Thread 512835102

I don't get this particular angle of "America First" when the country was Anti Catholic and Anti Anglican since its inception. Is a Catholic theocracy spearheaded by Nick Fuentes really feasible? Especially considering how left-leaning the church is?

>>512835102 (OP)
It's a grift for Nick. "Conservatives are religious, so I'll peddle religion and they will give me money." He didn't realize that only retarded beaners and liberal Irish in America are Catholic.

do you honestly believe a worm like nick gets up early on sunday to go to church, i went to church as a child and i was bored out of my skull, this retard wouldnt last a second. Do you honestly think he has eveerr read the bible.

dude is a larper and phony

>>512835102 (OP)
>Is Catholic theocracy feasible
Only when it's an absolute monarchy

>>512835102 (OP)
Nick Fuentes Is smart and stupid which is almost everyone but his stupidity is gonna be his down fall

>>512835275
oh yeah, this too, nick decided to larp as a catholic while majority of white nationalists who if they even are religious come from protestant background

>>512835102 (OP)
Fuck CathoLICKS. Jesuit freemasonic lying degenerate trash.

>>512835102 (OP)
Chuds just ignore obvious problems like this one.

>>512835102 (OP)
why? catholics have been faggots since before borgia.

>>512835102 (OP)
Nick's goes in deeper, i think he might be the top.

>>512835102 (OP)
>Is Catholic theocracy feasible?
I sure fucking hope not lol

>>512835275
I live in a small but affluent town that is 99% white and mostly Catholic. Feels good. Are you doom posting or are you Jewish

>>512835279
What kind of retard hasn't read at least the Gospels? You say that as if it was hard. The guy literally reads and talks about what he read for a living, so it's really not far-fetched.

>>512835476
What is the name of your town? I guarantee you're making this shit up.

>>512835102 (OP)
Why are they doing the jihadi john islamic hand gesture?
They look like some chechens

Cptxh 420 8v

>>512835293
There s only one true God, Allah.

>>512835102 (OP)
Catholics are the reason that WASPs lost the grapple for power with the jews around and after the 1960s. They don't deserve any influence. Moreover, they're basically just a Bureaucratic stronghold for brown people.

>>512835476
Then may the Christian Lord guide my hand, against your Roman popery.

CHOMOcracy

>>512835102 (OP)
>Is Catholic theocracy feasible?
First, you'd need to get some real "Catholics". You know, Christians.
Protestants are not Christian, they're Lutherans, Calvinist, Smithites, Smythites..
Novus Ordo, FSSP, SSPX, SSPV, etc are not Christian, they're Marionist. If Jesus and Pope says Up, and Mary says down, they go with Mary ss

>>512835102 (OP)
In Mexico and south america yes.

>>512835102 (OP)
No, christianity is gay.

>>512835102 (OP)
No -- which is why it gets promoted by israelis and glowniggers.

>>512835819
Are you a sede? Your post is unclear

>>512835702
>First conclusion: state of the Church
The first conclusion asserts that the English Church has become too involved in affairs of temporal power, led by the bad example of the Church of Rome, its stepmother, deadly sins that remove its legitimacy (see the portions of the translation with the phrasing "to dote in temperalte, and "challengith the title of heritage").
>Second conclusion: the priesthood
The second conclusion asserts that the ceremonies used for the ordination of priests and bishops are without scriptural basis and not the priesthood into which Christ ordained the apostles. ("For the presthood of Rome is mad (made) with signis, rytis, and bisschopis blissingis." Holy orders are "the leveree (livery) of antecryst.")
>Third conclusion: clerical celibacy
The third conclusion asserts that the practice of clerical celibacy has encouraged sodomy among the clergy and monks, such that churchmen need purgation or worse from their lifestyles—i.e., of decadent "delicious metis and drinkis"; men who like these "like non wymmen".
>Fourth conclusion: transubstantiation
The fourth conclusion asserts that the doctrine of transubstantiation induces idolatry (of the communion bread), suggesting that "Frere Thomas" (Aquinas)' Feast of Corpus Christi service is "untrewe".
>Fifth conclusion: exorcisms and hallowings
The fifth conclusion asserts that the exorcisms and hallowings of substances, objects and pilgrims' staves carried out by priests are a practice of necromancy (shamanism) rather than of Christian theology, asserting that nothing can be changed to be of higher virtue than its kind.

>>512835102 (OP)
Not with pathetic faggots like that who does his 1 finger ISIS salute with mudslimes which is specifically anti-Trinitarian.

>>512835102 (OP)

>Catholic theocracy feasible

Yes, we had that shit in the pass, when Pope had more power than Kings. It's called the dark ages.

>>512835102 (OP)
Catholicism is just gayer, jewier Paganism. If I'm gonna light candles and incense for a deity, it's gonna be for Freyja and Odin, not some wop shiksa and her freir mamzer faggot.

>>512836001
>Oy vey goyim we can't do that again, it sounds scary

>>512835977
>Sixth conclusion: clerics in secular offices
The sixth conclusion asserts that it is prideful for men who hold high spiritual office in the Church to simultaneously hold positions of great temporal power—"Us thinketh that hermofodrite or ambidexter were a god name for sich manere of men of duble astate."—and that parliament should fully excuse all curates—"bothe heye and lowe"—from temporal office, so they can look after the cure of souls and nothing else.
>Seventh conclusion: prayers for the dead
The seventh conclusion asserts that prayers for the souls of specific individual deceased persons is uncharitable, since it implicitly excludes all the other blessed dead who are not being prayed for, and that the practice of requesting prayers for the dead by making financial contributions is a sort of bribery that corrupts the Church, asserting that the industry of prayers for the dead is simony and idleness: "all almes houses of Ingolond ben wikkidly igrounded".
>Eighth conclusion: pilgrimages
The eighth conclusion asserts that the practices of pilgrimage, images, crucifixes, images of the trinity, and the veneration of relics approach idolatry and are far from alms-giving, and that offerings should be given instead as alms to the needy, who are "the image of God in a more likenesse" than the stick or the stone.
>Ninth conclusion: confession
The ninth conclusion asserts that the practice of confession for the absolution of sins is blasphemous because only God has the power to forgive sins and because if priests did have that power it would be cruel and uncharitable of them to withhold that forgiveness from anyone, even if they refused to confess.

>>512836104
>Tenth conclusion: war, battle, and crusades
The tenth conclusion asserts that, absent a special revelation, Christians should refrain from battle and in particular wars that are given religious justifications, such as crusades, are blasphemous because Christ taught men to love and forgive their enemies, likewise the knights who seek to slay heathens for glory (i.e., Crusaders); moreover, it asserts that lords who purchase indulgences for their army's actions are robbing the poor of those funds.
>Eleventh conclusion: female vows of continence and abortion
The eleventh conclusion asserts that nuns in the Church who have made vows of celibacy should be married, rather than being fickle, becoming pregnant and then seeking abortions—referred to as "the most horrible synne possible to man kynde"—to conceal the fact that they had broken their vows, all practices the text strongly condemns.
>Twelfth conclusion: arts and crafts
The twelfth conclusion asserts that the multitude of crafts used by the Church causes waste, curiosity (distraction by non-essentials) and "disgysing"; only crafts necessary for simple living should be tolerated. "Us thinketh that goldsmethis and amoreris and all manere craftis nout nedeful to man…schulde be distroyd."

>>512836079
Shut the fuck up nigger that post was funny and based go be a kike faggot somewhere else

>>512836172
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twelve_Conclusions_of_the_Lollards

>>512835275
For someone to say this shows they’ve never watched his show or they’re part of the anti-Nick shilling, which comes from homos and feds