Is pederasty the ultimate redpill?
>viewed as a normative form of attraction throughout history before feminism; boys are pretty and lack adult male features which are repellent, therefore it isn't gay, and is perfectly masculine behaviour
>it isn't gay from the boy's perspective, because they have a higher sex drive and are more prone to sexual experimentation
>celebrated as a superlative form of relationship by the Greeks; considered instrumental in the healthy development of boys personalities
>creates strong, masculine bonds between males which can not be broken; see the Sacred Band of Thebes
>devalues women by providing an alternative to the roastie paradigm, invalidating their holes, which weakens women's pernicious influence on society
>the theory that it causes psychological harm to the younger participant is debunked pseudoscience (read Rind et al. and Newgon); negative effects primarily occur due to harsh cultural opposition to the practice, resulting in unnecessary criminal and psychiatric proceedings
>most harsh opposition traditionally comes from judaism (via Christianity) and feminism; virtually all pre-Christian European societies partook in the practice of pederasty
>allows boys to socialize with adults and connect with the adult world in an intimate way
>provides men with a powerful incentive to direct attention towards younger generations
>Goethe, Schopenhauer, and Voltaire all said it was natural
Well? Why are jews and feminists so staunchly opposed to the love which dare not speak its name?
>it isn't gay from the boy's perspective, because they have a higher sex drive and are more prone to sexual experimentation
>celebrated as a superlative form of relationship by the Greeks; considered instrumental in the healthy development of boys personalities
>creates strong, masculine bonds between males which can not be broken; see the Sacred Band of Thebes
>devalues women by providing an alternative to the roastie paradigm, invalidating their holes, which weakens women's pernicious influence on society
>the theory that it causes psychological harm to the younger participant is debunked pseudoscience (read Rind et al. and Newgon); negative effects primarily occur due to harsh cultural opposition to the practice, resulting in unnecessary criminal and psychiatric proceedings
>most harsh opposition traditionally comes from judaism (via Christianity) and feminism; virtually all pre-Christian European societies partook in the practice of pederasty
>allows boys to socialize with adults and connect with the adult world in an intimate way
>provides men with a powerful incentive to direct attention towards younger generations
>Goethe, Schopenhauer, and Voltaire all said it was natural
Well? Why are jews and feminists so staunchly opposed to the love which dare not speak its name?
