Thread 512796515

/sci/ retarded NPCs confirmed

>>512796515 (OP)
Looks like /x/

>>512796515 (OP)
>>512796609
Woops, I was almost NPC level retarded and covered half my post. Fortunately not /sci/ level NPC, so I corrected the error.

>>512796609
The discussion on /x/ is actually 111x more intelligent than /sci/ This time of neotenous, frankly infantile reply, is quite uncommon in comparison. /sci/ is genuinely retarded. The only thing it has going for it is being a relatively slow board, not that this potential amounts to anything.

>>512796852
>This time
type*

>>512796515 (OP)
hey, that's my thread!

>>512797138
Well, kind of based. You're welcome. It's not everyday someone screencaps your thread to complain about how retarded someone is on another board.

>>512796852
Maybe 3 threads out of the 100 on /x/ are worth engaging with. Most of the time posts on /x/ that would push interesting conversations in a thread are ignored in favor of schizo babbling because most people there are either larping about being a dragon ball character or are medicated and drunk out of their minds.

/x/ used to have both the most retarded and most intelligent people in the website, now it only has the most retarded, escapist schizo zoomers kek.

>>512796515 (OP)
I like /sfg/

>>512797458
The ppg&asm (prison planet general) threads caught my interest leading up to the eclipse, probably late 2022 to 2024. A lot of intelligent anons who seemed like real people gathered at that time. I've gradually drifted from the board since, and don't know if those anons are even around anymore.

>>512797700
Take a stroll and see for yourself, sometimes it's so bad it's worth it just cause of how unusually retarded that board had become.

>>512797880
Sad. But such things are temporary I suppose.