Anonymous
(ID: PFA1jDvP)
8/12/2025, 6:44:54 PM
No.512873607
>>512873906
>>512874066
>>512874358
>>512874367
>>512874488
>>512874605
>>512875354
>>512875494
>>512875607
>>512875647
>>512875702
>>512875770
>>512876009
>>512876056
>>512877243
>>512880839
>>512881022
>>512881260
>>512881287
>>512883561
>>512883588
>>512884535
>>512884625
>>512884627
>>512885980
>>512886504
>>512887141
>>512887355
>>512887778
>>512887782
>>512888270
>>512891648
>>512891813
>>512892756
>>512893324
>>512894154
>>512895670
>>512895860
>>512897066
>>512897747
>>512898551
>>512898742
>>512898742
>>512901358
>>512902489
>>512902491
I think the “controlled demolition” thesis is a red herring meant to make 9/11 truth look schizophrenic. Assume for a moment that the towers were indeed brought down by the airplanes we all saw. I don’t think this detracts from the real questions. You don’t need 9/11 to be an inside job you just needed them to “let it happen,” just like with Pearl Harbor. You still have the cover up, you still have all the lies to get is into Iraq, you have a major scandal and you don’t need any silliness like a missile hitting the pentagon or thermitic material in the dust or whatever