>>512367909
JK Rowling is poking fun at the fact that her husband couldn't recognize a Shakespeare quote (King Lear), and thought it was literally from her books.
>>512368619
Okay so sheโs playing risk with her son, and then her son takes Asia, and then she asks her husband who said this quote, and her husband didnโt know it was shakespear?
I still donโt understand. Is she making fun of her husband not knowing Shakespeare or what is the point of that tweet?
>>512369014 >Is she making fun of her husband not knowing Shakespeare or what is the point of that tweet?
I literally just explained exactly this in my previous post.
Her tweet is not fucking difficult to understand. Jesus Christ. Read it again or something. Do I need to hold your hand too?
>>512369857
It's not a random quote. It's one of the most famous lines from one of the most famous plays. It's something any educated Englishman older than a Millennial would know. It's on the same level as "This royal throne of kings". But more importantly, the joke is that Neil literally thinks it's from her book, which is sort of flattering but horrifying at the same time.
So her crusade is " we can't risk having a generation of chemically infertile sex freaks"
Yet that's exactly what modern women are and she's a feminist who supports it. I'm just gonna side with whoever beats women's skulls, whether trannyfag on the field or rapefugee on the street.
>>512365864 (OP)
Kek this is actually hilarious! She's trying to flex and he isn't even paying attention. Who said this? I don't know is it one of your dumb things? Imagine having to live with some bitch whose actual entire life is Harry Potter. Literally kill me
>>512371354
You can see the contempt and disrespect Rowling has for her own husband. Trannies are less than 1% of the population. Women are half and a good portion of that is compromised of man-hating feminists. Trannies didn't destroy society, feminists did. Trannies don't hate men, feminists do. You are a simp or vagina-haver.