Thread 512885673

Convince me of white superiority without also justifying the Taliban victory in Afghanistan.
>what does that have to do with each other?
If white makes right and right makes might, than the Taliban being brown, poor, outnumbered, outmatched in every metric and winning anyway means they are even more right and whites owe it to Taliban Imams to stfu and listen. Maybe women shouldn't have rights. Maybe you should kill infidels. We don't know why it worked, it was disadvantaged by literally every metric that the west accounts for; but it still won, so obviously it is superior enough on at least one metric and by so much that it overshadowed every deficiency.

America won the war, tbe Taliban were hidden for 20 years

>>512885673 (OP)
We won against Taliban, while Taliban won against other Afghans after we pulled up. There was no battle were Taliban won against US forces.

>>512885673 (OP)
White supremacists can't even explain what white is. Really, this applies to terms like Black, Brown and Asian as well. All silly terms with no solid definition.

>>512885908
*pulled out

>>512885956
>>512885908
>>512885756
You just proved his point and your posts are cope.
Women would still have rights in Afghanistan unless there is something fundamentally flawed in our core values for us to not still have our functioning puppet government over there. Given the state of the modern west, can we say we don't have fuckloads of indirect evidence that their is a fundamental flaw in western values? If there isn't, then why didn't Afghanistan embrace jewish doctrine like we did? After the money and brutal occupation, they never caved to the shit that we have. It took decades to get Taiwain and Japan to pass gay marriage laws, and they needed to be under threat of China everyday for the last 80 years to make that happen. Why are western values so much easier to corrupt than anyone else's?
>>512885956 This one here is the biggest cope of all because the other ones at least point out that we won the individual engagements, which is true. It narrows down where our problem is.
This one here is just trying to ignore the problem entirely. Literally nigger logic. "Ayo stop axing questionz niggah"

>>512885673 (OP)
We know why it “won” dipshit. You can’t fight against a guerrilla army with a formal army that follows the rules of engagement. That’s how we won the American revolution mein nigger. You’ll never squash guerrilla dissidents with force

>>512885922
That’s fine. Tell that to black people. As long as people identify as black, I identify as white. Simple as

>>512885956
Holy copeposting batman.
>scaring globohomo kike lovers and liberal bleeding hearts into giving up on some country that never wanted us there in the first place
Why? Why didn't they want us?
Mind explaining why we do want it and they don't cause the mere fact they didn't want us should be raising questions in the white man and did 100 years ago. It's only now that present whites are losing their critical thinking and not trying to get to the heart of the issue. Acting like the entitled Greeks did to the Romans, sucking off the achievements of greater generations while squandering what they left us, doesn't have a historical track record of leading to productive resistance.

>>512886675
>You can’t fight against a guerrilla army with a formal army that follows the rules of engagement
Who wrote the rules of engagement? I'm sorry, what I mean is, what color was his skin and how long was the nose of the lobbiest who called for those rules to be implemented?
You niggas argue like leftists. You excel and identifying the specific problem in any one instance and fail to push any harder, extrapolate or dig any deeper than the first couple of layers.

>>512886466
America won, seethe brownoid

>>512886466
>It took decades to get Taiwain and Japan to pass gay marriage laws, and they needed to be under threat of China everyday for the last 80 years to make that happen.
Obergefell v. Hodges was in 2015. You wrote the post like West had gay marriage in 1950s when it only got legal in Western Europe and America in 2000s and 2010s.

>>512885673 (OP)
your army - and government - had/has a lot of browns and blacks, females and faggots

>>512885908
you lost, tranny. Just like alexander the great, genghis khan, mughal empire, persian empire, british empire and the soviet union.

Whites are inferior and weak, they lost to the mapuche tribe for 300 years a people with sticks and stones and they had horses and guns and still got their shit pushed in. Whites are weak and pathetic. Can't even beat a caveman tribe with superior weaponry. Also incans had a greater civilization and did it in just 100 years which took inferior Whites centuries to do even with slave labor kek. Weak race and inferior

>>512885673 (OP)
I just realized that the first thing Jesus did in the church was to expel the Jews

>>512885673 (OP)
>WHITE POWERRRRRR

Allow me to paraphrase some other anon I saw some weeks back. All forms of opposition are themselves pozzed.

Imagine a Muslim superstate with the power of the modern US. Israel would be fucked. Only it could never happen, because Muslims infight like crap. It's the tradeoff for their value system. The half judeo-christrian half secular west has the opposite problem; we can do that, but wouldn't. Western atheism, could it do it? No. All their talk of 'trusting the science' and somehow they don't believe in anything we learn when we study DNA. Then you have wokies have the inverse problem of most social theories, thinking so massively on consistency of principles that they managed to correctly identify the problem as the kike (even if it took them years), yet can't see that they only exist due to kile funding and their value system, meant to weaken the west, is stuff they truly believe in, meaning their will to resist is very weak. In all these movements, resistance tries to form, but because the fundamentals have been so jewed, they can't form an effective resistance. People, even normies these days, can tell something is wrong, but they have all been trapped in a cage of acceptable opinions so strongly they can't bring themselves to compromise their own pre-selected and pre-assigned jewish morals to actually resist effectively. Only one man ever tried to break out of the dynamic.

Why does the 'Those Wacky Nazis' trope exist? Why did the Nazis spend so much money trying to make sure space was actually there, or that the Earth bent down and not up? We mock them for it today, but should we? They were fact checking everything! They couldn't know what fundamentals were actually correct and which were jewish subversion and they took nothing for granted. We do. We keep trying to stop the jews within a 'western' moral framework, when the framework is jewish. We need to rewrite the framework from scratch. Flip the table, like Hitler tried to do.

>>512886729
/thread
fuck niggers