How can anyone argue against evolution?!?

>>512660142 (OP)
The bible said so, CHUD.

>>512660203
Quote it.

>whales are preflood giants adapted to the sea
added to my schizo library

>>512660142 (OP)
>How can anyone
Does anyone argue against it?

>>512660142 (OP)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZgivA2ENvY

kek

https://i.4cdn.org/gif/1754739781595385.mp4

No way it is possible to fake it, .... right?

>>512660304
moby dick's whale was sentient on another level

>>512660142 (OP)

Whales are humans that ate too many fish and thus became fish, it is written in the rune stones. Hail Wodan.

>>512660142 (OP)
>6 fingers

Where have I heard this.... oh nevermind

>>512660317
>Does anyone argue against it?
Of cause not. We know jews was first

my ancestor

Christianity has been using evolution in place of a noah's ark device for the last thousand years.

It's a retard soaker, basically everyone teaches the fundamental truth that evolution is a lie, and those that can't figure it out, are inoperable, not to be trusted with the power that flows out of even their very own hands.

It stopped being useful once the internet caught on. All the nitwits supposed to be soaked by these obviously wrong ideas are tip tapping out the question on google and getting overwhelming hand-holding proofs. So now they have to use other nitwit soaking and shekel rinsing systems.

Global Warming and AI singularity are half-assed replacements which simply don't do the job, but get part way there.

If ding dong wake up smell the coffee; you believe in this stuff, you don't get to vote, you don't get to choose anything, full stop.

>>512660142 (OP)
... get..

man is so hopeless when you try to find a plain tradiotion dish, and it's just full of chefs and nonsen... ... get

>>512660142 (OP)
You can argue against anything; that's part of the scientific process.
What you aren't allowed to do is pass of logical fallacies, or make assertions purely based on the presumed authority of a source.

An alternative hypothesis to evolution is not impossible to imagine; but a similarly convincing argument has yet to be made.

Many religious people feel like evolution contradicts their literalist origin stories of the world; indeed, it does.
And the problem lies not in evolutionary theory, but in them taking their own mythology as literal, instead of allegorical; even the ancient Greeks understood the function of religious stories as tutelary, not literal.

Then there is the fact that the ground-work for evolutionary theory was done by Gregor Mendel; an Augustinian Friar, and later Abbot, who formulated our modern ideas about genetics and heritability through rigorous experiments with breeding pea plants.
Darwin was really just riffing off his work when he started formulating his observations into the theory of evolution.
Standing on the shoulders of giants and all that.

"Literal Minded" religion is religion as practiced by the Laiety.
They have little to no understanding of the inner mysteries pointed to by the body of text, and so can only take the statements as descriptive of literal fact.

The more you study any religion, the less likely you are to take it literally.

Some people say religion is "just" a control mechanism for the retarded masses.
I ask; Is that supposed to be a bad thing?

And even then, there are great thinkers scattered all over the religious spheres.

>>512660502
man what an uppety karp..

>>512660142 (OP)
The earliest parts of most religious texts are people with little knowledge trying to explain what was inexplicable at the time. It also had to be suitable for the "average" person of the time. They had much less information to work with than we do today. I prefer to think of God working with DNA and RNA and intelligent design than the literal interpretation anyway. Then being created "in His image" can mean carbon based life.

Old jew testament is mostly parable and record keeping anyway. The new testament is the better part of the faith.

Poor thing can't masturbate. Now we know why some whales are such a holes.

>>512660142 (OP)
oh I believe evolution, but I don't understand why we're not allowed to acknowledge the biological differences between the various human races.
There are some people out there who are only 1000 years displaced from the rest of humanity with special evolutionary traits and are basically a separate species, but africans? clearly the same species as us, chud.

>>512660502
https://youtu.be/hD8GkF-ajCg

>>512660142 (OP)
whale is food it is ont man.. if whale were man I would eat man because it's tasty


god I am drunk I missed your points here lol

Because there's no supporting fossil record. And because "scientists" make of fan fiction over a single bone fragment to support their hypothesis further.

Even Darwin was highly skeptical of common ancestry evolution. That's a far cry from birds developing different kinds of beaks over time.

>>512660883
>13 minutes
Beginners numbers.

>>512660142 (OP)
That’s a troll foot. Dinosaur bones are goblin, troll, and dragon bones put together incorrectly

>>512660142 (OP)
> wow all these animals have a really similar design.
>I guess that’s proof they weren’t designed

>>512660142 (OP)
Humans have DNA of all major species of animals within in them. That's why in the womb we start out looking like tadpoles, then rabbits, then humans. Some people have genetic mutations and born with scales like reptiles. Some have tails, etc.

That's why in the Bible God said man would have Dominion over all creatures on the earth because they are within us. In medieval times they thought we were related closer to bears than monkeys. It's all in the Bible. Read between the lines.

>>512660304
They were actually dire wolves that really liked to swim. Look it up

>>512660142 (OP)
>How can anyone argue against evolution?!?
>beavers and platypus are related because they look like each other

using physiognomy to identify something only works on humans and pseudo humans

like jews

>>512660142 (OP)
seems to point more towards intelligent design

>>512660883
You understand why.
Because it violates the norm, the need for people to have hope, otherwise they will not believe in religion, which is its own ethical/moral influence, all through parables that have been written, rewritten, translated in and out of different languages, interpreted by different people, etc. It's all bullshit, meant for those that are in power to maintain that power. They are a special group, and we are not in it. And until a massive disruption, such as an AGI or Aliens, or a real, full world revolt, they will continue to control, and influence the world to death.

This is not just jews, but it's mostly jews. They want the destruction, because they believe they will rule over the rubble.

FUCK THE KIKES.
FUCK ISRAEL.
FUCK THE TALMUD.

>>512660142 (OP)

>>512660317
When The Science reconstructs every fragment of extinct monkey into the newest proto-human ancestor, it becomes tiresome and suspicious for some of us.
When dutifully vaccinated redditors take umbrage at our skepticism as some kind of forbidden heresy, this only reinforces our doubts.

>>512660737
I don’t really feel like evolution is anti-biblical, I argue against it just because it’s a dumb theory.

That’s not to say it’s wrong, and I acknowledge it has good explanatory power, it’s just a dumb, unscientific theory, especially out of the mouths of laymen.

>>512660142 (OP)
because its not a scientific theory since it is not falsifiable.

>>512661053
>Dinosaur bones
How the hell did dinosaurs fuck?

>>512661538
they transmitted their fucking over long distances with their mind

like ancient peoples across the world did with anti-semitism

>>512661029
>Croat holding breath
Bad example, They are used to, to avoid inhaling Serbian smell.

>>512660737
>Greeks saw myth as allegory
appeal to authority.
>Literal religion is for laity
ad hominem.
>Religion is a control mechanism
genetic fallacy.

>>512661445
what I didn't even know until a couple years ago is that there are MULTIPLE "theories of evolution", and Darwin's has been debunked and discredited, and nobody believes it anymore (???).
I didn't bother to investigate further to find out, well, what the hell IS the commonly accepted theory of evolution today? If Darwin's was no good, then what?

>>512660142 (OP)
>evolution so amazing
>intelligent design???? FAKE
>how do I know? some men in robes wrote a book I had to read at school that contradicts your robed men's book,our rituals are Le science!!!

>>512661114
>Humans have DNA of all major species
You've got it backwards
Humans forcibly put their DNA into all major species.

>>512660142 (OP)
>muh evolution
Smoothbrain topic... explain existence first.

>>512660142 (OP)
>six fingers
Whales are pre-flood Nephilim confirmed. Nuke the whales.

>>512660142 (OP)

Here’s the Genetics Lab
https://www.znakovi-vremena.net/en/bucegi-mountain.htm
Research this Base in Romania and your satanic imposed belief in evil lution will end.
To understand magnetic biofield manipulation of DNA for the manufacture of new species see joecellwaterscience

>>512660142 (OP)
You have it backwards, humans aren't evolved animals. Animals represent aspects of God. So Animals have some skeletal similarities to hthe human skeleton that is in the image of God.

I’m actually amazed at how many retards are in this thread right now lmao. There’s more evidence for evolution than there is for gravity. Even a fucking toddler can look at a house cat, a tiger, and a lion and conclude that each of these things is related to each other

>>512661813
This also, how does OP know the world wasn't created last Thursday?

>>512660446
That's the elbow. Whales have the same arm bones as humans, the proportions are just different.

>>512661736
>>intelligent design so amazing
>>evolution???? FAKE
>>how do I know? some men in robes wrote a book I had to read at school that contradicts your robed men's book,our rituals are Le christcuck!!!

>>512660883
Technically Neanderthals and humans are the same species just different subspecies.
Home sapiens Neanderthalenthis and
Home sapiens sapiens
You could try to taxonomically make a difference but a chihuahua and a great Dane are both just dogs

>>512661733
It’s just woke Darwinism now. Darwin was racist and had some embarrassing tidbits stuck in there as well.

>>512661964
Did the lions in video games evolve?

>>512661704
They did see religion as allegory.
And they were right.
I am referencing them though, not as an authority, but as an example that allegorical interpretation of religion is not a recent development, or a sign that religion is becoming a less potent force in the world; it has always been interpreted differently at different strata.

Being a member of the laiety is not an insult - it is an objective state of being, because you are either laiety, or have taken orders.

And I am not dismissing religion as a "Control mechanism" - I am pointing out that control mechanisms are useful and desirable.

Any more out of context buzzwords you wanna trot out, shitface?

>>512662064
Niggers are also a sub species.

>>512660142 (OP)
>whales are just FAT mermaids
LMAO I had to beg chatgpt to make me this because apparently asking for a hugely obese whale mermaid is against policy.

>>512661316
That skull isn't Lizzo's, it's that alien looking thing.

>>512662104
Youre a pseudo-intellectual who doesnt even know they used fallacies in their own argument. What a raging homosexual.

>>512660142 (OP)
1. Mathematically impossible
2. Violtates laws of Thermodynamics
3. Scientific evidence that the fossil record is less than 10,000 years old and all from a single catastrophic flood
4. Creation makes more sense.
5. I am not worried about being labeled ``uncool'' by the world, I would rather embrace truth than a drag queen at the library.

>>512660142 (OP)
Whales also have hip bones that they reused for their penis.

>>512660142 (OP)
That isn't anything like a human hand

>>512662053
You got the joke, well done

>>512662122
Nah they're actually the most straight up human as they have the most dominant genes. They stayed in the gene pool where most primate evolution occurred.

>>512662223
You are a redditor, who relies on a dictionary of buzzwords and thought-terminating cliches, in lieu of having anything pressing or relevant to say.

Lew-hew-hew-ser.

>>512661316
That image is a good warning not just to vacuum seal tissue but nobody does that any more.

>>512660260
FUCK NO, JESUS. END OF DISCUSSION.

>>512662381
>reddit spacing.
You cant make this shit up. This dude sucks dicks through his butthole.

>>512660502
fuck that diabolical abomination!

>>512660344

You are pretty religious and dogmatic.

>>512661882
Nobody argues that nothing existed. Something had to exist in order for the big bang to occur.

den how we still got whales?

>>512662146
What's the chance that all animals came from extreme human devolution?

>>512662226
Short vid. Disproves the flood myth. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j6apFLhUjYs

>>512662447
Are

You

Upset

By

Line

Breaks?

Or

Do

You

Have

No

Frame

of

Reference

For

What

Constitutes

Redditor

Conduct

Besides

Formatting

You

Smeg

Eating

Brainlet?

>>512662637
>What you aren't allowed to do is pass of logical fallacies, or make assertions purely based on the presumed authority of a source.
Proceeds to make an argument full of fallacies.

>>512661964
Anons standard of evidence:
>just look at things and agree with me
Powerful

>>512660142 (OP)
lol

>>512662598
>disproves
lol https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htrLQv9hXdk

>>512660883
>the biological differences between the various human races.

>>512660142 (OP)
>not learning that human hands, whale fins, bat wings, and dog paws are all deviations of the same structure in biology class
this country is so fucking done for

>>512662598
>well I misinterpreted this evidence in a way that makes you wrong
>this proves you are wrong

Have atheists become too powerful?

>>512662789
When you lie about the scores, isn't that just amusing? check the scores now, dipshit, even with the retarded niggers and jeets, we are still on average higher than israel, faggot.

>>512662588
50/50

>these ice layers show you how many years it’s been, like a tree!
Oh god, it’s way worse than I imagined

>>512662789
Ah yes, the all knowing and intellectual east asians and joos who invented every single useful piece of technology in the wor- oh wait

>>512660142 (OP)
If evolution is real, how come there are egg laying animals but somehow this feature wasnt evolved into humans? If somehow someway humans evolved from one supposed fish from the sea, how is there no subspecies of humans that lay eggs?

>>512662515
>Something had to exist in order for the big bang to occur.
Matter can magically pop into existence as long it also disappears.
A bit popped in on a wildly expanding spot of nothing.
Poof! The Big Bang

>>512660142 (OP)
Christcucks/Abrahamics deny it because it contradicts the Bible, that's it. I'm sure there are legitimate criticisms of evolution, but it doesn't matter next to muh Bible.

>>512660304
Had the same thought, That's where they went/are. Think about precursers of them that constructed the pyramids. Things that make ya go hmmm.

>>512660389
To be enraged with a brute beast that acted out of blind instinct is blasphemy.

>>512662910
>50/50
Happening as we speak.

>>512660142 (OP)
>Mammal has mammal skeleton
Wowzers

>>512662104
>they did believe in allegory
Which greeks? When and where? They bannished atheists, too. Be real, mankind has been debating theism v atheism for centuries, maybe thousands of years. No side has a winning arguement, only gotchas.

>>512661316

Their useful idiots don't actually perform any research or experiments of their owns. They trust The Science in faithful obedience, and are truly some of the biggest hypocrites the world has ever seen.

>>512660142 (OP)
next you're going to tell me all of these "evolved" from the same thing

>>512662465
this motherfucker is the reason we invented interest rates

>>512661230
>WE

>>512661882
>atheism requires faith in the big bang
>"IT'S NOT A RELIGION, GOY!"

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>512662711
i wanna lick that toad

>>512660142 (OP)
Okay, so if whales used to have hands why did they lose them? Hands with opposable digits are clearly one of the most potent evolutionary advantages a living thing on Earth can have.

>>512661813
>explain existence first.
Shit happens

>>512660142 (OP)
It has EVOL in the name dumbass, and I HATE evol, evoldooers, evol in thot word indeed, whatever forum it cums in I HATE it
Faggot

>>512663685
i literally never once used the word
>we
in that post you pitiful kike

>>512660142 (OP)
Are whales a mammal by chance? There’s your answer.

>>512663829
>Hands with opposable digits are clearly one of the most potent evolutionary advantages a living thing on Earth can have
Not when you spend most of your time in the water, you retard.

>>512662598
>Yeah bro every creation myth from every single continent at the exact same timeframe was made up

>>512662373
That actually makes them the least human. Humanity is that which evolves for the better.

>>512664026
>thinks the flood was the creation of the world
The Flood was 2,000 years after Adam, you retarded kike.

>>512663907
>WUZ

>>512660142 (OP)
You don't have to reference God or the Bible to make a good argument against evolution as it's normally thought of (random mutation piled on random mutation, eventually cumulating in the complex life forms we see today).

We know how long it takes for a positive mutation to emerge in a single celled organism, and how long it takes for that mutation to become fixed in that species. Single celled creatures are much less complex than say, humans or elephants, so common sense suggest that process should take longer in more complex, longer lived animals, but for the sake of the argument, let's say the rate is the same.

Given that we know pretty much how long it takes for a positive mutation to occur, then have that mutation become fixed throughout the species, and given we know pretty much how many such mutations would need to happen to get from single celled life to large, complex, multi-cellular life like humans, we can calculate how much time would be needed for that process to get us where we are today. The problem is there simply hasn't been nearly enough time for it all to happen in the way evolutionists say it did.

It's not a God problem, it's a math problem. I'm not saying God waved his hand and made things the way they are. I'm saying the math of evolution (as it's popularly understood) doesn't work.

>>512664166
>my mother
>has very large breasts
>but a bushy afro

how unfortunate

>>512664120
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yu_the_Great
Kys retard

>>512664210
>HEBREWZ N SHEEEEEEEEEEEEIT

>>512664259
>hebrew is an
>AFRO-asiatic language
>an shiieeet

>>512660142 (OP)
nice whale fin. your point? no point you are a lefty KYS

>>512660260
"And the whale is not man, but of an unrelated species and though their creator is one in the same as ours, they are not of same origin like evolution. Ignore thous that say it could be easily interpreted that way, because they are trannies. Now watch as I will flip this table in synagogue of satan. Christ is king"
- Matt 1:69

>>512664253
>links something that has nothing to do with Noah
Want to know why flood myths are so common? It's because civilizations develop around rivers, which are prone to flooding. Primitive people attributed flooding to a supernatural cause and created myths around them. There is zero evidence of a global flood.

>>512660142 (OP)
tyrannosaurus rex had fingers too. wowee weewah

>>512662696
We already went through why your assertions of logical fallacies, are actually just faults in your reading comprehension.

You deaf-blind diving-bell creature.

>>512660502
this nigga eatin beans

>>512664300
>AYO, IZ U SAYIN
*posts a shitty image macro
>IZ U SAYIN
*Spergs out about tanit*
>AYO IZ U SAYIN
*thinks Vikings were descended from the tribe of Dan*
>IZ U B SAYIN
*muh purple dye shellfish*
>*smacks lips* YO U B SAYIN
*Reddit spacing*
>IZ U B SAYIN
*cope and seethe*

DAT WE WUZ IZRAELITEZ N SHEEEEEEEEEEEEEIT!?!?!?

>>512663964
If you can grasp things, why bother spending all your time in the water.

>have hand that can pick up things
>live along the shore
>find muscle in tide pools
>pick up rock
>smash shell of muscle
>eat what's inside
>lots of protein, little work, little risk.

"Nah, I think I'll go fuck off full time into the deep water, have to swim all the time, deal with sharks, chase small game fish and krill all over fucking creation, let my hands turn into stupid flippers."

Make it make sense.

>>512664553
>all that butthurt

u-u-u-gon start crying too?

>>512664529
Oh youre back. Thought you left after your little reddit crashout. You sure know a lot about reddit. Tell me more. Make as many spaces as possible.

Evolutionist have to be the dumbest people to ever live.

>YEAH DUDE THE UNIVERSE JUST FARTED INTO EXISTENCE AND TIME WAS MADE FROM THIS FART AND THEN AFTER THE FART FLOATED AROUND SPACE FOR SOME YEARS THOSE STAR FART REMNANTS TRANSFORMED INTO A ROCK WHICH TRANSFORMED INTO A FISH WHICH TRANSFORMED INTO YOU AND THIS WAS ALL RANDOM CHANCE. WE ARE ALL FUCKING STARDUST I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE.

>>512662053
unoriginal pajeet take

>>512662465
>fuck that diabolical abomination!
Some actually do.

>>512664697
>YEAH DUDE THE UNIVERSE JUST FARTED INTO EXISTENCE

lel

that's jews for ya

>>512660502

>>512660142 (OP)
And for the retards, this doesn't mean whales and humans have a common ancestor, it means they have the same creator/designer.

If anything this meme is proof of creation not evolution kek

>>512664697
Gay if troo

>>512664500
https://www.native-languages.org/zunistory.htm
Kys retard

>argue
Lol. Lmao. What year do you think it is? This isn't the early 2000s. No point in arguing with a euphoric. That ship sailed a long time ago.

>>512660502
OH FUGG

they're all EVOLVING!!

>>512664622
>why bother spending all your time in the water
Food, you retard. There are wolves in British Columbia called "sea wolves" because they hunt fish exclusively. Their feet are more webbed than normal gray wolves. What would cause this change? Also, the animals whales evolved from didn't have opposable thumbs, genius.

>>512664675
Nah, I just like to give you a little kick whenever you rear your empty head. Back to your misery, worm.

>>512664253
Me the great? Thank you, yes me is!

>>512662064
What's interesting is that Sasquatch body proportions are very Neanderthal-esque: a long torso to go along with short, stubby legs that are the same length as the arms (with a knee gait that never locks fully unlike us humans):

>>512664936
>just likes to get butthurt
>admits all he has is ad-hom and nigger-descended jewish rage

i pity you

>>512660203
Pretty dumb argument consider god create nigger jew and jeet why the fuck he didn't made all look like the same god must hate yall especially mericunt one twisted bible spew non sense and claim to be their religion even nazi yikes when they heard about mericunt

>>512660344
>Proof that God exists.
Youre pretty dumb aren't you

>>512664924
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unu_Pachakuti
Kys retard

>>512660344

>>512664979
>Sasquatch body proportions
Real or nonexistent?

>>512665124
>this proves Alexander the Great
You're a faggot, arent you...

>>512665124
that is a book which has been translated dozens of times and is likely completely wrong

>>512665182
You keep posting shit that proves my point, you retard. These people lived in areas that are prone to flooding.

>>512665227
>𝟷𝟶s of thousands of hand written manuscripts across 𝟷𝟶𝟶𝟶s of years
You got me there, anon. Damn.

>>512664500
Sea levels rose 80 meters when the ice age ended 10k years ago.

>>512665124
bible
>multiple documented eye witness accounts of historical events and people
darwin
>DUDE FISH PEOPLE

A dog will always give birth to a dog and to say otherwise is low IQ. No amount of million of years of cope will change that

>>512665321
>E-every single recorded and still available story from every single continent that was inhabited during the period of the great floods is merely coincidence goy
Brown midwit moment

>>512664553
>36% negroid
36% negroid
>36% negroid
36% negroid
The modern kike is a mutt mixture of everything and has no ancestral homeland. They roamed the earth for thousands of years and set down roots nowhere because nowhere would have them. They are about as related to the ancient Israelis as they are to the average Mongolian yak herder. Less probably. And that's not even going into the fact that there are already very genetically diverse groups of kike (Ashkenazi, Sephardic, Mizrahim, etc). You are a retard to fall for the Chosen lie.

>>512665405
>the period of the great flood
It wasn't a single even, you retard. We actually know when "Noah's flood" occurred and where. It was in Iraq.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shuruppak
Here's "Noah"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ziusudra

>>512665515
JUST 36%?

i demand a recount

>>512664924
The argument was that whales originally had something like hands that could grasp. If you're already heading down the path of having an opposable thumb, how does it make sense to du a genetic U-turn, then fuck off into the ocean? These wolves are like other wolves, they run around on their toes. If they live in a place where there is more food in the water than land, and it's easier to catch the sea food than land food, then yeah, it would make some sense. But if you can pick up a rock and smash over shell fish, it makes zero sense to give up that advantage to waddle out into shark infested waters to chase krill.

If evolution is supposed to help give you advantages in survival and reproduction, and having a hand that can grasp and manipulate things is one of the top evolutionary advantages you can have, how does it make sense to give up that advantage.

Jesus, I love it when fucking retards call other people fucking retards. It's like when really smelly people can't smell their own stink.

>>512665362
>dog will always give birth to a dog
The majority of dog breeds are the result of selective breeding by humans.

>>512660677
Dang. That stew looks good.

>>512664204
This, there's simply unanswered mathematical holes in evolutionary theory that are never addressed. It's not at all necessary to invoke God or a creator to address these problems with the theory, although i do personally think these holes indicate that evolution through natural selection is just one process among others responsible for the development of life. I do happen to think that life was created and seeded here on this planet and that natural selection and evolution merely dictate how much a species can vary from whatever its original template is to adapt to changes in its environment. I think that whatever seeded or created life here will often genetically manipulate its creation, and that is what we see in these large leaps forward that cannot satisfactorily be explained by natural selection alone. It's also possible that not every mass extinction event was natural but rather induced by an outer intelligence. I don't agree with everything Lloyd Pie asserted as far as human origins go, but I do think his model is a lot closer to the truth than evolution as the sole, unguided process being responsible for everything we observe about terrestrial life.

>>512665227
The Bible is a library of manuscripts from many different authors across thousands of years. Its not a single book. You can read the manuscripts in their original languages, you don't need to rely on a translation.

>>512665744
>theyre still dogs
So where is the dog that became a different species?

>>512665661
>The argument was that whales originally had something like hands that could grasp.
Literally no one has ever made this argument. Their flippers have the sames bones as the human hand, so they resemble a human hand. Most animals have the same bones, this points to a common ancestor.

>>512665894
Ur brown

>>512664677
>Oh, what, you're still here?

Yeah, actually, I'm just puzzled as to why you should think you did anything herein besides prove that you don't actually know how to identify a logical fallacy, even with explicit instructions from google.

Then you resort to the "If I act irrationally smug, people who haven't followed the conversation will assume I'm right"

Which is just the most redditesque form of online ego masturbation.

What you are doing is rather like jerking off your withered micro-penis whilst visualizing it as a throbbing land-python in your minds eye.

>>512665894
It points to a common designer/creator you retard.

>>512662588
Reminded that all out turned ears are an indicator of inbreeding

>>512665321
The Flood story probably harkens back to the end of the last Ice Age when ocean levels raised dramatically, and the Mediterranean breached what was at the time the natural dry damn of the Bosporus, resulting in a flood of real Biblical proportions throughout the Black Sea. The Göbekli Tepe shows that a significant population of people were likely living along the Black Sea coast at the time. If you had villages of advanced hunter-fishers-gatherers or even early stage farmers living along the coast when that happened, they would have had their "entire world" destroyed by endless rain and a wall of water that would have seemed to rush at them out of nowhere.

>>512660456
Ancient my ass. I saw that degenerate walking out of the synagogue last week. That's the rabbi!

>>512665894
>The common ancestor of a car is the T-model. Therefore the big bang theory is real. Macro evolution is real
The absolute state of mentally gay athiest.

>>512666026
So God is a retard with no imagination. He has to repurpose old parts instead of making new ones. Good to know.

>>512666080
Nice straw man, Miguel.

>>512665362
>Eyewitness accounts
>The resurrection started a Holy Zombie Apocalypse.

51 At that moment the curtain of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom. The earth shook, the rocks split 52 and the tombs broke open. The bodies of many holy people who had died were raised to life. 53 They came out of the tombs after Jesus’ resurrection and[e] went into the holy city and appeared to many people.

You know what the difference between a confirmed and unconfirmed croc sighting is in western Australia.

Unconfirmed a bloke says he saw a croc
Confirmed his mate says he saw it to.

This is the same standard as your Bible.

>>512666121
Just like you repurposed your asshole as a mouth for dicks.

>>512666121
Yes, programmers will recycle their own codes and designs.
You believe the male and female reproductive magically automatically invited themselves. Good to know youre retarded
>he believes the universe farted into existence magically

>>512660344
christcuck has to steal memes. very original lol

>>512665892
>became a different species?
In 60 years Russians selectively bred a tame, dog-like animal from wild foxes.
https://evolution-outreach.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12052-018-0090-x

>>512666190
invented*

>>512666190
>God is a Pajeet working for Microsoft

>>512665661
>Move from the water to the land
>Develop feet to walk the earth
>Aww fugg this place is ghetto af. We have to go back.
>Redevelop aquatic traits
>Move into the ocean
Makes sense to me. The hand-like bone structure is very common though. If you look at a bird's wings, you will notice a very similar structure, albeit elongated.

>>512666202
Is it the same animal species as its parent?

>>512666147

>>512666026
Hurry Durr god just copy and pasted one design over and over because too dumb to come up with something new. No fucking wonder the invalid had to take a rest day

>>512660142 (OP)
I'd tell you to believe in yourself, but there's no peer reviewed evidence to support that claim.

Sooo....

>>512666229
I accept your concession

>>512666190
Also it's ironic you use male and female reproduction as evidence of God when they Bible says man was created first even though all humans start out female in the womb. Another strike against your kike fairy tales.

>>512666306
>Hurr durr everything magically made itself hurr durr

>>512666374
Yes science is magic to those with small brains that cannot understand it.

>>512660142 (OP)
Whales are literally the lung fish that turned back meme

>>512666344
>keyword created
Yes the womb didnt create itself.

>>512666011
I cant entertain this retard anymore. Not my fault you contradicted your own rules.

>>512666425
I FUCKIN LOVE SCIENCE YOU JUST DONT UNDERSTAND IT THE UNIVERSE FARTED AND IT EXISTED JUST LIKE THAT

>>512663506
The evidence against god of the bible are inconsistencies and contradictions in the Bible plus the fact that there's an observable trend of Biblical explanations retreating before scientific advancements

>>512661704
holy...

>>512660203
As much as Christianity is right about things, the Bible is not a citable source

>>512666491
Why did gorilla nest set him off?

>>512666596
>The evidence against god of the bible are inconsistencies and contradictions in the Bible

for example?

LET'S GUESS WHAT YOU'LL SAY

GOT ANY PROOF?
>i already posted it
where, prove it

>it's here look for it yourself
so you can't prove shit

>>512666596
>there's an observable trend of Biblical explanations retreating before scientific advancements

high liberal critical scholars arent the church lmao

>>512660502
>bless his little heart

>>512666425
>The big bang was science
You clearly don't understand what science is. It's a theory, but so is literally every other explanation. Calling everything the experts say "science" is some retarded pseudo religion for oversocialized söyfags.

>>512666011
>fake sophistication to distract from when you violated your own criteria

its over you lost

>>512666491
Was it just because he looks like a gorilla?

>>512666755
>for example?
for example, in Genesis
>On the first day it says there was darkness and the God's spirit hovered over waters. Then God said "let there be light", he made day and night and separated them
>On second day he made fully developed plants, it mentions trees and seeds and so on
>On the third day he created the Sun and the Moon
So
>Night and day existed before Sun
>Plants existed without photosynthesis
Logical blunder

>>512666826
So the Church maintains that Sun was created after daylight already existed and that insects have 4 legs ? Cool

>>512660502
that s my grandpa

>>512667120
>that insects have 4 legs ? Cool

forgets that definitions change

>>512667457
Funny how you ignored the first part
You truly are a spiritual Jew

>>512666268
>Is it the same animal species
You decide. 60 years is a damn short period of time.
What could happen in 600 or 6,000 years?

>>512665744
the majority of what breeds? dog breeds? from dogs? right

>>512660737
Here it goes.

Evolution doesnt exist and the planet has 5000 years. But it started as if it had million years just for physics consistency. Like a fabricated videogame savestate. We started in year 10000000000, 5000 years ago.

Mind you, we might be a high tech simulation, in which a biblical god and heaven/hell are coded into it. Anyone who dies in this simulation moves towards heaven or hell simulation depending if they followed the bible or not. The complexity of such simulation wouldnt be possible inside the world we know, but outside there might be different physics laws.

While I cant provide evidence, it makes sense 100% and explains everything.

>>512660142 (OP)
There has never been a species to species evolution. When they put bacteria that reproduces every 20 minutes in an isolation tanks for 10 years, guess what, same old bacteria. No tentacles, tails, teeth... It is such a bad theory even Darwin knew it was flimsy at best.

>>512660344
>[YouTube] Como Serian los Noticieros si Fueran Honestos (embed)

the best piece of propaganda I have ever seen.

>>512660883
Still not a new species... just good lungs from lots of practice

Convergent evolution implies that intelligent aliens are also likely to be featherless bipeds

>>512667052
>for example, in Genesis
WHERE?

>i just gave it to you
where in the bible, retard

>i already posted it
where

>find it yourself
LOL

>>512660344
>No way it is possible to fake it, .... right?
Find a whale kill it and check its fin? Just go to Norway or Japan and see how they butcher them and check for yourself.
Jfc

>>512667542
>dog breeds? from dogs?
Dogs are domesticated wolves.

>>512668029
Genesis 1, literally the opening lines of the Bible

>>512661070
This. Came here to post this.

>>512660317
You can't really call it an argument. The Christians just post their primitive bronze age superstitions and screech their angry Christian noises. Arguing with a Christian is like arguing with a dog. Pointless and foolish. So only the fools even try.

>>512660142 (OP)
Evolution is a spectrum. It ranges from procreation to mechanisms to overt macro-changes. Trying to define such a slippery eel is worthless and part of the con. We all agree that procreation results in novelty, the mechanisms for that are well known and yet this is the basis for evolution despite it requiring unpurposed (not random) selective pressures. Selection itself is an unknown and poorly defined as well. All of it is based upon the premise of common ancestry, which is not a scientific theory nor a fact. Common ancestry/descent predates Darwin's origin hypothesis by at least 100 years. Pierre Maupertuis was likely the first to pen it in the same british era circles that Erasmus Darwin ran in. Erasmus, Charles' grandfather, was so enamored by this idea he published poems about it and believed it well before a single piece of evidence was found for it. Remove this idea and evolution evaporates as anything other than adaptation.

Organisms and genetics have similitude because we must be able to process and assimilate everything. Even if we allow for these mystical pressures to select genes in a blind, unpurposed manner (i.e., without true mechanism) we should not expect what we see now. The genetic aberration would be the rule, not the exception.

>>512660142 (OP)
Evolution is not our best theory because of a few strong chains of evidence which tie it down, but rather it is like Gulliver's bonds, with millions of facts and threads which link to one another in a self-corroborating fashion.

This is just one special creation killer thread. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oXfDF5Ew3Gc

>>512666344
This is false. All humans start as undifferentiated, neither male nor female.

>>512668552
Sperm and egg. Male and female.

>>512661538
https://www.google.com/search?q=did+dinosaursa+have+sex&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS931US931&oq=did+dinosaursa+have+sex&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIJCAEQABgNGIAEMgkIAhAAGA0YgAQyCQgDEAAYDRiABDIICAQQABgWGB4yCAgFEAAYFhgeMggIBhAAGBYYHtIBCDY3ODhqMGoxqAIAsAIA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:5e9d2ddb,vid:ElFyDjV7rmw,st:0

>>512660142 (OP)
No one has since like the 90's.

>>512663506
Yeah, like Diagoras, who was banished for Impiety, and others.

The principle crime of which they are accused though, is as much political as theological; the outward appearance of piety is a display of cultural normativism; to make an offering at the temple of a city's patron god for instance, can be couched as an act of faith, or a formal gesture of good will and covenant with the people of that city; the religious and civic lives of these societies being much intertwined.

Plato and Heraclitus are two examples of persons who saw gods as basically allegorical characters; Plato isn't so much interested in discussing the existence of Gods; he assumes them to have a sort of implicit existence, but that they are separate from mortal spheres, probably in a similar manner to how he describes his "Forms", and as such they "Exist" as personifications of ideals and natural forces.

Or at least, that's my understanding of where Plato stands on Gods.

The attitude was likely not the broadly held one, but seemed to have been privately considered by the ruling classes.

The attitude towards gods as allegorical also filtered into strains of the Stoic philosophy of the Romans, probably via the influence of Heraclitus, who's Atomism influenced the movement, particularly his model of a dynamic universe underwritten by rationally comprehensible laws, which the Stoics called "Logos".

Though a lot of this is tangential to the subject, because the ancients seemed less concerned with whether or not the gods were "real" or in what sense they were real, and more with what they represented, and whom.

>>512660203
Fpbp

>>512668624
Anon said you were a bitch with a vagina and womb in the womb. It was literally never the case. There are tissues in the fetus called mulerian ducts and wolfian ducts. The mulerian tissue develops into a vagina and womb, but is completely absent in the male wolfian developed into ducts that carry semen, and that is also absent from the female. At no point in development is a male fetus a fully fledged female with a vagina and a womb. So the assertion that "we were all female in the womb" is nonsense you probably got from a liberal gender studies professor.

>>512661538
Probably the same way modern birds and reptiles do. Alternatively they could have reproduced the same way cetaceans do, prehensile dick.

>>512660142 (OP)
If evolution were more than a theory then all the brown and yellow races would have evolved into white by now. The best white traits are destroyed mixing with any other race. The non white races would downbreed all life into Salamanders if they were permitted.

>>512660142 (OP)
We live in a simulation. Everything is designed by a higher being aka a programmer. The programmer is god.

>>512668331
same for people that still believe in something as stupid as evolution lmao

>>512660142 (OP)
what do you mean by evolution?

>>512660304
thinking the world was NOT flooded is whats schizo deranged delusional nonsense.

>>512660142 (OP)
>looks nothing like a human hand

>>512660502
I look like that.

the fact that creates are related or may have changed over time is not proof that the flood didnt happen and that he world is older than 6,000 years old.

life "evolved" or adapted into its many variations because God designed it to, and because the flood caused the environment to change in various ways which brought about all of those variations.

DNA is a code which has an author. and within the code is the potential for variations depending on environmental triggers. to think all the countless types of reatures just coinedentally evolved extremely beneficial mutations that have very specific purposes and sophisticated mechanisms.. its beyond chance.

life was created. far more scientific to believe that than it made itself and continued to improve itself without meaning to. like i dont think many atheists appreciate how unlikely that is. they just say, "oh well.. it must've happened that way" no different than the faith put into "God did it".

>>512662053
The bible never outright claims evolution is fake.

What it DOES claim is that humanity is fundamentally special to any other species on earth.

Which it is, due to the fact you're reading this post

>>512660142 (OP)
Even in evolution two things can come to a similar form through a process called convergent evolution. Two things looking similar does not necessarily imply relatedness.

>>512671118
says life brings forth after its kind. a wolf or a dog is a kind of creature. well we got a lot of breeds of dogs. a lot of variations of this bird and that fish. and those variations exist because of the extremely specific conditions they lived in.. some balance of things. and those paramaters dont exist for prolonged periods of time.. the idea of "deep time" is completely absurd. hundreds of millions and billions of years is so stupid. just looking at he rates of population growth and this and that.

the flood changed the world drastically some 4,500 years ago. life changed a lot in those immediately centuries after and then those changed gradually slowed down. and now people look at things.. way after everything slowed down and believe its always been going at that pace. no, the world stopped changing quickly, so life stopped changing quickly.. as our creator intended. its so easy and plain to see that creatures were provided with this and that by design, its not the illusion of design. its just design. and it didn't take hundreds of millions of years of tinkering. it was a sort of automated process guided by the underlying code that the creator made in the beginning.

>How can anyone argue against evolution?!?
Low IQ + christcuckery + they are probably brown.

my ancestors,,,,,,,,

>>512660502
he displays with such grace and dedication, respect+

>>512660344
>https://i.4cdn.org/gif/1754739781595385.mp4
Good groove

>>512661029
Not air, they inhale pure oxigen to do these records.

>>512664427
Keked

>>512660142 (OP)
>hand and flipper have 5 finger like clumps of bone ticking out
>guess evolution is real
this isnt science, Raj...

>>512668425
looking for similarities in DNA is disingenuous
you're essentially saying that if 2 tractors have similar features, they share a common ancestor when they were created by humans in the first place
assuming that we're at the starting point and are weighing evidence of either side, asserting that by that fact evolution is true is illogical and retarded

>>512660142 (OP)
For hundreds of millions of years every generation fought for its life. They woke each day in fear, hunted by predators faster and stronger than them. They starved when the land went barren, froze in endless winters, and baked under suns that burned the earth dry. Whole families vanished in floods, in fire, in the jaws of beasts. Yet somehow enough survived to have children, who faced the same misery, the same hunger, the same terror. This happened not for decades, not for centuries, but for unbroken ages beyond counting. a chain of struggle that stretches from the first tiny creatures in the shadow of dinosaurs all the way to us. Every breath we take was bought with their suffering. All of that for some retards to go around and be kike puppets and believe some kike book about a kike on a stick. I respect and honor my ancestors, not jews.

>>512668331
>>512660142 (OP)

young earth creationists believe in selective breeding and adaptation, or "micro-evolution". Which accounts for most arguments in favor of evolution.

What we don't believe is that humans game from goo.

>>512660142 (OP)
>He doesn't realize all animals are genetic hybrids/chimeras our creators made.

you're not fooling anyone with that reddit spacing btw

>>512666063
>all out turned ears are an indicator of inbreeding
Elephants are freaky

>>512671118
>The bible never outright claims evolution is fake
Dumbest cope

>>512661070
They were designed by evolutionary pressure, not foreskin god

>>512671118
>The bible never outright claims evolution is fake.
leave it to an albanian to be retarded
in the bible, the dates and ages of people span to about 6000 years ago since garden of eden
this makes evolution impossible, evolution depends on people to blindly believe that gorillions of years happened for which there is no actual evidence for

>>512663749
It doesn't require belief in anything and big bang is a catholic theory

>>512665894
>the purple bone
Ahh yes, all animals have the purple bone.

>>512662226
>Drag queens made me believe in yahooowa

>>512663506
They also hated yahweists

>>512672455
>in the bible
Stop.

>>512660142 (OP)

You gotta do better than a single example, which can be nitpicked in a vacuum. You're up against highly determined motivated reasoners.

...then the fish wanted to eat fruit and created legs so it could walk on grass, it was wild

>>512672696
>in the textbook it says evolution is real because there are pictures of different animals in them
stop, i can do this shitty debate tactic to you too

>>512672726

Do you deny modern dogs were modified from wolves by selective breeding? That's all evolution is, except environmental circumstances/competition does the selecting.

>>512672805
natural selection is a whole different ballpark than believing that gorillions of years happened, because one can actually be observed

This one is specifically for moderates who contend that there exist no contradictions between evolution and Christianity. Herein I’ll address first the perspective that the Genesis accounts in fact closely parallel the scientific account of origins. I’ll then address the view that it doesn’t attempt to, being only an instructive, illustrative story about man’s relationship with Yahweh.

The first of those two apologist camps will often claim that Genesis, while not literal, still closely lines up with (and is a metaphorical description of) the actual processes now understood by science to have resulted in the formation of the universe, the Earth, and life on it. (This defense does not extend to the creation stories of other religions, which Christians are often content to simply reject as products of ancient man’s ignorance.)

However, Genesis asserts that the Earth existed before the sun, trees and other land vegetation before sea creatures, and birds before land animals. The Sun and Moon are both created together on day 4 along with all other stars(!). The order itself is wrong (in both versions), and it’s never been explained what is metaphorically conveyed by getting the order wrong which could not have been conveyed while keeping the order accurate.

In Genesis, each day’s worth of creation events is followed by “the evening and morning” of the next day according to scripture, things that literal days have which “indeterminate periods of time” do not. On top of which Genesis 1:4–5 defines what a yom/day is and what distinguishes it from night, making it very clear from the context that they intended ‘yom’ to mean a literal day rather than eon:

“3 And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. 4 God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness. 5_ God called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the first day.”

>>512672805
can you prove that? Can you prove your point, not by saying "well science says..." but by showing me the many stages of animals evolving and linking them? Hardly believe, meme flag

>>512672885

Literal days are light, and literal nights are dark. It can (and does) have additional metaphorical layers of meaning on top of that. Certainly, these kinds of stories in scripture are primarily intended to illustrate some spiritual principle. But that doesn’t preclude such stories from also containing beliefs about nature that were sincerely held in antiquity, impossible to confirm or deny at the time of writing, but which have become investigable since.

Further frustrating efforts to misrepresent Genesis as purely metaphorical, the genealogy provided early in the OT traces all the way back to Adam and Eve. Unless we’re to believe that genealogy is metaphorical (whatever that could possibly mean) this confirms that they believed Adam and Eve were real people from whom mankind descended, and by extension that Genesis accurately describes how humans came into existence.

Indeed, if the Genesis story didn’t occur then Adam never incurred original sin by eating of the tree. This means we did not inherit original sin and Christ died for nothing on the cross, per Romans 5:18: “Yes, Adam’s one sin brings condemnation for everyone, but Christ’s one act of righteousness brings a right relationship with God and new life for everyone.”

Luke’s Genealogy traces Jesus’ ancestry back through King David, all the way to Adam, never stopping to tell the reader “Everybody before this was a metaphorical person, everybody after is historical”. If there was no literal Adam, what is the basis for belief in a literal King David? Or Moses, for that matter.

>>512672908

Yes: >>512672709

>>512672455
>More people that don't understand the source material
The Bible never actually says Adam was the first man. All it says on this account is that God had a garden and he needed someone to tend it, so he created Adam. It's very likely that other people already existed elsewhere, but Adam was the first Ancestor the ancient Hebrews traced their lineage to.

>>512672924

Or, if we throw out Luke’s genealogy as unreliable, what is the basis for Jesus being a descendant of King David (necessary criteria of the messiah foretold by the Torah)? In these and many other ways, a literal Genesis account is a load-bearing pillar, without which the rest of Christian theology collapses.

In 1 Corinthians 15:45, Paul said “The first man, Adam, became a living person.” But the last Adam —that is, Christ—is a life-giving Spirit”. In Acts 17:26, he said, “From one man [God] created all the nations.” This is impossible without a literal, historical Adam.

As for Jesus, in Mark 10:6 he said “But at the beginning of creation God ‘made them male and female.’” This would seem to affirm both creation and a literal Adam and Eve. Concerning the events recounted in the Old Testament, in John 5:46–47 Jesus is recorded as saying “For if you believed Moses, you would believe Me, for he wrote about Me. But if you do not believe his writings, how will you believe My words?”

His admonition to trust the events of the OT doesn’t only apply to Genesis: Jesus also seemingly refers to Noah’s Ark as a real event in Matthew 24:38–39: “For as they were in those days before the flood, eating and drinking, men marrying and women being given in marriage until the day that Noah entered into the ark and they took no note until the flood came and swept them all away.”

Onto the problem of death. According to Genesis, prior to the fall from grace, there was no death in the world. Evolution requires a great deal of death to occur. So even if Adam and Eve are metaphorical stand-ins for our first recognizably human ancestors, how could they have evolved to that point in a world with no death?

>>512661538
>How the hell did dinosaurs fuck?
each of the spikes was actually a penis bone

>>512672977

In Romans 1:20, the authors of scripture were very clear that they believed nature is obviously the work of a designer. In Romans they express the opinion that there’s no excuse for not believing in a creator because when you look around you at nature, it is unmistakably the handiwork of a vast intelligence:

“For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse.”

Catholics are, in my experience, the most stubborn about acknowledging these issues. Their usual recourse is to assume some apologist, somewhere, has already addressed the problem and whatever they had to say should be good enough for me, or to refer to statements by the Pope affirming that no conflict exists between evolution and the credibility of scripture.

The basis for this claim is the August 1950 encyclical Humani Generis wherein it is written:

“The Teaching Authority of the Church does not forbid that, in conformity with the present state of human sciences and sacred theology, research and discussions, on the part of men experienced in both fields, take place with regard to the doctrine of evolution, in as far as it inquires into the origin of the human body as coming from pre-existent and living matter—for the Catholic faith obliges us to hold that souls are immediately created by God.”

The encyclical did not actually affirm evolution but portrayed it as unproven at the time of writing while expressing receptiveness to it should the evidence ever rise to a threshold that satisfied the Vatican:

>>512673003

“This certainly would be praiseworthy in the case of clearly proved facts; but caution must be used when there is rather question of hypotheses, having some sort of scientific foundation, in which the doctrine contained in Sacred Scripture or in Tradition is involved.”

However, in this very same encyclical which the Pope references and which Catholics reference indirectly when quoting him, actually agrees with my position: That a metaphorical Adam, either as a mythical figure or as one protohuman ancestor among many, is fatal to the scheme of sacrificial atonement for original sin as described in the New Testament:

“When, however, there is question of another conjectural opinion, namely polygenism, the children of the Church by no means enjoy such liberty. For the faithful cannot embrace that opinion which maintains that either after Adam there existed on this earth true men who did not take their origin through natural generation from him as from the first parent of all, or that Adam represents a certain number of first parents. Now it is no way apparent how such an opinion can be reconciled with that which the sources of revealed truth and the documents of the Teaching Authority of the Church propose with regard to original sin, which proceeds from a sin actually committed by an individual Adam and which through generation is passed on to all and is in everyone as his own.”

This is consistent with the contents of the Catholic catechism which addresses evolution:

“The Church, which has the mind of Christ, knows very well that we cannot tamper with the revelation of original sin without undermining the mystery of Christ.” Catechism 389

“Adam and Eve transmitted to their descendants human nature wounded by their own first sin and hence deprived of original holiness and justice; this deprivation is called “original sin”.” Catechism 41

>>512672956
that's a non seq to my point
the point of me saying all that is that, going by the bible, it's been around 6000 years since adam and eve, it doesnt matter if they were first

>>512673115
Unless animals existed since way before the Garden of Eden, and when The Bible says a day (the 7 days of creation) it doesn't literally mean a day, but a period of time similar to how people will say a minute and it doesn't mean a minute. Or it could be countless other causes. My point is that you are making too many assumptions and this is probably leading you to false answers.

>>512673258
>Unless animals existed since way before the Garden of Eden,
that is an assumption in the first place, you're being hypocritical
and just to state my stance so you know where im coming from, i personally believe that everything was created, i have no idea when, why or how, and im using the religious bible like you or anyone else is using your religious textbooks to make others believe in evolution
im also not arguing for creation, i just find it fun to point out fallacious logic when evolutionists try to assert their beliefs as fact

>>512660502
tiktaalik breathing the first air for the first time must have been a one hell of drug that he got addicted to it overtime

>>512660260
Genesis 1.1-28
God created all things in 6 days and rested on the 7th.

>>512673258

>nd when The Bible says a day (the 7 days of creation) it doesn't literally mean a day, but a period of time similar to how people will say a minute and it doesn't mean a minute.

In Genesis, each day’s worth of creation events is followed by “the evening and morning” of the next day according to scripture, things that literal days have which “indeterminate periods of time” do not. On top of which Genesis 1:4–5 defines what a yom/day is and what distinguishes it from night, making it very clear from the context that they intended ‘yom’ to mean a literal day rather than eon:

“3 And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. 4 God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness. 5_ God called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.” And there was evening, and there was morning—the first day.”

Literal days are light, and literal nights are dark. It can (and does) have additional metaphorical layers of meaning on top of that. Certainly, these kinds of stories in scripture are primarily intended to illustrate some spiritual principle. But that doesn’t preclude such stories from also containing beliefs about nature that were sincerely held in antiquity, impossible to confirm or deny at the time of writing, but which have become investigable since.

Also, the day/age apologetic doesn't solve the issue of events occurring in the wrong order. Genesis asserts that the Earth existed before the sun, trees and other land vegetation before sea creatures, and birds before land animals. The Sun and Moon are both created together on day 4 along with all other stars(!). The order itself is wrong (in both versions), and it’s never been explained what is metaphorically conveyed by getting the order wrong which could not have been conveyed while keeping the order accurate.

>>512673754

And now we pay taxes & are addicted to processed sugars, good job amphidiot

>>512660142 (OP)
should shoop a fat womans hand to replace the whale bone

>>512671118
You just have never read the Bible. It does in fact directly contradict Evolution. God created all creatures and man within a few days of each other. But death was not a thing until Adam and Eve ate from the fruit of knowledge.

>>512674074

Besides this, if we do not all descend from Adam, we don't all inherit original sin

>>512673811
>>512660142 (OP)
Notice how 6 days never specified how many hours, minutes, or seconds that is
6 days to God is very different than 6 days to humans is

>>512662789
ignoring the dubious average statistics:
1 -- asians have a narrow bell curve. More average, fewer idiots and fewer geniuses.
2 -- personality is genetic too. The mainland asian empires killed off all their free-thinkers millenia ago. Even if a chink has the brains to think anew, he doesn't, and he won't, he doesn't have the balls, the confidence and the drive. The Japs are partial exceptions to this, being shielded by their island-geography, like the English being shielded from the continental empires. For the Japs, it is a much bigger effect, as their situation has lasted way longer and the Chinese empires bred conformity infinitely more than any euro empire ever did.
3 -- competition. Europe has always been fracturous and it keeps everybody on their toes to innovate. Monolithic chinese empires don't.

that's why Germanics and Celtics and Slavs invented all of everything, within a rounding error.

>>512660883
>>512667883
>just lungs
they have adapted larger spleens over the generations which is 50% larger than other humans, to hold more oxygen per dive

>>512674687

See >>512673927

>>512660142 (OP)
Full formed humans landed in India from space circa 7000 BC. Evolution did happen to animals and cloned niggers but not for humans (whites and asians)

>>512660502
american 4 sure

>>512660502
pretty sure it was just propped up there by the person filming

>>512662465

>>512672956
>The Bible never actually says Adam was the first man.
It does
>5 Now no shrub had yet appeared on the earth[a] and no plant had yet sprung up, for the Lord God had not sent rain on the earth and there was no one to work the ground, 6 but streams[b] came up from the earth and watered the whole surface of the ground. 7 Then the Lord God formed a man[c] from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being.

>8 Now the Lord God had planted a garden in the east, in Eden; and there he put the man he had formed.

>>512673927
>In Genesis, each day’s worth of creation events is followed by “the evening and morning” of the next day according to scripture, things that literal days have which “indeterminate periods of time” do not.
Good catch, I missed that
Literally 7 days

>>512672178
"Micro-evolution" is just pretending that what is observed within a human lifetime just doesn't happen before and after that. It's a cope.

>>512676052
No evolutionists are huffing pure copium. Using micro evolution as a means to state that macro evolution exists is the cope.

>>512676179
Try looking at it non-retardedly sometime.

>>512660344
ok no you're a dumbass.

>>512660142 (OP)
Powerslap, whale edition.

Always a good laugh when retards who believe in deluded sandnigger fairytales project and try to claim that science is 100% dogmatic and fake like their gay ass religion.

>>512676692
they are just holdovers from a bygone era who think slop like 'the scientific method' still matter, it's like retards now who don't understand the gender sciences or climate science. yes they are stupid, but science is science!

How can anyone argue against the vax?!?

>>512661029
Now swim around and spear fish.

why do theists have a problem with evolution? it does not disprove the creator in the slightest.

>>512660142 (OP)
>Common programmer

>>512660142 (OP)
Its not really like ours at all.
There are way more carpal bones in the whale. But they are fused. No metacarpals. Up to 6 phalanges and variable per digit, not 3 per digit.

>>512660317
See
>>512678670

>>512661190
Based prehistoric knower.

>>512660142 (OP)
Anyone who has some brain left.
No spicie has ever evolved and be observed and documented by the scientists.
For 10 000 years no evolution.
But it was working before that.
The magic has disappeared. Sad...

>>512665894
points to : they all come from the same factory. also points to : I bet you're vaxxed willingly and like trump

>>512679301
research the evolution of the peppermoth

>>512664204
Thanks Box

>>512660883
training = "genetically modified"
"recluse society" dude is wearing and using civilised world items
how much spit do you ask for?