Thread 512842586

Everyone who has a platform is allowed to have a platform. Every influence who has an audience is hand selected by CIA/MI5/Mossad

There is no escape from Operation Mockingbird

Anyone who tries to create a genuine platform is gangstalked and destroyed.

>>512842586 (OP)
why do you require the "media" source to have a large audience? look in the mirror, fag.

>>512843099
Triggered by the truth. Fuck off shill.

>>512843164
I'm not triggered, gay. Weird projection. I'm telling you that all kinds of real sources exist and that they do not have large audience numbers because of what you say in your OG post. What I'm doing is nudging you away from being a complaining faggot and showing you a solution. You don't want that, of course, you just want to whine like a woman.

>>512843594
You gave me no solutions, and you have given no sources. Sounds like you can barely speak English, you must be a nigger or a jeet.

>>512843725
>You gave me no solutions, and you have given no sources.
retarded and lazy is no way to go through life, kid

>>512843788
And now you are deflecting. Shill tactics. My original post stands. If you want to refute it, you can post sources. If your next post doesn't display real alternative media platforms that are uncomprimised, then you are a confirmed shill. Simple as. Put up or shut up.

he's saying you need to signal boost the smaller voices out there doing research and posting their results and digs, not just checking the feeds of known artificially boosted zog circus slop.
they do artificially boost the zog circus slop, and they do deplatform real content if it hits topics they don't want in the overton window.
Like Fred Leuchter Jr's report on gas chambers in WW2.
The way to approach that problem is to Streissand Effect those verbotten topics when you find them, then brute force your way through it. The more they ban a topic, the more you build the Streissand Effect on it.

There's some attrition with debanking and deplatforming content producers, and then the demoralization ops, but they can't debank or deplatform the Streissand Effect.
Don't get demoralized, that's their biggest op.

>>512842586 (OP)
>Every influence who has an audience is hand selected by CIA/MI5/Mossad
Pretty big claim. There are many very small channels (with like a few hundred live viewers) and get to 20-30k views that discuss things that aren't kosher but the eye of Sauron isn't on them. Because they don't have any big influence and it's not worth the effort. Think if it as like that kid who made a few 100 bucks extra above the threshold to declare his GME stock captial gains and he simply didn't bother. Yes, he's technically violating the law but the cost to go after him (audit him, drag him through court, etc) would mean the government would lose money and it also looks bad from an optics perspective if he's actually not earning that much money (and is already paying things like income tax).

I think that once someone gets to a certain size though, especially close to that 100k views per video that their name gets out there and they're having enough influence that it becomes viable to go after them.

>anyone who tries to create a genuine platform is gangstalked and destroyed
They don't need to "gangstalk" you, they can just cancel you. Get your accounts terminated, or like on Israeli controlled platforms like X, they allow you more "freedom of speech" but not "freedom of reach" and they will severely limit who can see your posts if they're not kosher. If that doesn't work, if you're getting too big, they then lean on things like payment processors, crypto exchanges or banks to cut of you access to the financial networks to actually make a living on what you're doing. The next resort after that, if you decide you're going to build your own platform from scratch is to directly attack that platform. DDoS attacks. Hassling any companies you're using to then protect against said DDoS (e.g. trannies petition cloudfare to drop you from protecting your site from DDoS).

The only way forward is: many more smaller streamers. Or completely building your own infra. Right down to servers.

>>512845703
Why wait for them to get big? Nip it in the bud. They have the technology to "predict" if someone has the potential to be big anyway. They have the means to do everything I said, so why wouldn't they?

>>512843594
That guy angry posting is unironically using shill tactics. He's not even trying to have a conversation. Just turn everything into a pointless argument so you get nowhere. Worse because if you're White and on pol, we probably agree 90%+, so there's even less point usless blabbering.

Really this site has somehow gotten worse again. There's just no alternative too.

Yes, it's 99.99% of people with large audiences are fake.

>>512843788
Yes that too, crazy of you try to help people here, they expect to be spoonfed. There is no easy answer, doing good, real good, will be one of the hardest things to do as the world gets more evil.

Also it's always specific to your own scenario, should use your own pattern recognition to apply. Wanting to know exactly what to do is how you blindly follow goycattle instructions anyway, discretion and thinking should always be used.

>>512842586 (OP)
I want to make a platform where you begin your profile with 1000 guaranteed followers but its just bots and Ranjeets from New Delhi

>>512845840
>>512845963
Looks like the shill changed his VPN so he can blow smoke up his own ass.

>>512846015
Nigga I am a different fucking person taking a shit. Really just uselessly argumentative for no reason, if you aren't a gpt or at elgin, you should be ashamed with your behaviour. Go funnel your rage to some indian.

If you were actually trying to have a discussion instead of rage reply, you'd see that we don't even have the same writing style.

You can just leave the thread instead of adding more garbage if it bothers you so fucking much. Though I doubt it, and I'll probably get another waste of air butthurt reply from internet tough guy who still needs to be spoonfed like a child.

>>512842586 (OP)
It doesn't even matter if people are "real" media, if the digital media outlet is controlled by say, youtube, only the opinions they want will be pushed by the algorithm.

>>512846295
The opinions that they want are spammed by bots controlled by Ntrepid corps operation earnest voice. Look it up. It's a defence contracting agency that controls the entire internet.

>>512846547
I have no doubt this could be true, but the thing is, they don't even need to do this, they can just take real peoples opinions, boost them to the top, and delete any dissenting opinions, on centralized media platforms.

>>512842586 (OP)
OP is part of Operation Mockingbird.