Thread 512685721

How tf did they do it, without modern technology, computers etc? Just doesn't seem possible is all...

>>512685721 (OP)
they had computers

Gyroscopes

>>512685721 (OP)
Read a book.
for once

>>512685721 (OP)
i often ask myself how dodge engineers made only 500bhp from an 8.4l v10 in the 90s, but they did

>>512685832
and turbopumps

>>512685721 (OP)
They had computers.
...
They were extremely new but they built them.

>>512685721 (OP)
>without modern technology, computers etc?
they did, pioneered the digital age with the usage of digital computers and microchips. hope that clears things up

>>512685721 (OP)
Moon is 275k miles away
Took them 4 days to fly there
>muh rocket flew 68,750 mph to AND from the moon…but we lost the data.

>>512685851
books are fake

>>512686195
i have no idea what you're trying to say

>>512685721 (OP)
When something is overly complicated for my high brain I just explain it as a conspiracy.

>>512685721 (OP)
Go play Kerbal.
I can safely land on the moon by just winging it.

>>512685721 (OP)
It's bullshit

>>512686522
your dumb meme is bullshit

>>512685721 (OP)
We gotta summon the spirit of Stanley Kubrick for that.

>>512685721 (OP)
>without modern technology, computers
why does no one question how they were able to print crisp fonts and digital illustrations decades before the pc or gui even existed. They had computers the peasant class did not know about or have access to until decades later.

>>512685721 (OP)
the moon is a state of mind, not some real place people can go to.. btw the circus is dead, nobody gives a fuck anymore

>>512685721 (OP)
So is the point of this board pretending to be retarded

>>512686739
what are you talking about exactly?

>>512686754
But... while it may be a frame of mind, it is also a real place a person can go to. It is a very dangerous place but it is real.

kek. yeah and they didnt just do it once. they did it 6 times in 3 years '69-72. But yeah almost 60 years later no country has even attempted to land people on the moon again. Or private corporation. Sixty years later and the pinnacle is currently humans 1/1000th of the distance from the moon. But hey it definitely happened, its not like the pictures look fake or anything, or they lost all the telemetry data and tech. Or the moon rocks they gifted to other countries turned out to be fake. https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna32581790

fucking boomer brains. nothing is too fake for them to believe in

>>512686974
>its not like the pictures look fake or anything,
they dont. you just dont understand photographs.
>or they lost all the telemetry data and tech.
they didn't
>Or the moon rocks they gifted to other countries turned out to be fake.
no, it didn't. that was never gifted as a moon rock.

https://moonhoaxdebunked.blogspot.com/2017/07/98-how-come-moon-rock-donated-to.html

>>512686195
Nice math you got there buddy did you think of that all by yourself?

>>512687095
stop being a cuck and start using your brain. I hope you're in your 20s because if you are the possibility exists you will live to see it be 100 years since those supposed man missions. I'm curious if at that point would you concede they faked it.
currently you have to believe USA 60s tech is more advanced that 2025 Japan/China/Russia and 2025 USA. And of course don't forget the private corps. And not just a little more advanced, like I said, they currently are maxed out at humans in low earth orbit, that is 1/1000th of the distance they covered 6 times and back safely in those 3 years, 1969-72.
so yeah, please be 23 or and be talking your shit 40 years from now arguing that 100 year old tech was just do darn good.
canadian faggot cuck

>>512685721 (OP)
They didn't. They fired a rocket in the sky and that's about it, as they do it today. The rest is cinematography and CGI and Star Wars popculture space brainwashing.

>>512685721 (OP)

>translation: I Dont understand how it happened because i am a huge retard who knows nothing therefore it could not have happened and must be a fake jewish conspiracy.

Kill yourself

>>512685721 (OP)
There is no list

>>512687648
>the distance they covered 6 times and back
you cant even get the msot basic things right because you dont know what you're talking about. they covered the distance 9 times.

>>512687648
I can't help but notice you didn't actually defend your position with facts or information
You just said "lol you believe it" and that's it

Would you care to make an actual argument or present some evidence for why you think it couldn't have been done with 60s technology?

They didn't

>>512686195
Retard

>>512685721 (OP)
As always, it helps to learn some WW2 history. The Nazis had the most advanced rockets, also the Allies also had TV guided missiles during WW2. These were all new and experimental, but during WW2 the groundwork was laid for the post war space exploration technologies (including primitive computers)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-1_flying_bomb
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Television_guidance
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-2_rocket
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colossus_computer

>>512686825
Hes saying the meme about "how did NASA go to the moon with computers less advanced than a calculator" is bullshit and NASA actually was way way more advanced than they let on which is obvious and the fact nobody ever yells "BULLSHIT" every time that meme gets brought up is kind of weird to me too

>>512687648

I cant believe retards like this exist. The asteroid cant come sooner, we need a hard reset

>>512687864
they never do. ive never seen one moonhoaxie even try to make a case for why it couldnt have been done with what they had back then. its always just expressions of incredulity.

its just because they've never tried to learn about it. it all seems so incredible and mysterious.

>>512685721 (OP)
Modern technology is a myth. Outside of computers technology has hardly developed in decades. Did you know we still use what amounts of blacksmithing to forge large steel parts. Also, they had computers sufficient for the task.

>>512686195
You are sub 95 IQ

>nothing was possible without computers
The absolute state of zoomers

>>512686475
This. Once you realise just how simple it is you drop the silly conspiracy theories.

>>512688227
i dont think they were way more advanced than people knew about. they were just a smart bunch of people using the best equipment of the day. their computers were huge and slow compared to what we have now but what they had was still very useful, especially when everyone was used to doing everything manually.

the cope:
>it was all fake!
the TRVKE:
>civilisation peaked decades ago and we will never have men and minds as great again in our lifetimes

>>512685721 (OP)
they had black women

>>512686974
Just because something can be done doesn't mean it's economically viable to keep doing it.

>>512688464
Exactly. And we've gone to the moon dozens of times. What point is it to send a human up there to jump around in a bulky suit? One day when we get better space suits we will probably send a person again.

>>512685721 (OP)
They had computers and modern technology. Here's the real reason though: Technology has been artificially limited since the 1960s, when we discovered free energy. Since then our lives have been a progressive sham experience. The actual level of technological development of humanity right now is far ahead of what you think. What we experience down here on the surface is a controlled life with strictly limited technology.

>>512685877
It was not a case of lack of ability. ICE tech has not changed much in the last few decades. Its a design choice. Large engines will last longer than smaller ones that are over-boosted and screaming.

>>512688448

Unironically this. These retard zoomer kids have a phone in their hand scrolling tik tok from the age of 2 probably dont even know their fucking times tables and peel their eyes off the screen long enough to say "fake and gay" Next time i see kids crossing the street im probably just gonna hit the gas.

>>512685721 (OP)
It was done because we were ready to spend the money required to get it done and were not just bleeding the system to employ substandard political hires.

>>512686475
>I can safely land on the moon by just winging it.
Just follow this handy flowchart!

>>512688464
concorde is always useful to mention in these threads because its still the only supersonic passenger aircraft ever operated, and its been over 20 years since it flew. soon there will be faggots arguing that it was fake because we dont have one today.

>>512688308
>>512686974
Answer me honestly. Have you ever really scrutinized your ideas like an intellectual. Saying to yourself ...what if the way I view things is wrong at the root? Maybe I've been misinformed?

Don't take what you are told for granted. You think we didn't go to the moon because we don't keep going to the moon, right?

https://www.yahoo.com/news/fact-check-yes-u-army-202600222.html

Surely he just misspoke. Good thing they fact checked it.

>>512688705
ha, i like that. engineer humor is funny

>>512688793
>what if the way I view things is wrong at the root? Maybe I've been misinformed?
of course. and in this case its the ones calling the moon landings fake who are misinformed, usually incredibly ignorant, and just wrong.

as for what that guy said, i dont know. in context he might just have been saying that the soldier was happy. you know, like saying someone is over the moon etc.

>>512687095
>you just dont understand photographs
Look for a documentary called "American Moon" - it was made by a professional photographer.

If your IQ was above 80 you would understand.

>>512689919
and he's an idiot. whats the most convincing thing from that 'documentary'?

>>512688790
The Concorde was not particularly suited to most flight paths. It was almost exclusively used for trans-atlantic flights. There's plenty of people alive today who actually flew on one though.

They are actively trying to develop a modern supersonic airliner that doesn't sonic boom so loud while burning up huge amounts of fuel. I still wouldn't fly one because I'm not in a hurry, at least not enough to ever put up with the cattle car treatment and nasty security that you get with it.

>>512689919
>professional photographer
fashion photographer.
Mazzucco's documentary on 9/11 is useful, but 'American Moon' is moronic.

>>512690053
Submissive low IQ schizos are unable to present any arguments in writing. The only thing they can do is repeat "watch this 4 hour long youtube video".

>>512690113
yeah i get you anon. just saying that the argument against the moonlandings becaue we aren't currently landing on the moon is silly.

>>512690253
to be fair, American Moon has pretty high production quality, so it takes some people in easily. its all total bullshit though. absolute idiocy, but even the worst kind of idiocy can be effective if its explained with nice imagery and a deep voice.

>>512685721 (OP)
By the power of money. Also it was 1960's efficient. Modern rockets lift significantly more for less. That and no DEI.

>>512688790
Russians had their own Tupolev copy of the Concorde. It was absolutely horrible and was soon quietly memoryholed.

>>512685721 (OP)
It's amazing how quickly you can accomplish things without rampant corporate grift levels.

>>512688549
There is no free energy

>>512690611
oh yeah you're right.

>>512685721 (OP)
As we progress closer into space travel we will slowly phase out the lie of the moon landing and forget it happened because it will be seen in such a way that was not feasible and nonsense.

>>512690440
>its all total bullshit though. absolute idiocy
How do you get people past the Van Allen radiation belts?

>>512691303
By translunar injection path that intersects the belts at an aspect and path to minimize duration of transit exposure for the crew.

>>512691303
for one, you can fly in such a way that you avoid them. also, you can have a craft designed to block most of those fast particles. can you explain why you can't fly straight through them? are you aware that when the apollo craft flew, they were moving at their maximum speed, both ways? that makes a big difference to exposure levels.

>>512691260
>it will be seen in such a way that was not feasible and nonsense.
What is not feasible about the moon landings?
Why do you think it is nonsense?

Be specific, please

>>512691303
Can you explain in your own words what the Van Allen belt is? And show your calculations about how much radiation it has, and what amounts are harmful to humans?

>>512692289
yeah know he can't. its just something he heard in american moon and it stuck with him. thats all it is - he accepted what he heard in that video, never bothered to check on what was said or on the subject as a whole, and now repeats it on the internet. its terribly sad.

>>512688790
Dumbass, we do have one today that has already passed testing. NASA also built one. The Concorde was a complete failure with nothing but problems.

https://boomsupersonic.com/

>>512692289
There's absolutely no point arguing with flat earthers spurdo anon. My grandfather was one of the lead engineers that designed and built the satellite that monitored solar radiation for the Apollo mission and I've posted summaries of the radiation and it's tested effects and it was pointless. They don't care. You can literally look up the time the ISS is overhead and physically look at it with a pair of basic bitch binoculars and idiots here will tell you with a straight face that it's a prop on a set somewhere. Half of them are far to vested in trying to spoil actual human achievement to listen to reason. The other half are trolls and well poisoning shills and there's no point in wasting your time on them either.

I mean if you take some copper and nickel you can experiment and make a battery. You don't need a blueprint for everything you do. You can just use your brain and sometimes it translates to rocket science.

>>512692971
ok great, go book a flight.

>>512693049
interesting. have you followed in your grandpas footsteps in terms of your career?

>>512685721 (OP)
Men back then were capable of great things. You think it was impossible because you're a lose who has trouble going to the market for food. It's much easier for your ego to believe it was fake rather than admit you're a subhuman with no value.

>>512693049
>There's absolutely no point arguing with flat earthers
You don't argue with the flat earthers to convince them they are wrong
You argue with the flat earthers to prevent lurkers from believing their lies, and thus falling into the conspiracy black hole

Wherever it is encountered, ignorance and lies must be countered with knowledge and facts

>>512691753
>intersects the belts at an aspect
At an angle, you stable genius, and the best angle is 90°. Very advanced science, by Amerishart standards, I know.
>to minimize duration of transit exposure for the crew
It is very unlikely that that would suffice, due to the sheer amount of high-speed electrons in the outer belt. You would need serious shielding that only a lot of lead can provide.

>>512693727
Are you going to answer the question or not?

>>512691765
>you can fly in such a way that you avoid them
Sure you can - with a trajectory that exits Earth's magnetosphere at one of the poles, but nobody does that because it would waste a lot of fuel.
>you can have a craft designed to block most of those fast particles
Yes, you can - by lifting a shitload of lead in orbit, for the shielding. Care to guess why that is prohibitively expensive?
>are you aware that when the apollo craft flew
I was, until I watched "American Moon". Now I am not so sure it left orbit at all. Too many unanswered questions, without having to be a schizo about it.

>>512693727
>sheer amount of high-speed electrons in the outer belt. You would need serious shielding that only a lot of lead can provide.
Electrons are beta radiation
Beta radiation is blocked by a few millimeters of aluminum, not "a lot of lead"

You should look this sort of thing up before you repeat ridiculous and easily refuted claims like this one, which you probably heard from a Youtube video

>>512686475
I fucking love Kerbal

I feel like I know more about orbital mechanics now than everybody at NASA.

>>512694142
>lifting a shitload of lead in orbit
And again, you're just repeating what you've heard without any rational thought or research
See >>512694310
>"American Moon"
>Too many unanswered questions
Every single one of those "questions" has been answered for decades - you're just too indoctrinated to go and find them

>>512694142
>a trajectory that exits Earth's magnetosphere at one of the poles
Not even close to the truth

The Apollo flight paths specifically avoided the strongest part of the inner (strongest) Van Allen belt
And because of the physics of spaceflight, they were traveling the fastest as they were just escaping Earth's gravity well
So they avoided the worst and sped through the bad
And even then the overall dose was incredibly small, pic related

Readings were the average of various dosimeters that they carried on the Apollo spacecraft with the astronauts
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19730010172/downloads/19730010172.pdf

Russia also sent a vessel with a "fly-by" of the Moon, the Zond-5, with tortoises, insects, plants, seeds, and so on.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zond_5

Also https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrCfkcb_DuQ
Also https://youtu.be/fMHLvoWZfqQ?t=3098

>>512694511
>Not even close to the truth
A better image for the argument that he was making
Here are the trajectories for the trans-lunar injections for all of the Apollo missions that left LEO

>>512693727
>Italy flag 4 pbtid hurr durr
Aspect means characteristic.
I could have written 'characteristic angle' (or 'calculated angle'), too lengthy and brevity was the goal.
I'm an engineer by profession..
Shut The Fuck Up, conspiratard.

>muh shielding muh lead

(You) need to Shut The Fuck Up.
Do you know what Shut The Fuck Up means?
Shut The Fuck Up spaghettinigger.

Shut

The

Fuck

Up.

Shut Up, pizzaslave.


Do you know what Shut The Fuck Up means?

It's time for (You) to Shut The Fuck Up.


>>512694511
Was going to include this graphic in my upthread post.
Incredible that the internet/computer databases are partly an evolutionary extension of what the 1960s space exploration programs developed, and we have Italy flag on here August 2025 bringing it all back to the stone age. Gobsmacking

>>512685721 (OP)
The wonders of the government actually investing in society we could have this and more but neolibs and neocons got us stuck in infinite pointless wars and allowed the Jews to financialize everything

>>512686195
This pencils out. Moon landing is so clearly fake.

>>512688790
But The Concorde was fake.............

>>512693229
Kind of. I went aircraft maintenance like he did, but ended up liking it more and sticking with it. You basically have to get pipelined from an early age now to end up in aerospace engineering unless you have the money for your own startup.

>>512694310
>Electrons are beta radiation
>Beta radiation is blocked by a few millimeters of aluminum, not "a lot of lead"

«"Killer electrons" are highly energetic particles trapped in the Earth's outer radiation belt. Their name derives from the fact that, due to their energy, they can penetrate the thick shielding of satellites and cause microscopic lightning strikes which damage and sometimes destroy vital onboard electronic components.» - https://sci.esa.int/web/cluster/-/46685-shocking-recipe-for-killer-electrons

>>512685721 (OP)
White Men

>>512694684
>I'm an engineer by profession..
>Shut The Fuck Up, conspiratard.
Prove that you are not a "software engineer" by explaining how WTC bulding 7 collapsed ;-)
>bringing it all back to the stone age
That would be an upgrade for you, in those stick and cardboard sheds you call "houses".

>>512686522
this is a jew

>>512685721 (OP)
National-Socialist engineers, Magicians and Ayylmaos. If you know, you know.

>>512687648
I want to smash your skull in, you disgusting jew

>>512696510
>cannelloni 5 pbtid
just Shut The Fuck Up retard.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5d5iIoCiI8g

>>512685721 (OP)
They didn’t.

>>512685721 (OP)
The hardest part was here on Earth, Anon. And it was building a powerful rocket that can launch everything they need to space. Something the USSR failed to do. Everything else is way easier to do than you think

>>512685721 (OP)
because the Saturn V is still the biggest functioning rocket to ever exist

>>512698197
Isn't the Starship better (ignoring that it's still on cope stage)?

>>512698047
Why couldn't the soviets do it? They sent astronauts and dogs and shit in space? Why couldn't they just land?

>>512698434
yes, technically its bigger, but it hasnt done anything so far
still says alot how hard it is to surpass the Saturn V

>>512694142
>with a trajectory that exits Earth's magnetosphere at one of the poles
nope
lol no. yo dont know what youre talking about
>until I watched "American Moon". Now I am not so sure it left orbit at all.
that was your mistake then. how about you read some balance and maybe learn something

https://moonhoaxdebunked.blogspot.com/

>>512685721 (OP)
they basically 'made' modern technology

>>512695775
definitely

>>512695886
ah thats cool though anon. i bet its a very specializing kind of work. thanks for replying, i like to hear things like that.

>>512698434
They failed to build a powerful rocket that it would allow them to send people to the Moon. They didn't have the money nor von Braun to be succesful.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N1_(rocket)

>>512698047
Wow
True if Big

>>512688448
Why not both?

>>512688464
Concorde was arguably the safest passenger aircraft. The only fatality accident it had was from hitting debris on a runway during takeoff which blew up a tire and punctured the fuel tanks.

The reason it retired was a combination of lower demand after 9/11 and the high cost of operation/maintenance. And it had super limited flight paths because it's sonic boom is a nightmare for residential homes.

Maintenance costs are super high for all passenger aircraft though, cutting corners is why so many planes are falling out of the sky lately.

>>512698434
Nothing bigger is possible without nuclear thermal propulsion. The lesson with Starship is either that or ketamine is bad idk which

>>512685721 (OP)
Turn out slide rules are good enough. Or, in other words 3 decimal places is just as good as 9.

>>512685721 (OP)
Americans learned math in schools back then.

>>512688464
All the money that was spent on the space race by Russia and the US, the 'race to the moon', was actually spent developing the ICBM, pilfered into the Military Industrial Complex.
Only a small percentage of that was used to create the set and film the lie.
The only proof you need that we never made it to the moon is the fact that we've never been back, even with all the advances in technology, metallurgy, insulating, shielding, and telecommunications. Because we STILL can't.
Stanley Kubrik had special lenses made specifically for the job, he got to keep one of them and nasa all has the other 4.
It was all a big show, and the sooner people accept that, the sooner they'll grasp how every major event that's been 'broadcast' the last 60 years has so been a show.
Covid and 9/11 should have the citizens of the western world guillotining every politician, media personality, CEO and billionaire involved in those psyops that's still alive.

>>512699927
Sorry, meant picrel

>>512699321
So why not build a nuclera powered rocket? Why still cope with these liquid shits?

The manned moon landings were faked. However, the NASA moon mission was real. I know that sounds confusing but hear me out.

There really was 100,000 people working on the mission. There really were hordes of engineering teams working on every piece of the entire mission. They really did build Saturn rockets.

Everything was highly compartmentalized though. If you are on an engineering team, you work on 1 thing at a time and you never see the whole thing.

You design a spacesuit helmet, a different group tests it, you are told it passed or needs a design change. You absolutely end up making something that looks and feels like a spacesuit helmet, and obviously at some point your team is told it has passed tested and is ready to be used on the mission. You and your team get assigned to a different project.

However, it's one thing to build a spacesuit helmet that passes the sniff test - it feels and looks real and all engineering concerns have been satisfied so it feels real. It passed the test phase. The moon missions were a success.

But it's entirely different to build every single piece to actually function properly in space on a manned mission to the moon. And it's also still incredibly difficult to pull off a successful mission even if everything was real.

And if the reward for a successful moon landing is you get to become the superpower on the planet for decades, well, you can start to imagine how it becomes worth it to have a real program with a fake moon landing.

>>512700319
because a bunch of faggots wont allow it to happen. some of their concerns are justified but too much fear means nothing ever happens.

My uncle invented the computer memory for the Apollo missions. He also invented foldable computer memory and retired in his 30's after selling off his patent portfolio to DEC and Varian. My uncle is a non-bullshitter with no toleration of it. He and I are certain the Apollo missions flew men to the moon, where they walked and drove around, and returned thesr men safely. You flat earthers are both agents and idiots.

>>512699927
ive always adopted the philosophy of them providing something for free ("here, let me tell you whats going on") is always laced with ulterior motives

nobody would make a business out of this out of the goodness of their heart

I'm the nephew above. I am in my 50's, GenX. While those around me in school used Texas Instruments calculators, my dad would only allow me to use slide rules believing this would develop a native appreciation for math. I graduated top of my class engin from a top five program and later earned an engin PhD inter alia. I built Heathkit and other PCs for our neighborhood. Some of you have no idea what can be done with analog and basic electronics. Clueless buttholes.

>>512685721 (OP)
and how did they do it so quickly?

>>512685721 (OP)
mostly white men and smart white men

it is pretty amazing all of this was done without computers while today, Elon's rockets continue to blow up and we haven't been back to the moon (or even gone to Mars)

NASA is basically gutted and their SLS system likely will be cancelled

>>512696601
Funny that Russian engineers have mogged them before AND after the miraculous Apollo trips kek.

>>512701936
they had computers. at least enough to crunch the numbers required. those computers occupied thousand of sqft but they had them.

>>512702388
not really. the USSR wasnt even back into manned orbiters when Apollo 11 was landing on the moon.

>>512685781
with less memory than an old Nokia

>>512685721 (OP)
They used the same computer chips that were only made commercially available in form of the C64 10 years later.

>>512685721 (OP)
Maybe they used the Antikythera device?

>>512703193
Purportedly, the Chinese calculated nuclear weapons parameters in warehouses filled with abacuses and Chinamen.

what if modern technology is actually worse?

>>512702932
yep. still did the job. orbital mechanics can be done in your head or using a sheet of paper if you know what you're doing. just takes longer.

>>512686565
i'm not much into conspiracy theories, but i gotta say those references to moon landing in the shining got me scratching my head

>>512704532
its just a movie some guys made. that want people to be interested and think about it so they put all kinds of little things in for people to think about. its not trying to reveal secrets to you.

>>512685721 (OP)
>How tf did they do it
They had nazis. Today you have women, Niggers, Faggots and jeets. It’s that simple. I know the moon landing waa real because there are no laws preventing me from saying otherwise, nor will I lose my social media, access to banks, or employment for saying
otherwise.

>>512702388
delusional
the first soviets rockets were also nazi rockets

>>512705951
kek this
zoomers never heard of a red herring

>>512706496
Tsiolkovsky and Korolev were no nazis tho.
It was von Braun that was learning from Tsiolkovsky kek.

>>512706851
how many rockets did the soviets build before 1945, dumbfuck?

>>512706605
looking for (and finding) great truths in movies is a sure sign of approaching schizophrenia. next comes the voices and thinking you're Jesus.

>>512707028
10,000 rocket launchers alone you imbecile.

>>512707188
retarded polish nigger

>>512704532
Don't mind the canadian shill turning out to be a psychiatrist (kek). Drawing of Apollo among (other) models and toys - made by a man who is known to be involved in a project - likely does have a meaning.

>>512685877
Low compression. Same engine from Honda will be like 1700hp.

>>512707463
keep watching movies for signs and pointers anon, you'll get the truth eventually. they are trying to sneak it out to you in small parcels using clever little easter eggs and stuff. its your job to put it all together.

dont forget to use lots of red string to join all the pieces together on your wall.

>>512685721 (OP)
German engineering. TRUE german engineering.

>>512685721 (OP)
With Nazi scientists

>>512707463
>made by a man who is known to be involved in a project
Would you care to provide evidence of that?

>>512708032
You seem to be quite worked up about this.

>>512708454
im really really angry about it yes. its a consuming passion and occupies my every waking thought. sometimes my dreams too. thats because im a shill and im here to try and keep brave seeking anons from finding the truthes hidden in hollywood movies. you've found me out, because you are a brave seeker of truth.

>>512708334
>25 September 1965: Frederick Ordway (left, in white) joins a few notables for a tour of the British studio where 2001: A Space Odyssey was filmed. From left to right, they are: Donald "Deke" Slayton, NASA Director of Flight Crew Operations; Arthur C. Clarke; Stanley Kubrick; and George Mueller, NASA Associate Administrator for Manned Space Flight.

>>512685721 (OP)
straight white men.

>>512708757
yeah, imagine getting professional advice for your space movie from people who plan and carry out space flight missions. its definitely a sign of something fishy going on. keep pushing into the truth anon!

>>512709449
The dates show that it was the other way round. NASA specialists were seeking advice from accomplished space movie producers (rofl)

>>512709615
>1965
you dont seem to know much about the US space program if you think they didn't know what spaceflight was like by that time anon. Mercury, Gemini...Apollo was being built.

>>512708757
So he was pictured with people at NASA
Where is the evidence Kubrick was involved in the Apollo program in any way?
Is that photo all you have?

Is this photo proof that Elvis was involved in the Watergate scandal?

>>512686195
dont forget nixon phoned the moon from his landline with no delay

>>512709861
>nixon phoned the moon from his landline with no delay
Actual uncut footage of the call, including a clear 7 second delay after Nixon stops and Neil begins
https://youtu.be/VLyJ9FHDO-c?t=104
Because it was recorded on Earth, there is no corresponding delay when Nixon starts talking again
Anybody who's spoken on a Zoom call knows this delay

>>512686289
Hello brainlet! There is a famous clip of a NASA scientist responding in an interview that one of the major reasons they haven't been able to go back to the moon was because they "lost the technology". Hope that clears things out for you, retard.

>>512688464
>money wasted all the fucking time on countless bullshit
>no no we don't have the budget to fly ONCE to the moon in more than 50 years just to do it again
>but yes we have the budget to waste over money hole fields in science (quantum physics)
Goddamn, you need to be killed. You're just too retarded.

>>512685721 (OP)
TELL YOU HWAT

HUWHITE PPO

CLEAN BURNING LIQUID OXYGEN

>>512710911
>they "lost the technology"
The "lost technology" is because the parts used are no longer manufactured
The guidance computer was a bunch of wires running through magnetic rings for fuck's sake
You can't ask Ford to make a '76 Ford Mustang that will match the materials and processes used back in '76
That's what he meant.

Most of the facilities that were used to hold the Saturn V were repurposed for the Space Shuttle, so they are no longer appropriate
But we can make better rockets, which we've already seen with Artemis I
https://youtu.be/2XmxDea3JhE?t=475

>>512693049
>My grandfather was one of the lead engineers that designed and built the satellite that monitored solar radiation for the Apollo mission and I've posted summaries of the radiation and it's tested effects
prove it or gtfo

>>512712291
Fuck off genocidal psychopath.

>>512710911
>'brainlet'
Look in a mirror toothpaste flag

>>512709923
>'his landline'
kek
Why do all of the 'analyses' come from people that have never even used a computer only a "smart"phone

>>512711996
>we can make better rockets
>but we can't use them to go to the moon
>so basically you're fucking stupid and there's no point manufacturing the old ones xD
Holy fucking shit. Kill yourself.

>>512693049
flat eartherism is a chinese/russian psyop posted by bots
these arent actual normal posts
they try to undermine western accomplishment

>>512716514
Only Apollo fanboys are babbling about "flat Earth" here. Earth is round but you didn't go nowhere, simple as.

>>512708757
Kubrick took five years to produce the '2001: A Space Odyssey' motion picture, which was unheard of at that time.
During the production (in addition to all of the set, prop, and constume construction and designs) Kubrick and Clarke deliberately sought out the assistance of NASA contractors (dozens of corporate electronics and aerospace firms) experts and astronauts to fully comprehend the state-of-the-art of early-mid 1960s space flight technology as it existed at the moment. Kubrick wanted the completed film to have as realistic an appearance as was technologically possible (in addition to having highly skilled effects personnel such as Douglas Trumbull), and Clarke did a lot of additional research attending and speaking at academic conferences of astronomy and extraterrestrial colonies and SETI, about what living in space/on other planets for extended periods would be like and also non-human EXT lifeforms.
It was a highly ambitious film project and extremely thoroughly executed; at the least even if one "doesn't like" or appreciate the film itself or disagrees with its artistic/philosophical premises, it's a monument to Kubrick's own vision and diligence, thoroughness as a craftsman and director.

>>512717679
you certainly didnt go anywheree, Pooplack

>>512701510
Yeah, because you have to be a flat earther to think that getting to GSO is a completely different kettle of fish than flying far enough out it the most inhospitable environment known to man to enter the moons gravitational arena AND dealing with landing on something with 1/6 the earth's mass (and thus 1/6 the earth's escape velocity requirements) while still dealing with earth's escape velocity requirements, AND also dealing with the Van Allen belts, AND dealing with solar radiation, AND dealing with extrasolar radiation, AND dealing with fuel constraints, AND maintaining a living atmosphere for human beings for upwards of a week with contingency reserves for twice that, AND dealing with doing it all again in reverse.
You're a well poisoning piece of shit, and I'm glad to know you're fully clot shotted to get your shekels.

The faked moon landings killed the soviet union, Russian and American scientists have said as much in the last 35 years, and again: we've never done it again, and it's been over 50 years.

>>512701309
>>512701510

Apologies to (0kmQh+Jj) for previous post, was meant for this larping piece of shit.

>>512714508
They're very, very stupid. They live in the here and now. Actually taking the time to understand different environments and eras is beyond them. It's a similar variant of retardation that affects people that think importing browns is a good idea.

>>512687713
The rocket was the hard part.

Sort of free energy.

>>512688549
Yep this is accurate. Every time it's developed independently it gets buried under defense and never heard from again. A lot of parasites keep their fortunes this way.

>>512686974
The time between the Wright Brothers first flight and the SR71's first flight is 61 years.
The time between the SR71's first flight and today is 61 years.

>>512709860
Look up the lenses he used for Barry Lyndon,
And then kys, you gaslighting piece of garbage.

>>512696510
That was jews and explosives you fucking retard. Because one thing is a lie doesn't mean everything is.

>>512711996
>But we can make better rockets, which we've already seen with Artemis I
the first half of your statement is true, but then you use the wrong rocket as an example

>>512719856
It's hilarious and also pathetic.
RE: the upthread pic of Kubrick at U.K. studios with NASA personnel and Clarke (already posted in response to it), I just pulled off the shelf an old copyright 1970 small paperback book titled 'The Making of Kubrick's 2001' which is a compilation of information, photographs, interviews, and reactions to the 1968 release of the film and its lengthy five years of production
There's a piece in this book by Frederick I. Ordway, academic pioneer of modern rockets and spaceflight that was a senior advisor to NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center and also served for eighteen months as a prime scentific and technical consultant for the '2001' production, in which he discusses the film and Kubrick's dedication to getting the film to appear as technically appropriate, up-to-date and correct as possible and also some mild recommendations how to make the philosophic pacing of, for example, the opening sequence a bit more digestible for more viewers.
Most zoomers today see films like '2001' or excerpts from it as a cliche no different from an MTV video clip. It's part of the internet generation's postmodern simulacrum disconnect from being marinated in oceans of media content without any rudder or compass to navigate or comprehend what it actually is. Or distinguishing it, how to differentiate it from flat earth / 'no moonlanding' streamertard podcasts
Ah well the internet

>>512720319
Decade of the 1960s was the peak of aerospace exploration and technology.
Now it's all about systems refinement
(one broad example of that might ? be Elon's orbital rockets landing themselves)

>>512721348
It's deeply frustrating but what are you going to do. Just keep pointing out their obnoxious retard splooge.
>>512697131
Also thanks for this, somehow I missed it.

>>512710911
its famous for how stupid people completely dont understand what he's saying.

>>512714508
of course nixon was talking into a landline. you cant seriously be puzzled by this.

>>512719659
just stop anon. its actually painful reading such retarded bullshit.

>Anonymous (ID: dQT5sXvU) leaf THIRTY-TWO POSTS BY THIS ID
>>512724348
>"a landline"
That you don't comprehend how retarded it is to unnecessarily make that distinction with telephonic communication in the year 1969 says more about (You) than anything itt

>>512724459
You're a kike, so the only thing you enjoy reading is your own bullshit and blacked porn, but please, do go on.

>>512723031
>thanks for this
It's one of my favorite 9/11 WTC videos, still relevant 15 years and millions of views later, that engineer's a hero

>>512685721 (OP)
>How tf did they do it, without modern technology, computers
goddamnit you niggers are fucking stupid
they had computers. a lot of modern tech was invented specifically to accomplish the moon mission.
and von braun had figured out the napkin math on how to get there in the 30s. it was just a matter of him getting to a cunt that wasnt trying to fight the entire world at once, so that he could make rockets instead of ICBMs

at least you actually believe in space tho, so i guess you could be a lot dumber

>>512702932
>with less memory than an old Nokia
A 3310 had 1.5 KB RAM. The apollo guidance computer had 4 KB.

>>512702932
>>512725971
That's not even enough for them to post a meme from the Lunar Module
wtf ikr

>>512720319
Diversity is the great filter

>>512686522
LMAOOO

>>512689919
good film on many glaring problems on the moon footage. Anyone saying it's shit are shills. Which this thread seems to attract like flies

>>512685721 (OP)
>how
possessed ayys helped them nazis, then murricans and ruskies took those nazis in

>>512728906
>Finland flag 2 pbtid 'American Moon is good!'
Wrong, midwit

>>512701309
Then you sucked his dick after. Lmao.

>>512701784
No one cares fatass.

>>512708032
32 posts by ID. Fuck off shill nigger.

>>512716254
>but we can't use them to go to the moon
we can. Nobody will pay for it

>>512686522
The camera was preprogrammed and it actually took them multiple attempts to get this right. This is from the very last moon landing IIRC.

>>512731130
He's a jeet, this country is infected and our only hope is a long winter with no power. God loving, sooner than later, before the vermin starts breeding.

>>512696090
>comparing risks of static discharge to sensitive electronics equipment in incredibly weight optimized mass produced and deployed satellites to human payloads which are optimized for shielding and only briefly pass through dangerzones twice in a mission rather than live in them in high orbit for decades
kike retard alert

>>512685721 (OP)
White People Can Do Anything!

>>512725249
This meme has made me deeply melancholy.

>>512686974
>no country has even attempted to land people on the moon again
Nobody has the braindead reason to outperform the Soviets too. Never has, same as invading a country without an Army, Navy, Air Force or even a single soldier because some Arabs demolished some office buildings (and declare a win agter).
Only US retards are that idiotic.

>>512692971
>https://boomsupersonic.com/
>Why Boom? Hear from the Women Fueling Our Supersonic Mission
Anon

>>512733983
you have to go back

>>512693727
>high-speed electrons
>shielding that only a lot of lead can provide.
You do not even know simple basics of physics.
Why do you dare to post over here (or at all)?

>>512734918
It's the same with all the moonlanding deniers, they watch YT videos and streamtards
then come to 4chan to post flat earth subtrash
Absolutely zero conception of basic hard science at even high school tier
the internet was a mistake

>>512733983
>some Arabs demolished
Sorry Hans that is *not* what happened

>>512685721 (OP)
5% of GDP

>>512685721 (OP)
>Zoomers can't imagine a world without smartphones

>>512685721 (OP)
>How tf did they do it, without modern technology, computers etc? Just doesn't seem possible is all...
They had scientists with funny accents back then

>>512700612
>If you are on an engineering team
I know radio amateurs measured doppler shift of Apollo - Earth communication. All fits, moon movement and earth rotation included. Sure you will not believe and it's better that people like you stay dumb. But there are other readers.

>>512707188
>10,000 rocket launchers alone you imbecile.
See the difference
https://www.youtube.com/watchv=EgiMu8A3pi0

>>512735883
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EgiMu8A3pi0

>>512735149
That's the spawn of replicunts for ya. Sterilize them all, including the parents and elderly but especially females. It's the only way to be sure.

>>512735430
They're going to be even dumber thanks to AI doing all the work for everything. They won't know how to do shit when the power goes out.

>>512685721 (OP)
Unironically? An absolute toe-curling fuckload of coffee and cigarettes.

>>512685721 (OP)
They didn't have DEI niggers, chinks and jeets

>>512686522
It was on a heckin timer that followed a set freakin path.
It was done this way because they couldn’t control it from earth and many heckin tries before this one failed by it tilting too fast, too slow, -early - late.
But everything went perfectly on the real trip and what heckin luck.
There are so many freakin’ examples of things that went perfectly on this mission. And they are all pretty heckin real because they can all be proven to work as long as you have a lot of freakin’ luck and these guys had to the darn luck in the world.
So it’s pretty heckin real if you ask me.

>>512736247
I am seriously worried (not personally, the Royal 'worried') for the future of human species. Including daily userposts on /pol/
It's like the movie Idiocracy ×10,000

>>512735976
This is a good video
if anons want to get a concept and full comprehension, understanding of how liquid fuel rockets operate

>>512686974
India has been to the moon 3 times

>>512685781
lol they had a glorified abacus

>>512685721 (OP)
they didn't anon. the landing was fake.
ignore the shills and just accept it.
they faked the whole thing.

If americans really went to the moon there would already be a domed city full of niggers and at least one McDonalds there, the fact that there’s none of it is proof enough to me that they never landed.

12712291
>>512714309

Yes pls take two holocausts and burn in hell.

>>512725249
Wait untill you realize it was 6 million Germans pows after the systematically genocided by the jews in the death camps.

Wait untill you realize it was 6 million Germans POWs after the war was over systematically genocided by the jews in the death camps.

Eisenhower's death camps.

These are the most evil.vile pepole in history.

Wait hold up shlomo didn't you do this?

Antisemitic!

>>512735430
>>512736340
Stunning how dumbed down the mass populace appears to have become since iPhone introduction 2007
Centralized control aspects were mask-off (no pun intended) during 2020
It's all about mass information database central control, since the 2010s

>>512688252
You're going to be waiting a long time because a "hard reset" isn't going to happen

Then this is about denazicaftion.

I can't belive Putin was willing to butraly kill over a million of us.

Wow Russia's really do put their cards on the table frist.

If you remember we went into this war....

Hitler was a jew stop genoicoding yourself.

Oy vey that so antisemitic stop bulling me.