Thread 512554214

seems potentially problematic

>>512554214 (OP)
Who the hell is using all that internet in the ocean?

>>512554322
the indian navy has no physical capabilities but they fill carriers with millions of shitposters that exclusively operate on this board

Each of those would be much smaller than a pixel at that scale. One pixel could host a loosely packed cluster of a hundred of them and it still wouldn't be a good ideal of scale.

>>512554322
Yachts, sailboats, catamarans, cruise ships and container ships.

>>512554322
>Who the hell is using all that internet in the ocean?
Sea peoples.

What if they collide with each other which could lead to Kessler syndrome and make earth's orbit unusable?

Huh what then? Did you think about that Muskrat?

>>512554214 (OP)
>be alien
>see random planet with tons of unknown metal objects surrounding it's orbit
>leave because whatever species lives there is surely crazy

>>512554470
>>512554484
Bingo. Can’t shitpost on a run across the southern ocean without a starlink hub.

>>512554214 (OP)
You can (not) connect

>>512554638
They're pretty low. I've watched a few of them burn up.

>>512554322
big brain question here... whew.

>>512554322
Oh you think starling was for internet and not some massive psyop for complete and total world surveillance? How innocent of you

>>512554484
>I sea peoples and den I eat em

>>512554322
Exactly. Why don't the satellites hover over cities instead of going everywhere randomly?

>>512554322
Sea niggers.

>>512554638
Why would he care, they throw hundreds of them into orbit every few months

>>512554214 (OP)
starlink satellites are already a huge problem for astronomers

>>512554214 (OP)
Space is fake and gay

>>512554638
turn that frown upside down.

>>512554322
Starlink satellites aren't geosynchronous. They orbit at lower altitudes. They orbit closer to the earth so that lower latency can be achieved. Since the satellites can't maintain position above a populated area due to their lower orbit, they eventually travel out of range of the populated area. In order to maintain constant coverage over the populated area, then you need a large enough swarm of satellites so that new ones orbit into range when old ones orbit out of range. This means that your satellites will spend some time over empty expanses like the ocean.

>>512554638
At that low of an orbit they will de-orbit and burn up in a relatively short period of time.

>>512555598

apparently they're burning holes in the ozone too

https://www.cnet.com/home/internet/starlink-plans-to-send-42k-satellites-into-space-that-could-be-bad-news-for-the-ozone

>>512554322
The same reason why there are internet cables on the sea floor. To get data from one side of the ocean to the other.

>>512554214 (OP)
Safe and efficient goyim!

>>512555615

Turn on a lamp in a large pitch black room with 1 white ball in it.
1 Red Ball
1 Blue Ball
1 Yellow ball.

The white ball will glow, because it reflects the full light spectrum. Whereas the other balls will barely be visible, unless their proximity to the white ball, or source of light is increased.

Logic.

>>512554322
are you retarded? do you know what an orbit is?

>>512554214 (OP)
you literally have no idea how vast the orbit of earth is

these dots are absolutly meaningless
they could shoot up the same amount times 100 up there
it wouldn't even make a dent

>>512554214 (OP)
It looks denser than it really is at this resolution. I imagine it's only a matter of time until a chain reaction causes some mass accident though.

>>512554214 (OP)
Bigger problem is jeets crashing their shit into other satellites and creating massive amounts of hazardous debrief in space.

>>512555970
"satellites"

>>512554638
kessler syndrome is pretty bad, but the the thing is it will all fall down to earth in about a decade or two and burn up.
But the problem is, how will humanity survive with two decades of no satelites.

>>512554214 (OP)
Anon there are 6 billion jeets on the planet and I haven't bumped into a single one today. 100,000 satellites is nothing.

>>512554322
crab people

>>512555970
What that chart fails to deal with is bandwidth
Yeah, 3 satellites in Geostationary orbit could cover 99% of the surface
But there's a limit to how much throughput of data each of those 3 satellites can downlink
Get more than 100 people on a satellite like that and your speeds go to complete shit
Starlink, on the other hand, has you connected to multiple satellites at once, and one person downloading in New York won't affect me in Chicago

>>512556388
>fall down to earth

>>512556618
Bandwidth could be overcome by using more geosynchronous positions. The point was the 700ms latency times for geosynchrous communication. Closer satellites means lower latency.

>>512556388
>kessler syndrome is pretty bad
Care to elaborate?

>>512554214 (OP)
Not my problem.

>>512554214 (OP)
yeah but the satellites are not the size of a large city.

>>512554322
Those satellites orbit so they are actually needed to carry terrestrial land based capacity so the ocean is just a bonus.

Also, commercial aircraft have internet and cell now and they can use starlink for it.

>>512554885
>Oh you think starling was for internet and not some massive psyop for complete and total world surveillance?
Why are they surveilling the fish?

>>512556869
A cascade of space debris turning everything around earth in to a shooting gallery.

I frequently aim my anus at the night sky whenever one of Elon's gay satellites flies over my house. Somewhere, on a hard drive in a secret bunker, there's a picture of me with my anus spread wide

>>512556869
Kessler syndrome is a hypothetical disaster where the orbits above a planet become so saturated with space junk that it is impossible for manned spaceflight or unmanned orbital infrastructure to exist.

>>512556849
It's also a lot more expensive to launch geosynchronous satellites in terms of delta-V and thus fuel
Hardware failures are also a lot less tolerable in a geosynchronous satellite, since it's responsible for a larger coverage area and takes dedicated missions to launch

Basically, there's a lot of reasons satellite Internet didn't become feasible until Starlink

>>512557007
oh seems we had a misunderstanding, when you said it's bad I got the impression that you meant the model itself is flawed. Bad as in "poorly thought out" not "this is going to be a disaster"

>>512557124
No problem.
I'm no expert, but we still need a lot more stuff up there to really set off a kessler syndrom.
Most of the starlink and other stuff is on low orbit anyway and would go down fast if the ion thrusters stopped working.

>>512554637
as the sun grows in the future, having a lot of things in orbit might block some more light from reaching the ground and keep temps down

>>512557269
>>512557062
Due we really need more stuff? The model takes into account that satellites are full of small parts, things like your standard sized screw. Get a million of these screws flying around in orbit and they might stay there

>>512554885
A decacde + ago i had a kundalini blabla (google it, best way to describe it) and got a really clear feeling, like a revelation, that some rich assholes had the idea to cover the whole earth in a dampening field designed to stop the expansion of human consciousness.

Not drug related, never done any heavy psychadelics, not done weed for years and alcohol for weeks at that point. Just meditation.

>>512557076
Yeah, there's a lot of factors regarding why low orbits were used. But the answer to the original question of "why are there a bunch of satellites over the ocean" is because you need an abundance of satellites in order to maintain service over an area when using low orbits.

>>512557494
Understood, anon
Cheers

>>512557452
A dampening field? You mean like burning lead into the air for approximately 70 years or so?

>>512554214 (OP)
Looks like Third Impact

>>512557398
The risks aren't as great in low earth orbit. There's enough atmospheric drag that satellites need to routinely burn fuel to maintain their orbits. Any debris at such a low altitude would burn up in a relatively short period of time.

>>512554214 (OP)
Problematic how? Those red dots aren't to scale size you fucknugget.

>>512554214 (OP)
space lasers will clean that shit easy.
or ground lasers if a lot less easily.

>>512555176
>Why don't the satellites hover over cities instead of going everywhere randomly?
Because to put a satellite in geostationary orbit so that it will stay over one spot on Earth as the Earth rotates, you have to put it 22,000 miles above the Earth's surface.
The starlink satellites are only about 340 miles above the ground. A constellation of satellites in low Earth orbit is significantly cheaper and has lower latency than one satellite in geostationary orbit.

>>512554214 (OP)
Shut up goy its only to give you better streaming quality, stop noticing that 5g can manipulate nano-graphene

>>512554214 (OP)
theres a lot of room in space around the earth. think of all the surface area of the planet earth and its even more than that

>>512554214 (OP)
>250x245
what the fuck those glowyies doing?
running those graphics on AMD K6 II?

>>512554214 (OP)
Those dots are the size of some countries. At actual scale it is no where near this bad. You moron.

>>512554641
>>leave because whatever species lives there is surely crazy

>>512555176
Are you serious? You have to be trolling. Do you know the speed necessary for low earth orbit?
7.8 kilometers per second. Because the earth is round different cities travel on earth rotation at variable speeds.
You are going to have a very hard life man.

>>512554484
Should we expect the second bronze age collapse?

>>512557831
No, more like a big wifi router blocking out some cosmic waves that would move us up to a higher vibration

>>512554214 (OP)
man, what a balanced ping grid. that totally makes so much sense and isn't probably fake distraction operation data at all.

>>512556388
>how will humans survive like is was before the 1960s?

Truly it is unfathomable.

>>512559343
Anon, i understand what your trying to say, but you really dont understand how had the world economy relies on these satelites.

>>512554214 (OP)
thats a lot of mother fucking space debris

>>512554322
They aren't stationary.

>>512554214 (OP)
>problem + automatic
>= Problematic

The communists won.

>>512559651
Not just economy, shipping traffic, weather forecast, global communication, airline traffic and satellite imagery (obviously). Which granted are all part of the global economy but also goes beyond that.

>>512559858
>dependency
lol

>>512554214 (OP)
This is space pollution for profit and nobody is held accountable

>>512554214 (OP)
i've stopped stargazitg sice they started with that shit.
fucking gayass satelites ruining the view. can't have nice things.

I HATE ELONGATEDMUSKRATSTEIN

>>512559858
Yeah, i read a while ago that seamen have become so reliant on tech that if they lose sat uplink they would find it very hard to navigate the open sea.
It would pretty much grind seatrade to a stop until seamen get trained to navigate the sea with old ways.

>>512556539
walk like crab, talk like people
hypnotoad, hypnotoad
white-paper, white-paper

>>512554214 (OP)
atleast we can die happy knowing nobody will inherit the stars

if the white man dies on this worthless rock,then everyone else will

elongated muskrat is a terrorist by doing this little apocalypse project

>>512557045
faggot

>>512554214 (OP)
Unbuckle the earths foreskin and thrust us raw into the inky void.

>>512560321
they might notice that the sun is only 32 minuets (nautical miles) wide if they were required to lean how to use a sextant, that would be bad for (((business))).

>>512560502
This would seriously hamper the globohomo.

>>512560245
dw goy, we've taken care of daaa ebil plasticstraw

>>512560595
I'm no sailor anon, i dont know what those words mean.

>>512560598
would it?
it makes orbit a prison, so even if hermetically sealed fusion powered hovercars dropped there'd be no escape.
it'd also demoralize actual humans more than it'd hamper (((them))).

>>512560595
Why? Sounds like someone can earn money selling sextants

>>512560700
one (arc) minute is 1 sixtieth of a degree.
he's saying the occular diametar of sol on the horizon is about 0.53°

no idea how the nautical mile relates to this, or haw big that actually is. but i know the surveyors mile isn't an actual mile and both are defined in terms of meters.

>>512554214 (OP)
considering the amount of garbage we already have in orbit, yes

>>512560810
they'd probably get some of whore to sell a branded sextant&sex-tent bundle

>>512554322
Swimmers.

>all this shit can be up there without crashing into each other despite the fact that most satellites have no ability to self-propel to avoid collisions and that small meteors supposedly enter the atmosphere constantly which would throw the trajectory of a satellite off if it made contact with it
K.

>>512560926
>no idea how the nautical mile relates to this
it's a 1:1 ratio.

>>512561067
to what? the mile? why even call it nautical then?

>>512561063
that's the problem, they have, can and will hit more things the more junk floating around there.
there are nuts and bolts and shit orbiting at 18000 mph

>>512554214 (OP)
reminder the person in charge of those throws tantrums on twitter

>>512554322
When the elite need to chill in the ocean for 30 years after the great purge they will have internet.

>>512554214 (OP)
China is developing technologies to pull them all back down to Earth and replace them with Chinese satellites

>>512554322
It's the fucking ayys
they live under the ocean

>>512561159
the nautical sextant uses the physical 1 minute angular resolution limit of the human eye to make measurements, 1 (arc)minute == 1 nautical mile.

>>512555970
>>512558276
How does the system even work if they aren't geosynchronous? The ground unit would have to track the movement of the satellites with its antennae.

>>512554214 (OP)
They're designed for their orbits to decay in ~50,000 years at which time they will fall back to Earth entirely harmlessly
Musk was aware of the potential problem of permanent space debris when he planned this shit out

>>512560528
autistic kraut spotted

>>512561679
so the length of the nautical mile depnds on tho dintance of the perpendicular observer? that's fucking retarded, how is that ever usefull?
why the fuck call it a nautical mile? arce minutes already exist.

>>512561940
>kraut
fuck kraut, disgusting shit. who the fuck eats leafs? my food, not i. fuck that crap.it's just fancy grass, no thanks.

>>512561994
>how is that ever useful
for navigation anon.

>>512557452
>cover the whole earth in a dampening field designed to stop the expansion of human consciousness.

Lmao. Or they just could sell porn and goyslop.

>>512558751
>the plastic age collapse
God I wish.

>>512554214 (OP)
not in my lifetime

>>512554322
Poseidon is an omega level gooner

>>512557452
That's part of their plan yeah.
But as long as nobody launches Starlink, or shoots the rockets down on their way up, the entire system will disappear in 5 years.
That's what they're designed to do, to automatically de-orbit so they can be replaced with more advanced satellites as Judaism goes on.
It creates its own problem. They leave aluminium oxide in the upper atmosphere on burn-up, which destroys the ozone layer. Oops.

>>512554393
Even that doesn't give a proper scale.
If you were to shrink that by 50-100x, you might be close to the ISS.

>>512560321
>until seamen get trained to navigate the sea with old ways

not to mention half of usa would fail to find way home from work without gps

>>512554214 (OP)
it isnt because the red dots are not actually the size of a city

>>512560595
>retarded flat earth nigger talks about sextants
The irony. Celestial navigation only makes sense on a globe.

>>512554214 (OP)
Now show it to scale

>>512554214 (OP)
Retard.

>>512554322
Cargo ships you fucking retard. I swear I got flashback of that retard who didn't know you could freeze water to get ice.

>>512554214 (OP)
TUMBLING DOWN TUMBLING DOWN TUMBLING DOOOOOOWWWWWWWWN

>>512557494
>why are there a bunch of satellites over the ocean
Epstein need internet in the island and his yachts on "international waters".

>>512563030
To be fair, i would have a hard time finding my way around europe too.
I still remember my dad using a big ass book full of maps of europe to take us on vacation all over europe.

>>512561758
The ground unit does track the movement of the satellites via phased array antennas.

>>512563199
nasa has bigger balls (picrel).

>>512554214 (OP)
World Wide Web
Links
Chains
Cell
Bars

>>512554214 (OP)
Hardly a monopoly.

>>512554214 (OP)
Imagine 11,000 cars equally distributed over the entire globe, including the oceans. What are the odds two of them bump into each other?

>>512554322
The hunt is on for the latest (((Island))).

>>512564633
Are the drivers asian?

>>512556388
>life... fading... need... satellite...

>>512554214 (OP)
Soon, you will have to pay for sunlight
Then the vampires will come for you

>>512554214 (OP)
how many did the 2 big solar events last year take out?

>>512560784
Global communication and surveilance would take a hit, so I would assume some manner of fracturing/localization happening. And slowing down of the schemes.

>>512554214 (OP)
The powers that be have a new system that has been in the development for decades now, ready to be rolled out in the coming years. It will operate in parallel starting sometime this year and by the next decade it will be fully operational as the Agenda 2030 goals are slowly being implemented.
There will be no collapse, no violence, no uprising, no world war, no revolution, no killing of jews or politicians or other such fantasies. Instead there will be law & order, compliance and total surveillance until the very end. AI will be at the center of it all.

The Great Reset is inevitable.

>>512556225
>100 IQ take
>Somehow the smartest reply
This board is shit.

>>512554214 (OP)
zoom out

>>512554214 (OP)
It's just a digital tracking prison system. Nothing to worry about.

>>512554214 (OP)
i am being tortured by EMF neuroweapons and it's having a severely negative impact on my mental and physical health

>>512554322
>he doesn't know about Atlantis.

>>512554322
Nigga have you heard of this thing called ships, and have you also heard about what orbits are?

It's not for internet. The reason they are working so hard on this is so they have a live high resolution view of everywhere on the earth at all times.

>>512554470
epstein island...

>>512566627
LOL
LMAO

>>512555615
nigger "thinks" light doesnt have to be reflected by a surface to hit his retina with some scattered lightwaves... nigger "thinks" visual sense is just there working on its own. like some magic illumination spell.

>flat earth tiere wannebe psyops.

>>512554322
Me for one, I have been sailing for just over 3 years now. Starlink is a game changer in safety and connectivity.

>>512566627
>AI will be at the center of it all.
not for that long - speaking in historic scale though.

they already "discovered" that LLM can transfer evaluations and preferences by using 3-tier number codes - and it doesnt happen publicly - to other LLM they have to "train".

its only 2025, mind-niggers. just ask grand-gramp pr grand-granny what he/she thought graham balls telephon would be like in a 50, 80 or 100 years and then check that with you state-of-the-art perma-connected, geofenced, ID-locked "smart-phone" bug.

mindniggers have no idea whats coming.and im not just talking about a new, even worse mass-unemployment.

>>512570333
appendix:
uncle ted was and will be right.

https://rumble.com/v4u0b59-behavioral-sink-ted-was-right.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp_a

>>512566627
Makes sense