>>512738044
Not really.
Estonia and Finland were nigger tier lands of pure inbreeding (although even niggers surpassed them as seen in the West African Kingdoms and the Nubian Egyptian LARP and Ethiopian kingdoms). Sweden was a den of sea roving gopniks and nigger tier rapists until the Enlightenment (c. 1700).
England and Ireland were actual intellectual and cultural forces until the Norman invasion (Ireland had the best universities and best scholar learning until the Viking gopniks raped them). I wouldn't be surprised if anglo excellency is not due to Scandinavian blood but due to the original aboriginal genetics (It's very interesting that English is the more mellifluous and flexible language of all the Germanic ones, and that maybe due to the Celtic infusion).
Russia was always a backwards shithole.
The first universities appeared in France and Italy. The stones of scientific thinking were put in place in Greece and Rome.
You may not like it, but Jews and Indians had very strong scholastic and scientific traditions. India was very advanced scientifically but got really fucked over by sandnigger invasions from Iran. That was the main cause of Indian cultural decline.
China was on the path of modernizing but isolationist politics fucked China over.
Mayans had more advanced mathematical and astronomical concepts at the time when Scandinavia and Balts were roaming in mud and fucking each other.
Even now, if you actually check the scientific papers, it's a lot of Indian, Asian, and Jewish names with an occasional anglo here and there.
It's highly likely that, if it weren't for anglo and French colonialism, the result of the Viking rapist gopnik genes in the aboriginal population, and if it weren't for the goatfucker explosion, Asian countries would have modernized as fast as Europe. Colonialism and Middle Eastern demons cults did set them back.
The Indian is correct.
Outside of the Nobel committee and refining things, scandos created nothing of worth