Anonymous
(ID: A+1Aedw+)
8/12/2025, 3:42:56 AM
No.512825470
>>512825507
>>512825642
>>512825762
>>512825785
>>512825894
>>512826418
>>512826585
>>512826663
>>512827645
>>512827978
>>512828160
>>512828235
>>512828290
>>512828378
>>512828456
>>512829239
>>512830582
>>512831166
>>512834270
>>512834458
>>512834500
>>512834506
>>512834564
>>512835405
>>512835589
>>512835812
>>512835995
Hey, check out this substack article that challenges the claims of the pro-immigration activists.
>Instead of arguing that the US needs to be more open to immigration or high-skill immigration generically, advocates for using immigration for US geopolitical advantage should be specific. Say which technologies the US should dominate and give names of particular foreign experts, how much they should be paid, and the total numbers of individuals involved (hundreds or thousands, not millions). Doubling down on the present system, which diffuses US technological advantages, increases vulnerability to espionage, enables broken institutions, and makes us dangerously reliant on foreign talent by undermining the domestic talent pipeline, not to mention giving away the entire country, is not acceptable.
https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/brain-drain-as-geopolitical-strategy
It brings up a good point. We should be more like the Japanese and only bring in the top-tier super-geniouses of the world to train the local population (around 10s of thousands of people rather than millions) instead of migrant-spamming the west.
https://arctotherium.substack.com/p/brain-drain-as-geopolitical-strategy
It brings up a good point. We should be more like the Japanese and only bring in the top-tier super-geniouses of the world to train the local population (around 10s of thousands of people rather than millions) instead of migrant-spamming the west.