Thread 512620343

Are anthros white-coded, in a general sense?

Just look at berserkers

>>512620343 (OP)
It's an awoovement.

>>512620343 (OP)
No you're a faggot and hereby demoted to not white

>>512620343 (OP)
its a form of nephilim worship

>>512620571
The furry fandom is 90% white worldwide.
>>512620652
How?

>>512620343 (OP)
Well, when Whites are made to feel guilty about being White, they partake in other outlets of self expression because they aren't allowed to feel pride in themselves. I don't agree with it, but I can see it as a form of escapism. Some do go overboard and wear fucking fursuits, but yeah.

>>512620343 (OP)
When you are killed, don't act like you have no idea why. You will die alongside your masters.

>>512620343 (OP)
Depends on the animal, because they are coded to the race of whatever region that animal comes from. For example: an anthropomorphic beagle will be brit-coded, a panda or chow chow will be chink-coded, an anthropomorphic coyote will be redskin-coded and the turd with a face emoji is indian-coded.

>>512621019
Is it really birthed by 'white guilt' alone? Escapism maybe.
>>512621087
Why are you like this?

>>512621203
But more broadly, how do canines generally go, in your opinion? And then felines, cervines, etc. etc.

Yes, and it's from a rational perspective more retarded than trannyism. Thinking you are the opposite gender is one thing, and there are mechanisms that can lead to change on a "spectrum".

But you will never be a wolf, no matter what you take.

>>512620912
> my jewish fairy tales say it's bad
Cringe

>>512621701
Meant for
>>512620652

>>512621679
>He thinks furries believe they're animals
This board is genuinely infested with boomer retards

>>512620343 (OP)
An appreciation for furry imagery requires an ability for abstract thinking and ability to consider aesthetics.
It's very white, there's a few non-white furries, but they tend to be pretty obvious and out themselves by being porn-brained gooners with ugly fursonas.

>>512621367
It really depends on the race/species and also any clothes they might have. I don't think an anthropomorphic shiba-inu dressed in traditional japanese garb is white-coded.

Same goes for birds or any anthropomorphic animal. White owls can't be black-coded because they don't come from the regions that black people originate from.

Though cultural associations do play a role. For example in dysney's robin hood the king is a lion and is a reference to richard the lionheart, even though lions aren't native to england because lions are a symbol of the british royalty.

But rafiki from the lion king is definetely not white-coded. Depends also if you consider lion king characters to be anthropomorphic enough. Is the rat sensei from ninja turtles white? Idk, you tell me. My stance is no.

>>512621847
Almost all the non-white furries are East Asian, incidentally.

No, yiff in hell furfag

>>512621838
So what are you? Attracted by animals, sexually? Why do you put on a costume if you don't think you are an animal or don't want to act like one for that time?

animal person sexo

Or is it like autogynophilia but with animals?

>>512621930
What about in a more culturally neutral depiction, i.e. no clothes or structures indicating a certain region?

How would you categorize pic related?

>>512620343 (OP)

FAKE THREAD POST EPSTEIN

>>512621367
>>512621930
In a "general" sense I think the answer is meaningless. Are most depictions of furries coded as white? Yeah, probably, but I think that is merely an artifact of the fact that most furry artists are white and not a property inherent to animal anthropomorphism.

all degenerates are coded by jews, in a literal sense

BREAKING NEWS

this is the thread

>>512622404
Possibly

>>512622142
Well, that looks like a timber wolf, has a face of fear and is in a forest. He looks male but not any particular race. If you told me that is a werewolf and before the full moon he was white, black, asian or whatever I would have no trouble accepting that as part of the story.