>>512411185
That is a fucked chart.
You niggers post a half encrypted picture like that and insult the genuinely powerful tool you made.
Your chart, If I am understanding correctly (it's just buzzwords and arrows with minimal context) is "stuck in time" as it never reconsiders "cognition" (the natural state you want to solve?) instead it just spins itself into it's own little gilded cage of autism. It's not going to find anything new, it's just going to keep being a retard spamming benchmarks around a local maximum (like most humans desu)
You claim that the machine does the job of three humans, (the researcher, engineer, and analyst) but really, humans are just so FUCKING LAZY that your retard bot will produce federal level results and you won't notice that microshitter just charged you for 4 experts worth of work while you reinvent the wheel, but instead of having an intern do this and maybe learn something every summer, you are going to have a bot run 10,000 summers a week and convince itself that if it runs another 10 million a week it might cure cancer. (It can't, you knew after the first three interns back in 1997, who themselves were brute forcing the theory from 1963, which was drawn as an iso standard in committee based on research from a genuinely mentally ill man from 1903)
If you were smart, (you aren't) you would rig the bot to read the 1903 research notes and 1963 standard and replace various words at random until drastically different meanings with plausible matches to reality existed. Then explore what variables you are missing in these "theoretical models of reality" thereby validating and exploring truly uncharted realms of science with a tool that genuinely can.
Instead you are going to make the mechanical intern and spin up 10,000 jeetcores to crunch jeetmath and discover... "wow this model is o.k" or "OMG MAGIC MACHINE IS CHEATING!"
When you could actually learn wtf is going on if you just asked properly.
>tldr: you are a faggot.
