>>512946357
>so it is completely reasonable to surmise that Jews have a stranglehold over global finance
You aren't "surmising," though, are you? This isn't a theory to you that you propose or surmise. It is a fundamental, axiomatic function of everything you believe. This is, for the record, the divide which you're never going to be able to span with people who have a higher evidentiary standard for belief: everything is "correlated" or "surmised." Nothing is real or testable. It lives in the realm of faith, in an almost religious sense, that there exist all these mechanisms (none of which have ever been directly evidenced) by which these people (none of whom have ever had a crisis of conscience and so much as hinted at this cabal) pursue goals (again, none of which have ever been publicly expressed -- and all of which must be "interpreted" between-the-lines).
It's fine to surmise. Hypothesize away; theorize to your heart's content... but again, that's not what you do.
Where I see tangible, real, extant structural problems with identifiable and falsifiable hypotheses -- e.g. that if we heavily restrict lobbying and impose friction on capital's access to political power, we will see more policies which favor the people over elites -- the best the JC crew can muster is vague notions that if we get rid of Jews, everything is fixed!
The maddening thing is that some of what you say is cogent. Financialization, we will readily agree, is a fucking disaster and a rent-seeker's supra-economy which extracts pure wealth for doing zero work. But by attaching it to your unfalsifiable conspiracy theory, you completely poison the well. You immediately alienate EVERYONE who has a higher evidentiary standard and you do it by invoking things most people find too morally odious to associate with on any level at all.
Can you see why this is counter-revolutionary? Can you image how dropping the JC shit, we might be more united in our shared goals? This is the literal mechanism.