Thread 512717124

>You have to show id to verify your age because we need to protect children from accessing no-no content

>We need to scan your content stored on our cloud services that you pay for because there might be CSAM. These systems are automated so there MIGHT be false positives but we have zero tolarance so it'll get shut down without notice.

FUCK THE CHILDREN. FUCK EM! They are retarded, smelly dipshits. I don't give a fuck abot random children watching goatsie accidentally or get kidnapped.It's not my fucking problem. Do not give your child a fucking tablet to babysit. I don't care.

Just do not touch my internet.

I don't give a shit about children and if you think caring about them is a moral thing to do, you are retarded. This whole muh children is an AMERISHART POLITICAL propaganda to get votes from people.

Children aren't important. They don't shape the future. The rich shapes the future.

>>512717124 (OP)
These laws have nothing to do with protecting kids, it’s just about controlling the goyim.

>>512717261
FPBP
/thread

suck shit niggers I support this
golden days of internet are long gone, it's time the online world became like reality. That means if you say some retarded shit, you are known as a retard. I can understand why you'd hate that prospect

>>512717261
I know. But the average normie thinks it's about kids or stopping terrorism.
They need to drop this "muh children" argument all together online.

>>512717473
>suck shit niggers I support this
DIE

>>512717473
Lol OK. It's going to be normies hit the hardest. Just like after twitter started using automated moderation all the blacks got banned for racism.

>>512717637
They will after its too late and it's them being primarily affected. I know it's the dream of every weather underground boomer in government and tranny on discord to make out of the way anonymous posts on 4chan illegal but there are 100s of millions of people putting all of their identification upfront and center. Millions of people who've been shitposting for decades without realizing it are serving as an impenetrable meat shield. And you won't so much as I conve ience 1% of them before there's mass revolts in polls, and politicians running on repealing the act win every election.

>>512717124 (OP)
This baby and online chuds are basically the same. Getting scared of fake shit

Can we talk about how humiliating to use internet with your real id attaced to it?

Take the example of social media. You put your real name and surname to a retarded website and you comment on a situation where you won't do shit IRL but you sound like you'd do a lot. It's like reality inside of a desired dream reality. Mental ilness

>>512717713
That's fine, they're the reason why the internet is dead. Half the retards here are just twitter posting normie fuckwits anyway.

It's all about controlling dissent
>you watch this kind of youtuber who speaks about issues that aren't pro-feminism, pro0trannies, or anything the government doesn't like?
>oh looks like Mr. Anon wont be working at this place anymore, and we're going to cut access to everything he has under his name

>>512718070
How does your name being attached make that different in any way? You're still just as pathetic and impotent, it's just that people can see it. If tat makes you care more, you're a fucking normie and you're the reason this shit is happening.

>>512717124 (OP)
Ignore the "won't somebody think of the children" angle, don't even give it the dignity of being mentioned. It's entirely for the sake of censorship. It took 12 hours for the UK to apply it to anti-government thought, making it harder for normalfags to see violence against protestors and engage in discussion. The EU will do the same but maybe with fewer direct blasphemy laws, the US will use it to crack down on "antisemitism". It's nothing but our leaders using corporations to circumvent your rights. When they've damaged the culture enough they'll apply more direct means.

>>512718419
why do you think the government 'likes' those things, retard? They're paid to. That's where the problem really lies. You will only ever get more tyrannical bullshit from governments as long as politicians are allowed to sell themselves.

>>512718616
>It took 12 hours for the UK to apply it to anti-government thought, making it harder for normalfags to see violence against protestors and engage in discussion
It's easy if you don't do it in a retarded way

>>512717473
>That means if you say some retarded shit, you are known as a retard
reality is:
>if you say some shit that isnt retarded, you are known as a retard.

>>512718070
Sometimes it's just the exchange of ideas that prevents the need for violent action. You don't have to do "shit". Shit takes care of itself. You are not responsible for saving the world.

>>512718584
>If tat makes you care more
I don't care but people shapes their identity that way. Which is dangerous.

>>512717124 (OP)
>FUCK THE CHILDREN.

>>512718817
Retard. Politically interested normalfags are more aware than ever because we were able to discuss these things openly. That's the "retarded way". The non-retarded way is to self censor:
>don't show police brutality
>don't mention crime statistics
>don't discuss demographics
>don't show warcrimes
>don't criticise the government
>don't bring up history
>you can now talk about politics online :)

>>512719797
None of that shit is what's getting people targeted though. Post the posts that people have got in trouble for in the UK.

>>512717124 (OP)
KEK! Infants are cute but fucking morons!

>>512717473
Spineless aussie cuck. We saw you during Convid. You bow down to authority faster and more willing than an aussie girl to abo cock.

>>512720541
Nah I protested. I know when the government is trying to take away my rights. We have never had free speech as a constitutional right in this country and you retards have even less free speech than us. Either change that or shut the fuck up.

>>512717124 (OP)
>Children aren't important. They don't shape the future. The rich shapes the future.
But anon, all these regulations and restrictions are to protect the rich!

>>512720684
Wrong. I can say whatever I want, as long its not against kikes or threatening a shabbos goy ZOG official.
Yes, we have to suck jewish cock, but we can openly be racist towards any other minority.

>>512718584
>How does your name being attached make that different in any way?
>You're still just as pathetic and impotent, it's just that people can see it.
It does make all the difference. The relative anonymity that the internet gave us until now was as revolutionary as the printing press or the birth control pill in it's implications for social change. By "relative anonymity" I mean that you're safe from the judgement of your primary social group - your parents, teachers, siblings, peers, extended family, your village or town. Only anonymity is true freedom, as this makes it possible to name and reveal social injustices and lies, that would otherwise be covered up. It allows millions of people - who otherwise would not have a voice - to speak up, without having to fear the consequences. Think of it as whistleblowers - we're all whistleblowers. The main reason 4chan, other websites and the internet in general had such a huge cultural impact (to the point of helping electing an American underdog presidential candidate - twice!) is that we had this relative anonymity. If the government strips the web of this protective privacy, the internet becomes basically useless in it's main form, that is a communication medium. If people are forced to comment under their real identity, we will never see any true radical comments ever again. The conversations would be as stimulating as the Yahoo weather forecast. Revolutionary thoughts, or even just everything that is truly offensive, would be banned to the lost corners of the dark web, or to tiny groups of private real world locations - where it would no longer have any impact on society whatsoever. We'd be back in the 1980s where the narratives would again be solely composed and conducted by governments, NGOs and the big media companies.

>>512721094
>we're all whistleblowers
This is one of the reasons we're getting IDs. You retards think you're 'whistleblowing' when you talk about flat earth bullshit or all your other schizo retardation. You aren't. You're just another normie virtue signalling. The fact that you do it anonymously is even more pathetic.

there will probably be a way to circumvent it

Feels like half of twitter was censored in the EU a few days ago. Very concerning regression straight back into the dark ages

>>512717473
Aussie man commits literal hate crime worth 5 to 10 years while bullying others about Manning up over consequences to stupid shit

What did the abbo huffing gas mean by this?

>>512721334
I miss the days when I imagined Aussies being like Steve Irwin or Crocodile Dundee instead of this shit

>>512721334
>You retards think you're 'whistleblowing' when you talk about flat earth bullshit or all your other schizo retardation.
I know that you're just trolling but you brought up a somewhat interesting point: no, most of us do not spam retarded shit, it's - as always - a small minority of very active bots or posters, who spam the crazy shit. There are many important truths that were incubated on this website, slowly seeped into the greater web (I believe mainly through other social media sites like redd*t, youtube etc.) and have now become part of normie culture and language: the 80/20 rule, redpill, evolutionary psychology, alternative history, the questioning of circumcision, alternative archeology, nationalism, open borders criticism, general criticism of women's behavior as a group, Israel being a terrorstate, hypergamy, vaccine scepticism etc. Those are all themes that are impossible to discuss in public, because the backlash is so violent. The internet, as it exists now, is the only way that humanity ever had to discuss truly novel ideas and to bring forth honest critique, without having to literally fear for your life, because you disregarded a social taboo.

>>512722212
Steve Irwin was a massive leftie retard

>>512721619
>there will probably be a way to circumvent it
Probably, but I can guarantee you that if it takes only the slightest technical effort (like downloading, configuring and using a special browser like Tor), 99% of all people will not use it.

>>512722318
He was the most likeable aussie. Otherwise you are either deranged racist alcolholics, or spineless ZOG drones.

>>512722369
>Tor
I'm so grateful for this

>>512722269
>no, most of us do not spam retarded shit
Doesn't matter, you don't police the people who do and then retard children get on here and take everything posted as fact. That's why zoomers are the first generation to actually get dumber. The next generation will be worse.
It's not even just the objectively retarded shit like flat earth theories, you retards share shit without even checking sources or making sure the story you're sharing is even real. It's the same all over the internet. I deactivated facebook 15 years ago when boomers found it and started sharing hoaxes everywhere. Now they've spread over the entire internet, including this shithole, and reality isn't reality anymore. Half the world believes one set of lies and the other half believes another set.

The REAL problem is the fact that the internet is monetized now. Blatantly lying is profitable and completely risk-free. At least with IDs, there might be some consequences for that.

>>512722408
If you liked Steve Irwin, you're a fucking faggot.

>>512722269
>the 80/20 rule, redpill, evolutionary psychology, alternative history, the questioning of circumcision, alternative archeology, nationalism, open borders criticism, general criticism of women's behavior as a group, Israel being a terrorstate, hypergamy, vaccine scepticism etc. Those are all themes that are impossible to discuss in public
You can freely speak about any of those things. There are people being jailed for posts online and it's not because of anything to do with that.

>>512717124 (OP)
>Children [in White countries] aren't important.
wow I wonder why someone from turkey would say this

>>512722871
>You can freely speak about any of those things.
I sincirely invite you to try this at your workplace. You won't speak for longer than five minutes.

>>512717124 (OP)
What a fucking moron. Maybe you should have read the 20+ pages of ((legalese)) in the user service agreement for your cloud service. Not only have they ALWAYS scanned your stored content, you gave them ownership of it. They can do whatever the hell they want and you already agreed to it

>>512722673
>Blatantly lying is profitable and completely risk-free. At least with IDs, there might be some consequences for that.
But as for now, blatantly saying the truth is also risk-free. I don't think the small theoretical gains outweight the massive costs here.
>and then retard children get on here and take everything posted as fact.
People grow up and learn. They are not dumb children their whole life. What's the worst thing that can happen? Someone sailing to the "edge" of the world to check if there's really an ice wall?
>That's why zoomers are the first generation to actually get dumber.
We don't know why IQ seems to drop over time or if it actually happens at all.
>The next generation will be worse.
Baseless extrapolation.

>>512722871
you retard. You can say any of that shit near a cop, and certainly cant write it online.
And its not getting better its getting worse. dont be a dipshit, walk into a station and tell them Isreal is a terror state. get on a list faggot.

>>512723165
Did it all through covid. Also most of those things aren't interesting at all, you bring them up at work and people will just ignore you. You being boring isn't you being censored, retard
>>512723591
>You can say any of that shit near a cop, and certainly cant write it online.
I assume you meant 'can't' because you're retarded but you can talk about literally any of that with a cop or anyone, what the fuck are you even talking about? Get off social media, retard.

>>512723483
>We don't know why IQ seems to drop over time
We do now.
>or if it actually happens at all.
>>512723591 this retard thinks laws exist that don't. How did he get that impression? You really can't imagine what bad could happen by people believing objectively false things?

This is going to bite them so hard in the ass

>>512719144
I wonder how long will that take

bump

>>512717124 (OP)
Maybe this is a blessing in disguise? It might make alternative platforms such as those on tor or i2p more mainstream.

>>512717261
Fpbp

>>512717473
chinkike

>>512717124 (OP)
>implying that the degenerate and traitorous elites are pushing and supporting these laws because they actually care about children
You some kind of retard or something?

>>512728835
see
>>512717637

>>512717124 (OP)

Children should NOT be allowed to use the internet without Parental supervision.

What kind of criminally negligent parent can't see that?.
- Seriously !!!

>>512731507
>Children should NOT be allowed to use the internet without Parental supervision

It should be a misdemeanor to let children play on the internet.

You wouldn't let them play with your Pistol unsupervised, would you?

I have a question, what if this leads to a de-stigmatization of porn and fetishes in the same way modern society views homosexuality? What if there is a growing movement of people who are no longer afraid to admit they goon to interracial gangbang cuckhold porn?

>>512717261
It's a good excuse because it appeals to emotions, especially effective on women.

>>512717124 (OP)
Politicians keep saying that pornography "does serious harm" to children but where are all the rigorous, unbiased studies that prove this claim? I don't recall them providing any evidence for this claim at all, it could be a complete lie based on nothing but oversensitive nanny state feelings or a convenient scapegoat for mass censorship

>>512717124 (OP)
Lol.
Another minor screeching about not having access to porn.
This is a good thing for you, kid. Porn addicted 15 y.o., are a sad thing to see.
You can still go to a store and buy porn, if you're so ashamed of your identity being linked to watching porn.
Bottom line. Porn is NOT for minors to consume. The fact that sites were permitted to go up without verification, was crazy.
A golden era for coomers, that has come to an end.

>>512717473
+1 social credit points added

>>512717261
-6000000 social credit points added

>>512717124 (OP)
no