Thread 512909985

Republicans are going to send porn-watching coomers to federal prison. And yes, that means YOU.

>>512909985 (OP)
I don't care I want to execute the pedophile elite

>>512909985 (OP)
>bill to trample the constitution for christfags
>this is good!
TKD
AIPAC is the only party, they use Mossad blackmail to groom powerful people they then use AIPAC to put those people in power. Those blackmailed people will do what they ask

>>512909985 (OP)
holy fuck jews are gonna be seething as they own all porn sites

>>512909985 (OP)
Anyone who advocates banning porn without promoting prostitution legalization should be executed

>>512910122
checked and you can bet jews are infighting over keeping their money laundering porn sites vs a humiliation ritual on leftists coomeers

>>512909985 (OP)
Maybe we could save some young anons before it's too late...

>>512909985 (OP)
The only reason they want to do this is because of AI porn involving politicians.
They only care about themselves.

>>512909985 (OP)
fucking based, coomers can go and find a real woman for once

>>512910263
>holy fuck jews are gonna be seething as they own all porn sites
Oh my sweet summer child! Jewish porn will obviously be exempt, after you send them a picture of your ID for "age verification," of course!

The purpose of this is to ban all COMPETITION to jewish porn. That is, all the Japanese porn, doujins on sadpanda, pixiv, rule34 websites, artists and animators on twitter and patreon, etc.

>>512909985 (OP)
About fucking time

>>512910817
>Jewish porn will obviously be exempt
What's the point if 99% of it will be exempt?

>>512909985 (OP)
Coomers will get validated as a real woman after they get raped in prison.

>>512909985 (OP)
Sir
We cannot draft you because you tapped the sign

Were just gonna have to frame you then force you to draft or gwt raped

>"prurient interested in nudity... etc"
Hey Oxford, define "prurient" for me.
>having or encouraging an excessive interest in sexual matters
Ok cool thanks. Seems like "excessive" is the key word here, now define that.
>more than is necessary, normal, or desireable; immoderate
Alright, so let's see them define in the bill what constitutes prurient or excessive.
>https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/1671/text
>all hits for searching "prurient" fail to define what makes something prurient.
Ah okay, thanks that's all I needed. Pretty retarded to making sweeping bills that can't even define the terms and conditions they want to set.
Considering whether something constitutes "prurient" definitions or not is key to the bill and they refuse to define it, I can safely say "into the trash it goes."

>>512909985 (OP)
Inshallah

>Mormon
Not surprising, the people pushing for these sorts of laws are usually the biggest perverts themselves.

>>512909985 (OP)
Based.
Literally only coom-brained betas will bitch about this.

He's hiding something. He's got some degenerate stuff on his hard drive, or he's been touching kids.

>>512909985 (OP)
Wow with all of this focus on taking down pornography and perverts we can reasonably expect that the pedophiles that hung out with Epstein will all be executed soon right haha

>>512910893
>>512911002
>>512911075
>>512911413
>Someone needs to control jewish porn!
>Who?
>The jewish controlled government, of course!

>>512909985 (OP)
Sounds good. Jacking off is time Americans could be spending working.