>>512951426 (OP)
Not sure if it was this one but there was a """study""" done on this and the "meat eaters" they surveyed was largely people eating fast food, seed oil fries and all. Then they went to claim that soft drinks were less likely to cause diabetes than red meat, but then lumped in sugar-free drinks on the soft-drink side.
I just looked at this video, and they, of course, lump all meat in together. So to them a grass-finished ribeye is meat just the same as a highly processed piece of bologna. No meat eater would ever consider those the same though.
Third: it's Harvard, they're corrupt, bought and paid for. They can sell their name when people really want to add "credibility" to their claim.
Lastly: every study ever is, or can be, flawed. You literally can't trust anything. If you do it's just your confirmation bias showing. I can find you a ton of studies showing how healthy meat is. Then I can find another dozen saying how horrible it is. They'll completely contradict each other.
So what do? Trust your gut at the end of the day. Does it make sense in your head? Do you go to bed worrying about it? Is everything copacetic in your mind? Great. Listen to your body, we're all different anyway. What works for me, a white Texan male may not necessarily work just as well for some Filipino chick.
Yes, at the end of the day all the broad, generalized, specialized, studies done by institutions, even done with the highest of integrity and absolutely not compromised doesn't even mean it necessarily applies to you anyway.
We're headed to an era of complete uncertainty anyway. Even today it's difficult to know what to believe at all and AI is obfuscating it to the point that you can't even try to understand. The only thing you can believe is God and your gut. Simple as.