Alright, the question’s in the title. Got into a debate at work with a colleague about promiscuity in women and why a lot of men see it as a dealbreaker. I know it sounds outdated, but when she pressed me for a reason, all I could say was, “It’s just gross.” I feel like most guys have that same knee-jerk reaction, but is there any legit science or psychology backing it up?

I tried doing a quick search, but all I find are think-pieces and social media threads telling me I’m stuck in the past and should “reframe my mindset” to be cool with it. Meanwhile, every dating podcast, TikTok panel, and red-pill YouTuber seems to swear it’s still a big red flag.

So… is there actually something deeper going on here, or is this just one of those holdover instincts we haven’t dropped yet?

>>512521059 (OP)
I'm up promiscuous man myself so I don't care

Female pubic hair is the only thing that protects countries from american wokism.

Pubic hair protects women from bacteria, viruses and parasites.

When the fashion for pubic hair removal began in America in the 90s, wokism began to enter, now that hair removal is the norm, wokism has invaded the west. In China and rusia, pubic hair is the norm and there is no wokism. In Japan the trend of removing pubic hair is just beginning but 80% still leave pubic hair so they still have some protection.

>Muh radical feminist doesn't shave
Radical feminist aren't like 0,1% of women, most women that vote woke parties shave.

Pubic hair = fertility, tradition, large families

Shaved = globalism, childfree, woke.

Go to any woke porn page and you will see they promote shaving.

>>512521059 (OP)
not politics.
>>>/twitter/

>>512521059 (OP)
Fried pair-bonding capability - once a whore, always a whore. A w*man who had decency fucked out of her brain will never get attached and is going to treat you like disposable dildo or wallet.

>>512521059 (OP)
Firstly shut the fuck up and kill yourself
Secondly a high body count means men didn't get turned off.
Thirdly, see the first part

>>512521059 (OP)
Yes her hole is her entire value and if it is ruined and mileaged out whi wants the bitch, she's not special

>>512521059 (OP)

>>512521059 (OP)
It’s haven’t had a shit lay gf energy

>>512521059 (OP)
it's simple instinct. if she fucked 10 men before you how do you know she won't fuck 10 more during you or after she dumps you?

>>512521059 (OP)
i just picture all the dirty filthy other-men creampies leaking out of her. What ever formulated value I had for her dissipates with this image and all that is left is this vaguely humanoid disgusting mess that resembles a woman courting me for my seed (my financials really) and all I can consider is she is a demonic entity that I should ignore, leave alone destroy.

>>512521479
>>512521121
Bots or brain damaged

>>512521059 (OP)
It gives us the ick, simple as

>>512521059 (OP)
1pbtid

>>512521059 (OP)
Considering there is birth control and you can check the DNA of your kid, it is absolutely a hold over instinct.


Still doesn’t change the fact that it is an instinct and you can’t reframe your mind out of it, and no amount of social shaming will accomplish this.

My mate married a woman that my other mate fucked at school, I wouldn't be able to deal with that. they are happy together though

>>512521059 (OP)
paternal investment is proportional to paternal certainty, iron law of nature

>>512521059 (OP)
Only a redditor needs to reverse engineer arguments for things that they already know.

I'm done arguing with women, fags, libs. I'm not wasting my time on convincing mentally retarded people anything.

>>512521059 (OP)
Marital satisfaction and longevity are inversely correlated with body count. Likelihood of having an incurable venereal disease goes up. This applies to both men and women by the way, the hypocritical philanderers who go on and on about "master key, shitty lock" just want to hold women to a standard they don't hold themselves to. There are more factors such as telegony, imprinting, dangerous and obsessive ex partners, revenge porn, body/performance anxiety, and infidelity to name a few, but the main reason is that it's highly damaging to each person in the marriage and the health of their marriage. The point of marriage is to create a stable environment for childrearing, endanger that and you endanger the child. Imagine your child grows to adulthood and asks you why you did such a shitty job raising them. Your response boils down to "I wanted to have sex with strangers for a temporary high" if your marriage was unhealthy and/or outright failed as a consequence of each partner's high bodycount. Would your child respect you after that? Would your child want to interact with you after that?

>>512521059 (OP)
1. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC40117/
2. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16084184
3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10068676
4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23954393
5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3545914/
6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3654737/
7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5293315/
8. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00444.x/abstract
9. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/11133203/Could-previous-lovers-influence-appearance-of-future-children.html
10. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.12373/abstract
11. http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0045592
12. http://press.endocrine.org/doi/full/10.1210/jcem.87.7.8656
13. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/scientists-discover-childrens-cells-living-in-mothers-brain/
14. http://blogs.plos.org/dnascience/2012/10/25/male-dna-in-female-brains-revisited/
15. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/09/120926213103.htm
16. http://www.kopfinstruments.com/Carrier/downloads/Carrier79.pdf
17. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2017.00154/full
18. https://www.deccanchronicle.com/lifestyle/sex-and-relationship/270617/find-out-how-women-keep-dna-from-men-she-has-had-sex-with.html
19. https://www.insider.com/why-women-retain-male-dna-2018-3 (this article author is a whore doing damage control for #18)
20. http://www.microchimerism.org/
21. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19381956.2016.1218583
22. https://www.jci.org/articles/view/6611
23. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ele.12373
24. http://www.neonnettle.com/news/4209-women-store-dna-from-every-man-they-ve-ever-made-love-with-study-finds
25. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0045592
26. https://www.rooshv.com/a-womans-body-may-incorporate-dna-from-the-semen-of-casual-sex-partners
27. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23049819/

>>512521059 (OP)
it`s really obvious i don`t get why more people don`t just spell it out

if a woman has had 52 partners before you what are the odds she stops at 53? its that easy

do you want to invest time and resources and have children with a woman with a high body count when statistically you`re just the next of many more notches on her bedpost?

its all extremely pragmatic and logical

>>512521059 (OP)
The hole needs to be tight, that is all

>>512521059 (OP)
it's very simple
not everyone wants mystery std

>>512521059 (OP)
>but is there any legit science or psychology backing it up?
See here
>>512521724
No man wants his legacy to be the hideous disgusting dysgenic bastard of 500 sweaty monkey scrotums. The kid might have White skin, but it will have a literal monkey brain.

>>512521059 (OP)
Its not that difficult to explain. In a long term partner, men want a woman who is actually capable of pair-bonding. Not some dead-eyed, cynical and numb woman who cannot feel joy in a relationship because she already got pump and dumped so many times by guys shes liked, or can't experience anything new with you because shes already dated so many people that its always Deja Vu.

And no man wants his children to have to call a whore mother.

No man wants to have to wonder at every single group setting, how many of the guys in the room have seen her with her holes splayed.

If sex and relationships are that casual to her, why would she make a good long term partner? Higher chance of cheating, higher chance of looking to trade up, higher chance of a tiktok video making her suddenly decide she wants a man who surfs.

The list goes on and on. High body count is just the best indicator that the woman is not suitable as a long term partner.

>>512521059 (OP)
It shows she views men as toys and you're looking for a partner not someone who will throw you away once she's bored. Here done.
>Oh but she's looking to settle down NOW
She probably told that to the last 4 guys.

>>512521059 (OP)
Evolutionary psychology. The more partners a woman has had the less likely they are trying maintain a stable long term relationship.
Additionally it speaks of the character of a woman, either making poor choices in partners or just generally sleeping with strangers which is a huge potential disease vector. Historically sleeping around also came with the risk of pregnancy and no man wants to spend his time and resources into the genetic offspring of his competition outside of unusual circumstances

New

INCEL

thread

just

dropped!

>>512521664
This is what wisdom looks like

>>512521059 (OP)

Haven you met a woman with a genuinely high body count? Have you dated one?
They are fucking mental, and the more bodies the accumulate, and the older they get, the more mental they become.

It's like those dubai porta-potty girls who say they are going to settle down now they are 26 and have a husband and family, and just forget the previous 6 years of being shit on, fucked by dogs at parties, and taking the virginity of 14yr old arabs to make them a man. It haunts them.

>>512521059 (OP)
>pair bonding
>hpv(and other more uncommon shit)
>red flag for bad decision making
>red flag where self worth increased by partner count
>most likely cheated, once a cheater always a cheater
>decade of birth control harms fertility
etc... but you can sum it up with
>you're just a fucking whore
It's no different to in my mind then men who will fuck everything that will open legs.
You can say that promiscuous behavior is liberating, high-t, chad behavior, "ur not a virgin incel lmao", etc..
If you look at animals, the animals that fuck the most are either non-complex like rabbits and the bonobo apes which are the dumbest of all the apes are plagued with stds and are known for raping and fucking everything.

>>512521059 (OP)
If it didn't work out the 100 other times why would it this time?
Does she love you or just settled because of financial/biological reason (hitting the wall).
She will always compare you to those other 100.

With a car with alot of owners you could always replace parts when they break.
You can not with a woman.

It unironically stems from insecurity, and the natural male drive to bring down other successful males for pussy.

Whether men are aware of this or not, they're hypercompetitive with other males. They will always betray and fight each other over pussy. Either directly or indirectly, and this is one of the more indirect ways. "Your girl is a whore, she has no value because she had sex with other men". It's trying to instill shame in the successful male, and, subconsciously, whether you'll admit it or not, it makes it easier for you to fuck the same woman.

I've seen some of the most beautiful women - gorgeous looking, small, petite, feminine white girls - settle down and stay in long term relationships without cheating. And the guy ends up leaving her because some weird performative male says "haha i had sex with her at one point", bullying the successful male into leaving her.

Men will never admit this but they have an insane, detestable rage for other successful males, and this is why incels exist. Not because of women's standards but because of these insidious weirdos prying into people's lives and backstabbing their "bros" for some pussy.

>>512521121

Being fucked in the ass by other men doesnt count Chaim.

>>512521059 (OP)
Would you put your foot in a show that had previously been worn every day by a dozen other men?
And even if you would, would you be willing to pay full price for that shoe?

>>512522074
...foot in a *shoe*...

>>512521059 (OP)
>>512522044
No, I just want our love to be special, to be each others first and only, forever. If I can't have that then they can fuck off

>>512521059 (OP)
it requires effort for men to fuck women, while women can just find any random man and bone them when they feel like it, alternatively, just be their manipulative selves and make their army of simps work for them, and then fuck Chad thunder cock while the simps cannibalise each other

it's pointless to discuss anything with women because they have very skewed views of the world, you wanna give that shit a rest

it's that simple

>>512521268
The bonding capacity thing is just a convenient rationalization. There is little to no connection between sex and bonding. The fact sex needs to produce oxytocin to prevent you from choking a woman to death after copulation is proof of that.

This bullshit masks the real issue with female promiscuity, that's far more important. There is no way to know whether your children are your own for a man. Modern paternity tests don't change that significantly. For 9 months she is gestating and you're paying the bills and feeding her, you don't know if it's your child. Once it's born she can just go to the real father and use it to monkey branch. Or she can claim your child is another man's because she slept with him.
Humans evolved to select fertile virgins because then the chance she doesn't fuck behind your back and gets pregnant with another man's child, or just goes to another man, forcing you to fight to the death for her, is the highest.

The important fact here is this is genetic preference. Men desire virgins genetically for a biological reason. Women only need an able bodied man, biologically, to reproduce and survive. Men require a young virgin because a slut makes your reproduction a game of chances you can't win. Since you're likely feeding other men's children, pumping and dumping becomes the norm, which goes against both sexes' preference and child survival.

Ultimately it's why all human cultures have marriage. Women accept sticking to a man, and men accept not doing pumping and dumping. These contacts need to be obligated for both sexes though, or they're worthless.

Allowing women to fuck around ensures only dumb men will marry at all.

>>512521059 (OP)
If she slept with more then 3 guys she is a whore.

>>512521059 (OP)
Knowing myself I'd probably be a whore if I were a woman, at least for a time in my life.

>>512522044
It's impossible to make sweeping generals statements about men like that; we're very diverse in our principles and intellects. W*men on the other hand are extremely homogeneous and conformist - once you've been with three or four, you understand all of them.

>>512522210
Who asked you demon?

how much should the state pay as reparation to men for marrying a whore?

>>512522180
I don't think it boils down simply to chemicals released during copulation. As other Anons have already pointed out, there's an element of naivety and inexperience required to truly bond to a stranger of opposite sex - that's why teenage "love" is the most intense kind.
The evolutionary psychology you pointed out is 100% correct either way.

>>512521059 (OP)
In casual sex you treat one another instrumentally. It means she used someone as a tool for her own personal gain and did something that is emotional for others coldly. Why would she treat you any differently? If your daughter comes home with a mercenary that seems unaffected by killing 30+ people for personal gain, would that carry over any risk for your daughter?

any bc above zero (excluding (You)) is a high bc
I don't see the difference between a woman having one ex vs. tens of them. Why would you want to be with either? It's equally gross either way.

>>512522210
You don't even need to say that, your flag says it for you. Of course you would you hooked nose sexual deviant. You are also a pedophile. You also would let another man sodomize you. You also would rape a senior citizen. You fucking animals will do literally anything degenerate.

holy bot >>>/r9k/

>>512522231
No, it's pretty common to the point men have made up a mantra behind it - "bros before hoes".

You can also see long time male "friend" groups like video game players unravel in real time with the introduction of a beautiful woman. Not to mention the thousands of cases of men betraying other male family members i.e. uncles fucking their brother's wives, or even fathers trying to hit on their son's girlfriends.

You can deny it all you want but there's a reason women and men were separated until very recently in places like the military and school - because the bro-code doesn't exist and unit cohesion goes sour with the introduction of a female. If the bro-code was legitimate, it would never be a thing.

>>512522512
Pretty common still doesn't equal universal. Indubitably, there are many undeveloped men who betray anything and anyone for pussy. But every w*man who has been prefucked casually, pumped and dumped by strangers, is irredeemably damaged and worthless. The former is possible, probable perhaps, the latter a certainty.

>>512522044
This is a shit theory though because without a single man ever saying something like that to me, I STILL would dislike the knowledge of her high body count.

If you have a young child, and you are super excited to get to take them to their first theme park, you plan it out, you make it a surprise, and he then tells you he actually went to a theme park earlier this year with one of his friends families, you are going to feel shitty about that. The experience you wanted to have with that person depends heavily on the fact that it is novel.

When she has a high body count, the act of sex and the act of love have become routine to her. She will never be able to reach the highs, the excitement, or the novel period of a new relationship because shes already done it too many times.

It couldn't be more obvious why that is a problem.

>>512521059 (OP)
If you leave a woman/man because she/he cheats, you cannot bond with another woman/man because it would be adultery. Same applies for the woman/man that was left. You only get one shot to make it right. Matthew 19:9. The disciples conclude in 19:10 that it is better to not marry at all, because you can't be sure who is a whore and who isn't. You don't take care of single mothers/fathers or women/men with high body count. Only widows and orphans.

>>512521724
27 articles and they all prove nothing. Some cellular level contamination is gross, but not the same as your children not being yours.
Virginity is important for far more basic and important reasons.
A man can't know whose child grows in a woman's womb at all. Even after it's born it might be too hard to tell most times. It's all you need to consider. You're gonna waste your resources, time, effort, reputation, then 9 months of gestation just to have to guess if the child is yours for the next 10+ years. If she fucked around once before you, you can literally die in a hunt and your only chance at reproduction would be a failure, your genes going extinct.
In fact women should be there ones defending virginity. Without virginity your only insurance of paternity in nature is immediately crippling a woman and disfiguring her and hiding her in a cave so no one can get to her or want to fuck her.

You can't even trust your own brother to guard her, because women just need to get fucked once to win the reproductive competition. They're assured the child is their own in 100% of cases. This is why virginity and youth are important to maximize your chances. Impregnating a virgin is the only way to know the child is 100% yours. Just impregnate her and don't let any male see her until her stomach grows. That's how much effort it takes for men to get what women get each time they fuck. So realistically a man wants to maximize his chances, at least, by marrying a fertile virgin

>>512522825
>that it is better to not marry at all, because you can't be sure who is a whore and who isn't
Wisdom

>>512521059 (OP)
Ask her if she'd date a bisexual man especially one who bottoms. Chances are she wouldn't, and if she says she is she's lying. Women really really really dislike bi guys, it gives them a massive ick.

So if they don't want a partner who's taken dick before, why should you?

>>512522774
With this logic, every time you masturbate, you're ruining your ability to orgasm and feel love. It's not novel anymore to cum. Also with this logic, men would get bored of fucking the same woman over and over again, and desire "novel" pussy and cheat. Which they do.

One day you'll realize why we invented marriage, and it has nothing to do with women being whores. It's men being hypercompetitive. And protection from these other men. It's also the reason why Islamic societies prefer the burka. It has nothing to do with how hot the woman is. It's literally just other men looking for "novel experiences"

>>512521132
nice schizo theory you have there. have an updoot

Men are motivated to win things and show dominance over other men. If you're a prize that's been won many times before then there's no value incentive, I might take a turn just on general principle but I'm not going to put in a lot of effort for what is essentially a participation trophy. At the same time for men like me, who crave intimacy, you've cheapened most significant way of expressing and sharing that, I can't get what I need from you because you've chipped and gouged it all away to give it bit by bit to other men.

>>512521059 (OP)
Oxytocin is released in the brain during/after sex. Oxytocin is a hormone which encourages pair bonding. The higher the body count of a woman the less sensitive to Oxytocin she is and will thus struggle to actually form a pair-bond with a man meaning any real relationship will be destined for ruin.

>>512522901
great hairstyle.. though if i saw it today i would just think that person is a clown and they are trying to hard to look interesting..
wonder which of the two thoughts applies to him

>>512522928
No, with that logic, every time you masturbate, masturbation loses its novelty even more. Is that not extremely true? Anyone who remembers being 12 will tell you it is.

Men won't get bored with the woman if they have pair-bonded, which is not possible when she has had a high body count, which is the point.

I get it, you have your pet theory and will never hear a single detail if it doesn't fit into it, so be it, thats on you, but clearly it isn't a convincing one.

>>512522044
Women having standards is another idiocy. Women don't judge men by looks which is why if you ask them about men's looks they rate low most men. Women will always pick a guy that's dominant. Simple as. In modern society violence is so low dominance is a joke, which is why only good looking and rich men have the confidence to be dominant. It's a social issue. Go to Muslim countries and dumb ugly bastards get cute virgin wives.

Most "incels" from white countries would be megachads in Muslim ones with muslimas thanking Allah for their luck. Western society is just completely deranged, where everything good is banned because we took it for granted. Hubris

>>512523111
Judge the man by his words

Would you buy a beer that's been already opened?

>>512521059 (OP)
Do you want a wife or do you want a one night stand?
If you want a wife, you need one who's proven herself to actually take relationships seriously and be loyal.
If she's fucked a ton of guys before you, she's the type to fuck a ton of guys after you. She'll marry for stability, look outside the house for entertainment, and leave you for someone with more money.

>>512521059 (OP)
I hate this shit. It's a typical trick to make people doubt their position.

Why isn't "it's just gross" a good enough reason? They asked you why it's a red flag, you say "it's gross", end of debate.

They say "but why define gross? Why not x? Why not y?" and cos you can't answer 300 "but define that" questions you think they're right and you're wrong.

It's gross. That's IS the answer. End of.

Also, how come "you're stuck in the past" works as a put down to your answer? If you turn the tables on them and start questioning that to death you'd shut them up too. It's just all word games.

>>512521059 (OP)
(((modernism))) outgroup dilemma
women you just met saying she fucked 50 random strangers=gross

fighter jet pilots and firefighters who pass their wives around to other members eskimo style=they dont think its gross

women from same tribe as you who you grew up with who belongs to the streets (said streets are 20 other tribe members) same non gross response

>>512521059 (OP)
What a tr00n in the image. And imagine wanting to be with women today. I swear most men are masochists.

>>512523145
>No, with that logic, every time you masturbate, masturbation loses its novelty even more.

Which is why you have men masturbating to men in wigs and thinking it's still straight. Yes, they'll look for more novel things to masturbate to. They won't get tired of masturbating. You are literally proving my point that the natural course of the male libido ends in variety and not pair bonding.

>Men won't get bored with the woman if they have pair-bonded

Only an absolute retard believes this. Or a really immature person who's maybe in his teen years. Men cheat on their "pair-bonded" virgin wives all the time. There's Muslim refugees with wives back home who can attest to this. Or, if you don't like that example because it's brown people, look at prominent white people like Donald Trump, Anthony Weiner, etc. congressmen cheating on their "pair bonded love interests".

And for that matter, how about men with a high body count? They settle down once they find the right girl and never party again or cheat? You really believe this shit?

>>512522044
You're describing female behavior anon

>>512522111
Perfectly reasonable desire. Don't let some idiot tell you to stop letting Disney shape your view of reality. Some dreams are worth chasing.

>>512521978
>stable long term relationship
You mean stable long term society. Men are brainwashed into protecting the people wrecking things. If the women couldn’t just jet off somewhere and find new dick there, we wouldn’t be in this mess. Men protecting the women destroying society from consequences like rape, murder, or AIDS is just unreal.

Ultimately, Jewish feminism is an existential threat to humanity and will be eradicated if we are to survive. Both Jews and feminists should be held accountable.

>>512521059 (OP)
would you buy a used mattress that 6 or 5 or 4 or 3 or 2 or even 1 peoples before you have owned and then want to sleep on it?

scientifically provable non-virgins are worthless as relationship material

they can no longer pair bond and will just treat you as a transaction

>>512521059 (OP)
because its cuckoldry.

If the woman youre with has ZERO STANDARDS, then you arent going to have an enjoyable experience. They are unstable and they will bring instability to your life. You need to avoid that

>>512521059 (OP)
Past behaviour indicates future behaviour
I am not some cuck that is OK with beign cheated on therefore a high body count means higher risk of cheating

>>512523448
>men with high body count
That used to be called a cad and was frowned upon in polite society. The same Jews that told you, Miss Anon, that you should be having sex with randos also started telling young men that they have no value other than their own body count.

We still hate you. Right now the common Jewish enemy can die first if you would just work with us instead of against us.

>>512521059 (OP)
They aren't.
Stop thinking this place in any way represents reality.

>>512523496
Funny enough, women have a much stronger support system than men after being cheated on precisely because of this.

Men will not support their heartbroken male friends, because you feel instant revulsion when you hear another man talk about how he got cheated on. Or amusement. He'll become a butt of jokes because he got cucked. If he goes on about it, you'll call him a simp who doesn't know how to move on.

>>512521059 (OP)
It’s disgusting to think of my wife with another man. I wouldn’t love her as much if she wasn’t a virgin when I married her. I would die for her and my children because of my love for then.

>>512521059 (OP)
Hundreds of thousands of years of people dying from painful diseases has led to all world cultures placing a high mportance on virginity and monogamy. For some good fun, read about the Syphilis outbreaks in the 1400s in France’s armies. It’s horrific.

Safe Sex (with condoms) is a kike conspiracy to create roasties and destroy the family. In reality, condom use is still risky. Just less risky than bareback. Monogamy is the only Safe Sex.

There is no such thing as Safe Sex

Here's a sex fact that no one tells you. Condoms are only 50% effective in preventing STD transmission. They reduce (80%) transmission of fluid borne diseases, but are ineffective against skin transmission diseases like HPV and Herpes. So there is no such thing as Safe Sex, just less risky sex.

"There are two primary ways that STDs are transmitted. Some diseases, such as HIV infection, gonorrhea, chlamydia, and trichomoniasis, are transmitted when infected urethral or vaginal secretions contact mucosal surfaces (such as the male urethra, the vagina, or cervix). In contrast, genital ulcer diseases (such as genital herpes, syphilis, and chancroid) and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection are primarily transmitted through contact with infected skin or mucosal surfaces."

Also, why does the sheet for health professionals give different facts than the one for the public? One says effective, one gives the truth.

https://www.cdc.gov/condomeffectiveness/brief.html
https://www.cdc.gov/condomeffectiveness/latex.html
https://www.stdcheck.com/blog/stds-you-can-get-while-wearing-a-condom/

It's important to guard against a psychological effect called risk compensation by actuaries.It's the tendency of people to engage in riskier behavior when they know a safeguard has been added to a system.

>>512523949
No I won't. That's kinda fucked up behavior. I'd stick with him through that shit.
I'd also break his legs if I discovered he was an unrepentant cheater.

>>512523584
You dont own a vagina.

Sex is sex, nothing more.

>>512521059 (OP)
She wants her cake, and so on. You don't have to justify yourself.

>>512524101
Sex is not sex.

>>512524116
It is. Everything else is implied by people here that dont have sex.

>>512521059 (OP)
If you want to use logic, all you really need is the graph that shows that a higher body count before marriage leads to a higher divorce rate. And it's literally just common sense, it follows rational thought that that's how it works. But even if that wasn't the case, how exactly is "it's just gross" bad reasoning? You really don't need to justify yourself to anyone.

>>512521724
none of these explain mens inherent reaction
also a few of your links are taken down

>>512521852
except absolutely zero genetic data shows microchimerism
its actually worse, 1/6 of all genetic data in science studies is flatout the wife fucking the mailman and lying about it

>>512521059 (OP)
It is gross because sex is intimacy. Yoou choose to be vulnerable and intimate with someone. If you choose to be like that with lots of people, it shows that you do not value any of them so why would you believe you are the one they settle for? Or what makes you think they value beig vulnerable and intimate with you given that they have just handed that out like its warm bread.

>>512524101
If you don't have exclusive access to w*man's vagina, there is no reason to invest any time or attention into her.
I'd argue that it's a trap anyway, even with exclusive access, but understandably the mating drive is too strong to handle for some.

>>512522478
It really is fucking insane how normalised it all has become to do this. I thought the entire point of a relationship is to be special to someone? How can you be special if you're not first.

Obviosly she can't ever respect a man that is content with someone else's second-hand woman. Also a woman with high body count lacks any ability to bond, which is bad for the marriage and children.

>>512524156
Cool, let's see what the sex havers have to say then.
Sex is not sex.

>>512521059 (OP)
I've had sex with a decent amount of women. Body count as the kids say isn't that big of a deal to me as long as she isn't a slag. Reason being you cannot trust a slag any more than a woman can trust a fuck boy

>>512524387
Women ought not to trust you.

>>512521059 (OP)
Anon one third of sexually active people have an STI. You would have to be low IQ to take the chance on a woman with more partners. Or you just don’t care about dying from HPV

>>512521059 (OP)
They are whores. End of discussion.

>>512522774
>never be able to reach the highs, the excitement, or the novel period of a new relationship
sounds like youre bad at fucking

>>512524291
>because sex is intimacy
Sex is sex. It can be intimacy in the right situation, but it doesnt have to be .

>>512524303
>If you don't have exclusive access to w*man's vagina
In a relationship im monogamous, beyond that sex is sex.

>>512524348
It can be whatever you want it to be. But youre trying to force your definition on sex on others.
Youre just as bad as guys with makeup demanding others to call him her.

>>512521712
>Marital
>Satisfaction
OMG lol lmao, you can't be for real. You naive child. There is no such thing as peace with a woman in your house.

>>512521059 (OP)
Sex is like shaking hands. Get over it. This is 2025. You will learn to love used goods. How do I taste?

>>512521059 (OP)
to put it simply, the more they use their hole for recreational purposes, the less suitable it is for procreational purposes

>>512524538
What's the difference between casual sex and a masturbation session? Except a massive difference in time and effort wasted.

>>512521059 (OP)
There easy to fuck, so when you're back is turned they will fuck around.
Most women will lie, about cheating.
Now in Russia the women out number the men, so it's the man that is probably doing the high body count and cheating.

>>512521059 (OP)
higher potential for toxic behaviour, that can't be worked on unless the high body count decides to do it. such as charlie sheen.

>>512521059 (OP)
>legit science
paз шлюхa, вceгдa шлюхa
you want a whore to raise your kids?
wait, how will you know if they're your kids if she has a history of whoring?
simple as

>>512521121
That's not the subject anon, but thanks for being a man whore.
We live through you and your promiscuous sex.

>>512524655
The casual sex has spiritual significance in life because you earned yourself a story to tell. A masturbation session is just a normal Tuesday, feels good but not story time worthy.

>>512524655
Masturbating isnt sex, it doesnt count so youre still a virgin.

>>512524538
Yes yes, how dare I argue in favor of my principles.
I suppose you also aren't "personally" in favor of cannibalism but feel it's people's right to do it in their own home.

>>512524538
You are disgustingly Americanized. People like you are proof we need to break with the Anglosphere if Europa wants to survive.

>>512521059 (OP)
Depends in what you're searching for. Do you search a gf and want her to be loyal? Then a high body count is a bad idea, she probably just want to fuck. If you just want to fuck too then it's a match. But why do I have to explain this to you and can't you think for yourself

>>512524387
>Body count as the kids say isn't that big of a deal to me as long as she isn't a slag
high body count means she's a slag, retard
is this the famed school of IrIish logic?

>>512521121
Based and same. Only insecure guys are against high body count. I've never met a confident, virile man that agonizes over his hypothetical future wife having sex.

>>512522013
>you DON'T want a bitch that 500 kilometres of dick in side her?
>INCEL
amerinigger flag posts have somehow gotten even worse

>>512524811
Yep if a man has his brain and penis working correctly, he will prefer easy sluts and prostitutes. If a man has no interest in sex or is extremely naive, he will settle for a virgin girl (in 2025 they're all mentally ill and prone to feminism).

>>512521554
/thread

>#nigga you're a kafir. End of story.

>>512524776
Is a night spent on wooing and pounding some easy skank a worthwhile story to tell? Is there a value except cheaply impressing your male peers? You could hone some skill instead and produce a genuine piece of art for example.

>>512522180
>There is little to no connection between sex and bonding
There is overwhelming evidence across the fields of biology and more relevantly, human biology. Of course, an uneducated slimeball like yourself could not possibly grasp the concept of science or, perhaps more pertinently, scientific integrity. No, you would instead wallow in the cesspool of ignorance and happily drag your midwit peers along with you. Every part of the poorly constructed sentences that your overweight sausage-shaped appendages struggled to type out was false. All of that nonsense, only to offer the gormless conclusion that the abstract concept of marriage is a solution to the subversion of a proven biological phenomenon that is established by demonstrated evidence is one of the most disingenuous attempts to derail a discussion I have ever seen.

>>512521059 (OP)
Since I am a betaboy Jew, I would love to be a cuck slave to a hot slut big milker gf who fucks Sarayet Mattel alpha chads

>>512521059 (OP)
The more sexual partners a woman has the less likely she will be able to have a successful long term marriage. Presumably it's the same for men but I'm not sure. Fucking someone you're serious about in a relationship is better than strangers anyways.

>>512524916
Suppose you never told anyone, it's still good masturbation fuel for later. I still remember the taste of ass, tits, and pussy fondly.

>>512524836
I don't agonize about it either, I have a standard and I don't think about it much besides when it's questioned. People just keep questioning it because they're a bunch of degenerates

>>512524782
Once you've lost the virginity, gained experience with a w*man or a couple of them, there's nothing but futility and disappointment there after that point.

>>512521059 (OP)
Interesting how you get into a debate at work but make this post and never come back

>>512521664
Truth nvke

>>512524890
How does another man's piss taste like you cuck?

its just an incel excuse. just like "volcel"

>>512521059 (OP)
It's pointless to invest emotions and resources in volatile and unreliable goods.

>>512525168
Salty like your mother's cooch.

>>512524943
would you accept a hot slut big milker trans gf?

>>512524788
You can have your own principles, but stop trying to force them on others.

>>512521059 (OP)

>>512524992
That's true, and also it's important for a man to learn about the female nature for long-term decision making. I'm just questioning the purpose of keeping on with fucking once you've had it.

>>512521664

>>512525192
incels like to move goalposts
>I can't have sex
pay a whore
>nooo, not that kind of sex
tl,dr: only volcels exist

>>512521059 (OP)
The reason is simply because men don't want their wife to be a whore.
In the past only whores tended to go with many men (and they were open with it) and now this behavior is common for many women. The fact that is usual doesn't mean that men are ok with it. If they wanted a whore, they would buy one.

>>512524538
Do you think anyone with more than a two digit IQ thinks your opinion matters? Go outside, be a normie, since you are so good with girls. You ain´t fooling me.

>>512525231
No thanks, I like the idea of having a functional stable society for my family to live in

>>512523411
tpwp
go back to r3ddit you freak

>>512521059 (OP)
Disease, genetic contamination, and a sign of disloyalty and carelessness.

>>512521487
Yup. For me, it's also think about a guy taking absolutely pleasure fucking her mouth and using her like a disposable whore just so a bitch made cuck can marry her later. Fuck that. Once a fuck toy always a fuck toy. You are a cuck if you take these whores seriously. Fornication needs to end and we should bring back stoning.

>>512525268
Because there is nothing sweeter than the warmth of a woman's body. It's one of those experiences I wish I could have most days of my life, but there is always a price to pay in effort to get it.

So I thought about it, and I think I managed to pinpoint one specific aspect of modern women, across the whole culture, which greatly affect the current man to woman average relationship, and it can even be argued it affect all relationships, not only those with the opposing sex.

Politeness is expected, rather than reciprocated.

Ie, you are expected as a man to always leave the toilet seat down in case a woman need to use the bathroom, yet to do the same for men isn't. You shall be judged unfavorably if you do not do it, yet you gain absolutely no recognition for doing so. A man is expected to fulfill social obligations he gain nothing to uphold, and in fact may get demonized for (muh toxic masculinity), yet women are devoid of such expectations and are tolerated having the most deletirious personal traits inbthe name of personal freedom, on and on and on... So this create a massive dissonnance from a cultural view point, as the blatant double standards clashes, especially when compounded by the modern globohomo of "equality" for all that further exacerbate the feeling if disatisfaction.

Tldr; kikes poisoned the societal well of social expectations with the intent to drive a wedge between genders and act as the middlemen to keep the delititious status quo.

Promiscuous women are not suitable for being wives or mothers.
Their brain is simply incapable of bonding with their children and husband, and they will hate them.
These are the exact type of women that kill their own children and pretend they died in their sleep.

If she has lived the "Instagram lifestyle" of travelling, partying, alcohol and promiscuity, she will never be able to be happy with the simple life of raising a family and all the sacrifices involved.
She will always be looking back to her fun days and resent her husband and kids for preventing them from resuming it.
That's why divorces are so common. Family life is hard, and they want to go back to the nightclub and be whores.

It's really that simple. We don't want to marry other men's leftovers. And for good reason.

Promiscuous women are only good for sex. They don't deserve commitment or motherhood.

>>512521059 (OP)
1) theres a high correlation between "pre-marrital sexual partners" and "chance of first marriage ending in divorce"
Like literally a night and day difference with only 8% virgin at marriage ending in divorce vs over 50% with a double digit bodycount.
2) there are studies that show that women will always compare their current partner to their previous partners, humans have retarded selection biases, you don't have to just be better than any single one of her previous BF's, you have to be better than an unholy amalgamation of all her previous BF's combined. Tyrone had a big dick? Well your's better be bigger or she (at least mentally if not vocally) compare you two, Brad had a six-pack? Well your physique should be better. Chad made 6 figures, you better not be poor, etc... Even if you can be better than Tyrone and Brad and Chad individually, can you be better than all of them at once in every single category?
3) research epigenetics and microchimerism. Women can carry living DNA of the people they've slept with in their body. If they got pregnant, they 100% do still carry microchimeristic living cells in their bloodstream from the baby of the previous partner. If you now come along and also have a kid with her, the microchimerism can be passed down in the womb and now your child has the DNA from a foreign man in some cells in his body.
4) Intimacy releases oxytocin, the "binding hormone", if you have a lot of sex with one person, you "imprint" on that person. If you have a lot of sex with different people, your synapses and receptors in your brain for that get fried over time (simmilar how dopamine receptors get fried from extended drug use) and you loose the ability "imprint" on anyone anymore, you have ruined your ability to pairbond.
5) You use past actions to judge a persons character, not their honey-ed words today. If you're "body #31", its just very likely that there will be a "body #32" after you.

>>512525434
If pleasure alone is the goal, heroin is infinitely more intense than sex.

>>512525106
Only a true incel have the Audacity to tell others how sex is.

>>512521059 (OP)
Eventually nature will reassert itself.
Whether that be supersyphilis or a lab leak.
And I refuse to save you when that happens.
You can stick with all the cuck biochemists that gave you the mrna vaccines.

>>512521059 (OP)
Because it’s fucking gross

>>512525404
Nah man. What America needs is a return to tradition, prostitution has to be normalized just like ancient times.

>>512521059 (OP)
1pbtid
Bots got you again.

>>512525494
But heroin can kill you easily. Sex only has hormonal benefits, no drawbacks unless you fuck someone who's visibly diseased.

>>512521059 (OP)
Relationships and marriage all are vows. Vows to the other person that there will be a permanent relationship between both man and woman. Sex is an extremely intimate act which represents the connection both have. As such, a man or woman which views sex as some casual thing to dish out whenever, much like divorcees or cheaters or the like, are all undeserving of getting together with virgins who ought to have a proper love experience which should end up as a permanent binding act between each other.

>>512521059 (OP)
it demonstrates poor decision making and impuslive behaviour, which is bad for long term stable partnerships

traditionally, men cant just walk up to a girl and ask for sex, and then be successful, we typically have to work for it to some degree, and so a man that is successully breeding, must also be somewhat successful in life. Meanwhile, women have the choice of man to breed with, and so if she has a high body count, she doesnt select for long term stable relationships, but instead selects for short term gratification which means she will cheat on you with literally anyone

>>512521440
Based

>>512525225
no too many dicks

Think its not talked about enough or at least intentionally obfuscated how alot of these women LIVE with the fear of being considered a whore throughout every second of their existence.
I have fucked and been with girls like this (last one i was with was in a poly relationship with some cuck, almost got her pregnant too, shit scared me), it's always massive levels of cope unline anything you have seen before. "I carry condoms with me at all times but i never use em cuz...not a whore lol!", "Sometimes i feel bad about my body count...hey anon do you think my body count is high?", "idk anon i feel like no one will ever love me". Its ingrained into their brains, the guilt, it makes me sad sometimes because some of them are genuinely great gals who are unfortunately a bit fucked in the head due to psyops.
There's also that weird period in their 20's where they decide to lay off the whorism and "settle down", which usually ends up with them relapsing a few years down the road, getting with some cuck or becoming a lesbian.

>>512521554
My wife is white and that's what truly bothers pajeets like you because you know that only they can have white babies. Yeah my wife had 3.5 guys before me, but I have her now and she's faithful

>>512522180
>fact sex needs to produce oxytocin to prevent you from choking a woman to death after copulation
Elaborate?

>>512525530
You have no reason to trust me that I had a three year long relationship and some casual things before and after that, but Schopenhauer's romantic/sexual involvements are well documented; his bodycount might be in triple digits. What did he have to say about sex with that massive pool of experience he had?
>the ultimate manifestation of blind and uncaring Will
>futile, disappointing, preventing one from growth
>a trap for simple-minded men
>replaced by cultivating intellect

>>512523540
It's not Disney you butthole, it's biology and God.

>>512521059 (OP)
You've nailed it without realizing it. There is no 'reason' because it's not about reason. The disgust circuit undergirds any rules-based system in the human brain. Nobody can appeal to personal distaste with logic. I have a preference, pretty widely shared, not to roll around in shit too. I can appeal to cleanliness or social acceptability but it's talking around the fact that I just plain hate filth.

>>512525345
Im at work, soon done and got plans for the weekend with the woman ive dated the last six months.

>>512525355
Which family?

>>512525666
Nice try Satan, but we all know vows are intangible. There is nothing to bind anything. Just because you were the first to have sex with someone doesn't mean the two of you will be in love forever and love isn't enough to keep a relationship going. All things must come to an end.

>>512525723
Yeah it's almost like they are functional drug addicts afraid of getting caught by the police.

>>512521059 (OP)
Studies show being promiscuous fucks up women's brains and makes them unable to commit to a relationship. It's also gross, which is the most valid reason there is. If most people think something's gross, there's a high likelihood it is an evolved genetic behaviour formed as a result of having said reaction be a statistically significant boon to passing one's genes forward.

>>512525868
So you are a sex haver. Congratulations. Want me to award you now? I also got plans for my weekend and I will not be bored.

>>512521059 (OP)
>be man
>want fertile mother material
>dislike high risk partners
>avoid high risk run through women

Simple as.

>>512522206
Cope you cuck nigger. You're just telling yourself that because you married a whore I guarantee it. I want you to visualize this you cuck bitch. Your whore wife sucks even 1 single cock. Puts another man's piss hole in her mouth. Sucks him to completion.... Your whore wife asked him to bust in her whore mouth. She wouldn't even let him pull out. She is equal to the most run down whore in all of Amsterdam. You should actually just kill yourself.

>>512525786
Schopenhauer is right about women, he is just terribly pessimistic about it. I prefer Charles Bukowski's take.

>>512525868
I'm not going to try giving that a genuine answer, your response is bound to be something cringe and gay.

Also if that was an attempt at a low effort insult about me never reproducing, "which" is the wrong word.

>>512521934
>And no man wants his children to have to call a whore mother.
Shout it from the back so these fucking cucks can hear and get it into the faggot brains.

>>512525644
Someone could say that spending time with worthless w*men also contaminates your mind - in a less obvious way than drugs, but all the more sinister. Strictly physically speaking, a promiscous w*man is about as toxic as a used needle.

>>512525889
>Uses the term "Satan"
>Ignores the permanent vow of marriage and states it's temporal which is completely against basically all Christian dogma
Lmao. Also love can carry things, the biggest issue is that love is like a plant, you must keep watering it to maintain it. Most people nowadays are way too depressed (men areliterally content with living in a shithole with just a fan, a TV and some vidya; women are constantly taking meds and buying shit to try and fill empty voids in their lives) to actually try and maintain it, they come back from work and just watch TV and never try to actually maintain things together. Modern society is purposefully designed to destroy the family unit and enslave people to the system via MGTOW/feminism/whatever

>>512525786
The people replying to him are worse than worthless.
They not only hurt themselves but everyone around them.
They think perception is everything. That as long as they are viewed positively, everything will work.
Put these people in charge of sewage treatment and everyone will die of cholera.
Put these people in charge of food production and you get the farm in the middle chaz.
Put these people in a game company and you get asscreed shadows.
They have been mindfucked to believe structural reality does not exist from a young age to make them easy to control.
The only cure is a bullet.

>>512525819
Kid, you don't know the first thing about biology and God. Have you ever seen a wasp reproduce by laying its eggs inside a caterpillar? Gruesome, cruel, brutal. Even God regrets creating the world.

>>512525375
its ingroup outgroup

pre agriculture tribe, its a woman who is a peer who has fucked other peers and everyone is mutually held in high esteem, and you probably fucked all her sisters and cousins as well

Modern day, its not a "local" woman, theyre literally a stranger you meet with zero prior connection to and fucking god knows who or doing what and what STDs, all people you dont know, have zero respect or connection to, like being in ancient Rome and meeting some woman from Persia and she tells you she fucked half of babylonia

>>512525786
>>512526004
Schopenhauer was NOT an incel. Common yet erroneous assumption.
He never married because he didn't believe in monogamy.

>>512525893
>i'm gettimg fucked by several men
>my tribe must've gotten conquered
>i need to serve the conquerer's to survive and hoard resources for myself

>>512526004
Strangely enough, even he valued if there was some purity left.

>>512521059 (OP)
You say dealbreaker which implies a long-term committed relationship. I have no problem with high body count whores, but I have an issue when they start asking for low body count benefits. Semen only goes in mouth and anus, as there will never be a reason to risk a child or relationship with them.

High Body Count Benefits
>relationship problems = walk away
>only stay if you think you are having fun, no boredom periods
>no family meet up requirements
>buffet table of penis options, throw it away if it sucks
>quick money in exchange for sex (losers will pay for rent, rich people will pay for vacations)

Low Body Count Benefits
>lifetime of resources for yourself and your children
>family and society not ashamed
>spiritual and mental self worth
>2 parent household = maximum chance for child success
>elder care almost guaranteed by children (financially or personally)

The benefits are exclusive to each other because the high body count girls are likely to divorce and leave. The low body count girls can leave too, but if their family is involved in the shaming process, it is much less likely.

>>512525723
>alot of these women LIVE with the fear of being considered a whore throughout every second of their existence
And then nobody talks about how because of this men who are at risk of being sexually active have to worry about catching venereal diseases if they so much as have at it once or thrice in their life.

>>512526104
If that's what you believe it's what you believe. Your experiences, not mine. If you don't want to interact with promiscous women no one is forcing you to. Just walk away.

>>512522928
Islam is right you stupid kafir. Enjoy having BBC Tyrone rape you whores asshole because you're too much of a bitch ass faggot to tell her not to dress like a whore as she struts outside like a LITERAL prostitute seeking propositions from other men since her own cuck (you) is such a faggot bitch.

>>512526210
Anyone who questions w*man's total whorish liberation is labeled as "incel", the term has lost any meaning at this point. Simpletons can't understand how someone succesful with w*men can become highly critical of them, it's beyond their comprehension.

>>512522825
>because you can't be sure who is a whore and who isn't
Yes you can. They're all whores.

>>512526032
You waste your time circlejerking on /pol/ how bad women is and trying to force your views on women and sex on others.
If promiscuity is important for you, get into religious circles and you will find like minded people/girls.

English is my second language so youll have to excuse my grammar.

>>512526346
Married men are incels
You cant ask for sex without the police being called on you. Sex is only permissable after turning in 5 stickers on the chore chart.

>>512523448
Post diseased holes and beef curtains

>>512526210
Yeah I know. I'm not married either, it's not worth it.
>>512526228
Because he lived in boomer times when having a virgin non mentally ill wife was still possible. He did also say that the boys can keep their virgins, he'll take an old woman with a fine ass any day.

>>512526346
>the term has lost any meaning at this point.
Once I saw women telling married men they were incels I stopped taking the word seriously all together.

The fact is that all women by their nature are incels unto god. This is where penis envy comes from.

>>512526306
>Just walk away
I have done that on multiple occasions (college campus and event agency internship with hostesses). Not a single regret a decade later.

>>512526400
I was married for ten years, was nothing like that in my experience.
How long were you married?

>>512522928
>With this logic, every time you masturbate, you're ruining your ability to orgasm and feel love
Yes, porn destroys the mind. Retards here defending it are the exact same as crack addicts, they're unable to accept the reality of the situation.
>Also with this logic, men would get bored of fucking the same woman over and over again, and desire "novel" pussy and cheat
Wrong, because if you maintain the love in a relationship, it's always novel. This only happens if either one or both partners are lazy cunts who don't work to maintain the relationship (and cheating is just a sin by itself)
>One day you'll realize why we invented marriage
Marriage isn't a human invention, it's a basic biological function you moron. It functions to raise the child properly. Men aren't hypercompetitive in traditionalist societies where postmodern sexual bullshit is pushed by academia and most people are coupled with someone they actually care about. Read about the past from reliable sources instead of making up delusions in your head

>>512526306
>Just walk away.
You can always kick them out, or just be so obnoxious and off putting that they leave. It doesn't take much to convince the other party to leave you alone you don't always have to run away yourself.

>>512526360
The general consensus is that 4chan is an unconventional public square in a back alley permitting hot takes that the masses do not approve of. You're not the arbiter of conversation around here. Kick rocks, nerd.

>>512521059 (OP)
I kinda stopped caring about it a long time ago. Everything is become hyper sexualized. It ijust s what it is

>>512521059 (OP)
Go fuck more japanese men

>>512521059 (OP)
It’s called instinct, retard.

>>512526210
Schlomohauer was a hedonist idiot. He was also part of the masonic/jewish nihilist "enlightenment" that led to modern society. His bitching about women being worthless whores and how men should have flings led exactly to most women becoming worthless whores and more men having mindless flings, making his own writings "correct" retroactively.

>>512526496
How did your ex-whore cuck you?

>>512526306
>Just walk away.
And then it turns out the woman is as clingy and unstable as you think and will do whatever is in her power to make sure you can't get rid of her.

>>512521059 (OP)
women with high body counts have higher chances of divorcing due comparison between her husband and other males

>>512526108
There is nothing to maintain. You are still thinking of spooks, ghosts of a past forgotten.
>>512526493
Good.
>>512526606
Becoming obnoxious on purpose is a classic.

>>512521059 (OP)
Women are property and I don't even buy used cars what makes you think I want a whore that's eagerly sucked human residues out of men who used her for free???

>>512526965
If that happens to you just send her a long text saying how much you love her like a cuck, then she'll leave you alone. And if that doesn't work, just fuck other women. Then she'll leave you alone. And if that doesn't work, just call the cops lol.

>>512521059 (OP)
Pair bonding. There is good data on it too it's just hard to find. Marriages where they are eachothers first are 90 percent likely to endure. 1-3 partners (making shit up at this point) is like, 50 percent, 4-8, 25 percent, 10 plus is like 8 percent etc. Something like that. It's data backed. No point "debating" a foid. They don't care about being honest, the truth, hypocrisy etc. They want their cake, and to eat it too, and fuck you.

When I was a kid, they made us do all kinds of stupid shit and called it a "field day". One such thing was potato sack races with a partner where you each have to have one leg in a potato sack, and race other groups that did this. Imagine you walk up to your partner, and you say "how many times have you tried this before" and they're like "65" and you say nice, have you ever won? and they reply "no, I've never even finished a race". ..... You think you have a fucking chance with this person? Would you even take it seriously knowing that? Also, in this analogy, this person almost certainly has some kind of infectious disease and mental illness. Yea just no. NEVER fall for the feminist propaganda. Read Machiavelli on women. Fair warning though, after doing so; you'll likely draw the ontologically correct conclusion that they're not worth interacting with literally at all on any level. In fact it will almost always be to your detriment.

>>512526961
She didnt, we grew apart and agreed that we didnt see us grow old together.
Had dinner with her not long ago, still good friends.

>>512526983
>You are still thinking of spooks, ghosts of a past forgotten
Demoralizing shill or brainwashed retard. Either way, doomerism is just another attempt to destroy society and I am not falling for it

>>512521059 (OP)
No one respects a slut.

>>512521724
>>512522871
What you're describing is microchimerisms, and yeah it's real. Problem is that research on it is heavily (((suppressed))) and so people do it in roundabout ways.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/ele.12373
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16084184/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10068676/
https://web.archive.org/web/20141113170929/http://press.endocrine.org/doi/full/10.1210/jcem.87.7.8656
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/09/120926213103.htm
https://web.archive.org/web/20151024154921/https://kopfinstruments.com/Carrier/downloads/Carrier79.pdf
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3545914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC40117/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5293315/

So yes, to those who are married to non-virgins and had offspring, every person who has cummed inside your wife has made their DNA a part of hers, and your wife has passed on that DNA to your offspring. So every time you think; "Wow my kid may share my DNA with me but he looks/acts so different from me! That can't be though she never had an affair!" It may not be her being a cheating slut, it's just her past sluttiness passing on multiple men's DNA onto what was supposed to be YOUR CHILDREN.

>>512526233
>You say dealbreaker which implies a long-term committed relationship. I have no problem with high body count whores, but I have an issue when they start asking for low body count benefits. Semen only goes in mouth and anus, as there will never be a reason to risk a child or relationship with them

Precisely. I was dating a girl for a month and when I realized how much of a whore she is ( every story mentioned a different ex, body count probably over 100) I was so grossed out I couldn't even kiss her.
After a while we became friends ( because I lost all attraction I used to have) and I get a peek of how a woman manipulates man and how needy man are.

>>512521059 (OP)
Because these bitches have diseases. Just found I got syphilis and this is from young, fit and otherwise normal looking women. No slags, no tattoo BPD whores, no blacks, no face piercings.

Normal looking women are giving out diseases now that could potentially fuck you up for life. I've lost 30% of my vision and I have clear neurological damage symptoms like facultations and balance issues as well as severe tinnitus.

These girls are riding so many dicks that they are diseased, sickly lepers.

>Is there an actual reason why men still get turned off by “high body counts” in 2025?
yeah women really aren't all that and a bag of chips, so it's easy to just fuck them off rather than bother trying to keep them if they fuck about.

>>512521059 (OP)
Insecurity. Fear that despite "making it" they will still fail to measure up to the Chad that they concocted in their mind.

>>512526849
>>512527158
Schopenhauer argued against hedonism, that's a major (perhaps main) point of his philosophy - chasing pleasures is fool's endeavour, because with each desire satisfied, two new ones pop up.
He also didn't recommend suicide in any way, just refused to condemn it as was the standard at the time.
What he argued in favor of was suppressing the Will (chiefly manifested by mating drive) by immersing oneself in artistic appreciation, creativity, and/or intellectual research. His own way to go about that was a flute and philosophy.

>>512527158
I never once said I believe in doom and gloom, anon. Society doesn't even exist. You keep believing these social constructs are tangible.

>>512527439
Such many cases.

https://youtu.be/jJTwXg-80sk

>>512527439
>Just ignore divorce and relationship statistics bro, it's all boogiemen
No

Western women are whores, unmarriageable whores

>>512521059 (OP)
1) Roasties don't want to be judged or be held to account for their actions or suffer prejudice
2) Lefties support this, because they love eroding the social fabric of Conservative Christian societies.
3) Kikes like this, so they support it
4) Creeps that claim they don't care, they the same tier as the roastie whores. They both lack core human traits that are desirable in partners.
>Perverted creeps and roastie whores both say they don't care about body count. That is true while they want a hole, or a dick. But when it comes down being a partner, they finally start to sense something isnt quite right.
>That something not quite right is; a hole, a dick, a piece of meat, actually doesnt mean anything and thats a turn off once you're living with that hole or dick day in day out.
>It takes a certain type of person to condone promiscuity. To believe high body count does not matter. As mentioned previously they lack core human traits that are desirable. They have traits that are undesirable, that transcend beyond sex. When they get into a real relationship, and they're not just dumping their balls or getting dicked down, reality dawns on them.
>The relationship isnt great, because they're both essentially scumbags. They try to cope by staying in it because bills need to be paid, and they're mid 30s now so who else is there. What would they do alone.
>"He pumps my ass and discards me, its like I mean nothing, the sex isn't great any more. My work colleague is good banter, he's got big dick energy, I see his bulge, he's packing, he earns more money too. He seems to really understand women. Oh I can't believe I'm having an affair (after being a whore all my life)"
"She helps out with bills and I pipe her ass once a month, but its getting kinda boring. I want fresh pussy. Maybe I need more than a hole (despite being a perverted creep all my life)"

>high school years
>there is this one group of girls that everyone ends up banging but no one will date seriously/long term because they are the sluts
>underdog friend hits his growth spurt and fills out
>raging_hormones.exe and he needs an outlet
>friend dips into the whore pool and looses his virginity
>first time for almost everything for him
>warn him not to fall in too deep
>ends up bonding with one of the whores and starts talking sack shit like marriage
>friend group tries talking him out of it reminding him its his first and these whores are just for test drives as they have given everyone rides
>bros not listening at all and heading for a life of pain and suffering
>finally send him a pictures of fun time with his future wife
breaks the spell finally and after a some raging and some time to cool down he comes to his senses and ends up thanking me
disaster averted and the whores graduated to ethots and onlyfans

>>512521059 (OP)
Men dont like sluts.

dunno man, been thinking about it alot myself lately.
the truth that every man has to face himself is this:
you feel less like a man if a girl you like fucks someone else.
but that just means your happiness was depending on some slimy genitalia.
is this really it?

>>512521059 (OP)
>Is there an actual reason why men still get turned off by “high body counts” in 2025?
"I fucked up my last 20 relationships" is not a very good indicator of a quality partner.

>>512527624
Were they even atrractive?

>>512521059 (OP)
can’t trust a whore
She wasn’t dedicated to her future husband. What makes you think she ever will be?

>>512527491
>What he argued in favor of was suppressing the Will (chiefly manifested by mating drive) by immersing oneself in artistic appreciation, creativity, and/or intellectual research.
It's the only way. Hedonism can never be set aside without something productive/creative to do instead.
The creative urges can only be satisfied with art (developing a skill) or with reproduction (which is why we crave sex).

>>512521059 (OP)
evolutionary adaptation to paternity fraud. We didn't have DNA tests thousands of years ago. The only way you knew a child was yours was if you knew your woman was only having sex with you. This extends to: "if she has a history of fucking every guy in the group, she will probably continue and I will end up raising someone elses genes." Simple. Not to mention we evolved in small groups - imagine being the fucking loser that pair bonds with the woman that all the other men in the group fucked. They'd be laughing at you every time you stepped in public and you'd have no status among them, which would lead your whore to resenting you anyway.

>>512527575
>What he argued in favor of was suppressing the Will (chiefly manifested by mating drive) by immersing oneself in artistic appreciation, creativity, and/or intellectual research
That's still hedonism. He rejects the nature of life to pursue illusions which lack any true meaning as he isn't following the laws of nature but rather his personal interpretation of the world (AKA postmodernism). Philosophy and the arts without a basis on the real world are meaningless, and self-indulgent, hence hedonistic (hedonism doesn't just mean "do drugs and gain instant satisfaction", it means rejecting moral standards and ethical problems and indulging in one's own desires)

>>512527439
Diseased hole/jewish energy right here

>>512527624
You're a good friend, and the guy learnt one of the most valuable lessons in life the way it sticks - the hard way.

>>512527665
Sex =\\= relationship

>>512521059 (OP)
>1pbtid
The internet ruined relationships

>>512527693
attractive yes but not marriage material. some have already begun to hit the wall almost 6 years later after graduation. Couple of the sluts will no doubt morph into full on slag heaps and one is already on her way to meet the Architect

nothing of value is lost

>>512527788
That's an excellent picture you attached there, thanks

>>512524195
People consumed by deadly sins tend to put their own pleasure before other people; so naturally they think their urges are entirely justified but other people need to prpve their revulsion is.

>>512527624
You were a good friend.

>>512527831
Its hard to override biology but had to go the distance to save a bro from a ho

>>512527398
>rawdogs strange
>doesnt get tested
>someone elses fault you are diseased

>>512521934
real talk: is that Mr Rogers?

>>512527836
>Sex =\\= relationship
Thinking that in the first place is a gigantic red flag and marks you as a hedonist.

>>512527824
>postmodernism
It's called idealism - the belief that we're more than monkeys looking to coom inside one another. You can't push for laws of nature and moral standards at the same time, because they're mutually exclusive.

>>512528236
Dont care what you think. Sex is just sex. Now i have sex being in a relationship, i have also had sex without being in a relationship.

>>512528296
You're brainwashed by jews to think of laws of nature in the atheist manner where there is no meaning beyond life naturally. Both postmodern materialism and postmodern "idealism" (surrealism more like) are purposeful deviations from the actual nature of the world, implanted by jews and masons

>>512528374
>Dont care what you think.
Then don't reply to me, faggot.

>>512521059 (OP)
It’s self respect, anon. If you willingly put your lips on something that you know another man’s cock has touched, you are, by definition, both a cuck and a faggot. It’s basic science.

>>512527788
That entire screed is a rationalization of slave morality. It is quite telling that the previous post on that site is the author trying to convince himself that caring about the world's effect on you and your loved ones is slavery.
>you need to be more productive for me and my cause
>you need to give up anything you enjoy
This is just the ramblings of a narcissist who wants other people to serve him.
Ask this faggot the difference between a kid playing a video game after working for ten hours and a farmer smoking pipe weed for an hour after tilling all day. He is trying to say pleasure is always wrong unless he defines it for you, so he will respond to this question by saying you should give all of it up. Then tell him he has fallen into his own definition of asceticism and is rejecting the world and life because he can't define pleasure.
At this point I would tell him he is writing shit on the internet because if he goes outside and tries to engage people he'd fail; not because average people are smart but because they actually have ingrained evolutionary defenses against being made a useless slave for some literal who; that's why jews have to use brainwashing from birth for 4-5 generations to accomplish it.

>>512528483
>actual nature of the world
I'm assuming you aren't refering to our closest natural relatives, the chimps who fuck and kill indiscriminately, so please elaborate on the actual nature of the world you're refering to. Seeing as you've already blamed the jews, hopefully you don't mean Abrahamic beliefs.

>>512528516
Then dont try to force your deluded world view on me.

>>512528483
>if you have hobbies I don't like you're a hedonist
>if you are good at something that makes me look bad you are an asceticist
You are a boring garden variety narcissist attempting to justify dehumanizing everyone in the world.
You bring up masons, whores and jews because you must compare yourself to monstrous people to appear less foul.
You are alone for good reason, and if you deny it I will post some of your private pictures; vampires hate sunlight.

>>512528730
He doesn't have any beliefs other than thinking everyone else is dumb and he's a norman rockwell painting.

>>512521487
>i just picture all the dirty filthy other-men creampies leaking out of her. What ever formulated value I had for her dissipates with this image and all that is left is this vaguely humanoid disgusting mess that resembles a woman courting me for my seed (my financials really) and all I can consider is she is a demonic entity that I should ignore, leave alone destroy.
Fucking BASED

i've noticed a correlation between people who claim high body counts are just fine, and people who wouldn't use a secondhand smartphone unless forced to by circumstance

>>512528730
>Thinking jews follow Abrahamic beliefs
Lol, lmao even.

I can't change your mind, just saying that believing in anything established by the enlightenment or after that is just basically wasting your life believing in delusions.

>>512528852
Fuck off faggot. You're a hedonist that considers intimacy a recreational act. You might as well be a drug addict.

>>512529109
Sex is sex. Youre the one giving it implied meanings .

>>512521132
Based bush enjoyer.

>>512521268
Cant back this truth enough.
Pair bonding is extremely fucking important.

>>512528879
Your levels of assumption on my position are quite insane. My argument simply is that art must follow natural laws to truly be a pure and valuable expression of the self. Otherwise, following the nigh-solipsistic ideas that the masons pushed, you end up with corrupted "expressions" which are little more than indulging in aberrant beliefs. See how modern art is, for example.

>>512523892
Btw what ever came of Venti? Did she have kids or no?

>>512528296
most moral standards are moral standards in hunter gatherer societies

>>512521132
Probably some truth to this. Most women I've banged over the age of say 25 refused to go 100% hairless because they didn't want their pussy to look like a child's. Personally I enjoy a nicely kempt landing strip.

>>512521059 (OP)
You don't want to settle down with a party girl. She's had dozens to hundreds of men that are better than you or that she had more fun with than you. She was kind, sweet and fun with them. She is short tempered and hostile with you for any little reason but the real reason is she never really wanted to settle down. Her age forced her too. Unicorns don't exist. Neither do sluts who are kind and faithful.

>>512524021

>>512528296
>>512528879
You are retarded, art is necessarily expression and a form of generating brotherhood through sensation of the expression.
modern "art" does neither of these things and its often heavily self-conscious and that which is self-conscious cannot be art.
It lacked the expression of soul and will and others can not engage with the sensation borne out of soul and will, its not art, its more like a mistake or a training dummy for sharpening skill.

You are very unserious people and should stop posting.

There is, but you don’t need it. It gives you the ick is the only reasoning you need.

>>512521554
This only matters if she let her ex pound her like that but not you. I once had an ex that let her ex pound her pooper but wouldn't let me in because of my size. Honestly drove a wedge between us because I was jealous. So some truth to this picture if she gave more of herself sexually to someone else. But if she's doing the same shit and more with you, who the fuck cares. At least she likes sex. Otherwise you risk ending up with a prude or nonsexual person and carry these acts out with pros.

>>512525727
> 3.5
LMFAO what cope
Did a guy stick his dick in halfway dumbass?

>>512529653
You cant make a ho a housewife

>>512523949
>>512524089
in the Civil war, a guy got cucked when he was away and the whole town made fun of him
so he got his pistol, paid the guy who fucked his wife a visit and shot him in the head
based but he should've done the same thing to his wife too

>>512529238
>Youre the one giving it implied meanings .
Everything you've ever thought about only ever has implied meanings you stupid nigger. If you don't value sex as an act of intimacy between two people that love eachother you are worthless as a partner.

>>512527831
This is correct. I've been married two times already, despite my young age, and it took exactly two marriages before understanding that pussy is the sneakiest and deadliest weapon known to man.
At first you're like
>what's this, hmm looks interesting
and the next thing you know your house is gone, car is gone, dog is gone, if you had kids they're gone too, and your money. After every divorce it's like hard reset and you have to start building again. From scratch. You have to be very careful and learn everything about the next hoe before moving together. Take her on a long trip and see how she reacts to stress and minor fights. The ones faking it will sooner or later show their true self. Do not think of it as just a one time overreaction, it's a real flag that you must take seriously.

>>512529109
Any sex that is not for the purpose of procreation is by definition recreational. Recreational sex and intimacy are not mutually exclusive. You not going to fuck your pregnant wife?

>>512529653
>She is short tempered and hostile with you for any little reason
You talk from experience?

>>512529874
>If you don't value sex as an act of intimacy between two people that love eachother you are worthless as a partner
Sex is sex. Meeting my girl tonight, perhaps you would do a video call and educate us on how to have proper sex and how to feel about it?

>>512521059 (OP)
churkas need not apply

>>512530059
>perhaps you would do a video call and educate us on how to have proper sex and how to feel about it?
yes, I would.
pretty sure the danish would kill my boner thou

>>512521059 (OP)
it gives me the ick

>>512525748
You mean you've never felt the overwhelming urge to murder a woman before having sex with her? Damn bro you're an evolutionary dead end.

>>512530284
His girl is probably a 6'2 somali tranny. Might want to give it a miss

>>512521059 (OP)

If you were buying a car, would you rather have a brand new one, or one which has been used as a cab for years with countless different people getting into and out of it, many of them even leaving their bodily fluids behind? Sure, it's been cleaned, but unless it's waaaaaaaay cheaper and easier to buy, why wouldn't I prefer a brand new never used car?

>>512522180
Show tits or get the fuck out. Any man that hasn't also fried his ability to bond knows why a high count is bad.

>>512521059 (OP)
>1pbtid slide thread by NATO kike using russian vpn

>>512522180
>The italian is pro promiscuity
Classic, the jews fucked up italy in few decades, they did a great job

>>512529973
>Recreational sex and intimacy are not mutually exclusive
Okay faggot try reading the post chain where this retard literally says sex and relationships are two different things.
>>512530059
>Sex is sex.
You know what the funny thing about NPCs is? When they run out of preprogrammed things to say they repeat themselves.
>my girl
She's not yours, she's a slag and so are you.

>>512521059 (OP)
>So… is there actually something deeper going on here
People who care about this is generally
>very conservative Christians who believe sex before marriage is a sin or whatever
>incels who have never had sex who thinks its something magical and if that is shared with other men then its less magical
>schizos who believe in that theory that the vagina absorbs DNA from every male that cooooomed inside her
>small dick losers who are afraid that their future girlfriend is gonna be upset by your little dick after having average or large dicks earlier in life
Generally people who do not matter bascially

>>512522044
>>512523949
Not always, this is only because of boomers creating daycare culture.
Tight-knit friend circles that have existed since pre-k/middleschool. will stay together for life and form a social phalanx against the world.
boomers being petulant children completely destroyed this and created this winner take all competitive environment. This sounds great to them because they think life is an individual game, which naturally they would never having faced real hardship where individuals are entirely inadequate.

>>512521059 (OP)
the idea of my pretty hypothetical white princess getting blown out by niggers upsets me

>>512521059 (OP)
more partners = higher chance of stds, divorce, infidelity

any body count higher than 0 is a dealbreaker

>>512521132
It's nasty tho

>>512521059 (OP)
>her relationships with dozens or hundreds of men failed
>but certainly it will work with me this time!
>no im not grossed out by the fact that all of them stuck their penis inside her and sprayed her pussy full of cum

>>512521121
>t. im Jewish and I rape kids
We know

Sults can't pair bond, people with good pattern recognition pick up on that.

>>512521059 (OP)
>Is there an actual reason why men still get turned off by “high body counts” in 2025?
Because no matter what year it is, it won't somehow change that it is absolutely vile and disgusting. And it shows that they are promiscuous and cannot be trusted as a partner also
It isn't hard to understand. If a woman is constantly sleeping around, how are you going to know that the children you have with her are actually yours? It's an instinct that guards men form being used as a genetic dead end cuckold

>>512521059 (OP)
>the degeneracy will continue until morale improves.
No Mr. Kremlin 1pbtid
I do not want genitle warts, HIV, or any other suprise from some guy she thought looked nice once.
It's gross.
It's an indication of bad impulse control just like tattoos.
It's an indication that she invests very little into finding a serious partner and she will leave randomly or that she has some major issue that I will end up running from.
The world is not your dildo.

ONE POST BY ID
newfags.

>>512521443
Basically this. I don’t see how it’s a difficult concept. It applies to anything really.
Would you prefer a new BMW or the same BMW that 29 dudes jizzed inside?
How about a steak? Want a nice fresh steak or one that has had 15 dicks rubbed all over it?
>girls take showers
Yeah imagine if a restaurant tried this.
>yes, the whole male kitchen staff ran through your chicken Milanese but that’s in the past! And we washed the chicken cutlet after each guy came on it! If the chicken is with you on your plate now why does it matter?

>>512531047
>I don't like pussy in its natural form
Nigga u literally gay

>>512522180
>Its just a rationalization bro!
No, being the village bicycle means that the woman is low value. Women are property and always will be. Its a law of nature, and women want to be possessed as hard as a man wants to poses her.
Fucking everything with a dick does the same thing to her as having 100's of feet in a pair of shoes.
>I waited 2 min to post this

>>512524101
Tits or GTFO whore

>>512521059 (OP)
"body count" is such a cringe cope.
Virgin or nothing. Even suggesting that a respectable man should accept a non virgin is a huge disrespect.
They should be dueled to death desu.
Stats, muh science and other copes dont even matter.

>>512531757
>No, being the village bicycle means that the woman is low value.
Yet those women will most likely find a partner and live with, while men who call women "village bicycle" runs a much larger risk of ending up alone and have no value
>Women are property and always will be.
Yet so many chuds cant even get one
Really makes you think how worthless such a person must be

>>512522044
It's true.

t. Childhood friend group did this fairly frequently onto of parental units demanding zero hanky panky under the full threat of going to jail/calling the cops.

I’m 35, with a body count of 30+. My girlfriend (23), with 30, has BPD and self-harm scars. We’ve been in a relationship for 2 years.She love-bombed me, I fucked her brains out, and she sucked my dick so hard it nearly exploded. Yeah, I’m a degenerate, but I found Christ and really tried to “fix” her or at least red-pill her on the “whore” issue. Tried everything: played the Chad (I’m a solid 7), went for the antisocial bad-boy approach, acted like a trad cuck, dove deep into her psyche with her “radical feminist” trauma-bond nonsense. Even came inside her without permission—she was on birth control pills. Tried being nice and respectful, spent money on her, helped her with weed (it calms her down), listened to her nonstop rants about hating men. Beat her, let her beat me. Slut-shamed her, accepted her past, gave her attention, put her in her place. We had fun times, had hard times. In short, I tried every fucking meme.All I ended up with was a broken car door and a domestic violence lawsuit (she didn’t snitch, but the simp police are strong in this country).Nothing works. She still doesn’t want kids (only maybe after 25+ and after we’ve both had therapy) and isn’t submissive. Mind you, she has both parents. Weak fathers breed whores—that’s it! I think these women can be “fixed,” but not when the whole system backs up whoredom. Would not recommend for weak-minded people. Good experience to prove that. Shit’s fucked—our women have become our enemies, and we’re in shackles, unable to fix this problem.

>>512531933
>Yet those women will most likely find a partner and live with
Yeah, a worthless beta simp she will walk all over while fucking other dudes on the side.

>>512531974
You think we rage over people having children?
It' the same reason tattoos is a red flag.
You must have limited critical thinking skills.

>>512532185
>Yeah
Exactly so keep crying, not really interested in your cuck fantasies but thanks for sharing i guess

>>512532073
You can’t fix BPD just avoid as much as possible

>>512521059 (OP)
why do you feel the need to justify yourself?
just say it gives you the ick, women do it all the time

>>512532249
I'm a realist, you think some whore could ever love a man after sleeping with dozens of them with no attachment? They sleep around in the first place because they hate themselves.

>>512531933
>Nuh un, having 1000 dicks in my pussy is YOUR problem
Bitch please. You are a biohazard who's only worth is as a warm hole. You will eventually settle for a sub par because why would Chad when there are new and more interesting warm holes? The mid orbiter you capture will do nothing for you and you will be unfulfilled forever because you burned out your ability to pair bond because jewish social media told you whores and niggers are cool.
You are a whore, and your slow motion trainwreck of a life would have been vastly improved if the 19th amendment never happened.

>>512532355
>I'm a realist
Pessimist?
Pretty sure people can love someone even if they have been with other people because i see it everyday basically
Maybe if you had some social circles you would see that normies have no problems having relationships and meeting their new partners
Not everyone is as sad as you
>IM NOT SAD IM ACTUALLY SUCCESFUL AND HAVE A VIRGIN WIFE
Sure buddy

>>512532501
>Yes i am a retard who has never been in a relationship and nobody will miss me when i die alone
We know anon you did not have to tell us
Also pretty sure im not a woman because there are no women on the internet

>>512532259
With violence you can.
But modern world will put you in jail.

>>512532584
I'm a father with two kids. Enjoy your cats, wine, and bitter dregs of your "best life" lol. Vid related.

>>512532507
Labeling people as partners is dehumanizing. That shows how interchangeable they are to you, and it shows your lack of attachment. Before all this globohomo sex positivity brainwashing, partners were boyfriend/girlfriend or husband/wife now it's partners. The jewish brainwashing has done a fucking number on your head. It shows.

>>512532507
Sweeden checks out.

>>512532770
>I'm a father with two kids.
Maybe spend time with your family instead of sitting on 4chin on a friday morning? Or stop lying about yourself
>>512532778
>abeling people as partners is dehumanizing.
This is like some retarded communist logic
>"dont say your mother because she does not belong to you, use her name instead"
That is you right now
>now it's partners
Yes because a partner is someone you share your life with, someone you work and build something with
>>512532896
>le jew
Really shylock?
You are gonna give remarks about someones flag?

>>512527347
>>512521724
I've never bought into microchimerism, I have yet to see a mechanism.

That said. she's a beta female. insecure in her own skin. unsure whether her progeny meets the mark.
at the end of the day, I can't marry a woman who will dash my children's head on a rock, and I have a sense that the temperaments are similar.

>>512532778
Same shit with me she calls me a parnter all the time as if we runing a biz toghether.
Jews are tge ultimate cucks in human historys who install tgis bs into our brains and called it "norm" after ehuch they pikachu faced not realizing tge dmg they done "why goyim killing us" samw as whores " why there no good men man around" .
The jewish cunt really did a number on those faggits maube becaus jewish wonen have big millkers and sournded by weak lil manlet man idk.

>>512532945
>This is like some retarded communist logic
No, labeling people as partners is communist logic, sorry that upsets you. Maybe stop sleeping around like a whore. Are you going to do that till the day your shit doesn't work anymore?

>>512532945
A father with a whore wife who took some nigger dick bwfore you nice one sven.
Why are your women are such whores gor arab dick explain sven

>>512532945
Spend less time on 4chin.
Ok father why you are here then.
Go wash the dishes cuck

>>512532945
Maybe spend more time learning to be a chaste woman instead of fucking every dick that pops up and dodging responsibility for your poor choices. Mission impossible that.
I'm actually working right now in a boring meeting supporting my family. I don't care if you believe me roastie. We both know how your story ends, while I'd just have to fly to Thailand if I didn't already have a wife with only me as her body count. Having an expiration date stamped on your ovaries has to suck.

>>512521059 (OP)
>Is there an actual reason why men still get turned off by “high body counts” in 2025?
>>512521268
>Fried pair-bonding capability
This.
The more men she has had, the less she values men, and the higher her standards become. Eventually, her standards are so high, the men she wants, don't want her, so her only option is to date a man she isn't attracted to, so she can have a stable relationship. Of course she resents that man, because she should have stayed with this guy or that guy, so she has no respect for the man, and he becomes nothing but a sperm donor at best. Maybe you have a kid together, maybe one day she gets bored and decides to dump you and file for custody of the kid. As long as the woman isn't a psychotic meth-head, the courts will give her custody. So you get kicked out of your own house, you're living in an apartment, paying the woman who makes $80,000 a year at a meaningless jewish adult daycare job, child support, she's banging other guys in your house, and your kid is calling some other guy Dad. The woman still resents you, so she talks shit about you to your kid, and since Mom lives in a nice house and makes $80,000 a year, and you live in an apartment, working in the trades making $30 /hr, unable to afford a house because you pay child support every month, you're the vilified deadbeat Dad, meanwhile she's super Mom.
TLDR: You can't turn a whore into a housewife.

>>512533169
>No
Yes it is because its literally from a communist that i heard on the radio, or i guess hippy is more accurate
>>512533201
>>512533308
>jewish cuck-posting
No one asked for your fetish
>>512533324
>Maybe spend more time learning to be a chaste woman
Hey retard i am still not a woman
>I'm actually working right now in a boring meeting supporting my family.
Sure you are
>We both know how your story ends
Yeah im gonna watch European Championships in track and field and later im having pancakes
Have fun and keep seething

>>512532507
The swinger group in my home town all ended up contracting HIV.
It was quite funny when it happened.
Small midwestern town so everyone knew.

>>512533423
Im still not a women.
Tgen wtf are you?
A women, a man?

>>512533423
>Hey retard i am still not a woman
Talks like a woman
Logics like a woman
evades responsibility like a woman
deflects like a woman

The local uninhibited whore feminist went to a quinceañera in mexico with the only mexican in our class.
She returned pregnant with a 36 year old's daughter.
She got real desperate and when she started making a little money as a cna a construction worker wifed her.

>>512533423
You certainly argue like a woman, and are defending whores religiously, like a woman.

>>512532355
then they hate themselves because they sleep around. vicious cycle.

That said it takes all kinds.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5iLhA8eM8yg
some people are excited by high body counts some not.
Some are excited and disgusted by it.
Some are excited and fulfilled by it.

that said it speaks of a numbness so isolating with a sense that death is preferable. for someone so estranged from compassion and connection that every gentle affectation is agony. A woman pushed to her biological limit.

The parents even let the 36 year old mexixcan sleep in her bed when he visited.
Didn't even speak english.
Funniest shit I've heard.
Devout Lutherans.
Don't be racist.
wwjd.

Maybe I support whoredom?
Sure is entertaining.

>>512533907
She was 16 when he visited.
Haven't seen him for years.

>>512532770
Good vid

>>512521059 (OP)

Men are allowed to have standards just like women are. Except when it comes to a high bodycount, women can CHOOSE to not be whores. Tell your cunt of a coworker that.

>>512530250
whats this say?

>>512521059 (OP)
Women weren't asking for an explanation when they were young and actively dating. They were in their "fuck you I do what I want era", if I recall. Funny, that.