Thread 512897999

Why do so many people hate him yet have no clue what his ideas are even about?
>He's a jooo
Not an argument
>He's le corpo or something
He was literally against Elon Musk in the h1b debate
>Muh democracy is good
No it's not

>>512897999 (OP)
People hate him cause /pol/ rightly hates everybody, it's only by always pointing out the bad things that you can even learn something. He can make his own case, he doesn't need /pol/ for that. Case in point here are some common criticisms of him, not all of which I agree with
>he's a Jew and seemingly completely oblivious of the sometimes reasonable anti-semitic arguments that exists, such as the role that jewish intellectuals have played in the 20th century, while he is perfectly willing to trace the origins of such ideology back hundreds of years to the puritans and before, and be satisfied with the loose christian themes in it. He does not seem to care about what the old country thought about the schisms in christianity, even though that was all-dominating at the time, and considers it all pretty much hair-splitting, a la david stove. This is quite an enormous blind spot and extremely obvious to everyone.
>His solutions of the patchwork system and the bicameral government controlled by a CEO chosen by shareholders is very suspicious in a number of ways that are too numerous and wordy to go into, but to his credit he has conceded that his solutions weren't the best part of his work and anons generally agree.
>Not to harp on this point but THE CATHEDRAL, REALLY? jk
>Especially the burgers have extreme difficulty accepting or entertaining his thesis that communism is an american outgrowth, and that monarchy is the way to go. Note that even (european) natsocs often have a problem with this since they still, sometimes unconsciously, think of the leader as an extension of the people's will. In Curtis' philosophy there is only "formalism" whatever that exactly means, but at least it means that whoever owns the country own the country, and whoever is king is king.
>People really do not like the energy of a compsci nerd being in favor of techbro oligarchs with cryptographic absolutely authority, esp. without being more precise about volkishness = asset maxxin

>>512897999 (OP)
Let me guess, we need "elites" (pedophiles) to have total control over society or something.

>>512897999 (OP)
I like reading him and I agree with him about some stuff. I also have a few serious fundamental disagreements with him but I think he is worth reading anyway. He is most interesting to me when he gets tech skeptical as he has done in recent years.
>>512899651
Newsflash: we already do , we always have and we always will. He mostly just wants to formalize this inevitability because he is autistic.
Your rush to impugn detested elites as sexual degenerates is really, really old hat leftism btw. Not saying it aint true necessarily but there is a straight line from the French to the Russian revolutions running right through today with that same brand of propaganda.

>e-celeb
Buy an ad.