>>512578429 (OP)
Really?
The same apps that allow women to filter out low-height or income?
Sure.
Maybe apps are the problem to the begin with? Perhaps it's not biologically viable to give women access to every square jawed man with a phone within a 200 miles radius? Back in the day, if a girl wanted a man, she had to leave her house, go mingle, make herself available in public, filter her friend's circle, and go to events. And women had to settle if they were broke, with other broke men. They actually had to work for it. Now, an unemployed 4/10 has access to every Chad in her city and three towns over. In the past, even if they were next-door neighbors he wouldn't give her the time of day but now she can pester 50 types of himbo from her couch.
Except, the well has run dry.
Humans are still human and even those eligible bachelors got burnt out from all the pussy being thrown at them. And if they're even halfway put together to be viable for marriage, they realize how unhealthy it is to have 100+ desperate women lusting after them. Stalking, pregnancy scares, bipolar chicks, baby-crazy, ludicrous speed marriage proposals, and the hyper-fixations that all men fear are cranked up by sheer volume. After all, bitches be crazy and there's only so much nonsense that a single man can take before they check out.
The unspoken point of all this claptrap is that women didn't just break average or low-value men, they broke the high-value men too. One group of men is dying from thirst, and the other group dies by drowning. And women have zero ability to regulate or slow down because they destroyed the barrier of slut-shaming entirely.
It's like breaking the damn of a river and the deluge flooded all the crops and no longer fill the reservoirs needed to put out wildfires.
Lysistrata was a comedy for a reason but academics and TPTB thought it would be smart to foster this madness. Now we're stuck with the consequences.