/pol/ - Anon's Autistic Attempt To Fix Wikipedia Page of "Q" Actor John de Lancie Causes Edit War

I gave this op to chatgpt and told it to simulate a pol thread, here's what it gave me:
---

[Thread Start – Anonymous 08/07/25(Fri)13:47 No.22456789]

Main Bulk of Discussion:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:John_de_Lancie/Archive_1#Roles_mentioned_in_first_paragraph:_Q/Discord
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:John_de_Lancie/Archive_1#New_Edit_Proposal_for_Discord_Mention_in_the_Lede

Other related discussions:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1143
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard/Archive_240
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard/Archive_241

TL;DR:

> Some guy tried to make “Discord” from My Little Pony be listed alongside “Q” as John de Lancie’s most well-known role.
Wikipedia said "no."
Debate exploded.
Feels like WWIII broke out in a Wikipedia talk page.
Was the edit justified?
---

[Anonymous 08/07/25(Fri)13:53 No.22456801]

> Wikipedia
acting like Q isn't a state-sponsored propaganda role
but Discord is "not notable" because the audience is too online
This is just the system filtering out decentralized cultural movements.
---

[Anonymous 08/07/25(Fri)13:57 No.22456816]
The same site that locked pages to control COVID narrative is now gatekeeping ponies.
We're ruled by bureaucrats with anime avatars.

---

[Anonymous 08/07/25(Fri)14:01 No.22456829]
Discord literally represents chaos, anti-order, and subversion.
You’d think /pol/ would worship him as a metaphor for postmodern collapse.
Instead he's voiced by some Boomer actor playing space court jester 20 years prior.

---

(1/2)

Anonymous (ID: S+A3hO2b)

8/8/2025, 1:57:51 AM No.512496617

[Anonymous 08/07/25(Fri)14:04 No.22456835]
It was never about which role is more "notable."
It’s about what kind of fandom they’re trying to delegitimize.
Star Trek = top-down media
MLP = grassroots weird internet cult
Wikipedia always picks the corporate narrative.

---

[Anonymous 08/07/25(Fri)14:08 No.22456850]

> FlightTime shut the whole thing down
dispute resolution ignored arguments
admin closes discussion with boilerplate
The site’s just a microcosm of real life. The illusion of democracy. The guy made a decent case and got silenced.

---

[Anonymous 08/07/25(Fri)14:11 No.22456861]

> John de Lancie voices two anarchist gods
tries to represent freedom and chaos
Wikipedia insists you only remember him for the state-sanctioned sci-fi
This is why clownworld memes exist.

---

[Anonymous 08/07/25(Fri)14:13 No.22456868]
Remember:
Wikipedia mods are anonymous
Wikipedia decisions are final
Wikipedia consensus ≠ truth
Wikipedia is a psyop
(2/3)

Anonymous (ID: S+A3hO2b)

8/8/2025, 1:58:22 AM No.512496650

[Anonymous 08/07/25(Fri)14:17 No.22456885]
Unironically Discord was redpilled.

> causes rebellion
refuses to bow to any ruler
gets punished by being turned to stone
literally cancelled
And they say Q was the dangerous one.
---

[Anonymous 08/07/25(Fri)14:20 No.22456897]
This is why Wikipedia can't be trusted.
It’s curated reality. Doesn’t matter if millions saw Discord and loved the character.
If it didn’t air on CNN, it didn’t happen.

---

[Anonymous 08/07/25(Fri)14:24 No.22456912]
The real question is:
Why are nerd feuds like this more documented than half of world history on Wikipedia?

---

[Anonymous 08/07/25(Fri)14:27 No.22456927]
They’re not arguing about a cartoon character.
They’re arguing over who writes history.

---

[Anonymous 08/07/25(Fri)14:31 No.22456939]

> “Laughable at best, delusional at worst.”
Peak smug liberal Wikipedia tone.
Just say you hate fun and move on.

---

[Anonymous 08/07/25(Fri)14:36 No.22456958]
I’m not even a brony, but this reeks of institutional bias.
Any organic fan movement is treated like a joke until Netflix turns it into a 10-part docuseries.
(3/3)

Anonymous (ID: Fnsn6E2q)

8/8/2025, 2:19:02 AM No.512497871

Bump

Anonymous (ID: 9bfGejDQ)

8/8/2025, 2:22:58 AM No.512498070 >>512498684

i like this thread

Anonymous (ID: Fnsn6E2q)

8/8/2025, 2:34:06 AM No.512498684

>>512498070
Same, who do you side with in the dispute?

Anonymous (ID: aq/N0T1V)