Thread 512946513

Let's say you have the power to outright globally ban either porn, pre-marital sex, or sex change operations. You can only ban one. Which one and why?

>>512946513 (OP)
>pre-marital sex
this, why? because it would cause the most woman seethe.

>>512946513 (OP)
porn, because the other two are either directly caused by, or severely inflamed by, the former. no porn addictions, no trooners. no porn addictions, maybe young people start bonding again

>>512946513 (OP)
pre-marital sex, so that way people would have lasting bondings, if they want to make porn after marriage that's on them, but by banning pre-marital sex you also ban child sex, prostitution, etc... nobody would have sex if they are not properly married, although I know this wouldn't eliminate "perverted couples/swingers" etc

>>512946513 (OP)
sex change operations.

Everyone saying ban pre-martital can sign up for islam then marry their tranny wives.

>>512946513 (OP)
I would bring back public executions. Politicians need a reminder that they serve the people not the other way around

>>512946606
Only cause women are retarded and go along with mass media propaganda.
Sex for marriage is the most lopsided exchange in the favor of women.
The permanent access to a man’s resources it a huge price for something that we’ve all seen women give away for a couple shots of tequila.

>>512946775
So you believe without porn exposure, young men everywhere would find no ulterior urge to have sex with women before deciding on marriage?

>>512946513 (OP)
sex change ops can be outlawed - rhe other stuff cannot, desu senpai chan

>>512946513 (OP)
the only thing to ban is divorce and criminalize adultery, for both people meaning if you fuck someone who is married you go to jail too.

>>512946513 (OP)
Banning premarital sex won't help neither would the others. Marriage and divorce rates would become an inseparable piece of the economy. Then it would prized by the system. There are no shortcuts. You want to achieve modesty then reframe sex into a state of communion rather than a dick wetting conquest. Only men have this power yet most in fear of alone for pussy they scour. They wish to be the steed but have not the strength to lead for they pride their meat lashings and wonder why come the mirror in all of its bashings.

>>512947306
nigger did i say that, really, read that shit again and ask yourself if i said that. illiterate fucking memeflaggot

>>512946513 (OP)
Sex operations aren't a big thing anymore anyways. The vast majority of super hot trannies keep their huge dicks.

>>512946513 (OP)
I would absolutely fuck them all if they had cocks

>>512946513 (OP)
Kek all 4 of them are ugly

>>512946513 (OP)
There's no reason to ban premarital sex and sex changes, as they're mere symptoms of forbidding child marriage and spreading pornography.

sex change operations

On one hand i am a lustful fuck and wanna keep drooling at hot women hence why i want porn and pre-marital sex around

On the other hand i am curious to see how trannies would be explored scientifically if sex changes were outlawed, maybe psychology would finally come clean about the mental processes behind it

>>512946513 (OP)
The latter, pointless mutilation bringing no real positives.
The rest is outright inconsequential.

>>512946513 (OP)
Pre-marital sex, because it would probably get rid of a lot of the porn industry and it would be funny.

>>512947522
>porn, because the other two are either directly caused by, or severely inflamed by, the former.

You just said pre-marital sex is directly caused by porn. So I retorted that without porn, you're logic concludes that men wouldn't be thinking about or tempted to have sex whenever placed in opportunity because, as you state, they never were introduced to porn. That's complete and utter bullshit. But you're too retarded to understand where you went wrong with your swiss cheese argument. As if men from previous generations, before modern technologies allowed instant access to porn, didn't screw everything that moved regardless if they were bound by matrimony. I'm calling out your swiss cheese argument as it is. Moron.

>>512947038
I don't want to be religious tho.

>>512946513 (OP)
None. The government that governs least governs best.

>>512947850
True. All four of them have butter faces. Imagine when their physique turns to shit. They'll be walled harder than Emma.

3 is really ruining the picture for me. Fat, ugly tattoos, just sticks out like a sore thumb

>>512946775
Absolute kek
Have a good one, glownigger.

>>512946513 (OP)
Solid 0/10

Porn obviously. Without it people would have to have sex and possibolity to make money off sex would be drasticaly limited. With this, women would have to stick to their men which would result in more families

>>512948393
>ban porn
>women start acting differently and better
I admire your optimism

>>512948286
How is any of what he said incorrect?

>>512946513 (OP)
Man, the quality of these buttinela girls has really tanked.

>>512948346

wood rather

>>512948346
Figures you'd show up. Okay, unload the Venti files. Btw, she's half a nigger. I hope you're aware of that.

>>512946513 (OP)
These are some ugly bitches.

>>512948522
Porn has always existed in one form or another and people have always screeched that it is ruining society. Porn is fucking gross and I give no fucks if it gets banned outright tomorrow, but it's been around forever.
What has not been around forever is the bullshit feminism getting forced into every crevice of society and the massive changes in women's behavior since their "liberation"
In other words, this is just a way to blame men for the current environment by using a subject thousands of years old and ignoring the current problems which have started with the feminism shit.
Ban porn, see if I give a fuck, but it's not like women are waiting out there to pair bond but guys are too porn'd out to do so. Men are coping with gross ass porn because women are roaring drunk on feminism. That is to say, he's sort of right about what porn causes but banning it wouldn't even begin to have the recovery effects he's imagining.

>>512946513 (OP)
Porn. Premarital sex can't be banned in practice and sex change operations are cosmetic and they can still be regulated. Sex is one of the main dynamics of human behavior, porn is too dangerous as an industry, even more than religion.

>>512946917
I like this answer. I was leaning towards porn, but this might have the close to same effect. And do even more.

>>512948989
You ever wonder how the current world would behave if the governments banned porn distribution form the world wide web during its infant stage?

>>512946513 (OP)
I had to click the thread to see the picture bigger and now I'm replying because they're so sexy. I'm not saving the picture because there's no nudity

>>512946513 (OP)
>Let's say you have the power to outright globally ban either porn, pre-marital sex, or sex change operations. You can only ban one. Which one and why?

>>512948715
The middle one would be fun if you can keep handles on her.

>>512946513 (OP)
I would ban OP from making threads.

>>512949338
People would still be gooners, but it would be expressed in a much more organic way and there wouldn't be 200 narratives and interests attached to it.

>>512948286
He's right tho.
If you can only pick one, porn is the most logical choice.

Like if you say you can only deport one. jews, pajeets, or niggers. You have to pick jews, because they're enabling the other 2. Get rid of them and the other problems will work itself out naturally.

>>512947790
We know by fuck you mean let them fuck you, faggot

>>512949672
I kind of said it all here >>512948795
But I know what you mean, its not really like any of the choices are worth much. My thought was to pick gender surgery because its the only one which doesn't require a concurrent behavioral change in women to make a difference. That said, troons are what, 0.03% of the population? Not much of a difference anyway.
Either banning porn or banning the premarital sex would be WILDLY effective if women were able to adopt a kinder and less cantankerous worldview at the exact same time, however.

>>512946513 (OP)
>Sex change operations

Because false advertising.

>>512949543
Middle one is the least ugly of those, but looks like that disgusting whore Bonnie Blue.

I'd rather fuck a cute tranny than any of these disgusting slag whores.

>>512948168
You don't have to be religious to follow the teachings of Jesus Christ

>>512948259
prob sucks the meanest dick tho

>>512946513 (OP)
Ban tailless women.

>>512946513 (OP)
Look how awful the doodlenigger is compared to the pure skin of the others.
>>512946606
fpbp..?
>>512947207
Superficially, yes. However, in OP's hypothetical, premarital sex is not an option, so a 1:1 pairing is necessary. That means a woman HAS to choose a single (in both senses) man or remain celibate and childless and alone for life. It's only a lopsided exchange -because- they can give it away for a couple shots of tequila.

>>512946513 (OP)
Titless bitches are the worst.

>>512946513 (OP)
Sex change operations. Femboys being gaslighted to cut themselves is evil. The other two are based and redpilled.

>>512946606
Yeah, this would actually fix the most problems.

>>512946513 (OP)
I don't care enough, it's more interesting to see what human become without artificial limits placed by laws and morality.

>>512948715
Middle one (despite somehow being the least ugly), is setting off my jewdar

>>512947192
Everything else is a band-aid.

i kill all the jews, even the based sephardic ones.

>>512951057
Are you getting (((Bonnie Blue))) vibes off that physiognomy too?

>>512946513 (OP)
Sex change operations for anyone under 18. Banning anything is what democrats and neocons do so I'm very specific. I don't like banning anything outright

>>512948715
BoutineLA is about getting what would otherwise be attractive but still basic mostly white college age bitches with slim tummies and BBL ass and parades them around for coomer bait. These aren't the top models you would see at a fashion show or the pretty celebrities. They are just be upper class white whores otherwise.

Those girls aren't ugly they just aren't as pretty as your expectations probably expect.

>>512951892
I actually heard a consptheory BoutineLA is a underground sex trafficking op. But yeah what you said makes more sense. Plus these upper class mid girls who do shoots for BoutineLA usually wall pretty quick. Case in point would be Faith Ordway. Bitch looks like a middle age greasemonkey now.

>>512951352
not necessarily bonnie blue vibes. But observe the nose, sloped forehead, hawkish dark eyebrows, and wide mouth

>>512946513 (OP)
2, 1, 4, 3

objectively speaking though, they all look like over the hill ran-thru upper class whores. the ugliest one, also the dumbest looking one, being the whore with tattoos; self explanatory really. any woman with tattoos is guaranteed an IQ of below 80

>>512951892
They are ugly. They're not fat, and therefore they're fuckable, but their faces are ugly even with makeup on.

If you impregnated one of them, your baby would be ugly like their mother.

The difference between them and a typical british slag whore passed out in front of kebab stand is a month of dieting.

>>512946513 (OP)
D - None of the Above

>>512952266
I don't think its sex trafficking. I think it is possible these are whores that are willfully doing it though. It is possible they have prostituted themselves to the rich and famous men. Many of the girls have been seen with athletes, musicians, etc. One was even seen in a picture with Trump. But a big reason I don't think its sex trafficking is because there has been discussion before on how they recruit the models and from what I read it sounds very plausible and basic to me.
>>512953018
If these models are ugly then you might as well be saying most women are ugly.

>>512946917
This is obviously the correct answer. Luckily we don't have to choose only 1.

>>512953630
Most women are ugly. You're a simp drunk off hormones if you think otherwise. Most men are ugly too, as any woman will attest to.

The majority of humans are ugly, including the bitches in OP. Merely being "not fat" is an extremely low bar.

Imagine waking up next to one of these foids without makeup.

>>512946513 (OP)
I'd ban porn because its the most widespread issue imo, pre-marital sex cant be enforced by the state without massive surveillance apparatus and sex changes allthough disturbing and disgusting are not a phenomena that affects large swathes of the population

>>512946513 (OP)
>You can only ban one.
jews, because they are responsible for pushing for al 3

>>512946513 (OP)
Would breed far right

>>512946513 (OP)
2 1 4 3

>>512946513 (OP)
I'd ban jews. Solves all three.

>>512948346
US mystery meat.

>>512946513 (OP)
Pre-marital sex. I didn't even have to think about it.

>>512946775
The correct answer. /thread

>>512946513 (OP)
Honestly even if you ban it it won't stop people for replacing the problem with it where they will probably find cars to be attractive.

>>512946513 (OP)
>pre-marital sex
This one, would make things much more tactical and high risk

>>512953018
ahhh, gypsy whores.

>>512946513 (OP)
You will still be an ugly incel even if you ban all 3 so who cares?

Pre-marital sex, easily

>>512946775
>porn, because the other two are either directly caused by, or severely inflamed by, the former. no porn addictions, no trooners. no porn addictions, maybe young people start bonding again
Only a woman would say this. There's not a single man who thinks that they aren't getting married/having sex because porn exists.

>>512946513 (OP)
>pre-marital sex
It would be the most impactful and have the most positive benefit. Second most important would be porn ban. Tranny dick chopping least important as they ACK themselves anyway.

>>512946513 (OP)
The people fucking up the dating market are promiscuous men and the women dating them. None of that is solved by banning porn and not sure what sex change operations have to do with it

Although you'd have to establish a massive secret moral police going around making sure people aren't having premarital sex if you're gonna enforce it. Obviously not gonna happen and it's a complete waste of time and resources but of the three you mentioned premarital sex is a bigger problem.

>>512958699
show tits

>>512946513 (OP)
>Let's say you have the power to outright globally ban either porn, pre-marital sex, or sex change operations. You can only ban one. Which one and why?
ANSWER: Forget globally..in my kingdom I would ban anyone that isn't a White Christian. Harsh penatlies for even suggesting tolerance for degeneracy...up to swift execution for outright satanism as per Scripture. Jews and Blacks would be forbidden from even setting foot on my kingdom's soil..not even as diplomats, nor as tourists. All others would be required to obtain insurance to cover their behavior, and wear publicly a tourist ID visa whilst visiting.

>>512946513 (OP)
If I'm in power, do not tell me what my restrictions are.

>>512946513 (OP)

porn because it's a massively underrated problem

if i could i would also not necessarily ban pre marital sex, but absolutely ban cheating

>>512958810
Canschluss is inevitable

>>512958735
Incoherent reply.

>>512959036
Show tits

>>512959103
Prove you aren't a homosexual bot

>>512948715
Turn them upside down, and they are beautiful !

>>512946513 (OP)
built for BBC

If (((porn))) is banned then the other two problems will dry up.

>>512946513 (OP)
A premarital sex ban would bring the most societal stability from a conservative standpoint. It would have to be totalitarian as fuck though.
I also think that deep down even conservatives have no problem with porn made by married couples.

>>512961107
>porn made by married couples
Sounds worse honestly

>>512961523
You've just never thought about it before. It's okay, give it some time.

>>512946513 (OP)
Porn because it's demonstrably worse than the other two. It raises people's expectations of sex, it's edited and cut in a way that makes the average person think that sex is like 20 minutes of uninterrupted intercourse so they end up buying viagra, it's demonstrably addicting even more so than tiktok, the women are overdone with make-up and surgeries. If prostitution was widespread nearly everyone would say that sex is overrated and no one would be constantly screeching about I CANT BREED most wouldn't care and since porn isn't socially acceptable they need to filter their porn addiction into marriage, you can tell this because porn addicts want a 'cute' wife, just producing a child isn't enough they're doing it solely for a socially acceptable sex outlet. There's virtually no species of mammal that does male to female selection it's the kind of trait that could only develop unnaturally in domestic circumstances, in natural circumstances any female that goes into heat is game because of estrus cycles, not all females are fertile inherently. Porn is a completely destructive stimulus that completely hijacks a person's amygdala I think it's true purpose is to psychologically castrate men by making them unable to bond with people and instead bond with their computers.

Anyone who doesn't want to ban trannies is an incel.

>>512946513 (OP)
None.

>>512962584
what is all this babble? i use porn because all my attempts to bond with human creatures failed. also the whores laugh at you for your inexperience, so premarital sex is still gonna give women the edge in experience

>>512946513 (OP)
>either porn, pre-marital sex, or sex change operations.

Option d, birth control