>>512630140
Lmao, EU will definitely put conventionaö cars on the ban list eventually.
Until then you will pay a hefty hefty tax to be able to drive it.
>>512630015 (OP)
industry is so grim, no wonder they are closing down factories due to their lack of quality, trying to save costs, i will give it 5 years until they want quality back, but today is not a good time to buy new cars
>>512630291 >psst >hey kid >you want a car that breaks down more often, costs more to fix, takes 30x longer to reach 100%, has 1/4th the range, depreciates 3x as fast, and is ultimately less convenient than the thing it's trying to replace? >we'll give you a tax credit!
>>512630291
If it was just replacing the internal combustion engine and gas tank with a motor and batteries then I'd say its a personal preference thing for city dwellers.
IRL they're spying on everything in and around them up to a 1/4 mile away.