Thread 512619596

It led to inflation, and the news NEVER talked about it.

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/m1.asp

Yeah basically you are a retard if you hold much cash.

Why would biden do this?

I still don't get why like why couldnt the GDP go down a bit during the cough, it will come back up again after.

Why panic and lock everyone up at gunpoint, force vax experimental shit and increase the money supply by 400% on a permanent basis?

>>512619639
what do you hodl ?
ples halp

>>512619768
I'm all in on classic Roland keyboards.

>>512619639
That has nothing to do with how they increased the amount of total money in the country by 4x and NO ONE said anything.

>>512619821
Yes it does. And I said something. But that's why I'm not on TV or in papers.

I remember when Bush II discontinued the M3 reporting.

>>512619596 (OP)
there's no tool to know how many US dollar is in circulation
it's a guesstimate at best

>>512619723
Are the nord from the tariff thread?

Anyways, yeah, why WOULD they do that?

>>512619817
based

>>512619596 (OP)
That would require self-reflection from Republicans and their dear leader. They would rather blame Biden for the inflation bomb that Trump lit the fuse of.

thanks, trump

>>512619983
>still pushing Republicans vs Democrats instead of people vs the corrupt government
You glowniggers are understandably afraid.

>>512619596 (OP)
It is going down, I'd like to know when it has had a drop in proportion to this before. Yet the stock is still increasing, might just be inertia from the initial bump.
The initial bump was handouts to businesses. Bernie voted for it

>>512619639
It shows the money supply deceasing, cash should be ok, but it sure as hell isn't

>>512619879
Why is having physical cash on hand bad vs in banks? Besides missing out on growth.

>>512620185
the average american is a complete fucking retard with a nigger IQ like this anon but they successfully convinced them they're genius
that tard understand absolutely fucking nothing to economy but he's pretty sure he does

>>512620151
Yeah, I'm sure Democrats would have screeched at our allies, threaten some, and unleash a tariff war on all them JUST the same as the Republicans

>>512620233
Cash itself is bad, they are always debasing what you have by printing more. Doesn't matter where it is held.

>>512619596 (OP)
they should talk about it. i dont really have access to very much of that money

This has to be the biggest factor in the deindustrialization and ghettoization of America... When the means of exchange is constantly dwindling in value, it makes saving pointless.. which the "powers" have repeatedly stated, notably during the Great Depression, is their purpose, they want everyone constantly spending, not saving.. which means that no one ever builds up wealth, which means communities are constantly getting poorer and high investment projects like factories and infrastructure never get done.... The fundamental working of capitalism cannot function if the means of exchange is constantly dwindling (or growing) in value. Especially when you have an agent in that capitalism who has a "give me 5 billion bucks" button, which is the cause of that dwindling. All the incentives for people to work hard, save up, and spend well are removed by this.

We know that virtually the whole world adopted this fiat currency in the early 20th century...has there ever been any debate about it by the participants? Did any official sources ever express doubts about the moneyprinter?

>>512620185
It only goes down when physical money becomes destroyed, unusable, or leaves the country all together. How can they justify the 400% increase? It has never happened in history. And they never reported it.

mexican cartels have stacks of american cash sitting everywhere in rooms in mexico, printing more money just makes it more worthless

blame the faggots for enriching the mexicans and forcing the cia countering that with inflation

>>512620398
The system is so obfuscated by mystery that it is hard to report on.. can you give a QRD on what the M1 is, why they stopped reporting the M3, and what you would tell normies if you wanted to explain the importance of this event? I know that the M1 isn't the total amount of money, because there is a lot of "shadow money" in the form of loans, maybe triple the amount as in M1.

t. uninformed

>>512619639
Unirinically holding debt is better

>>512620398
Chatgpt says fractional reserve rate creates money. Could reducing ability of banks to lend more than they hold reduce money supply?

Any rate, the answer seems to be, no cash, put it in securities or inflation protected govs. Or physical gold, but that is all full of shady fucks when trying to redeem to money.

>>512620969
No it's not. You shouldn't hold ANY debt lol. They're openly saying that half the jobs will disappear within 5 years, debtors will lose everything. It'll make 1929 look like a tiny bump in the road.

>>512620973
Inflation is literally and exactly the money supply itself to my understanding. If you have a simple economy of two people, 100 widgets, and 100 dollars equal, both people can buy 50 widgets. If the gov adds 100 dollars to person 2, person 2 can buy 2/3 of the widgets and person 1 gets 1 and the overall price of widgets is now much higher.

>>512620841
It explains what they all are on the site. Sorry, not phonefagging all of this information.

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/m1.asp

>>512621163
doesn't being in debt mean you have negative money? what does lose everything even mean in that context

>>512620969
Fuck that shit. Are you going to chase 1% gain or have a paid off house. A paid off house lets you exit the system and live on your terms

>>512619596 (OP)
>M1
ah, an optimist are you?

>>512620185
>the stock is still increasing
lol, lmao

>>512619596 (OP)
The news does talk about inflation pretty often but it always tariffs or something to do with China, I never heard specially say the government created so much money. Specifically news seem to demand the interest rates are lowered to help with home loans.

>>512621371
>doesn't being in debt mean you have negative money?
usually the debt is used to acquire assets and if you can't pay the debt you lose the asset. if you have nothing but debt that's different, you can't lose.
>freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose

>>512619723

Because they stole the money to make themselves rich and don't care about the future for the rest of us. They have been looting the country systematically, in obvious manner, since 1972.

>>512621452
I've seen that bond chart, that downward trend is something that started and continued since the 60s. It must represent globalism in some way. Either way, it's meaningless to me since it's covered all ups/downs since 60s,