Anonymous
(ID: UvCPRIUn)
8/9/2025, 8:16:07 AM
No.512594719
>>512594868
>>512594985
>>512595037
>>512595437
>>512595777
>>512595820
>>512595969
>>512597319
>>512598082
>>512598534
8/9/2025, 8:16:07 AM
No.512594719
>>512594868
>>512594985
>>512595037
>>512595437
>>512595777
>>512595820
>>512595969
>>512597319
>>512598082
>>512598534
NEW STUDY, BROWNS ARE RETARDED AFTER AGE 10
https://www.psypost.org/bright-children-from-low-income-homes-lose-cognitive-edge-in-early-secondary-school/
>An analysis of Millennium Cohort Study data from the UK found that the cognitive skills of bright 5-year-olds from poor families keep pace with those of their wealthier peers until the end of primary school
>After the transition to secondary school, however, high-achieving children from low-income families tend to experience a particularly sharp decline in attitudes toward school, behavior, mental health, and academic achievement. This decline occurs between the ages of 11 and 14
>Socioeconomic status is strongly associated with children’s academic achievement and cognitive development. Children from higher socioeconomic backgrounds typically have access to more educational resources, enriching experiences, and stable home environments that support learning
>However, during the transition to secondary school—between ages 11 and 14—these disadvantaged high-achievers experienced a particularly sharp decline in attitudes toward school, behavior, mental health, and academic performance compared to their wealthier peers.
>“The failure to fully capitalize on the early potential of this group [bright children from poor families] is likely to be a key reason why the UK is failing to become a more socially fluid society,” the study authors concluded.
Political implications of all kids being equally retarded until it's time for their brains to grow and Whites pull ahead in every academic field? Should we keep blaming socioeconomic factors and continue to put sandpeople and 1-generation-removed from Zulu Bantu tribesmen pygmy niglets in the same classrooms as Europeans that are meant to cultivate nuclear scientists and doctors?
>An analysis of Millennium Cohort Study data from the UK found that the cognitive skills of bright 5-year-olds from poor families keep pace with those of their wealthier peers until the end of primary school
>After the transition to secondary school, however, high-achieving children from low-income families tend to experience a particularly sharp decline in attitudes toward school, behavior, mental health, and academic achievement. This decline occurs between the ages of 11 and 14
>Socioeconomic status is strongly associated with children’s academic achievement and cognitive development. Children from higher socioeconomic backgrounds typically have access to more educational resources, enriching experiences, and stable home environments that support learning
>However, during the transition to secondary school—between ages 11 and 14—these disadvantaged high-achievers experienced a particularly sharp decline in attitudes toward school, behavior, mental health, and academic performance compared to their wealthier peers.
>“The failure to fully capitalize on the early potential of this group [bright children from poor families] is likely to be a key reason why the UK is failing to become a more socially fluid society,” the study authors concluded.
Political implications of all kids being equally retarded until it's time for their brains to grow and Whites pull ahead in every academic field? Should we keep blaming socioeconomic factors and continue to put sandpeople and 1-generation-removed from Zulu Bantu tribesmen pygmy niglets in the same classrooms as Europeans that are meant to cultivate nuclear scientists and doctors?
