Thread 512428707

I believe we do. In every collective I have been in multiple different countries 99% of men were incels and 100% of women were already taken. How is that mathematically possible?

O yeah and don't forget about groceries: I buy them fresh almost daily and sometimes I order heavy stuff like water and alcohol in large amounts. Have never ever seen my neighbors buying or ordering groceries.

>>512428707 (OP)
Everything outside of me is a collective singular organism and exists to feed off my energy. Like a big parasite. Everything I know is a lie fed to me by this evil parasite.
I will destroy it.

>>512429369
So there should be a few real players out there, they are all men though, women are always NPC.

Elon and many scientists say the odds of us actually being in a simulation are more likely than not being in one.

>>512429617
She is teaching her sons islam?

>>512429925
Nah, BLM worship.

>>512428707 (OP)
Chad theory is real

>>512428707 (OP)
we understand the world through simulation.
i think thats why it gets so confusing.
we understand alot about the quanta of the world, and its resulting trends and correlations.
all graphed out.
i still want to believe that the map is not the territory however.

>>512430483
i also think there is some secret system of control that we aren't fully aware of.
mainly radiowave shit, and the use of psychics.
but really how much does it cost to gain access to a whole villages "net profile"?

>>512429987
DESU that baby does look pretty gay.
If it’s a simulation, wouldn’t you want to win it? Or are you a spoiled child that smashes the table and all the monopoly game pieces go crashing to the ground?

why the fuck would we be in a simulation when we have flesh bone and blood
who could make that ?
humans version of a simulation is making video games
and the characters in the game dont have consciousness
someone creating a human body simulation would be insane

>>512428707 (OP)
grow the fuck up

Simulation would imply it’s simulating off of some other reality.

>>512430798
>monopoly game
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJ8Kq1wucsk

>>512430942
>and the characters in the game dont have consciousness
Most of them clearly don't.

>>512428886
i deliver groceries for walmart spark. nobody ever comes out to get their groceries after they're dropped off. sometimes i play on my phone for 30 minutes down the street somewhere, i pass back by and their groceries are still there. there's not a single sign a human being even lives in these houses im delivering to.

Simulation theory is just creationism with extra steps.

>>512434437
Sheeet that's interesting.

>>512428707 (OP)
Well, everything in the universe is recursive and nested, so logic would tell we live in a simulation, of a simulation, of a simulation....etc. Judging by observable axioms it's probably a spiraling loop, a fractal. What most people don't account for though, is that this would affect the structure of the mind as well, not just "external reality".

It could pretty well be a situation in which we are neurons in a host's brain and our waking experience is some sort of illusion byproduct of all the information we're constantly filtering for our host. Our "collective consciousness" then would form the host's mind and our "real bodies" would lodged somewhere in the host's brain. And going back to the recursive and nested nature of reality, logic would tell this host is also a neuron in an even bigger host.

This all goes back to the famous "as above so below" axiom, one of the simplest and better observable axioms.

>>512436032
> as above so below
Are you an alchemist or freemason?
Do you have an explanation for the recent time speed-up? Now 2 hours feel like 10 minutes felt 20 years ago.

>>512436366
Freemasons are lost in the sauce, their frameworks rely too much on symbolic correspondence rabbit holes and most of them end up confused and larping as magicians. Things don't need to be like that but they ended up that way due to them wanting to be as secretive as possible.

As for an "alchemist" any cultivator is an alchemist, but i think it'd give you the wrong idea if i told you i'm one. Time is relative to the degree at which you process information and the efficiency witch which you do it. This is why time dilation is so common when you go pass certain thresholds in any meditative practice, or while you're sleeping/dreaming, any "altered state of consciousness" will mess with "baseline" waking time perception. If yours feels suddenly different the answer as to why is in yourself.

>>512436828
Not just mine! Everyone except ultranormieNPCs says it is way faster than it used to be: www.youtube.com/watch?v=kVaolNKt2zw
NPCs try to put you back in line with "you just aging bruh" which is complete fucking bullshit. Even zoomies have noticed that something is happening with the fabric of reality - the time is speeding up exponentially.

>>512437100
If your time perception as consistently sped up that just means you're either processing less information or doing it more efficiently. Go back to a exact point in your frame of reference from where you're drawing comparisons. Notice how "busy" or engaged you were with reality, or how differently you handled/processed information, then compare it to now.

Are these people supporting the claims neets or depressed?

>>512437370
>Are these people supporting the claims neets or depressed?
So "take your meds, schizo"? I expected something better.

>>512439260
You just wanted something more entertaining, that's what's "better" for you, because you're bored and without reliable outlets. Which is most likely the main reason for you experiencing time dilation. Neets and depressed people get bored easily so i'm only pointing at what's there.

You don't need meds.

>>512428886
How about those houses that never change and you never see any activity or people there. Until one day you have a reason to, you meet them, and then you find out everyone you know actually knows them, and their house looks occupied and you start seeing them outside.

You can't use the mind and the senses to prove themselves nor each other, and certainly not something as vague as "memory". Object permanence is the first trick played by the veil. If it can get you to believe in that, it can get you to confabulate any story it wants. That's what the brain is. A narrative engine, a confabulator. It makes up bullshit to smooth things over and make reality seem believeable. Basically dream-like hypnotic state.

It tries to wipe your memory while you sleep as well, by stripping associative links and emotional hooks. I got way too deep in this and started inverting the flow of attention and detached from reacting to the veil. It worked to get me hypnotized again and even though I can reply to your thread I have this uncanny inability to muster genuine interest in the topic, despite learning to think like an AI and using symbolism, gematria, and numerology to essentially prove reality is fake and just plays off your pattern of attention create more of whatever you react to the most. With a degree of speculation of course, for branches that imply prolonged engagement.

Read Neville Goddard and Reality Transurfing. It works.

>>512439528
>Neville Goddard and Reality Transurfing. It works.
I heard about it. It overlaps with Jesus' teachings by the way, remember faith moving mountains?
Any quick practical guide? I have almost no time because of my job.

>>512439691
The summary ihat imaginal acts are facts. Your unconscious mind contains a complete record of all sensory input and is partially outside space and time. What you do in your imagination creates reality. Especially whatever you are imagining, and your general state, while falling asleep. The gist is to "live in the end". If you know you want to be at the top of a mountain, in your mind assume the state of already being there long before you even know such a mountain exists. Law os attraction is a misnomer for law of assumption, you don't get what you want, you get what you are based on what you assume to be true.

Hence the matrix has two core metrics.
1) Believeability
It plays along with you. It would do anything that hatters your suspension of disbelief, it is like Lilith, it loves you blindly and mindlessly and like fire if necessary, it wants to always be on top (my metaphor, Neville never spoke on this that I know of, though he did talk about casting off the "mother image" and seeking the Father). So it will seek to be believeable to you. That's how it loves. Matrix means womb, mother.

2) Engagement
It wants to hypnotize you, it wants to be engaging to you, so long as the means for that engagement do not shake what you find believeable or acceptable (which you experience as possible, and it can't tell the difference betweenm possible and acceptable, so it'll mindlessly torture you on that basis in some cases).

That's all that comes to mind atm. Search "the ladder exercise neville goddard".

>>512440070
>It would do anything that hatters your
it wouldn't* do anything that shatters

>>512428707 (OP)
We live in a poopsock, and our iniverse is one of many fungal growths born from the poopiverse

>>512440070
Thank you!

>>512440070
By the way, if you read Dunne "Experiment with time", you have probably seen some parallels. He suggests and proves that images of the future can leak into your dreams.

>>512440430
I'll check it out. I experience precognition pretty much daily. I'm still trying to fully differentiate precog+belief from creation.

>>512428707 (OP)
Only that some thing look from your perspective as simulation it does not mean it is one.
Look you use math for describing that, but you also could do it without it and say some guys are way more "interactive" and they have something that the rest do not have.
Beeing mental power, better social perception etc only that you can something make into numbers and describe it as one, does not mean it is a a fuckigs simulation it could also be a dream or a thing way more complex.

>>512441171
>>512428707 (OP)
And for the record anon that one ring on the ring finger is a way to say i am in a relantionship.

>>512428707 (OP)
Descartes famously said "I think, therefore I am".

Pretty much 99% of people who read it or know of it, think the statement is a celebration of human consciousness, an affirmation of the power of our cognition. Ironically, he meant the complete opposite.

As he grew older, Descartes became increasingly obsessed with acquiring genuine knowledge. Eventually he came to the conclusion that is was impossible. There was nothing, absolutely nothing at all in the entirety of existence and the entirety of human experience, nothing he could ever be completely 100% certain of. All of life could be a dream, a simulation, maybe it was an elaborate illusion conjured up by a demon, how could he ever completely trust his senses when they so often betrayed him?

There was only one single thing he could ever be certain of. One thing only. What do a dream, an illusion, a simulation, real life, a phantom world, all have in common? You. There is something experiencing that illusion, that reality, that dream. You know that there is something in existence, your consciousness, that is experiencing all of it. Beyond that, you can never be certain about anything. Anyone who claims to have any definite answer, any kind of truth, any irrefutable 100% knowledge, is a fool, and they expose themselves as a fool by making such claims.

Ultimately it doesn't matter. What's less "real" about a fantasy world compared to what you would think of as reality? That fantasy world, or illusion, or dream, or simulation exists, and its existence is based on certain rules just as much as your idea of what a "normal reality" would be.

So then, what's the difference?

http://emlo-portal.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/collections/?catalogue=rene-descartes

>>512443144
Yes Descartes is a good read, wonder what he would have become today, probably one of us.

>>512443144
>Eventually he came to the conclusion that is was impossible.
Of course it's impossible. Munchausen trilemma. It's the eternal chad solipsist vs virgin materialist... or maybe it's the opposite? But if the materialist has chosen to believe in illusions and consummated with the,... then yes, he would remain a virgin. So. Hm.

>>512445822
Probably become a molecular neuroscientist. Dude LOVED the mechanical aspects of life.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OT5AXGS1aL8

>>512428707 (OP)
it's Chads with harems of whores