Thread 512434528

>In a hidden-camera recording, Russ Vought explains that age verification laws are just pretext to shut down porn sites.
https://theintercept.com/2024/08/16/project-2025-russ-vought-porn-ban/

>>512434528 (OP)
Why do Jews hate porn?

Yo zoomies, this is why conservatives were hated so much throughout the 80s, 90s, and 2000s, just so you know. They've always been obsessed with banning everything from video games, cartoons, porn, movies, books, etc. Remember the satanic panic and parental advisory fiasco? Do your research kids, it may save your life one day.

>>512434632
I assumed he was christian. I didnt even think he was jewish.

Porn is degenerate and soul corrupting.

i thought you guys believed porn was evil and jewish? isnt it good that it gets shut down?

I quit porn this year and I think it's been a good change. I wonder what they think this will achieve though?

>>512434800
>I wonder what they think this will achieve though?

More rapes and more suicides.

>>512434528 (OP)
Obviously. On all counts.
This guy’s a christoid psycho btw. Ultimate turbo-bureaucrat schemer.

>>512434723
I do think so, for 2 reasons
1. draining your vital fluids weakens you, and leaves you deficient in nutrients which are wasted producing new sperms. It drains your energy levels and motivation.
2. All porn corporations are jewish owned.

>>512434644
They can't do research. It's over.

>>512434644
Zoomers hate porn and sex. Girls are icky. Boys look like girls. They will welcome sharia law.

I sincerely hope that this generation can end the porn epidemic. I just wish we could do it ourselves. Honestly no children should have to grow up and be subjected to such a horrifying lifelong addiction and destruction of their soul. It needs to stop before we ruin all the coming generations. But this needs to be society’s position, because the government will abuse their power.

>>512434644
No it won't. Getting into porn and Satanism are terrible life choices.

>>512434644
so the woke people banning everything problematic and the nazi panic and trigger warnings are just crypto-conservatives that took over the progressives and want to make them look bad?

>>512434691
Extremely Christian

angry young men will riot

I think one of the things to consider here is the ability to visualize things varies from person to person. For the hordes of normies with no internal world, they need the porn because they can't imagine anything. At the other end of the spectrum are people like me. I don't really need porn. I can just imagine hot scenarios. I can think in my head, 'wouldn't it be great to be trapped in a tight space with a naked scarlet johansen and neither of us can get out as we slowly suffocate to death. And then I can auto-erotic asphyxiate to that. I don't need visuals. I create the visuals and the audio and the smells in my mind and they play out like a movie. So porn is almost a downgrade because I'm cucking myself by watching some other dude fuck a mid ukrainian refugee girl when I could be fucking Scarlet Johansen in my imaginary suffocation box.

>>512434528 (OP)
oh no! anyways

>>512434528 (OP)
only elite goyims get the goochie

>>512435052
The woke were attempting to censor anyone that might disagree with their worldview. I want bans on content that is harmful to society in general. There is no educational or even artistic value in porn and it needs to go.

>>512434644
banning porn is a matter of civilizational survival

t. 21

He is currently one of the most powerful people in the administration, along with Miller.
>>512434800
Evangelical Sharia is the goal

>>512434800
An entire generation will find out what Usenet is.

>>512434528 (OP)
The goal isn't the porn sites.

>>512434528 (OP)
Why don't they just grandfather porn "stars"? Ie if you are born less than 18 years before the end of 2025, you can't be in porn. But those who already are ie the whores that are 20-30 years old currently. They can continue as is. Basically in due time this will remove the industry. But in the meantime the whores don't have to worry about being replaced by a younger more youthful slut.

>>512435279
by your own words, you are "the woke".

>>512434528 (OP)
Jesuit wants to shut down free speech.

>>512435348
If people were sharing trvkes irl instead of over social media it'd be even more dangerous for the zionists.

>>512434632
once again, Jews are at the center of everything going to shit.

>>512435307
>He has called the Democratic Part "increasingly evil" for supporting secularism
>Vought says this as though there aren't secularist who've aligned themselves with Republicans and conveniently ignores the athiests that've supported Trump over the wokies
This guy should just take a plane to the middle east.

Russ Vought, a key figure in Project 2025 and former Trump administration official, was recorded stating that age verification laws are a deliberate strategy to restrict access to pornography, with the ultimate goal of banning it entirely. This aligns with Project 2025’s broader agenda, as outlined in its 900-page policy document, which explicitly calls for outlawing pornography, imprisoning its producers and distributors, and shutting down companies that facilitate its spread. The document also controversially equates pornography with “transgender ideology” and the “sexualization of children,” framing it as a moral and societal harm akin to illicit drugs or crime.

ConclusionThe push to ban pornography via age verification laws, as admitted by Vought, is a strategic move by Project 2025 to advance a conservative, Christian nationalist agenda. It aims to restrict personal freedoms, target marginalized groups, and expand government control under the pretext of protecting minors. While it may galvanize certain voter bases, it faces significant legal, practical, and societal hurdles, with potential unintended consequences like driving users to less regulated platforms or undermining free speech protections.

>>512435403
That's bullshit. Content matters, it isn't just about banning things and censorship if it offends my agenda. Porn mesmerizes people in a very ugly way. It's no good for society. This doesn't deprive people of a political opinion or idealogy, it guards them from sexual deviancy.
Colossians 3:5 (KJV) Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth; fornication, uncleanness, inordinate affection, evil concupiscence, and covetousness, which is idolatry:

>>512435303
Banning porn won’t raise white birth rates.
Lowering income and education levels per capita, banning female education and employment, banning birth control, lowering housing costs drastically, and deindustrializing might raise birth rates, given the data we have on the topic. And yeah, most of those things get astroturfed here 24/7, but if you’re hoping to implement them then you will have a holy war on your hands.

>>512435636
>words words words
you want to ban things that don't align with your world view and you use your kike book to justify it. you're "the woke" and a kike puppet.

>>512434632
1- Jews make porn
2- It's not about porn, it's about introducing a digital ID.

>>512435636
its literally impossible to ban, it will never happen

>>512435789
Arresting jews would fix it.

>>512435693
Porn destroys the birth rate. It leads to perversion and deviancy that ultimately ruins families, some before they even had a chance to start. It sets unrealistic expectations about sex and celebrates polygamy. It turns men into wankers and women into whores. There is no benefit to anyone but the kikes running the industry.

>>512435476
>Jews run the porn industry
>Jews destroy it
Getting rid of porn before the next generation is ruined by it is a good thing. Personally I couldn't exist in that world, I grew up on the Internet and remember when Liveleak was popular? Where were you when it was taken down? Where were you when rutracker was banned? Russians carried what little was left of the 'old' internet. The gore, the porn, the sensitive documentation, the banned literature (like DIY bomb instructions), and so on. You used to be able to find a recipe for military grade mustard gas pretty easily, now that rutracker is gone it's far less accessible.

>>512434917
>All porn corporations are jewish owned.
Even outside of the US?

>>512435817
Nigger just look at how many porn sites there are worldwide. How many share porn. How many like it. Literally impossible to stop that. They can maybe stop it from being a big business but people will always share/post for fun.

I think it would force people to use their imagination more which is beneficial. It's like a muscle and some people don't ever flex it. It's really quite baffling to me. Some people have nothing going on in their head. I guess they still function. Information goes in and normal human activity comes out but they could never come up with a new idea or visualize something they hadn't actually seen.

It's a little like the "How would you feel if you didn't eat breakfast this morning?" question. You are supposed to be able to simulate in your head, a scenario where you didn't eat breakfast, and think, about how you would be hungry if you didn't eat because that's the logical conclusion of the action of not eating food. So many people can't picture the breakfast table, they can't consider physical states they've been in previously and extrapolate how they might be in those states again under certain conditions. Conditional thinking. What-if scenarios. These are vital skills and some people NEVER flex that muscle.

>>512434528 (OP)
Based. Porn is degenerate Jewish cuckoldry.

>>512434706
4chan is a porn website

Forest Porn will back in style.

>>512435899
If it's contraband and examples are made it will greatly diminish people's willingness to post it openly. It will go underground, and that's a good thing. As it's harder to find and can lead to prosecution it will be stigmatized leading to a future where less people are exposed to it.

>>512434917
Japan has the largest porn industry in the world. Do jews control that too?

>>512435529
I agree porn is destructive but the government rarely seems interested in doing anything for the common good. It's always a cover story for something sinister and gay.

>>512436004
We can't even stop drugs which are illegal and destructive. If too many people like a thing, you can never suppress it. It will fail completely. Even china can't stop porn.

who can respect a man who lets his stomach hang out like that? he preaches about vice to distract your attention from his own degeneracy.

>>512436017
The eternal Jew is metaphorical, but most wignats don’t know how to articulate that.

>>512435279
>but muh goyciety
Jews, people who think like them and normalfags are primary problem and cause of all shit in the world, not porn, retarded puritanical faggot.

>>512436017
I doubt they run the porn industry in Japan. I can't even confirm that they control the porn industry in the USA. Grok tells me it's not true but I feel like Grok is just parrotting what it heard on reddit from some blue haired trannies who took one too many feminist classes.

>>512434632
>>512434528 (OP)
4chan is now the epicentre of idiocy

>>512435899
These porn streaming sites are not cheap to run.

>>512436017
There isn't a whole lot of jews in Japan, so no.

>>512435693
>muh liberalism
>muh moral relativism
Your time is over. Trump is re-opening the institutions, deporting the filth and removing the tranny groomers. He is beginning to cleanse society of degeneracy. The only problem is he isn't going far enough. It's people like you who caused these problems in the first place, fucking pick a moral position or you lose. Simple as.

>>512435924
No more racebait porn on /pol/. No more gay porn.

>>512434632
Jews literally created the porn industry.

>>512436076
Jewish excuses
>Why build a wall, they'll just jump it.
>Why have a law it will be broken.
You aren't Eeyore you're just afraid of losing your vice.

>>512436262
This seems like a Hegelien dialectic thing. Problem Reaction Solution.

Problem
4chan is flooded with big black cock porn
Reaction
We hate that gay shit, ban it!
Solution
Here is your porn ban

>>512435343
more like tor

>>512436332
im just looking at the numbers - more than half the internet is porn

>>512434528 (OP)
Not shit retard. They said this IN THE DOCUMENT that you all could have read before the election

>>512436386
I have witnessed firsthand how society has gone from young men just looking to score to full blown bisexual orgies in my lifetime. Porn fuels this insanity and it's time to stop.

>>512434528 (OP)
yeah just push people to the darker corners of the internet that'll go well. idiots

>>512435279
What is porn? All naked images? Or just images that are arousing? What if there are arousing images that dont depict nudity? Are fetishes porn?

>>512434632
they don't give a fuck about porn, they want to shut the internet down because boomers are dying off and younger generations don't see the holocaust as a valid excuse for them to run roughshod over the planet.

>>512436504
Orgies existed before cameras did. Dumbass

>>512436657
Why don't we remove the jew and figure it out. From Venus riding on a clam to pinups to shemale gangbangs it shouldn't be too difficult to draw a line and stick to it.

>>512436721
They belong to the dark. They need to go back to it.

>>512435037
Let's go Australia

I thought poopjeet 2025 had other motives kike's hated. What's this new lie?

>>512436776
Remove the jew? Elaborate.
Getting rid of jews doesnt flip a magic switch where women stop enjoying nudity and feminity. Or men from being horny as fuck.

>>512436969
It's the jew who will muddy the waters on this, and try to cross the line. So, what do you think porn is?

>>512434528 (OP)
They are going to shut down all sites.
Age verification means 100% verification, everywhere.
Complying means death for most sites, the end of the Internet.

>>512437293
The end of internet porn. There's still the other half of the internet where it's banned entirely.

>>512437093
Porn is an image of Muhammad, truly.

>>512436969
I've thought about this issue. I think you can't teach an old dog new tricks so a better option is to take the very young and make sure they only have limited access to information. This way none of the toxic social hysteria of the adults, is able to rub off on them. Eventually the older generations of useless degenerates will die and the new generation of citizens can take over society. They could probably start with special towns for the new generation, but they would have to be walled off from the degenerates. Even a little bit of cross-cultural contamination could ruin the experiment.

>>512435303
Porn is bad, but it's not apocalyptically bad.
>women in college
>immigrants
These are the 2 civilization destroyers.
Nothing outside of a top down well funded extermination effort by a superior military power even comes close to their destructive potential.

>>512437439
Ideas dont exist on this plane. You cant stop dreams.

>>512436969
>You said no depictions of sexual intercourse. But, in the scene there is no penetratrion I just filmed two people sweatily thrusting on each other but there was no penetration so it's nudity. Not porn.
>Sure it's a girl rubbing her vagina and moaning but her hand obscures a lot of the view and it was all fake anyways so she wasn't doing it for sexual gratification. I wasn't trying to provoke it was a valuable scene about her finding herself.

>>512434528 (OP)
That fat lard ass is virtue signaling

None of these people will ever shut down any porn site even the legal stuff

Do it or don’t because no one cares, they know you’re all lying

>>512435899
>They can maybe stop it from being a big business but people will always share/post for fun.
Yeah, that's what laws are for.
Going from 80% to 30% porn addicts is more significant than getting rid of that 30%.

Lolbergs always do this "someone will still do it so bans don't work".
But nobody claimed bans are a perfect fix, but they do reduce shit.

One way to achieve this would be to start a government program where you offer pregnant women money to give birth and give the baby up to the government. They take the baby to a secure facility off grid with no access to internet, TV, radio, nothing. The people selected to raise the babies would have to be military with special training to avoid all forms of cultural contamination. The idea is to raise a generation in a perfectly pure culture. You don't allow any of the flawed things that ruin our society, to ever enter the secure site. The kids would get a very carefully crafted fake history with all the bad parts removed. All the degenerate negative ideas stripped away. No access to blackpills or nihilistic thinkers. All of that bullshit. Religions, liars and con men.

>>512436434
And if we ban it that goes to 5%.

>>512437604
Porn uses arousing media. The most dangerous porn isnt clips of penetration. It is erotic hypnosis. Or more recently ASMR. Where do you think ASMR trend came from? People listening to sex. Is that not porn?

>>512437883
The only thing that should be allowed to survive is erotic literature. Age restricted, of course.

>>512435307
In summation ...
A fat Jewish terrorist who wants everyone to have a Digital I.D. that will be a constant and punitive record of their support for Jews and Israel.

>>512434723
He is a lying jew. It isn’t really about protecting the kids or about porn. It is about turning the world into North Korea where a handful of people decide who gets what while everyone else owns nothing and if you don’t play along, your entire life gets ruined
Then when machines can do most of the work, humanity gets cleansed

>>512438173
You want to keep Lolita? Wtf?

>>512434723
Porn is evil, but Jews are once again using both sides of an issue to promote their own interests. Introduce porn to spread degeneracy, then ban porn to introduce the panopticon.

>>512439106
It'd just be too hard to regulate.

>>512434528 (OP)
I'm pretty sure there would be other ways around like, like unironic obscenity laws. I would 100% stand behind them. Fuck porn. But this age verification BS is such a roundabout way to tackle the problem that it genuinely doesn't make any sense to me. So I can only conclude this is simply them masking their real goals behind what would otherwise be a very commendable moral campaign against a great evil. Shit's fucked.

>>512435039
Idiot. Satanism is literally just a harmless larp.

Send your money to Israel and stfu

>>512436017
It's spiritually Jewish. Doesn't matter if there are actual noses behind the cam counting money. If you're in the porn industry, you are a Jew and an enemy of mankind. It's that simple.

>>512439129
Pretty much this. If they wanted to tackle the Porn Question in not only good faith but also in an exceedingly effective way, they'd introduce obscenity laws. Problem solved overnight. So it's bizarre that the "solution" is digital ID, makes no sense whatsoever.

>>512434632
EVERY
SINGLE
FUCKING
TIME

>>512434528 (OP)
Based. Go out and touch pussy.

>>512440432
>obscenity
>confederate flag
You do realize obscenities extended beyond sex right? Then again you probably do masturbate to that flag...

>>512441102
I do. But I'm merely bringing it up as a point of reference. So I'm unsure as to what is bothering you exactly.

>>512434644
b-b-but muh small government!

Jews hate internet, they want to destroy it.

>>512441690
Not exactly.
Jews love a controlled internet where they can see whomst upvotes what.
Jews hate an open exchange of ideas.

>>512435039
Why is Russ Vought jewish then?

>>512434644
If there's anything worse than a jew, it's a devout evangelical christian woman with a ballot.

>>512437093
Porn is in the eye of the beholder. What you want is the ability to violently gang up on people because they enjoy something you think they ought not enjoy.

The right of the people to keep and bear arms exists to shoot people like you when you come 'round!

SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!

>>512437439
Anyone who talks about using force on others, should have force used to rearrange his face by those listening around him. If only we just did this one simple trick...

>>512442222
>Porn is in the eye of the beholder.
You know porn when you see it, anon.

I don't understand the mentality of people who defend porn. And it's always the same semantic games and mental gymnastics. Just eliminate the economic incentive and make websites liable for hosting pornographic content. That is all.

>>512435303
Fag

>>512434528 (OP)
we should have more porn then

>>512442345
Is this porn?

>>512434528 (OP)
just get a wife

>>512442517
I have no patience for these games, anon. You can stop pretending to be retarded now.

>>512442517
that's AI slop

>>512442345
>All it takes for retards to suddenly crave a global dictatorship taking away all their rights is go after porn
Get in the fucking Pod Goyim.

>>512434528 (OP)

wow that's antisemitic

>>512442614
Did I once said I approve of digital IDs?

>>512442577
>>512442581
How about this? Porn?

Some aislop Chad posted these, they're in the archive.

>>512442646
You are here dickriding the NWO because they dangled a carrot in front of you faggot. You don't have a soul.

>>512442674
no AI is disgusting, don't post that

Time for the terabyte HDD to fill full of the most delicious porn online. They can't stop the cooming

>>512442675
You can read through my entire posts ITT. You are simply mounting a strawman and arguing against it, and not against the actual substance of what I said.

I will be very clear: I oppose digital IDs just as vehemently as I oppose pornography. Which means that this entire shitshow is a lose/lose situation for me.

>>512442720
You a roastie mad about losing OF subs to diffusion tech? lol

>>512442736
that's the spirit

>>512434917
>1. draining your vital fluids weakens you, and leaves you deficient in nutrients which are wasted producing new sperms. It drains your energy levels and motivation.
Not really, your body is constantly producing new sperm whether you use it or not, because even in the balls sperm only has a lifespan of a couple hours.
>ruins your motivation
Speak for yourself, few things give me a clear mind to focus and get shit done than cranking one out really quick.
>2. All porn corporations are jewish owned.
Yes, mostly.

Make no missed steaks though, this isn't about banning porn, it's about getting their foot in the door to tie everything you do online to your real identity, and censor the internet.

Once boomers die, there are no generations following them that have a large enough share of the population to defend and support them. Gen x are too nhiihilistic to care, are based oldfags, or are hard libshits who don't support them because they're participating in an active genocode. less than 20% of millenials are christards, and an even smaller percentage of zoomers are christards.

These next couple years are the jews last chance to have enough support to keep getting whatever they want, and they know it. That's why they're in such a panic, trying to rush boiling the water too fast and all the frogd are noticing it.

>>512434528 (OP)
I thought Project 2025 was Q anon tier bullshit

>>512442809
Do you support the government censoring the internet so long as that censorship includes pornography?

>>512442812
OF is vanilla and it has severe limitations
the real party is at fansly

>>512442873
Of course he does, he is a strong believer!

>>512435636
>jewbook schizobabble
Chiggers are pretty much the OG woke.

>>512442873
Fucking hell, man, are you a dullard? Why are you still arguing with the same silly strawman?

>>512442926
Do you support it Pod Dweller?

Reading this thread has made me realized that the oppressed have now become the oppressors. A tale as old as time.

>>512442855
https://www.project2025.observer/en
they have a tracker of issues
it is all jews and space aliens

>>512442942
I believe I was sufficiently clear. You're clearly just looking for reasons to be mad and I'm not sure why. I have nothing more to say.

>>512442994
It's a yes or no question retard. Why is this so difficult?

>>512435834
>porn destroys the birth rate
No it doesn't women being independant of men, and being in the workforce does FAR more damage than porn ever did or could do.
>each woman working is a man who can't find a better job
>each woman in the workforce is another body worth of downward pressure on wages
>a woman who's working won't have kids because it will pause/end her career
>women who are working increase their standards for a man they would accept far beyond their actual worth

If porn ruined birth rates Africa, China, and India wouldn't be 2 fucking THIRDS of the global population.

>>512435303
Porn is banned, and then what? What do people do after?
Society only moves when we have incentive to do so, banning shit doesn’t make people want to do things

>>512434706
>anon has absolutely no vices whatsoever

>>512435834
If we ban porn then men will want to fuck their wives??? Where they’ll still use condoms and women use the pill?

>>512442926
>>512442994
Show us your real flag, jew.

>>512434528 (OP)
It's ok.

>>512436200
>>512436017
Japanese men are notoriously creepy.
Japan's low birth rate is in part due to women nor wanting to have sex with them because their first experiences are often traumatic. According to a female friend who lived and worked in Japan for a decade for some tech company.

Finding discarded Porno mags in the bushes. Blue movies hidden under yer dads bed. Wanking off to the bra section in yer moms clothing catalogue. Those were the Golden days of masturbation.

>korea has a ban on porn
>still some of the lowest birth rates in the world

>>512443060
I don't think anyone actually believes that banning porn will magically mend our broken societies. But it's a huge step in the right direction. You'd still have to tackle fundamental problems like women in the workplace, migration, housing, tax brakes for married couples, etc. The list is absolutely huge, I will agree with you on that. But to pretend that porn isn't on that list, that it isn't a problem is just a complete and utter lie.

>>512443146
UK will have wanking inspectors

>>512434644
>>512434528 (OP)

Cumbrains

>>512443207
Sounds like the perfect job for me. Instead of resisting tyranny be a part of it

Ban porn and you'll see rapes increase, you just watch and see.

>>512443129
I can tell you my nationality if you ask politely. Not sure why that matters. But I do not owe you the illusion of my 4chuds flag. If that means anything to you, you still have a lot interneting to do until you grow up.

>>512443288
>AAAAAH THERE ARE TITS ON THE INTERNET! SAVE ME DADDY GOVERNMENT!

>>512443203
So what is your plan after? Just ban more shit to control people? You’ve never managed before
People respond to incentives and positive feedback. We’re no different from dogs in that sense
Also the ban porn people aren’t thinking about getting women out of the work place, migration, lowering housing prices, tax breaks for couples
They’re just evangelicals who want to moral police

>>512443145
There's also the hypergamy problem there, and in south korea, even worse than here.
>they all work 60+ hour weeks leaving no time or energy to date or breed, after work they spend another 4+ hours glued to the bos at the bar
>they all make tue same accross the board so most of them cant find a man who can breadwin
>if they do couple up and stop working to breed they go homeless because they need 2 incomes to keep afloat

Hey if we just keep banning things, eventually people will start doing what we want right?

You can't ban anything at this point. The internet cannot be controlled

>>512439106
Yup. I have lolita at home

>>512442959
Built for BBC

>>512443333
>So what is your plan after?
I can't answer that question, it's way too broad. I'm sure we can agree on many points, but it's a silly conversation.
>Just ban more shit to control people?
I don't understand this argument at all. Isn't porn itself an instrument of control? You're essentially both giving too much power for women to wield and at the same time commodifying them while making men docile and progressively more reluctant about committing to relationships.
>People respond to incentives and positive feedback. We’re no different from dogs in that sense
If you're going full Pavlov, negative incentives worked just as fine. So again, I do not understand your point.
>Also the ban porn people aren’t thinking about getting women out of the work place, migration, lowering housing prices, tax breaks for couples
Anon, I'm not defending digital IDs, I think it's a remarkably dystopian law proposal. But I am very much against pornography and I do think you could regulate it out of existence without having to break the 1984 glass. That is all.
>They’re just evangelicals who want to moral police
I'd rather side with the silliest American evangelical than the pornographic Jew who is actively ruining mankind. And so should you. Pornography does not align with your political interests or your societal goals.

>>512443660
>The plan
>Submit to the New World Order
>And occasionally cry at them to ban things I don't like

>>512443288
>blah blah blah blah
Only jews and trolls use memflags, which are you? There is absolitely zero reason for you to out on a mask like that and expect us to treat you like a genuine, honest person

Now go suckstart a musket, faggot.

>>512443795
You're quite an unpleasant person. ITT, I've been conversational, I've engaged people sincerely, I have not once misrepresented my own personal beliefs and I haven't been rude to people.

Meanwhile, you spewed juvenile imbecilities and called me a faggot twice. So which one of us two should you be accusing of being a Jew and a troll? Being self-aware is great, anon, you really should try it.

>>512443660
There is no plan is what I’m saying, that’s why these bans are so thoughtless and they’re finding new things to ban on technicality
When understanding the choices of idealists, they don’t have well thought out plans because they think things will fall into place magically and when they don’t they’ll just lash out and double down on doing more bad shit for your freedoms
Our choices aren’t being made by intellectuals trying to make long term plans for the country, they’re idealists who work on hopium

>>512434632
jews hate porn because it prevents their goyim slave stock from reproducing, but they love porn because it keeps the otherwise overtly aggressive men placated.

Remember, (((they))) have 109 instances about how to subvert a populous, until the noticing begins and they have to fuckoff elsewhere.

>>512443959
>>512443660
What thing you also need to understand by idealists is that they’re also the best pawns

>>512443952
you glow too much

>>512443986
>that they’re also the best pawns
This guy understands.

>>512443952
>oy vey goyim you're unpleasant
What's unpleasant is you hiding behind a mask while claiming to be genuine.

Fuck you, you filthy fucking jew

>>512434528 (OP)
>preventing illegally serving minors will shut down porn
Really activates the almonds.

>>512443959
>There is no plan is what I’m saying, that’s why these bans are so thoughtless and they’re finding new things to ban on technicality
I understand what you're saying, and it reminds me of the abortion debate. "WE DID IT, WE CRIMINALISED ABORTION!!" Now what? Is there even a capable structure of childcare that is affordable and/or immediately available to young parents? Of course not, people don't typically think about these things. Nor most politicians, sadly. But that doesn't mean abortion isn't a great evil that has to be expelled from society. Same thing goes with porn, even if I do not agree with the current way they claim to want to go about it.

I like idealists because at the very least they aren't perpetually trapped by the status quo and can at the very least see a brighter, healthier future for our nations. There is no rational reason to defend pornography other than sheer entropy.

>>512444201
>no goy there's no genuine reason to defend your privacy
shut the fuck up, jew.

>>512435303
>fell this hard for the aggressive feminist and cuckservative anti porn propaganda
You're young there's still time to get out of it

>>512444201
>Abortion bad so we need to end free speech Goyim

>>512443986
Me being against mass online pornography is not the same as me wanting for digital IDs. It's pure lack of imagination that the only way to succeed in this endeavour is to root for dystopia. They may claim that they want digital IDs to fight pornography, but we all know that isn't the case. I am simply against pornography and that is all. That has been my narrow focus.

>>512444244
Free sexuality only empowers women. This has always been the case. So it is very bizarre for you to claim this as a feminist ploy.

>>512434528 (OP)
or maybe use existing law
how the fuck onlyfans and such is not pimps whoring users?

>>512444201
>>512444309
Everyone here already assumes that porn addiction is a net negative for society and porn companies are evil but personal freedom and privacy are what we value more
You just sound like you’re not happy with losing privacy but okay with it because porn bad
How about you live your own life

>>512444451
there massive demand for porn
therefore porn is good
end of story

>>512444382
Feminists wants to punish men for getting too much sexual satisfaction from porn, removing one of the few very accessible outlets for male sexuality that they've still got in the modern world without offering any alternatives whatsoever. Note how they never ever complain about the female sex workers or female sexuality.

Conservatives gets offended at the sight of sex so they want to shut it at all down because they're sensitive and they blame porn for being too "degenerate" and responsible for the fall of the west.

Both sides have been pretty good at propping up their psyops to dupe the masses completely.

>>512435529
>with the ultimate goal of banning it entirely
then go straight to it if there are reason to ban it, no need for extra step
unless it is extra step real goal

>>512443952
>and called me a faggot twice
Kill yourself faggot. Denounce the Talmud now and lose the memeflag. Seriously the point is not to give (((them))) more control over our personal lives because if you haven't noticed yet when they have control we never get it back no matter what it is. Also explain why India is filled with extreme coomers and rapists when they require VPNs there to view porn.
>>512444019
Yeah no one talks like that he's a kike obviously I should have noticed

>>512444451
I've clarified my stance on this several times. So I'm not sure why you're still claiming I'm fine with losing online privacy. I will always vehemently oppose it. I've only argued against pornography ITT because it's something that makes the Internet dumber. And it doesn't require too much imagination to think of ways to make mass pornography illegal without having to do digital ideas. Just tax them out of existence for example.

>>512444382
>>512444309
You're jewish, shut the fuck up.

>>512444637
>My stance:
>I want the government to fuck us all in the ass because there is porn on the internet

>>512434528 (OP)
They really want us subsidizing the roastgroids, don't they?
Yes, I know the real reason is noseticing. But this is definitely an added bonus for them.

>>512444637
you cannot ban the demand
because it is natural and good
your state is comically evil

>>512444571
>Denounce the Talmud
I denounce every single word of the Talmud and I denounce all followers of that false tradition.
>Seriously the point is not to give (((them))) more control over our personal
I haven't argued once for digital IDs.
>Also explain why India is filled with extreme coomers and rapists when they require VPNs there to view porn.
India isn't the only country that bans pornography. You're just picking the worst possible example, it's not the strong argument you think it is.

>>512444637
Tell that to your congressman, because when you try to explain why them banning porn at the expense of our freedom might be good you sound dismissive of people who care more about freedom. Like you’re trying to slowly manipulate people by being passive.

Sorry bud i don’t give a shit if the people who want to assault my freedom might be doing it for the right reasons. Preserving my freedom is going to be on the top of my thoughts. Have some damn self preservation for gods sake

>>512444811
>I want the government to fuck us all in the ass because there is porn on the internet so long as when they demand to see my papers they are made of paper!

>have shitty website that allows all sort of shitposting
>it's full of globohomo dissenters
>pass internet id verification law
>spam dissenter board full of porn
>demand shitty website to implement id verification
>make shitty website go under
and here it thought they just wanted to make 4chinz boring

MAGA and conservatives are controlled by jews. Why would jews allow them to shut down their own business (porn)?

>>512444838
The thing is that they do not want to ban porn. I want to ban porn. But there is no economic or political incentive at all for politicians to want to make a cashcow illegal. It is clearly an excuse for them to appear saintly while deploying more Internet mass surveillance. Again, and for the last time, I vehemently oppose digital IDs. This is final.

My only issue with your post is you somehow conflating pornography with freedom. But maybe I'm reading you uncharitably.

>>512445036
>Keeps on going with the digital ID red herring to distract from the fact that he wants the government elbow deep in his rectum

>>512445093
I've been ignoring you because you have nothing valuable at all to say other than seethe for absolutely no discernable reason. But please explain to me how in the fuck "digital IDs are a red herring", because that is a whole new level of not making any sense.

>>512434528 (OP)
>>512434632
>In a hidden-camera recording, Russ Vought inadvertently reveals that shutting down porn sites are just a pretext to have internet ID

>>512445159
>I don't care about needing to verify your age with ID because that ID is held on physical media
Total clownshow meat puppet.

>>512445219
?????????????????????????

>>512445249
Here you are arguing in favour of wank licences so long as they send you a psychical card retard.

>>512434632
If politicians can't have kids, chuds can't have porn, complete jealousy, and jealousy is for women, here they are acting like jealousy sissy women.

>>512445296
physical*

>>512434632
>>512434528 (OP)
I'm not surprised at all that he's a kike. Puritans on /pol/ keep trying to push some lie that kikes push porn. No, kikes pervert and destroy porn with intentionally shit genres. They try to corrupt your mind with mental virus tier porn. They use it as some sort of psychological weapon. They actually hate porn and severely punish porn use and masturbation. Why do you think they are so anal about cutting their cocks up. It's to discourage porn use. They hate it.

Meanwhile Whites and Asians mostly produce nice fun or just plan funny porn. In the late 90's and mid 00's there were tons of European and Australian pornsites making god tier softcore porn of hot White women just posing nude. They start off clothed and over the course of the gallery they slowly strip off, then pose nude for another bunch of pictures. And each girl would have tons of sets in her in different outfits at different locations. We never needed anything more than that, and the occasional hentai binge to admire the Japanese weirdness once in a while.

Pic related is good White porn. Start of a good set.

>>512445296
Aye, that is definitely something I said and I believe in.

>>512445375
Do you support the Online Safety Act?

inb4 you avoid that question too faggot.

>>512445036
I don’t care who you are but what you’re doing is undermining peoples values of personal agency and privacy because you care more about porn being bad
You understand how stupid it sounds when someone says “WE NEED TO PROTECT OUR FREEDOM” and then you come along and say “i agree but what they’re trying to ban is bad”

You sound more like you’re trying to undermine the very movement

>>512445351
that's correct
since jew serve the zog space aliens
they cut their foreskins off to make fapping and sex hard
since zog really hates it

>>512445408
>>512445036
We’re not in the conversation to where we’re trying to figure out how we will stop porn from ruining society
We’re in the conversation where personal agency is under attack and that’s the most important thing to worry about right now because ITS HAPPENING RIGHT NOW

Have some damn self preservation

>>512434644
This. Stopping the christian plague and its censorship of everything and reduction of civilization and culture into a fully sterilized hell is a top priority and the younger generation is finally learning this lesson. The disease of censorship, control and religion is to be fully eviscerated from civilization. It has been a great error to allow these primitives to survive the 18th century, because we all assumed that tolerance is the way to go and that they'll just live their lives the way they want to and leave us alone. This has not happened.

They are a cancer. Radical cures are necessary. Freedom above all things.

>>512434528 (OP)
Good. It’s not like it would ever be truly difficult to find. But dialing back the accessibility for the sale of youth and the average cookers well being would be a good thing.

>>512445408
You keep insisting that I'm undermining people's privacy and at this point I don't understand why. I've repeated myself sufficiently. Maybe there's some kind of miscommunication here. But I don't see how can I be any more clear on this.

As for "personal agency", I don't know what you mean by this. But if it is something like "the freedom to produce, watch and disseminate porn", as I've already said, I wholeheartedly disagree that is some kind of fundamental freedom.

>>512434632
esau gambit in action

>>512434644
It's sucks that humanity seems stuck between the moral outrage driven censoriousness of the right, or the literal fucking emotional insanity driven censoriousness of the left.

Fuck both of them.

>>512445572
This is the exact reason we no longer have guns by the way. Somebody shot up a school so then "think of the children!" and now no more guns.

>>512445579
The problem is you think you're smarter than you really are. You're a sub 80iq midwit. Thus the self rightous inflated ego.

>>512445036
>>512445159
>>512445375
Shut the fuck up jew

>>512445579
Part of freedom is understanding that you are free to make your own mistakes
Morality is understanding they were mistakes that you work to improve

>>512440091
Full retard. The "harmless larp" is their shield story they themselves heavily promote. You do realize kikes are behind satanism and use it to mentally entrap intellectual types and edgy atheists into something fucking horrifying.

>>512445638
And now you have hostile gangs roving around with mosques full of weapons going untouched, and african gangs with cars full of ak's roaming free.

>>512445579
>"the freedom to produce, watch and disseminate porn", as I've already said, I wholeheartedly disagree that is some kind of fundamental freedom.
And for that reason you are the enemy. Very simple. Christcucky and the moralfag get the rope. Go to Afghanistan if you want to live like a savage.

>>512445638
Rookie mistake, you're supposed to give out 1.5 guns per person in your country beforehand, with extra munitions for the most confrontational nationalists.

>>512445495
>We’re not in the conversation to where we’re trying to figure out how we will stop porn from ruining society
Fair enough. I'm not ignorant of what's at stake here. I just think it's extra bullshit that they're using pornography as an excuse because if they were sincerely in good faith, they wouldn't go about it in such a pathetic manner. And needless to say, I do not support the current law proposal.

>>512445720
Also true and so they are trying to ban anything even too pointy as well.

>>512445763
>sincerely in good faith
You're a jew hiding behind a memeflag(mask,) you're the last person who should be talking about good faith.
>I don't support it goy
>still goes well out of his way to defend it
You aren't fooling anyone moishe.

>>512434528 (OP)
Why does this thread discuss some random coomer's superficial thoughts about porn bad when Digital ID is the goal of every out of "muh childrens" rhetoric?

The guy could bellyflop all smut peddlers to death but instead he's quoted for "speaking the truth" behind a "hidden camera". Oh, that's deep.

>>512445670
I know how very lacking in intelligence I am, you're not hurting my ego. But that doesn't mean I'm unaware of what is right and wrong, and how evil pornography is. And I'm sure you too have your own moral causes.

The dating industry is in ruins. The only reason to ban porn is you think that fixing the symptoms will somehow drive men to become committed and desirable men that women will magically want to be with now, or you want to drive men into violent revolutionary rage due to having no outlet.

>>512445861
At a basic level your idea that if only there weren't tits on the internet the world would be saved is tedious bullshit and so you are mocked.

>>512445819
Because porn is the boogeyman they're using to get their foot in the door in terms of internet censorship.

Christards are cheering for it because they're too fucking stupid to understand that they're being taken for yet another ride by jews.

>>512445725
Pornography isn't any kind of societal achievement, it isn't any kind of higher ideal. I have no idea what you're even trying to argue. Would you go to war for pornography? Would you die for pornography?

>>512445950
>Gawd why do you even care when I come and stamp all over your rights?

>>512445679
I do not wish to misrepresent your arguments, but why wouldn't you have the freedom to murder then? It just doesn't make any sense to me. If you could come up with benign legislation that would help your nation by outlawing known evils, why exactly wouldn't you? Why remain inactive?

>>512445885
Banning porn compels women, not men.

>>512446119
Women will be unaffected because they've always had a plethora of options for an easy and successful life
>b-b-but onlyfans
Only the smallest fraction of women have ever made a profit from that site, same as streaming on twitch.

Imagine being dumb enough to actually think banning porn will make lonely men with barely anything to live for go outside, get a wife, become that moral christrian man.
They aren't even banning porn, just making you take a selfie to see it.

You are fucking insane.

>>512434644
Only problem with that comparison is the tradcucks back then were retarded and easily bypassed.
Now they are even more retarded, but others are doing the blocking for them so it doesn't matter.

>>512446198
>Only the smallest fraction of women have ever made a profit
Irrelevant, because so many women choose to do it irrespective of profit. Hence compulsion from banning.
>easy life options
Also irrelevant, because as the above demonstrates, women don't make and celebrate porn for purely material reasons. Bans still compel them.

>>512445885
Yeah, that's the real issue here. This was become way too complex a problem and porn is just a symptom. While it's hard to reject the merits of wanting to ban pornography, that is really not the solution to the real problem.

>>512446307
So you think onlyfans is the cause of women behaving the way they currently do?

>>512446473
No, I think the false promise of sexual liberation, as exemplified broadly in porn and sex work and its massively oversaturated ease of access is the largest root for why they act how they do.

>>512446543
Also the mass integration of women in the workplace, though that too naturally follows from women's emancipation. The worst victim was by far the family unit.

>>512446601
Yes, that too, but I don't think that genie is ever getting put back in that bottle.

>>512434528 (OP)
Great, can we start with OnlyFans?

>>512434528 (OP)
I fap exclusively to anime girl feet so most likely I won't be affected by that ban.
I dont support that still.

But from the other side maybe ban of porn will push normal men to actually uprise aganist unfair and corrupt system.

>>512446795
>But from the other side maybe ban of porn will push normal men to actually uprise aganist unfair and corrupt system.
This is an actual point. Not sure if they realise that banning porn make the chances of them personally getting strung up by an angry mob go up significantly.

No one's going to do shit. Your DNA is connected to the web.

>>512446972
>Do nothing Goyim. Just let us control your mind through curating what information you are allowed to see. It's for the children don't you know!

>>512443055
>No it doesn't women being independant of men, and being in the workforce does FAR more damage than porn ever did or could do.
In communist China, where women were, in fact, independent from men, the birth rate was so high they had to restrict it. The USSR had a birthrate stably above 2.1 until the very end.

But yeah, sure, it's the women who are to blame for everything.

>>512447314
>from
of

>YOU VILL PARTICIPATE IN SOCIETY AND BE SEXUALLY MOTIVATED TO WORK to be able to settle for a 2/10 pig
>You VILL be patriotic and fight WW3 because

It's the future Magacattle voted for.
Welcome to conservatard totalitarian, you though woke was bad. Woke was an annoying blip

>>512434644
Too smart for these retards, they have to live it again to understand.

>>512447388
This too will no doubt pass but does mean that these faggots are never winning another election for at least the next decade.

Does everyone realize we are steps away from an orwellian nightmare if not in the early stages of it already

>>512434528 (OP)
The elites are really starting to worry about the cattle not reproducing. NEETs and MGTOW are doing real damage.

>>512447659
That book wasn't really fiction.

>>512447659
but muh children safety! think of the heckin' childerinos!
everyone should suffer because i'm a bad parent and can't keep my children away from watching tranny porn

>>512445453
the lack of sensation/satisfaction only makes the hunger deeper

>>512447314
Communist china limited births not because of women, but because they were going through constant famines and simply couldn't feed 10 kids per family.

Chinks breed like Africans do, and always have. They shit out a dozen kids in hopes at least one of them makes it to adulthood, because up until VERY recently they were almost entirely an argrarian society of rice farmers outside of 3 mercantile cities.

>>512448075
There was also that whole, you know, communism thing where the government wanted to manage every single aspect of their lives down to how many kids they have, and what gender of kids they were allowed to have.

>>512448138
>and what gender of kids they were allowed to have.
That one wasn't the government. That one was because people wanted boys and if you're only allowed 1 then you're going to throw all the girls in the river in a sack until you get one.

>>512434528 (OP)
>le Project 2025
You’re worried about losing gay porn aren’t you?

>>512434528 (OP)
fake and gay
banning pornography sites would be extremely antisemitic. Jews clearly want us cooming.

>>512434528 (OP)
No. The age verification laws are about the global control grid and full spectrum dominance. A porn ban for the clearnet wouldn't require a regular user to do anything. You'd simply extended the current ban on Cheese Pizza on the clearnet to all porn and shut down anyone hosting any porn whatsoever. The simple fact they are asking for user end compliance means they are lying and it will fail to anything about porn and it is obviously they don't give a shit about access. They simply want to directly find out who is trash talking Zionist and have them immediately cancelled without having to any work finding out an anon's identity. Now they can certainly find the identity of any anon right now but it's now instant and requires some leg and especially make it harder to track people's IRL social networks. The point of this legislation is really to set a social credit system and bring online and then tie it to the new stable coin blockchain control grid they just set up with the GENIUS Act stupidity. The point is make permanent record of everyone's activities everywhere online and IRL.
The Democraps are the party of WEF and the GOP is the party of DOD. They all work for the same Rothchild Banks. They want the same control grid but GOP is using Porn and "National Security" to sell it while the Dems use "Climate Change" and "Anti-Hate" to sell the same technological human cattle digital tagging rollout.

Question for the peanut gallery:
If it reliably undercut the pitch for digital ID, such that digital ID never happens in future, would you accept a pornography ban?

>>512448990
Of course, I would 100% support it. And I genuinely cannot see what the case is for supporting this industry. Though I'm under no delusions of this being the one solution that would magically heal our nations.

>>512448990
>If we play a game of Street Fighter 2, and I win, will you enjoy the taste of pineapple more or less?
I'm not against hypotheticals but your question makes no sense.
OP article is a limited hangout designed to confuse people who sense an ulterior motive. It has nothing to do with banning porn, it's about shutting down and proscecuting the goyim and nothing more

>>512434632
Jew vs Jew

>>512449390
His question does make sense, even if I agree with you that it misses the point of the limited hangout. It's a perfectly coherent hypothetical scenario that you can answer.

>>512449620
That all hinges on the presupposition that it's possible to "undercut" totalitarianism by supporting broad, bilateral moves, such as a "ban", by a regime with totalitarian goals.
You can take the statement in a vaccuum and assign generic meanings to words like "undercut" and "ban" but, in context, the question is nonsensical.
If I suspect anon of being malicious I would say it's a "gotcha" question, typical of what we see when a regime critic comes up against a talking head like Piers Morgans or Medhi Hasan. It's a setup for motte and bailey, every time.

>>512450021
>That all hinges on the presupposition that it's possible to "undercut" totalitarianism by supporting broad, bilateral moves, such as a "ban", by a regime with totalitarian goals.
The hypothetical doesn't have to be probable or even possible to be evaluable. It's a sorting question on how much anons value access to porn.

>>512450021
How would you feel if you didn't have breakfast this morning?

>>512450109
>It's a sorting question
It's not effective in this context because the topic of discussion is a real, tangible attempt to use a porn ban to justify deploying digital ID and social credit.
In fact, it's the worst possible time and place to ask the question because people will either correctly take IRL context into account or, naively, conflate a fictional nonsense chain of cause-and-effect with the real world.
>>512450266
That depends, in this hypothetical scenario, do humans feel sensations of hunger and lethargy when they skip breakfast, or does some other entirely different casual chain occur?

>>512434528 (OP)
agree with him 100%
Porn has no place on the clearnet except as an age verified service

>>512434644
>Yo zoomies, this is why conservatives were hated so much throughout the 80s, 90s, and 2000s, just so you know. They've always been obsessed with banning everything from video games, cartoons, porn, movies, books, etc. Remember the satanic panic and parental advisory fiasco? Do your research kids, it may save your life one day.
it wasn't just conservatives
remember Tipper Gore and music censorship?
remember Hillary and Hot Coffee mod?

porn is garbage with actual human trafficking, something /pol/ pretends to care about, except when it comes to porn
let's face it - you're all degenerate and your "tradcath" shit is just as fake as the females

Anything with attractive females will be considered porn, dipshits.
Say hello to every female character looking like Abby in TLOU2

>>512451302
You're a gullible retard

>>512451871
maybe
I am also an old fag that has seen the clearnet grow to what it is
It is an essential part of everyday life, why the fuck should children have access to hard core pornography(the scummiest legal industry on the planet) just because they need to do research for homework
Also, if you are too retarded to find porno outwith the usual web access on clearnet, then you dont deserve it

tl;dr retards complaining about a simple age verification are the problem

>>512434528 (OP)
How long until a gooner Luigi's him?

>>512451302
porn shouldn't exist at all
it's partial human trafficking and partial "empowering but males who buy are awful incels!"
it's dogshit all around

>>512452096
Because they wont stop at porn, retard, they want to round up dissenters

>>512452096
You are a gullible retard and dont beong here. We will hang you and kill you.

>I am also an old fag that has seen the clearnet grow to what it is

You are not.

>>512435100
the onlything mattering are his jewish roots. everything coming from his mouth might as well be poop

>>512434528 (OP)
Next this retard will propose banning alcohol removing semi-automatics and limiting speech too

>>512434528 (OP)
And nobody's fighting it because it backdoors digital ID, which is the only way any ID system has ever been foisted on Americans.

>>512452782
>>512452843
lol
check out these fags
bro, if you think you are not being monitored constantly on the clearnet then so be it
everything you have done online is recorded, they dont use it because, guess what its just the same as the clearnet, absolutely full of shit, hence the following
>they were known to us
>it appears they had a history
>associated with certain groups
i.e. its only after the fact that most information about an individual gets released

Yes, its government restricting your access/increasing monitoring
Don't like it, use TOR or I2P, thats what they are there for
again, those that argue the loudest against this pretty much always turn out to be pedos/gooners/degenerates of some form and also incredibly lazy/stupid

>>512453515
Uh huh, sure

>>512434528 (OP)
this is an actor, this is a limited hangout, this is about shutting down the clearnet

>>512436219
go fuck a loli goat, mohammed

>>512434632
jews hate porn they don't control
>what's this? NON STEP SISTER INCEST PORN? SHUT IT DOWN - Moshe 2025

>>512445885
>you want to drive men into violent revolutionary rage due to having no outlet.
This is the solution, women won't lower their standards

The video is hilarious, he's desperately trying not to look at the camera and is obviously very consciously aware of it.
He's pausing and stuttering frequently, choosing his words very carefully even though the presumption is that this is a freeflowing private conversation.

>>512452096
As intermediate institutions (family, church, community) have eroded, society is left with only two powerful entities: the individual will and the coercive state. We now turn to the state either to protect our vices or to shield us from them, a situation that's pathological nonetheless.
And the individual will has flawed genetic origins and is poorly understood.

An ID check does nothing to challenge the underlying philosophy of the culture
it tacitly accepts it and merely tries to manage its most unpleasant consequences for children.

I simply believe it's the parents' responsibility to put in place parental controls on their kid's devices, and to talk to their kids about avoiding porn until they're adults. There's no reason to ask the government to step in if parents actually acted like parents.
But let's be real: this is likely not a case of the government fulfilling the masses' wishes. The government is choosing to step into our lives' over this.

>>512456009
>I simply believe it's the parents' responsibility to put in place parental controls on their kid's devices

You're an outdated boomer.

It's the State's responsibility to take care of the children

End of the day, blame AI, gooners
Institutions/Global corps that rely on clearnet want stricter rules/protection
AI is extremely good at picking holes in shitty web sites (porn), this leads to more malware etc
It will end with highly regulated clearnet and fringe will move to TOR etc

i.e. natural progression, something that anyone should be able to realize if they have even an iota of knowledge about network security

>>512452096
porn corrupts
children are naturally curious about sex
first thing theyre introduced to however is jewish degrading filth
it needs to stop, were gonna be in a technocracy anyway, at least childrens souls and relationships can thrive

>>512434528 (OP)
Based

>>512434632
Glowies don't enter heaven anon

>>512434632
>Tfw you realize Jews as a people have the most divergent and extreme viewpoints

>>512435636
Christcucks are the origin of wokeness. I'll never forget the true enemy has revealed itself.

>>512457035
Your enemy is the people who oppose porn? This is your priority? You're not a serious person.

>>512457425
He's a Jew and his priorities are to harm goyim by destroying the social safety net and implementing internet id. You're a retard. lol
Go worship your desert demon and make sure you kill children for him too.

>>512455503
>>512455652
True. There will be inevitable hand wringing about porn being "free speech" and, by conflating the two, they'll have a strong legal precedent for monitoring ALL forms of "free speech" online.
Porn is being treated like alcohol when it should, more accurately, be treated as hostile foreign agents posing as a beverage manufacturer and knowingly distributing poison to it's enemy-host nation.

>>512457585
>his priorities are to harm goyim by destroying the social safety net and implementing internet id.
is it true that the jews jammed the airwaves of ramallah palestine and forced all the children to watch hardcore pornography on their televisions instead of cartoons?

>>512458016
They're all the same inferior desert goblin race. I don't care if Iran nukes them all. Caring about team desert Jew is the first step to becoming a christcuck.

>>512434632
>Why do Jews hate porn?
look ma, i can lie too.
are you so obsessed that you go out of your way to make a lie just to quench your obsession ?
its not jews fault that god gave you a micro penis fag.

>>512436969
>Getting rid of jews doesnt flip a magic switch where
>women stop enjoying nudity and feminity.
Wow way to conflate two totally unrelated things... enjoying nudity and enjoying femininity are two things that have fuck all to do with each other. So this sounds like something a jew would say to try and sell "nudity" as an essential component of "femininity." Men can get nude too and no one ever says that's an essential aspect of "masculinty" except (jewish) faggots like BAP that like to sodomize brown teenage boys.

>>512435771
And everyone ignores the truest post.