women want to have kids
just stop being gay and get off the internet

INCEL thread!!!!!

>>512364693 (OP)
Picking a sloot to be the mother of your children is a really really bad idea (politically).

>>512364693 (OP)
Highly esteemed gentleman, thank you for bringing this matter to our attention. It is my hypothesis that this pertains to anxiety regarding paternity. With a promiscuous woman, the man can not be sure about the DNA of the children. The woman on the other hand, is always the biological mother of the children she gives birth to